Turns Out Trump Correct, The Left....As Usual

[PoliticalChic]

5. The Obama FBI and Justice Department intended to investigate Russian influence in the election. Toward that end, they applied for and got a FISA warrant.

"For instance, the [Obama] FBI and Justice Department received a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act warrant in October to help further the Russia investigation. Officials stressed there were no intercepts of Trump’s phone or emails.

Separately, they used traditional investigative techniques to review a computer server tied to the the soon-to-be-president's businesses in Trump Towers in New York but located elsewhere. " FBI probe of Donald Trump and Russia during election yielded no evidence of crimes




".... review a computer server tied to the the soon-to-be-president's businesses in Trump Towers...."


No matter that it was subsequent to investigating Russians..... Trump was correct with respect to his being surveilled by the Obama administration.

 

[Faun]

Poor, demented, PoliticalHack ... how do you wiretap a computer?

The same way you "hack an election".

Your deflection is noted and discarded. Take your issues up with the 17 U.S. agencies which have confirmed Russia did indeed hack the election. Hell, even Trump encouraged them.

Wrong again.. The DNC refused to let anyone see their servers. Now why would that be? did it even happen?

You too are welcome to take your beef to the 17 U.S. agencies which have confirmed Russia hacked the election.

That's a lie.

Poor, demented, PoliticalHack ... how do you wiretap a computer?

The same way you "hack an election".

Your deflection is noted and discarded. Take your issues up with the 17 U.S. agencies which have confirmed Russia did indeed hack the election. Hell, even Trump encouraged them.

Wrong again.. The DNC refused to let anyone see their servers. Now why would that be? did it even happen?

You too are welcome to take your beef to the 17 U.S. agencies which have confirmed Russia hacked the election.

That's a lie...and easily proven so.

"....statement does not mean that the U.S. has “direct evidence of senior official-level involvement,” Hennessey said.
Without more definitive statements, it’s difficult for some technical experts to take the government’s word on faith, she and others have said.

“There’s no evidence that this was done by the state itself, only evidence it was done by non-state actors that might be Russian-speaking,” said Jeffrey Carr, CEO of the cyber security consultancy firm Taia Global, referring to the evidence available to the public.

That evidence, which was released by private threat assessment companies rather than official channels, indicates hackers used Cyrillic keyboards and operated during Moscow working hours.
But indicators of identity like timestamps, language preferences and IP addresses “can be manipulated or faked rather easily,” said Juan Andres Guerrero-Saade, a senior security researcher at Kaspersky Lab."
Does the U.S. government really know who hacked Democrats' emails?



Next?

An October article to debunk 17 U.S. agencies in December confirming Russia hacked the election.

Your dementia is too funny, PoliticalHack. Do you see now why most people just laugh at the nonsense you post?

 

[Billy_Bob]

Poor, demented, PoliticalHack ... how do you wiretap a computer?

The same way you "hack an election".

Your deflection is noted and discarded. Take your issues up with the 17 U.S. agencies which have confirmed Russia did indeed hack the election. Hell, even Trump encouraged them.

Wrong again.. The DNC refused to let anyone see their servers. Now why would that be? did it even happen?

You too are welcome to take your beef to the 17 U.S. agencies which have confirmed Russia hacked the election.

That's a lie.

Poor, demented, PoliticalHack ... how do you wiretap a computer?

The same way you "hack an election".

Your deflection is noted and discarded. Take your issues up with the 17 U.S. agencies which have confirmed Russia did indeed hack the election. Hell, even Trump encouraged them.

Wrong again.. The DNC refused to let anyone see their servers. Now why would that be? did it even happen?

You too are welcome to take your beef to the 17 U.S. agencies which have confirmed Russia hacked the election.

That's a lie...and easily proven so.

"....statement does not mean that the U.S. has “direct evidence of senior official-level involvement,” Hennessey said.
Without more definitive statements, it’s difficult for some technical experts to take the government’s word on faith, she and others have said.

“There’s no evidence that this was done by the state itself, only evidence it was done by non-state actors that might be Russian-speaking,” said Jeffrey Carr, CEO of the cyber security consultancy firm Taia Global, referring to the evidence available to the public.

That evidence, which was released by private threat assessment companies rather than official channels, indicates hackers used Cyrillic keyboards and operated during Moscow working hours.
But indicators of identity like timestamps, language preferences and IP addresses “can be manipulated or faked rather easily,” said Juan Andres Guerrero-Saade, a senior security researcher at Kaspersky Lab."
Does the U.S. government really know who hacked Democrats' emails?



Next?

I know annalists who use different language keyboards on purpose.

 

[Faun]

Wrong again.. The DNC refused to let anyone see their servers. Now why would that be? did it even happen?

You too are welcome to take your beef to the 17 U.S. agencies which have confirmed Russia hacked the election.

You can't hack an election. It's a meaningless term.

Of course they could... hack into their private email and dump the contents into the public domain to sway Americans to vote against Hillary. You're not the sharpest tool in the shed, are ya?

You can hack a computer, you can try to influence an election, but you can't hack an election.

Words mean things.

So you concede the fact that Russian hackers tried to influence our election.

Yep, he just did.

 

[NYcarbineer]

Trump exposed the Obamunist attempt to "wiretap" his campaign....all the Leftists laughed....and were outraged that he targeted their messiah.


The Trump tweet:

"Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!"

6:35 AM - 4 Mar 2017




1. The short story: Trump was correct, the NYTimes, WaPo, and every Liberal cable show....split hairs to make it seem that Trump was wrong.
Read on:


2. Here's the spin that the Washington Post put on the story:
"This may be the worst defense of Trump’s Obama-wiretapped-me claim — literally
...chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, which means he's in charge of investigating President Trump's evidence-free allegation that President Barack Obama wiretapped his offices.

But Nunes doesn't seem particularly worried that the current president accused the former president of a crime. Echoing so many Republican defenses of Trump's tweets, he suggested Tuesday that Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value.

Here's what Nunes said:

The president is a neophyte to politics. He’s been doing this a little over a year. And I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. " Analysis | This may be the worst defense of Trump’s Obama-wiretapped-me claim — literally


3. Looks like Trump was dead wrong?

WaPo spin: "... Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value."
The actual quote has a different meaning: "....I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. "
The 'literally' refers to the term 'wiretap.'
It should be understood to mean 'placed under surveillance.'


4. But the facts are these:

"The FBI investigated a Trump server in its Russia probe, but no charges are expected by John Solomon and Sara Carter

The months-long [Obama] FBI counterintelligence investigation into Russian efforts to influence the 2016 presidential campaign briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election but has not gathered evidence of election tampering to date that would warrant criminal charges against any of the president’s associates, Circa has learned." FBI probe of Donald Trump and Russia during election yielded no evidence of crimes


Get that???

"....the [Obama] FBI ... briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election..."



sur·veil
sərˈvāl/
verb

past tense: surveilled; past participle: surveilled
keep (a person or place) under surveillance.
as in "he deployed FBI agents to surveil the offices of those companies"
Google



Trump was correct with respect to his being surveilled by the Obama administration.

Not one shred of evidence of a single illegally tapped Trump phone has been produced.

You're an idiot. Still.

So Flynn's voice and his conversation transcript, while on a Trump Tower phone are a fraud? Really?

Are you too stupid to know that 2 phones are involved in a phone conversation?

 

[Meane]

That's the worst reasoning one could possibly say out loud about politics.

First of all a president simply needs to understand the specifics of speech making, speaking to the public as a president. What he says, the way he says is will be written like to a stone. And though he is intellectually not too capable - as it isn't really a president's place to be - he understands that. He knew it when he tweeted it.

And it isn't just Obama personally worried about this. Every single brain in America is. So the fact that he and all of his actions - being the traitor that he is - are inspected is obvious with or without Obama.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Alt Righties continue to scream lies.

No president can order a wire tap, period.

They made 2 request one for criminal, which was turned down.
The 2nd for national security, which was granted.

AS the OP article points out there was one more besides those. And it was granted in September.

That warrant was closed with notation of no evidence found of Russian tampering yet remains sealed.

No president can order a wire tap. And you did not see any notation.

 

[Marion Morrison]

Trump exposed the Obamunist attempt to "wiretap" his campaign....all the Leftists laughed....and were outraged that he targeted their messiah.


The Trump tweet:

"Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!"

6:35 AM - 4 Mar 2017




1. The short story: Trump was correct, the NYTimes, WaPo, and every Liberal cable show....split hairs to make it seem that Trump was wrong.
Read on:


2. Here's the spin that the Washington Post put on the story:
"This may be the worst defense of Trump’s Obama-wiretapped-me claim — literally
...chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, which means he's in charge of investigating President Trump's evidence-free allegation that President Barack Obama wiretapped his offices.

But Nunes doesn't seem particularly worried that the current president accused the former president of a crime. Echoing so many Republican defenses of Trump's tweets, he suggested Tuesday that Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value.

Here's what Nunes said:

The president is a neophyte to politics. He’s been doing this a little over a year. And I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. " Analysis | This may be the worst defense of Trump’s Obama-wiretapped-me claim — literally


3. Looks like Trump was dead wrong?

WaPo spin: "... Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value."
The actual quote has a different meaning: "....I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. "
The 'literally' refers to the term 'wiretap.'



4. But the facts are these:

"The FBI investigated a Trump server in its Russia probe, but no charges are expected by John Solomon and Sara Carter

The months-long [Obama] FBI counterintelligence investigation into Russian efforts to influence the 2016 presidential campaign briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election but has not gathered evidence of election tampering to date that would warrant criminal charges against any of the president’s associates, Circa has learned." FBI probe of Donald Trump and Russia during election yielded no evidence of crimes


Get that???

"....the [Obama] FBI ... briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election..."



sur·veil
sərˈvāl/
verb

past tense: surveilled; past participle: surveilled
keep (a person or place) under surveillance.
as in "he deployed FBI agents to surveil the offices of those companies"
Google



Trump was correct with respect to his being surveilled by the Obama administration.

There was a FISA warrant and another yet undisclosed warrant. that's TWO investigations by the Obama administration. Not just one.. The shit is getting real deep real fast..

Then to add insult to injury, the CIA has been outed (by Wikileaks) how they leave foreign government tracks when they hack to make it appear as if someone else did it.. hmmmmmmm.... SO who really hit the DNC servers?

Ya. What's up with that.
They made 2 request. Why?

The first one was rejected.

The second was worded so as to not show it was Trump they were surveilling.

EXCLUSIVE: FBI ‘Granted FISA Warrant’ Covering Trump Camp’s Ties To Russia

 

[PoliticalChic]

The same way you "hack an election".

Your deflection is noted and discarded. Take your issues up with the 17 U.S. agencies which have confirmed Russia did indeed hack the election. Hell, even Trump encouraged them.

Wrong again.. The DNC refused to let anyone see their servers. Now why would that be? did it even happen?

You too are welcome to take your beef to the 17 U.S. agencies which have confirmed Russia hacked the election.

That's a lie.

The same way you "hack an election".

Your deflection is noted and discarded. Take your issues up with the 17 U.S. agencies which have confirmed Russia did indeed hack the election. Hell, even Trump encouraged them.

Wrong again.. The DNC refused to let anyone see their servers. Now why would that be? did it even happen?

You too are welcome to take your beef to the 17 U.S. agencies which have confirmed Russia hacked the election.

That's a lie...and easily proven so.

"....statement does not mean that the U.S. has “direct evidence of senior official-level involvement,” Hennessey said.
Without more definitive statements, it’s difficult for some technical experts to take the government’s word on faith, she and others have said.

“There’s no evidence that this was done by the state itself, only evidence it was done by non-state actors that might be Russian-speaking,” said Jeffrey Carr, CEO of the cyber security consultancy firm Taia Global, referring to the evidence available to the public.

That evidence, which was released by private threat assessment companies rather than official channels, indicates hackers used Cyrillic keyboards and operated during Moscow working hours.
But indicators of identity like timestamps, language preferences and IP addresses “can be manipulated or faked rather easily,” said Juan Andres Guerrero-Saade, a senior security researcher at Kaspersky Lab."
Does the U.S. government really know who hacked Democrats' emails?



Next?

An October article to debunk 17 U.S. agencies in December confirming Russia hacked the election.

Your dementia is too funny, PoliticalHack. Do you see now why most people just laugh at the nonsense you post?

Did you figure out that illegal aliens voted by the millions, as per Obama's instructions?

"It's Official: Clinton's Popular Vote Win Came Entirely From California
If you take California out of the popular vote equation, then Trump wins the rest of the country by 1.4 million votes.
.... if you look at every other measure, Trump was the clear and decisive winner in this election."
It's Official: Clinton's Popular Vote Win Came Entirely From California


Think California is loaded with illegal alien voters??????

You betcha'!!!!





California has the largest number of illegal immigrants in the United States, with an estimated 2.4 million unauthorized immigrants making up about 6.3 percent of the state's total population, according to the Pew Research Center.Sep 14, 2015

Illegal Immigration Statistics in California - Newsmax.com
www.newsmax.com/FastFeatures/illegal-immigration-California/2015/09/14/.../691462/

 

[xband]

Trump exposed the Obamunist attempt to "wiretap" his campaign....all the Leftists laughed....and were outraged that he targeted their messiah.


The Trump tweet:

"Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!"

6:35 AM - 4 Mar 2017




1. The short story: Trump was correct, the NYTimes, WaPo, and every Liberal cable show....split hairs to make it seem that Trump was wrong.
Read on:


2. Here's the spin that the Washington Post put on the story:
"This may be the worst defense of Trump’s Obama-wiretapped-me claim — literally
...chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, which means he's in charge of investigating President Trump's evidence-free allegation that President Barack Obama wiretapped his offices.

But Nunes doesn't seem particularly worried that the current president accused the former president of a crime. Echoing so many Republican defenses of Trump's tweets, he suggested Tuesday that Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value.

Here's what Nunes said:

The president is a neophyte to politics. He’s been doing this a little over a year. And I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. " Analysis | This may be the worst defense of Trump’s Obama-wiretapped-me claim — literally


3. Looks like Trump was dead wrong?

WaPo spin: "... Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value."
The actual quote has a different meaning: "....I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. "
The 'literally' refers to the term 'wiretap.'



4. But the facts are these:

"The FBI investigated a Trump server in its Russia probe, but no charges are expected by John Solomon and Sara Carter

The months-long [Obama] FBI counterintelligence investigation into Russian efforts to influence the 2016 presidential campaign briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election but has not gathered evidence of election tampering to date that would warrant criminal charges against any of the president’s associates, Circa has learned." FBI probe of Donald Trump and Russia during election yielded no evidence of crimes


Get that???

"....the [Obama] FBI ... briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election..."



sur·veil
sərˈvāl/
verb

past tense: surveilled; past participle: surveilled
keep (a person or place) under surveillance.
as in "he deployed FBI agents to surveil the offices of those companies"
Google



Trump was correct with respect to his being surveilled by the Obama administration.

Poor, demented, PoliticalHack ... how do you wiretap a computer?

There are more than one thousand ways to wire tap a computer. Re-wiring bootstrap one way that I accomplished late at night when nobody was around. Every time the computer powered up the printer would print out FUCK YOU and other than that the computer did what it should do. The computer experts could not make it stop doing that. I left my rig in for two weeks and took it out late at night when nobody was looking to stop the craziness and did not get caught. There is more than one way to skin a cat.

 

[jillian]

Trump exposed the Obamunist attempt to "wiretap" his campaign....all the Leftists laughed....and were outraged that he targeted their messiah.


The Trump tweet:

"Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!"

6:35 AM - 4 Mar 2017




1. The short story: Trump was correct, the NYTimes, WaPo, and every Liberal cable show....split hairs to make it seem that Trump was wrong.
Read on:


2. Here's the spin that the Washington Post put on the story:
"This may be the worst defense of Trump’s Obama-wiretapped-me claim — literally
...chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, which means he's in charge of investigating President Trump's evidence-free allegation that President Barack Obama wiretapped his offices.

But Nunes doesn't seem particularly worried that the current president accused the former president of a crime. Echoing so many Republican defenses of Trump's tweets, he suggested Tuesday that Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value.

Here's what Nunes said:

The president is a neophyte to politics. He’s been doing this a little over a year. And I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. " Analysis | This may be the worst defense of Trump’s Obama-wiretapped-me claim — literally


3. Looks like Trump was dead wrong?

WaPo spin: "... Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value."
The actual quote has a different meaning: "....I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. "
The 'literally' refers to the term 'wiretap.'
It should be understood to mean 'placed under surveillance.'


4. But the facts are these:

"The FBI investigated a Trump server in its Russia probe, but no charges are expected by John Solomon and Sara Carter

The months-long [Obama] FBI counterintelligence investigation into Russian efforts to influence the 2016 presidential campaign briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election but has not gathered evidence of election tampering to date that would warrant criminal charges against any of the president’s associates, Circa has learned." FBI probe of Donald Trump and Russia during election yielded no evidence of crimes


Get that???

"....the [Obama] FBI ... briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election..."



sur·veil
sərˈvāl/
verb

past tense: surveilled; past participle: surveilled
keep (a person or place) under surveillance.
as in "he deployed FBI agents to surveil the offices of those companies"
Google



Trump was correct with respect to his being surveilled by the Obama administration.

nice deflection from the clearly questionable acts of this administration

the president DID NOT WIRE TAP the orange sociopath. if his "server" was tapped, it was because he was having communications with people under surveillance through FISA ... which is entirely possible given the circle of Russian operatives around him.

now run along.

 

[jillian]

every day that goes by demonstrates to me that we may be too far gone as a country

Sure, there are examples of bad behavior and bad actions by "conservative groups & individuals"

But the amazing hate & violence is by and large coming from the left

And we do not have a trustworthy media; their agenda is more important to them than the actual truth

you are butt backwards... as most uneducated, uninformed trump apologists are.

 

[Faun]

Urbana man charged with living, voting in U.S. illegally
Illegal immigrant charged for voter fraud

I see only one in that article, but good for you, you found one. That's one more than than PoliticalHack who claims there are millions like him. Only 2,999,999 more to go and that senile old hag will be right.

 

[PoliticalChic]

That's the worst reasoning one could possibly say out loud about politics.

First of all a president simply needs to understand the specifics of speech making, speaking to the public as a president. What he says, the way he says is will be written like to a stone. And though he is intellectually not too capable - as it isn't really a president's place to be - he understands that. He knew it when he tweeted it.

And it isn't just Obama personally worried about this. Every single brain in America is. So the fact that he and all of his actions - being the traitor that he is - are inspected is obvious with or without Obama.

Welcome to the board.

Some hints in posting:
1. Quote what you are referring to...."That's the worst reasoning one could possibly say out loud about politics."
What is????


2. Carefully articulate who you are attempting to correct.
"What he says, the way he says is will be written like to a stone. And though he is intellectually not too capable - as it isn't really a president's place to be - he understands that."

 

[Meane]

Trump exposed the Obamunist attempt to "wiretap" his campaign....all the Leftists laughed....and were outraged that he targeted their messiah.


The Trump tweet:

"Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!"

6:35 AM - 4 Mar 2017




1. The short story: Trump was correct, the NYTimes, WaPo, and every Liberal cable show....split hairs to make it seem that Trump was wrong.
Read on:


2. Here's the spin that the Washington Post put on the story:
"This may be the worst defense of Trump’s Obama-wiretapped-me claim — literally
...chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, which means he's in charge of investigating President Trump's evidence-free allegation that President Barack Obama wiretapped his offices.

But Nunes doesn't seem particularly worried that the current president accused the former president of a crime. Echoing so many Republican defenses of Trump's tweets, he suggested Tuesday that Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value.

Here's what Nunes said:

The president is a neophyte to politics. He’s been doing this a little over a year. And I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. " Analysis | This may be the worst defense of Trump’s Obama-wiretapped-me claim — literally


3. Looks like Trump was dead wrong?

WaPo spin: "... Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value."
The actual quote has a different meaning: "....I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. "
The 'literally' refers to the term 'wiretap.'



4. But the facts are these:

"The FBI investigated a Trump server in its Russia probe, but no charges are expected by John Solomon and Sara Carter

The months-long [Obama] FBI counterintelligence investigation into Russian efforts to influence the 2016 presidential campaign briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election but has not gathered evidence of election tampering to date that would warrant criminal charges against any of the president’s associates, Circa has learned." FBI probe of Donald Trump and Russia during election yielded no evidence of crimes


Get that???

"....the [Obama] FBI ... briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election..."



sur·veil
sərˈvāl/
verb

past tense: surveilled; past participle: surveilled
keep (a person or place) under surveillance.
as in "he deployed FBI agents to surveil the offices of those companies"
Google



Trump was correct with respect to his being surveilled by the Obama administration.

Poor, demented, PoliticalHack ... how do you wiretap a computer?

The same way you "hack an election".

Your deflection is noted and discarded. Take your issues up with the 17 U.S. agencies which have confirmed Russia did indeed hack the election. Hell, even Trump encouraged them.

You just made my point for me. You can hack a computer, intercept communications, and receive information from disgruntled employees, but you can't hack an election. It's a meaningless term.

Not exactly. It travelled round the earth at the speed of an average internet connection and now the world knows Russia is accused of hacking the election of the United States.

 

[PoliticalChic]

every day that goes by demonstrates to me that we may be too far gone as a country

Sure, there are examples of bad behavior and bad actions by "conservative groups & individuals"

But the amazing hate & violence is by and large coming from the left

And we do not have a trustworthy media; their agenda is more important to them than the actual truth

you are butt backwards... as most uneducated, uninformed trump apologists are.

Another brilliant post from this dolt.


Jillian....how about investing in a stamp saying "Is not, issss noootttttt!!!"

It would save you lots of time.

 

[Meane]

That's the worst reasoning one could possibly say out loud about politics.

First of all a president simply needs to understand the specifics of speech making, speaking to the public as a president. What he says, the way he says is will be written like to a stone. And though he is intellectually not too capable - as it isn't really a president's place to be - he understands that. He knew it when he tweeted it.

And it isn't just Obama personally worried about this. Every single brain in America is. So the fact that he and all of his actions - being the traitor that he is - are inspected is obvious with or without Obama.

Welcome to the board.

Some hints in posting:
1. Quote what you are referring to...."That's the worst reasoning one could possibly say out loud about politics."
What is????


2. Carefully articulate who you are attempting to correct.
"What he says, the way he says is will be written like to a stone. And though he is intellectually not too capable - as it isn't really a president's place to be - he understands that."

I said " the president". When replying to the first post I find it unnecessary to quote it.

 

[Camp]

Trump exposed the Obamunist attempt to "wiretap" his campaign....all the Leftists laughed....and were outraged that he targeted their messiah.

As usual, the opening sentence to a PoliticalChic thread is at best, misinformation, and at worst an outright lie.

 

[Faun]

Trump exposed the Obamunist attempt to "wiretap" his campaign....all the Leftists laughed....and were outraged that he targeted their messiah.


The Trump tweet:

"Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!"

6:35 AM - 4 Mar 2017




1. The short story: Trump was correct, the NYTimes, WaPo, and every Liberal cable show....split hairs to make it seem that Trump was wrong.
Read on:


2. Here's the spin that the Washington Post put on the story:
"This may be the worst defense of Trump’s Obama-wiretapped-me claim — literally
...chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, which means he's in charge of investigating President Trump's evidence-free allegation that President Barack Obama wiretapped his offices.

But Nunes doesn't seem particularly worried that the current president accused the former president of a crime. Echoing so many Republican defenses of Trump's tweets, he suggested Tuesday that Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value.

Here's what Nunes said:

The president is a neophyte to politics. He’s been doing this a little over a year. And I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. " Analysis | This may be the worst defense of Trump’s Obama-wiretapped-me claim — literally


3. Looks like Trump was dead wrong?

WaPo spin: "... Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value."
The actual quote has a different meaning: "....I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. "
The 'literally' refers to the term 'wiretap.'



4. But the facts are these:

"The FBI investigated a Trump server in its Russia probe, but no charges are expected by John Solomon and Sara Carter

The months-long [Obama] FBI counterintelligence investigation into Russian efforts to influence the 2016 presidential campaign briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election but has not gathered evidence of election tampering to date that would warrant criminal charges against any of the president’s associates, Circa has learned." FBI probe of Donald Trump and Russia during election yielded no evidence of crimes


Get that???

"....the [Obama] FBI ... briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election..."



sur·veil
sərˈvāl/
verb

past tense: surveilled; past participle: surveilled
keep (a person or place) under surveillance.
as in "he deployed FBI agents to surveil the offices of those companies"
Google



Trump was correct with respect to his being surveilled by the Obama administration.

Poor, demented, PoliticalHack ... how do you wiretap a computer?

There are more than one thousand ways to wire tap a computer. Re-wiring bootstrap one way that I accomplished late at night when nobody was around. Every time the computer powered up the printer would print out FUCK YOU and other than that the computer did what it should do. The computer experts could not make it stop doing that. I left my rig in for two weeks and took it out late at night when nobody was looking to stop the craziness and did not get caught. There is more than one way to skin a cat.

That's not wiretapping, it's hacking. Wiretapping involves listening in on conversations, such as the phone conversation between Flynn and a Russian official.

 

[PoliticalChic]

That's the worst reasoning one could possibly say out loud about politics.

First of all a president simply needs to understand the specifics of speech making, speaking to the public as a president. What he says, the way he says is will be written like to a stone. And though he is intellectually not too capable - as it isn't really a president's place to be - he understands that. He knew it when he tweeted it.

And it isn't just Obama personally worried about this. Every single brain in America is. So the fact that he and all of his actions - being the traitor that he is - are inspected is obvious with or without Obama.

Welcome to the board.

Some hints in posting:
1. Quote what you are referring to...."That's the worst reasoning one could possibly say out loud about politics."
What is????


2. Carefully articulate who you are attempting to correct.
"What he says, the way he says is will be written like to a stone. And though he is intellectually not too capable - as it isn't really a president's place to be - he understands that."

I said " the president". When replying to the first post I find it unnecessary to quote it.

It was quite a vapid post.

Try harder.