Turns Out Trump Correct, The Left....As Usual

[NYcarbineer]

Trump exposed the Obamunist attempt to "wiretap" his campaign....all the Leftists laughed....and were outraged that he targeted their messiah.


The Trump tweet:

"Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!"

6:35 AM - 4 Mar 2017




1. The short story: Trump was correct, the NYTimes, WaPo, and every Liberal cable show....split hairs to make it seem that Trump was wrong.
Read on:


2. Here's the spin that the Washington Post put on the story:
"This may be the worst defense of Trump’s Obama-wiretapped-me claim — literally
...chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, which means he's in charge of investigating President Trump's evidence-free allegation that President Barack Obama wiretapped his offices.

But Nunes doesn't seem particularly worried that the current president accused the former president of a crime. Echoing so many Republican defenses of Trump's tweets, he suggested Tuesday that Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value.

Here's what Nunes said:

The president is a neophyte to politics. He’s been doing this a little over a year. And I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. " Analysis | This may be the worst defense of Trump’s Obama-wiretapped-me claim — literally


3. Looks like Trump was dead wrong?

WaPo spin: "... Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value."
The actual quote has a different meaning: "....I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. "
The 'literally' refers to the term 'wiretap.'



4. But the facts are these:

"The FBI investigated a Trump server in its Russia probe, but no charges are expected by John Solomon and Sara Carter

The months-long [Obama] FBI counterintelligence investigation into Russian efforts to influence the 2016 presidential campaign briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election but has not gathered evidence of election tampering to date that would warrant criminal charges against any of the president’s associates, Circa has learned." FBI probe of Donald Trump and Russia during election yielded no evidence of crimes


Get that???

"....the [Obama] FBI ... briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election..."



sur·veil
sərˈvāl/
verb

past tense: surveilled; past participle: surveilled
keep (a person or place) under surveillance.
as in "he deployed FBI agents to surveil the offices of those companies"
Google



Trump was correct with respect to his being surveilled by the Obama administration.

There was a FISA warrant and another yet undisclosed warrant. that's TWO investigations by the Obama administration. Not just one.. The shit is getting real deep real fast..

Then to add insult to injury, the CIA has been outed (by Wikileaks) how they leave foreign government tracks when they hack to make it appear as if someone else did it.. hmmmmmmm.... SO who really hit the DNC servers?

Ya. What's up with that.
They made 2 request. Why?

The first one was rejected.

The second was worded so as to not show it was Trump they were surveilling.

EXCLUSIVE: FBI ‘Granted FISA Warrant’ Covering Trump Camp’s Ties To Russia

Nothing of substance in your link supports your claim. Stop wasting our time.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Trump exposed the Obamunist attempt to "wiretap" his campaign....all the Leftists laughed....and were outraged that he targeted their messiah.


The Trump tweet:

"Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!"

6:35 AM - 4 Mar 2017




1. The short story: Trump was correct, the NYTimes, WaPo, and every Liberal cable show....split hairs to make it seem that Trump was wrong.
Read on:


2. Here's the spin that the Washington Post put on the story:
"This may be the worst defense of Trump’s Obama-wiretapped-me claim — literally
...chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, which means he's in charge of investigating President Trump's evidence-free allegation that President Barack Obama wiretapped his offices.

But Nunes doesn't seem particularly worried that the current president accused the former president of a crime. Echoing so many Republican defenses of Trump's tweets, he suggested Tuesday that Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value.

Here's what Nunes said:

The president is a neophyte to politics. He’s been doing this a little over a year. And I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. " Analysis | This may be the worst defense of Trump’s Obama-wiretapped-me claim — literally


3. Looks like Trump was dead wrong?

WaPo spin: "... Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value."
The actual quote has a different meaning: "....I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. "
The 'literally' refers to the term 'wiretap.'
It should be understood to mean 'placed under surveillance.'


4. But the facts are these:

"The FBI investigated a Trump server in its Russia probe, but no charges are expected by John Solomon and Sara Carter

The months-long [Obama] FBI counterintelligence investigation into Russian efforts to influence the 2016 presidential campaign briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election but has not gathered evidence of election tampering to date that would warrant criminal charges against any of the president’s associates, Circa has learned." FBI probe of Donald Trump and Russia during election yielded no evidence of crimes


Get that???

"....the [Obama] FBI ... briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election..."



sur·veil
sərˈvāl/
verb

past tense: surveilled; past participle: surveilled
keep (a person or place) under surveillance.
as in "he deployed FBI agents to surveil the offices of those companies"
Google



Trump was correct with respect to his being surveilled by the Obama administration.

nice deflection from the clearly questionable acts of this administration

the president DID NOT WIRE TAP the orange sociopath. if his "server" was tapped, it was because he was having communications with people under surveillance through FISA ... which is entirely possible given the circle of Russian operatives around him.

now run along.

Clean off your specs, old timer.

This was right in the post you linked to:

3. Looks like Trump was dead wrong?

WaPo spin: "... Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value."
The actual quote has a different meaning: "....I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. "
The 'literally' refers to the term 'wiretap.'
It should be understood to mean 'placed under surveillance.'

 

[xband]

That's the worst reasoning one could possibly say out loud about politics.

First of all a president simply needs to understand the specifics of speech making, speaking to the public as a president. What he says, the way he says is will be written like to a stone. And though he is intellectually not too capable - as it isn't really a president's place to be - he understands that. He knew it when he tweeted it.

And it isn't just Obama personally worried about this. Every single brain in America is. So the fact that he and all of his actions - being the traitor that he is - are inspected is obvious with or without Obama.

Welcome to the board.

Some hints in posting:
1. Quote what you are referring to...."That's the worst reasoning one could possibly say out loud about politics."
What is????


2. Carefully articulate who you are attempting to correct.
"What he says, the way he says is will be written like to a stone. And though he is intellectually not too capable - as it isn't really a president's place to be - he understands that."

I said " the president". When replying to the first post I find it unnecessary to quote it.

This board anything but 8th grade proper English class. : )

 

[PoliticalChic]

Trump exposed the Obamunist attempt to "wiretap" his campaign....all the Leftists laughed....and were outraged that he targeted their messiah.


The Trump tweet:

"Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!"

6:35 AM - 4 Mar 2017




1. The short story: Trump was correct, the NYTimes, WaPo, and every Liberal cable show....split hairs to make it seem that Trump was wrong.
Read on:


2. Here's the spin that the Washington Post put on the story:
"This may be the worst defense of Trump’s Obama-wiretapped-me claim — literally
...chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, which means he's in charge of investigating President Trump's evidence-free allegation that President Barack Obama wiretapped his offices.

But Nunes doesn't seem particularly worried that the current president accused the former president of a crime. Echoing so many Republican defenses of Trump's tweets, he suggested Tuesday that Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value.

Here's what Nunes said:

The president is a neophyte to politics. He’s been doing this a little over a year. And I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. " Analysis | This may be the worst defense of Trump’s Obama-wiretapped-me claim — literally


3. Looks like Trump was dead wrong?

WaPo spin: "... Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value."
The actual quote has a different meaning: "....I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. "
The 'literally' refers to the term 'wiretap.'



4. But the facts are these:

"The FBI investigated a Trump server in its Russia probe, but no charges are expected by John Solomon and Sara Carter

The months-long [Obama] FBI counterintelligence investigation into Russian efforts to influence the 2016 presidential campaign briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election but has not gathered evidence of election tampering to date that would warrant criminal charges against any of the president’s associates, Circa has learned." FBI probe of Donald Trump and Russia during election yielded no evidence of crimes


Get that???

"....the [Obama] FBI ... briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election..."



sur·veil
sərˈvāl/
verb

past tense: surveilled; past participle: surveilled
keep (a person or place) under surveillance.
as in "he deployed FBI agents to surveil the offices of those companies"
Google



Trump was correct with respect to his being surveilled by the Obama administration.

Poor, demented, PoliticalHack ... how do you wiretap a computer?

The same way you "hack an election".

Your deflection is noted and discarded. Take your issues up with the 17 U.S. agencies which have confirmed Russia did indeed hack the election. Hell, even Trump encouraged them.

You just made my point for me. You can hack a computer, intercept communications, and receive information from disgruntled employees, but you can't hack an election. It's a meaningless term.

Not exactly. It travelled round the earth at the speed of an average internet connection and now the world knows Russia is accused of hacking the election of the United States.

Actually, what the world "knows" is that no one has claimed that there was any such evidence.
And, one more time for the hard-of-thinking.....


"Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press,” former Obama Director of National Intelligence James Clapper told host Chuck Todd that he was not aware of evidence showing the Trump campaign had colluded with the Russian government to influence last November’s presidential election.

TODD: Well, that’s an important revelation at this point.

Let me ask you this, does intelligence exist that can definitively answer the following question, whether there were improper contacts between the Trump campaign and Russia officials?

CLAPPER: We did not include evidence in our report, and I say our, that’s NSA, FBI and CIA with my office, the director of national intelligence that had anything — that had any reflection of collusion between members of the Trump campaign and the Russians. There was there no evidence of that including in our report."

 

[PoliticalChic]

Trump exposed the Obamunist attempt to "wiretap" his campaign....all the Leftists laughed....and were outraged that he targeted their messiah.

As usual, the opening sentence to a PoliticalChic thread is at best, misinformation, and at worst an outright lie.

Well....read more than the first sentence, you dunce.

 

[Faun]

Trump exposed the Obamunist attempt to "wiretap" his campaign....all the Leftists laughed....and were outraged that he targeted their messiah.


The Trump tweet:

"Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!"

6:35 AM - 4 Mar 2017




1. The short story: Trump was correct, the NYTimes, WaPo, and every Liberal cable show....split hairs to make it seem that Trump was wrong.
Read on:


2. Here's the spin that the Washington Post put on the story:
"This may be the worst defense of Trump’s Obama-wiretapped-me claim — literally
...chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, which means he's in charge of investigating President Trump's evidence-free allegation that President Barack Obama wiretapped his offices.

But Nunes doesn't seem particularly worried that the current president accused the former president of a crime. Echoing so many Republican defenses of Trump's tweets, he suggested Tuesday that Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value.

Here's what Nunes said:

The president is a neophyte to politics. He’s been doing this a little over a year. And I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. " Analysis | This may be the worst defense of Trump’s Obama-wiretapped-me claim — literally


3. Looks like Trump was dead wrong?

WaPo spin: "... Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value."
The actual quote has a different meaning: "....I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. "
The 'literally' refers to the term 'wiretap.'
It should be understood to mean 'placed under surveillance.'


4. But the facts are these:

"The FBI investigated a Trump server in its Russia probe, but no charges are expected by John Solomon and Sara Carter

The months-long [Obama] FBI counterintelligence investigation into Russian efforts to influence the 2016 presidential campaign briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election but has not gathered evidence of election tampering to date that would warrant criminal charges against any of the president’s associates, Circa has learned." FBI probe of Donald Trump and Russia during election yielded no evidence of crimes


Get that???

"....the [Obama] FBI ... briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election..."



sur·veil
sərˈvāl/
verb

past tense: surveilled; past participle: surveilled
keep (a person or place) under surveillance.
as in "he deployed FBI agents to surveil the offices of those companies"
Google



Trump was correct with respect to his being surveilled by the Obama administration.

nice deflection from the clearly questionable acts of this administration

the president DID NOT WIRE TAP the orange sociopath. if his "server" was tapped, it was because he was having communications with people under surveillance through FISA ... which is entirely possible given the circle of Russian operatives around him.

now run along.

Clean off your specs, old timer.

This was right in the post you linked to:

3. Looks like Trump was dead wrong?

WaPo spin: "... Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value."
The actual quote has a different meaning: "....I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. "
The 'literally' refers to the term 'wiretap.'
It should be understood to mean 'placed under surveillance.'

LOLOLOL

Translation: when Trump bullshits, we should ignore what he actually says and just accept whatever you nuts thinks he meant.

3rd time... how do you wiretap a computer?

 

[xband]

That's the worst reasoning one could possibly say out loud about politics.

First of all a president simply needs to understand the specifics of speech making, speaking to the public as a president. What he says, the way he says is will be written like to a stone. And though he is intellectually not too capable - as it isn't really a president's place to be - he understands that. He knew it when he tweeted it.

And it isn't just Obama personally worried about this. Every single brain in America is. So the fact that he and all of his actions - being the traitor that he is - are inspected is obvious with or without Obama.

Welcome to the board.

Some hints in posting:
1. Quote what you are referring to...."That's the worst reasoning one could possibly say out loud about politics."
What is????


2. Carefully articulate who you are attempting to correct.
"What he says, the way he says is will be written like to a stone. And though he is intellectually not too capable - as it isn't really a president's place to be - he understands that."

I said " the president". When replying to the first post I find it unnecessary to quote it.

It was quite a vapid post.

Try harder.

vacuous

 

[PoliticalChic]

Trump exposed the Obamunist attempt to "wiretap" his campaign....all the Leftists laughed....and were outraged that he targeted their messiah.


The Trump tweet:

"Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!"

6:35 AM - 4 Mar 2017




1. The short story: Trump was correct, the NYTimes, WaPo, and every Liberal cable show....split hairs to make it seem that Trump was wrong.
Read on:


2. Here's the spin that the Washington Post put on the story:
"This may be the worst defense of Trump’s Obama-wiretapped-me claim — literally
...chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, which means he's in charge of investigating President Trump's evidence-free allegation that President Barack Obama wiretapped his offices.

But Nunes doesn't seem particularly worried that the current president accused the former president of a crime. Echoing so many Republican defenses of Trump's tweets, he suggested Tuesday that Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value.

Here's what Nunes said:

The president is a neophyte to politics. He’s been doing this a little over a year. And I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. " Analysis | This may be the worst defense of Trump’s Obama-wiretapped-me claim — literally


3. Looks like Trump was dead wrong?

WaPo spin: "... Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value."
The actual quote has a different meaning: "....I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. "
The 'literally' refers to the term 'wiretap.'
It should be understood to mean 'placed under surveillance.'


4. But the facts are these:

"The FBI investigated a Trump server in its Russia probe, but no charges are expected by John Solomon and Sara Carter

The months-long [Obama] FBI counterintelligence investigation into Russian efforts to influence the 2016 presidential campaign briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election but has not gathered evidence of election tampering to date that would warrant criminal charges against any of the president’s associates, Circa has learned." FBI probe of Donald Trump and Russia during election yielded no evidence of crimes


Get that???

"....the [Obama] FBI ... briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election..."



sur·veil
sərˈvāl/
verb

past tense: surveilled; past participle: surveilled
keep (a person or place) under surveillance.
as in "he deployed FBI agents to surveil the offices of those companies"
Google



Trump was correct with respect to his being surveilled by the Obama administration.

nice deflection from the clearly questionable acts of this administration

the president DID NOT WIRE TAP the orange sociopath. if his "server" was tapped, it was because he was having communications with people under surveillance through FISA ... which is entirely possible given the circle of Russian operatives around him.

now run along.

Clean off your specs, old timer.

This was right in the post you linked to:

3. Looks like Trump was dead wrong?

WaPo spin: "... Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value."
The actual quote has a different meaning: "....I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. "
The 'literally' refers to the term 'wiretap.'
It should be understood to mean 'placed under surveillance.'

LOLOLOL

Translation: when Trump bullshits, we should ignore what he actually says and just accept whatever you nuts thinks he meant.

3rd time... how do you wiretap a computer?

3. Looks like Trump was dead wrong?

WaPo spin: "... Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value."
The actual quote has a different meaning: "....I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. "
The 'literally' refers to the term 'wiretap.'
It should be understood to mean 'placed under surveillance.'

Trump was correct with respect to his being surveilled by the Obama administration

 

[Faun]

Trump exposed the Obamunist attempt to "wiretap" his campaign....all the Leftists laughed....and were outraged that he targeted their messiah.


The Trump tweet:

"Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!"

6:35 AM - 4 Mar 2017




1. The short story: Trump was correct, the NYTimes, WaPo, and every Liberal cable show....split hairs to make it seem that Trump was wrong.
Read on:


2. Here's the spin that the Washington Post put on the story:
"This may be the worst defense of Trump’s Obama-wiretapped-me claim — literally
...chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, which means he's in charge of investigating President Trump's evidence-free allegation that President Barack Obama wiretapped his offices.

But Nunes doesn't seem particularly worried that the current president accused the former president of a crime. Echoing so many Republican defenses of Trump's tweets, he suggested Tuesday that Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value.

Here's what Nunes said:

The president is a neophyte to politics. He’s been doing this a little over a year. And I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. " Analysis | This may be the worst defense of Trump’s Obama-wiretapped-me claim — literally


3. Looks like Trump was dead wrong?

WaPo spin: "... Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value."
The actual quote has a different meaning: "....I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. "
The 'literally' refers to the term 'wiretap.'
It should be understood to mean 'placed under surveillance.'


4. But the facts are these:

"The FBI investigated a Trump server in its Russia probe, but no charges are expected by John Solomon and Sara Carter

The months-long [Obama] FBI counterintelligence investigation into Russian efforts to influence the 2016 presidential campaign briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election but has not gathered evidence of election tampering to date that would warrant criminal charges against any of the president’s associates, Circa has learned." FBI probe of Donald Trump and Russia during election yielded no evidence of crimes


Get that???

"....the [Obama] FBI ... briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election..."



sur·veil
sərˈvāl/
verb

past tense: surveilled; past participle: surveilled
keep (a person or place) under surveillance.
as in "he deployed FBI agents to surveil the offices of those companies"
Google



Trump was correct with respect to his being surveilled by the Obama administration.

nice deflection from the clearly questionable acts of this administration

the president DID NOT WIRE TAP the orange sociopath. if his "server" was tapped, it was because he was having communications with people under surveillance through FISA ... which is entirely possible given the circle of Russian operatives around him.

now run along.

Clean off your specs, old timer.

This was right in the post you linked to:

3. Looks like Trump was dead wrong?

WaPo spin: "... Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value."
The actual quote has a different meaning: "....I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. "
The 'literally' refers to the term 'wiretap.'
It should be understood to mean 'placed under surveillance.'

LOLOLOL

Translation: when Trump bullshits, we should ignore what he actually says and just accept whatever you nuts thinks he meant.

3rd time... how do you wiretap a computer?

3. Looks like Trump was dead wrong?

WaPo spin: "... Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value."
The actual quote has a different meaning: "....I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. "
The 'literally' refers to the term 'wiretap.'
It should be understood to mean 'placed under surveillance.'

Trump was correct with respect to his being surveilled by the Obama administration

Sorry, but no one has to ignore what Trump actually said because you can't prove his actual words which he repeated.

But thanks for the confirmation that Trump lied again.

 

[Camp]

Trump exposed the Obamunist attempt to "wiretap" his campaign....all the Leftists laughed....and were outraged that he targeted their messiah.

As usual, the opening sentence to a PoliticalChic thread is at best, misinformation, and at worst an outright lie.

Well....read more than the first sentence, you dunce.

Why? If the opening statement of a thesis is invalidated the entire thesis is invalidated. The rest of the thesis is just a feeble attempt to justify by cherry picking data to validate what has already been invalidated.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Trump exposed the Obamunist attempt to "wiretap" his campaign....all the Leftists laughed....and were outraged that he targeted their messiah.


The Trump tweet:

"Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!"

6:35 AM - 4 Mar 2017




1. The short story: Trump was correct, the NYTimes, WaPo, and every Liberal cable show....split hairs to make it seem that Trump was wrong.
Read on:


2. Here's the spin that the Washington Post put on the story:
"This may be the worst defense of Trump’s Obama-wiretapped-me claim — literally
...chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, which means he's in charge of investigating President Trump's evidence-free allegation that President Barack Obama wiretapped his offices.

But Nunes doesn't seem particularly worried that the current president accused the former president of a crime. Echoing so many Republican defenses of Trump's tweets, he suggested Tuesday that Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value.

Here's what Nunes said:

The president is a neophyte to politics. He’s been doing this a little over a year. And I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. " Analysis | This may be the worst defense of Trump’s Obama-wiretapped-me claim — literally


3. Looks like Trump was dead wrong?

WaPo spin: "... Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value."
The actual quote has a different meaning: "....I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. "
The 'literally' refers to the term 'wiretap.'
It should be understood to mean 'placed under surveillance.'


4. But the facts are these:

"The FBI investigated a Trump server in its Russia probe, but no charges are expected by John Solomon and Sara Carter

The months-long [Obama] FBI counterintelligence investigation into Russian efforts to influence the 2016 presidential campaign briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election but has not gathered evidence of election tampering to date that would warrant criminal charges against any of the president’s associates, Circa has learned." FBI probe of Donald Trump and Russia during election yielded no evidence of crimes


Get that???

"....the [Obama] FBI ... briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election..."



sur·veil
sərˈvāl/
verb

past tense: surveilled; past participle: surveilled
keep (a person or place) under surveillance.
as in "he deployed FBI agents to surveil the offices of those companies"
Google



Trump was correct with respect to his being surveilled by the Obama administration.

nice deflection from the clearly questionable acts of this administration

the president DID NOT WIRE TAP the orange sociopath. if his "server" was tapped, it was because he was having communications with people under surveillance through FISA ... which is entirely possible given the circle of Russian operatives around him.

now run along.

Clean off your specs, old timer.

This was right in the post you linked to:

3. Looks like Trump was dead wrong?

WaPo spin: "... Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value."
The actual quote has a different meaning: "....I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. "
The 'literally' refers to the term 'wiretap.'
It should be understood to mean 'placed under surveillance.'

LOLOLOL

Translation: when Trump bullshits, we should ignore what he actually says and just accept whatever you nuts thinks he meant.

3rd time... how do you wiretap a computer?

3. Looks like Trump was dead wrong?

WaPo spin: "... Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value."
The actual quote has a different meaning: "....I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. "
The 'literally' refers to the term 'wiretap.'
It should be understood to mean 'placed under surveillance.'

Trump was correct with respect to his being surveilled by the Obama administration

Sorry, but no one has to ignore what Trump actually said because you can't prove his actual words which he repeated.

But thanks for the confirmation that Trump lied again.

Au contraire.....that wasn't a lie.


This is a lie:

"Obama: Islam ‘Woven into the Fabric of Our Country Since Founding’"
Obama: Islam 'Woven into the Fabric of Our Country Since Founding' - Breitbart



See the difference, Ugly?

 

[PoliticalChic]

Trump exposed the Obamunist attempt to "wiretap" his campaign....all the Leftists laughed....and were outraged that he targeted their messiah.

As usual, the opening sentence to a PoliticalChic thread is at best, misinformation, and at worst an outright lie.

Well....read more than the first sentence, you dunce.

Why? If the opening statement of a thesis is invalidated the entire thesis is invalidated. The rest of the thesis is just a feeble attempt to justify by cherry picking data to validate what has already been invalidated.

"Well....read more than the first sentence, you dunce.
Why?"

To prove you aren't a lying dunce.


But.....that would be a Sisyphean task, wouldn't it.

 

[xband]

Trump exposed the Obamunist attempt to "wiretap" his campaign....all the Leftists laughed....and were outraged that he targeted their messiah.

As usual, the opening sentence to a PoliticalChic thread is at best, misinformation, and at worst an outright lie.

Well....read more than the first sentence, you dunce.

Why? If the opening statement of a thesis is invalidated the entire thesis is invalidated. The rest of the thesis is just a feeble attempt to justify by cherry picking data to validate what has already been invalidated.

Occam's Razor

 

[Siete]

heres how it really turned out ..


Senators Graham, Whitehouse demand proof of Trump wiretap claim

 

[Camp]

Trump exposed the Obamunist attempt to "wiretap" his campaign....all the Leftists laughed....and were outraged that he targeted their messiah.

As usual, the opening sentence to a PoliticalChic thread is at best, misinformation, and at worst an outright lie.

Well....read more than the first sentence, you dunce.

Why? If the opening statement of a thesis is invalidated the entire thesis is invalidated. The rest of the thesis is just a feeble attempt to justify by cherry picking data to validate what has already been invalidated.

"Well....read more than the first sentence, you dunce.
Why?"

To prove you aren't a lying dunce.


But.....that would be a Sisyphean task, wouldn't it.

Trump exposed the Obamunist attempt to "wiretap" his campaign....all the Leftists laughed....and were outraged that he targeted their messiah.

As usual, the opening sentence to a PoliticalChic thread is at best, misinformation, and at worst an outright lie.

Well....read more than the first sentence, you dunce.

Why? If the opening statement of a thesis is invalidated the entire thesis is invalidated. The rest of the thesis is just a feeble attempt to justify by cherry picking data to validate what has already been invalidated.

"Well....read more than the first sentence, you dunce.
Why?"

To prove you aren't a lying dunce.


But.....that would be a Sisyphean task, wouldn't it.

The way your threads almost always turn out, it is you portraying the Sisyphean task.
The thread will fill up with your name calling, deflections, and evasions from answering questions and challenges.

 

[Camp]

Trump exposed the Obamunist attempt to "wiretap" his campaign....all the Leftists laughed....and were outraged that he targeted their messiah.

As usual, the opening sentence to a PoliticalChic thread is at best, misinformation, and at worst an outright lie.

Well....read more than the first sentence, you dunce.

Why? If the opening statement of a thesis is invalidated the entire thesis is invalidated. The rest of the thesis is just a feeble attempt to justify by cherry picking data to validate what has already been invalidated.

Occam's Razor

Excellent.

 

[PoliticalChic]

Trump exposed the Obamunist attempt to "wiretap" his campaign....all the Leftists laughed....and were outraged that he targeted their messiah.

As usual, the opening sentence to a PoliticalChic thread is at best, misinformation, and at worst an outright lie.

Well....read more than the first sentence, you dunce.

Why? If the opening statement of a thesis is invalidated the entire thesis is invalidated. The rest of the thesis is just a feeble attempt to justify by cherry picking data to validate what has already been invalidated.

"Well....read more than the first sentence, you dunce.
Why?"

To prove you aren't a lying dunce.


But.....that would be a Sisyphean task, wouldn't it.

Trump exposed the Obamunist attempt to "wiretap" his campaign....all the Leftists laughed....and were outraged that he targeted their messiah.

As usual, the opening sentence to a PoliticalChic thread is at best, misinformation, and at worst an outright lie.

Well....read more than the first sentence, you dunce.

Why? If the opening statement of a thesis is invalidated the entire thesis is invalidated. The rest of the thesis is just a feeble attempt to justify by cherry picking data to validate what has already been invalidated.

"Well....read more than the first sentence, you dunce.
Why?"

To prove you aren't a lying dunce.


But.....that would be a Sisyphean task, wouldn't it.

The way your threads almost always turn out, it is you portraying the Sisyphean task.
The thread will fill up with your name calling, deflections, and evasions from answering questions and challenges.

How excellent, you copying my post!

Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery.


At least you're learning.

 

[xband]

Trump exposed the Obamunist attempt to "wiretap" his campaign....all the Leftists laughed....and were outraged that he targeted their messiah.

As usual, the opening sentence to a PoliticalChic thread is at best, misinformation, and at worst an outright lie.

Well....read more than the first sentence, you dunce.

Why? If the opening statement of a thesis is invalidated the entire thesis is invalidated. The rest of the thesis is just a feeble attempt to justify by cherry picking data to validate what has already been invalidated.

"Well....read more than the first sentence, you dunce.
Why?"

To prove you aren't a lying dunce.


But.....that would be a Sisyphean task, wouldn't it.

Trump exposed the Obamunist attempt to "wiretap" his campaign....all the Leftists laughed....and were outraged that he targeted their messiah.

As usual, the opening sentence to a PoliticalChic thread is at best, misinformation, and at worst an outright lie.

Well....read more than the first sentence, you dunce.

Why? If the opening statement of a thesis is invalidated the entire thesis is invalidated. The rest of the thesis is just a feeble attempt to justify by cherry picking data to validate what has already been invalidated.

"Well....read more than the first sentence, you dunce.
Why?"

To prove you aren't a lying dunce.


But.....that would be a Sisyphean task, wouldn't it.

The way your threads almost always turn out, it is you portraying the Sisyphean task.
The thread will fill up with your name calling, deflections, and evasions from answering questions and challenges.

Sisyphean Task is a term that I never heard before and suspect that is the polar opposite or antithesis of a Herculean Task.

 

[Siete]

Trump exposed the Obamunist attempt to "wiretap" his campaign....all the Leftists laughed....and were outraged that he targeted their messiah.

As usual, the opening sentence to a PoliticalChic thread is at best, misinformation, and at worst an outright lie.

Well....read more than the first sentence, you dunce.

Why? If the opening statement of a thesis is invalidated the entire thesis is invalidated. The rest of the thesis is just a feeble attempt to justify by cherry picking data to validate what has already been invalidated.

"Well....read more than the first sentence, you dunce.
Why?"

To prove you aren't a lying dunce.


But.....that would be a Sisyphean task, wouldn't it.

Trump exposed the Obamunist attempt to "wiretap" his campaign....all the Leftists laughed....and were outraged that he targeted their messiah.

As usual, the opening sentence to a PoliticalChic thread is at best, misinformation, and at worst an outright lie.

Well....read more than the first sentence, you dunce.

Why? If the opening statement of a thesis is invalidated the entire thesis is invalidated. The rest of the thesis is just a feeble attempt to justify by cherry picking data to validate what has already been invalidated.

"Well....read more than the first sentence, you dunce.
Why?"

To prove you aren't a lying dunce.


But.....that would be a Sisyphean task, wouldn't it.

The way your threads almost always turn out, it is you portraying the Sisyphean task.
The thread will fill up with your name calling, deflections, and evasions from answering questions and challenges.

PC's threads start with partisan hack horseshit, they have no chance to end up as anything else.

EVER.

 

[vlad_hombre]

Trump exposed the Obamunist attempt to "wiretap" his campaign....all the Leftists laughed....and were outraged that he targeted their messiah.


The Trump tweet:

"Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!"

6:35 AM - 4 Mar 2017




1. The short story: Trump was correct, the NYTimes, WaPo, and every Liberal cable show....split hairs to make it seem that Trump was wrong.
Read on:


2. Here's the spin that the Washington Post put on the story:
"This may be the worst defense of Trump’s Obama-wiretapped-me claim — literally
...chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, which means he's in charge of investigating President Trump's evidence-free allegation that President Barack Obama wiretapped his offices.

But Nunes doesn't seem particularly worried that the current president accused the former president of a crime. Echoing so many Republican defenses of Trump's tweets, he suggested Tuesday that Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value.

Here's what Nunes said:

The president is a neophyte to politics. He’s been doing this a little over a year. And I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. " Analysis | This may be the worst defense of Trump’s Obama-wiretapped-me claim — literally


3. Looks like Trump was dead wrong?

WaPo spin: "... Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value."
The actual quote has a different meaning: "....I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. "
The 'literally' refers to the term 'wiretap.'
It should be understood to mean 'placed under surveillance.'


4. But the facts are these:

"The FBI investigated a Trump server in its Russia probe, but no charges are expected by John Solomon and Sara Carter

The months-long [Obama] FBI counterintelligence investigation into Russian efforts to influence the 2016 presidential campaign briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election but has not gathered evidence of election tampering to date that would warrant criminal charges against any of the president’s associates, Circa has learned." FBI probe of Donald Trump and Russia during election yielded no evidence of crimes


Get that???

"....the [Obama] FBI ... briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election..."



sur·veil
sərˈvāl/
verb

past tense: surveilled; past participle: surveilled
keep (a person or place) under surveillance.
as in "he deployed FBI agents to surveil the offices of those companies"
Google



Trump was correct with respect to his being surveilled by the Obama administration.

This really is getting tiresome.

How many times does it have to be explained to you idiots that intelligence was surveilling communications between two Russian banks and a Trump server was only involved extraneously?

Sheesh.

Buy a fucking clue.