You can't hack an election. It's a meaningless term.You too are welcome to take your beef to the 17 U.S. agencies which have confirmed Russia hacked the election.Your deflection is noted and discarded. Take your issues up with the 17 U.S. agencies which have confirmed Russia did indeed hack the election. Hell, even Trump encouraged them.The same way you "hack an election".
Wrong again.. The DNC refused to let anyone see their servers. Now why would that be? did it even happen?
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Turns Out Trump Correct, The Left....As Usual
- Thread starter PoliticalChic
- Start date
- Nov 14, 2011
- 120,819
- 65,689
- 2,635
Poor, deranged, PoliticalHack... she's now trolling her own thread.Nah, the true story is you have yet to find even one illegal alien who voted in the election, no less, 3 million. Have you forgotten already? You're senile.Poor, demented, PoliticalHack ... how do you wiretap a computer?Trump exposed the Obamunist attempt to "wiretap" his campaign....all the Leftists laughed....and were outraged that he targeted their messiah.
The Trump tweet:
"Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!"
6:35 AM - 4 Mar 2017
1. The short story: Trump was correct, the NYTimes, WaPo, and every Liberal cable show....split hairs to make it seem that Trump was wrong.
Read on:
2. Here's the spin that the Washington Post put on the story:
"This may be the worst defense of Trumpās Obama-wiretapped-me claim ā literally
...chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, which means he's in charge of investigating President Trump's evidence-free allegation that President Barack Obama wiretapped his offices.
But Nunes doesn't seem particularly worried that the current president accused the former president of a crime. Echoing so many Republican defenses of Trump's tweets, he suggested Tuesday that Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value.
Here's what Nunes said:
The president is a neophyte to politics. Heās been doing this a little over a year. And I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. " Analysis | This may be the worst defense of Trumpās Obama-wiretapped-me claim ā literally
3. Looks like Trump was dead wrong?
WaPo spin: "... Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value."
The actual quote has a different meaning: "....I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. "
The 'literally' refers to the term 'wiretap.'
4. But the facts are these:
"The FBI investigated a Trump server in its Russia probe, but no charges are expected by John Solomon and Sara Carter
The months-long [Obama] FBI counterintelligence investigation into Russian efforts to influence the 2016 presidential campaign briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election but has not gathered evidence of election tampering to date that would warrant criminal charges against any of the presidentās associates, Circa has learned." FBI probe of Donald Trump and Russia during election yielded no evidence of crimes
Get that???
"....the [Obama] FBI ... briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election..."
surĀ·veil
sÉrĖvÄl/
verb
past tense: surveilled; past participle: surveilled
keep (a person or place) under surveillance.
as in "he deployed FBI agents to surveil the offices of those companies"
Trump was correct with respect to his being surveilled by the Obama administration.
Hey, Ugly....did you hear?
With out illegal alien votes, the ones that Obama told them to cast, ....
....Trump won the popular vote and the electoral.
True story.
Millions.....at the behest of the snake, Obama
Fact.
LMAO
Putz... I challenged you a month ago to show me even one illegal who voted in the election... needless to say, I'm still waiting.
Your trolling aside, to bring your own thread back on topic...
2nd time... how do you wiretap a computer?
- Nov 14, 2011
- 120,819
- 65,689
- 2,635
LOLAnd again you prove my point. My work here is done.You poor, demented, soul... hacking a computer is not wiretapping it.You just made my point for me. You can hack a computer, intercept communications, and receive information from disgruntled employees, but you can't hack an election. It's a meaningless term.Your deflection is noted and discarded. Take your issues up with the 17 U.S. agencies which have confirmed Russia did indeed hack the election. Hell, even Trump encouraged them.The same way you "hack an election".Poor, demented, PoliticalHack ... how do you wiretap a computer?
Good job.
miketx
Diamond Member
- Dec 25, 2015
- 121,556
- 70,505
- 2,645
- Banned
- #25
Liberal fail...nothing new, there was a news article that granted your request to see one illegal that voted. Now hard spin!Poor, deranged, PoliticalHack... she's now trolling her own thread.Nah, the true story is you have yet to find even one illegal alien who voted in the election, no less, 3 million. Have you forgotten already? You're senile.Poor, demented, PoliticalHack ... how do you wiretap a computer?Trump exposed the Obamunist attempt to "wiretap" his campaign....all the Leftists laughed....and were outraged that he targeted their messiah.
The Trump tweet:
"Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!"
6:35 AM - 4 Mar 2017
1. The short story: Trump was correct, the NYTimes, WaPo, and every Liberal cable show....split hairs to make it seem that Trump was wrong.
Read on:
2. Here's the spin that the Washington Post put on the story:
"This may be the worst defense of Trumpās Obama-wiretapped-me claim ā literally
...chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, which means he's in charge of investigating President Trump's evidence-free allegation that President Barack Obama wiretapped his offices.
But Nunes doesn't seem particularly worried that the current president accused the former president of a crime. Echoing so many Republican defenses of Trump's tweets, he suggested Tuesday that Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value.
Here's what Nunes said:
The president is a neophyte to politics. Heās been doing this a little over a year. And I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. " Analysis | This may be the worst defense of Trumpās Obama-wiretapped-me claim ā literally
3. Looks like Trump was dead wrong?
WaPo spin: "... Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value."
The actual quote has a different meaning: "....I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. "
The 'literally' refers to the term 'wiretap.'
4. But the facts are these:
"The FBI investigated a Trump server in its Russia probe, but no charges are expected by John Solomon and Sara Carter
The months-long [Obama] FBI counterintelligence investigation into Russian efforts to influence the 2016 presidential campaign briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election but has not gathered evidence of election tampering to date that would warrant criminal charges against any of the presidentās associates, Circa has learned." FBI probe of Donald Trump and Russia during election yielded no evidence of crimes
Get that???
"....the [Obama] FBI ... briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election..."
surĀ·veil
sÉrĖvÄl/
verb
past tense: surveilled; past participle: surveilled
keep (a person or place) under surveillance.
as in "he deployed FBI agents to surveil the offices of those companies"
Trump was correct with respect to his being surveilled by the Obama administration.
Hey, Ugly....did you hear?
With out illegal alien votes, the ones that Obama told them to cast, ....
....Trump won the popular vote and the electoral.
True story.
Millions.....at the behest of the snake, Obama
Fact.
LMAO
Putz... I challenged you a month ago to show me even one illegal who voted in the election... needless to say, I'm still waiting.
Your trolling aside, to bring your own thread back on topic...
2nd time... how do you wiretap a computer?
- Thread starter
- #26
Trump exposed the Obamunist attempt to "wiretap" his campaign....all the Leftists laughed....and were outraged that he targeted their messiah.
The Trump tweet:
"Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!"
6:35 AM - 4 Mar 2017
1. The short story: Trump was correct, the NYTimes, WaPo, and every Liberal cable show....split hairs to make it seem that Trump was wrong.
Read on:
2. Here's the spin that the Washington Post put on the story:
"This may be the worst defense of Trumpās Obama-wiretapped-me claim ā literally
...chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, which means he's in charge of investigating President Trump's evidence-free allegation that President Barack Obama wiretapped his offices.
But Nunes doesn't seem particularly worried that the current president accused the former president of a crime. Echoing so many Republican defenses of Trump's tweets, he suggested Tuesday that Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value.
Here's what Nunes said:
The president is a neophyte to politics. Heās been doing this a little over a year. And I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. " Analysis | This may be the worst defense of Trumpās Obama-wiretapped-me claim ā literally
3. Looks like Trump was dead wrong?
WaPo spin: "... Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value."
The actual quote has a different meaning: "....I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. "
The 'literally' refers to the term 'wiretap.'
4. But the facts are these:
"The FBI investigated a Trump server in its Russia probe, but no charges are expected by John Solomon and Sara Carter
The months-long [Obama] FBI counterintelligence investigation into Russian efforts to influence the 2016 presidential campaign briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election but has not gathered evidence of election tampering to date that would warrant criminal charges against any of the presidentās associates, Circa has learned." FBI probe of Donald Trump and Russia during election yielded no evidence of crimes
Get that???
"....the [Obama] FBI ... briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election..."
surĀ·veil
sÉrĖvÄl/
verb
past tense: surveilled; past participle: surveilled
keep (a person or place) under surveillance.
as in "he deployed FBI agents to surveil the offices of those companies"
Trump was correct with respect to his being surveilled by the Obama administration.
There was a FISA warrant and another yet undisclosed warrant. that's TWO investigations by the Obama administration. Not just one.. The shit is getting real deep real fast..
Then to add insult to injury, the CIA has been outed (by Wikileaks) how they leave foreign government tracks when they hack to make it appear as if someone else did it.. hmmmmmmm.... SO who really hit the DNC servers?
"they leave foreign government tracks when they hack to make it appear as if someone else did it.. "
Exactly.....which is why there was never any proof of Russians hacking.
- Nov 14, 2011
- 120,819
- 65,689
- 2,635
Of course they could... hack into their private email and dump the contents into the public domain to sway Americans to vote against Hillary. You're not the sharpest tool in the shed, are ya?You can't hack an election. It's a meaningless term.You too are welcome to take your beef to the 17 U.S. agencies which have confirmed Russia hacked the election.Your deflection is noted and discarded. Take your issues up with the 17 U.S. agencies which have confirmed Russia did indeed hack the election. Hell, even Trump encouraged them.The same way you "hack an election".Poor, demented, PoliticalHack ... how do you wiretap a computer?
Wrong again.. The DNC refused to let anyone see their servers. Now why would that be? did it even happen?
- Nov 14, 2011
- 120,819
- 65,689
- 2,635
You remain rightarded. Said illegal was here legally.Liberal fail...nothing new, there was a news article that granted your request to see one illegal that voted. Now hard spin!Poor, deranged, PoliticalHack... she's now trolling her own thread.Nah, the true story is you have yet to find even one illegal alien who voted in the election, no less, 3 million. Have you forgotten already? You're senile.Poor, demented, PoliticalHack ... how do you wiretap a computer?
Hey, Ugly....did you hear?
With out illegal alien votes, the ones that Obama told them to cast, ....
....Trump won the popular vote and the electoral.
True story.
Millions.....at the behest of the snake, Obama
Fact.
LMAO
Putz... I challenged you a month ago to show me even one illegal who voted in the election... needless to say, I'm still waiting.
Your trolling aside, to bring your own thread back on topic...
2nd time... how do you wiretap a computer?
- Thread starter
- #29
You poor, demented, soul... hacking a computer is not wiretapping it.You just made my point for me. You can hack a computer, intercept communications, and receive information from disgruntled employees, but you can't hack an election. It's a meaningless term.Your deflection is noted and discarded. Take your issues up with the 17 U.S. agencies which have confirmed Russia did indeed hack the election. Hell, even Trump encouraged them.The same way you "hack an election".Poor, demented, PoliticalHack ... how do you wiretap a computer?Trump exposed the Obamunist attempt to "wiretap" his campaign....all the Leftists laughed....and were outraged that he targeted their messiah.
The Trump tweet:
"Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!"
6:35 AM - 4 Mar 2017
1. The short story: Trump was correct, the NYTimes, WaPo, and every Liberal cable show....split hairs to make it seem that Trump was wrong.
Read on:
2. Here's the spin that the Washington Post put on the story:
"This may be the worst defense of Trumpās Obama-wiretapped-me claim ā literally
...chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, which means he's in charge of investigating President Trump's evidence-free allegation that President Barack Obama wiretapped his offices.
But Nunes doesn't seem particularly worried that the current president accused the former president of a crime. Echoing so many Republican defenses of Trump's tweets, he suggested Tuesday that Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value.
Here's what Nunes said:
The president is a neophyte to politics. Heās been doing this a little over a year. And I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. " Analysis | This may be the worst defense of Trumpās Obama-wiretapped-me claim ā literally
3. Looks like Trump was dead wrong?
WaPo spin: "... Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value."
The actual quote has a different meaning: "....I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. "
The 'literally' refers to the term 'wiretap.'
4. But the facts are these:
"The FBI investigated a Trump server in its Russia probe, but no charges are expected by John Solomon and Sara Carter
The months-long [Obama] FBI counterintelligence investigation into Russian efforts to influence the 2016 presidential campaign briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election but has not gathered evidence of election tampering to date that would warrant criminal charges against any of the presidentās associates, Circa has learned." FBI probe of Donald Trump and Russia during election yielded no evidence of crimes
Get that???
"....the [Obama] FBI ... briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election..."
surĀ·veil
sÉrĖvÄl/
verb
past tense: surveilled; past participle: surveilled
keep (a person or place) under surveillance.
as in "he deployed FBI agents to surveil the offices of those companies"
Trump was correct with respect to his being surveilled by the Obama administration.
Exactly what the OP stated.
3. Looks like Trump was dead wrong?
WaPo spin: "... Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value."
The actual quote has a different meaning: "....I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. "
The 'literally' refers to the term 'wiretap.'
It should be understood to mean 'placed under surveillance.'
Billy_Bob
Diamond Member
AS the OP article points out there was one more besides those. And it was granted in September.They made 2 request one for criminal, which was turned down.Alt Righties continue to scream lies.
No president can order a wire tap, period.
The 2nd for national security, which was granted.
That warrant was closed with notation of no evidence found of Russian tampering yet remains sealed.
Last edited:
You can hack a computer, you can try to influence an election, but you can't hack an election.Of course they could... hack into their private email and dump the contents into the public domain to sway Americans to vote against Hillary. You're not the sharpest tool in the shed, are ya?You can't hack an election. It's a meaningless term.You too are welcome to take your beef to the 17 U.S. agencies which have confirmed Russia hacked the election.Your deflection is noted and discarded. Take your issues up with the 17 U.S. agencies which have confirmed Russia did indeed hack the election. Hell, even Trump encouraged them.The same way you "hack an election".
Wrong again.. The DNC refused to let anyone see their servers. Now why would that be? did it even happen?
Words mean things.
- Nov 14, 2011
- 120,819
- 65,689
- 2,635
LOLOLOLYou poor, demented, soul... hacking a computer is not wiretapping it.You just made my point for me. You can hack a computer, intercept communications, and receive information from disgruntled employees, but you can't hack an election. It's a meaningless term.Your deflection is noted and discarded. Take your issues up with the 17 U.S. agencies which have confirmed Russia did indeed hack the election. Hell, even Trump encouraged them.The same way you "hack an election".Poor, demented, PoliticalHack ... how do you wiretap a computer?
Exactly what the OP stated.
3. Looks like Trump was dead wrong?
WaPo spin: "... Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value."
The actual quote has a different meaning: "....I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. "
The 'literally' refers to the term 'wiretap.'
It should be understood to mean 'placed under surveillance.'
So Trump was right if you don't go by what he said??
NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
Trump exposed the Obamunist attempt to "wiretap" his campaign....all the Leftists laughed....and were outraged that he targeted their messiah.
The Trump tweet:
"Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!"
6:35 AM - 4 Mar 2017
1. The short story: Trump was correct, the NYTimes, WaPo, and every Liberal cable show....split hairs to make it seem that Trump was wrong.
Read on:
2. Here's the spin that the Washington Post put on the story:
"This may be the worst defense of Trumpās Obama-wiretapped-me claim ā literally
...chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, which means he's in charge of investigating President Trump's evidence-free allegation that President Barack Obama wiretapped his offices.
But Nunes doesn't seem particularly worried that the current president accused the former president of a crime. Echoing so many Republican defenses of Trump's tweets, he suggested Tuesday that Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value.
Here's what Nunes said:
The president is a neophyte to politics. Heās been doing this a little over a year. And I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. " Analysis | This may be the worst defense of Trumpās Obama-wiretapped-me claim ā literally
3. Looks like Trump was dead wrong?
WaPo spin: "... Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value."
The actual quote has a different meaning: "....I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. "
The 'literally' refers to the term 'wiretap.'
It should be understood to mean 'placed under surveillance.'
4. But the facts are these:
"The FBI investigated a Trump server in its Russia probe, but no charges are expected by John Solomon and Sara Carter
The months-long [Obama] FBI counterintelligence investigation into Russian efforts to influence the 2016 presidential campaign briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election but has not gathered evidence of election tampering to date that would warrant criminal charges against any of the presidentās associates, Circa has learned." FBI probe of Donald Trump and Russia during election yielded no evidence of crimes
Get that???
"....the [Obama] FBI ... briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election..."
surĀ·veil
sÉrĖvÄl/
verb
past tense: surveilled; past participle: surveilled
keep (a person or place) under surveillance.
as in "he deployed FBI agents to surveil the offices of those companies"
Trump was correct with respect to his being surveilled by the Obama administration.
Not one shred of evidence of a single illegally tapped Trump phone has been produced.
You're an idiot. Still.
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,519
- 2,165
- Banned
- #34
One, as we have found out, a president cannot order a wire tap.
Two, we have found Trump multiple voters but no such voters for Obama.
Three, as usual, the Alt Right is goofy.
Two, we have found Trump multiple voters but no such voters for Obama.
Three, as usual, the Alt Right is goofy.
- Thread starter
- #35
You too are welcome to take your beef to the 17 U.S. agencies which have confirmed Russia hacked the election.Your deflection is noted and discarded. Take your issues up with the 17 U.S. agencies which have confirmed Russia did indeed hack the election. Hell, even Trump encouraged them.The same way you "hack an election".Poor, demented, PoliticalHack ... how do you wiretap a computer?Trump exposed the Obamunist attempt to "wiretap" his campaign....all the Leftists laughed....and were outraged that he targeted their messiah.
The Trump tweet:
"Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!"
6:35 AM - 4 Mar 2017
1. The short story: Trump was correct, the NYTimes, WaPo, and every Liberal cable show....split hairs to make it seem that Trump was wrong.
Read on:
2. Here's the spin that the Washington Post put on the story:
"This may be the worst defense of Trumpās Obama-wiretapped-me claim ā literally
...chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, which means he's in charge of investigating President Trump's evidence-free allegation that President Barack Obama wiretapped his offices.
But Nunes doesn't seem particularly worried that the current president accused the former president of a crime. Echoing so many Republican defenses of Trump's tweets, he suggested Tuesday that Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value.
Here's what Nunes said:
The president is a neophyte to politics. Heās been doing this a little over a year. And I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. " Analysis | This may be the worst defense of Trumpās Obama-wiretapped-me claim ā literally
3. Looks like Trump was dead wrong?
WaPo spin: "... Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value."
The actual quote has a different meaning: "....I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. "
The 'literally' refers to the term 'wiretap.'
4. But the facts are these:
"The FBI investigated a Trump server in its Russia probe, but no charges are expected by John Solomon and Sara Carter
The months-long [Obama] FBI counterintelligence investigation into Russian efforts to influence the 2016 presidential campaign briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election but has not gathered evidence of election tampering to date that would warrant criminal charges against any of the presidentās associates, Circa has learned." FBI probe of Donald Trump and Russia during election yielded no evidence of crimes
Get that???
"....the [Obama] FBI ... briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election..."
surĀ·veil
sÉrĖvÄl/
verb
past tense: surveilled; past participle: surveilled
keep (a person or place) under surveillance.
as in "he deployed FBI agents to surveil the offices of those companies"
Trump was correct with respect to his being surveilled by the Obama administration.
Wrong again.. The DNC refused to let anyone see their servers. Now why would that be? did it even happen?
That's a lie.
You too are welcome to take your beef to the 17 U.S. agencies which have confirmed Russia hacked the election.Your deflection is noted and discarded. Take your issues up with the 17 U.S. agencies which have confirmed Russia did indeed hack the election. Hell, even Trump encouraged them.The same way you "hack an election".Poor, demented, PoliticalHack ... how do you wiretap a computer?Trump exposed the Obamunist attempt to "wiretap" his campaign....all the Leftists laughed....and were outraged that he targeted their messiah.
The Trump tweet:
"Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!"
6:35 AM - 4 Mar 2017
1. The short story: Trump was correct, the NYTimes, WaPo, and every Liberal cable show....split hairs to make it seem that Trump was wrong.
Read on:
2. Here's the spin that the Washington Post put on the story:
"This may be the worst defense of Trumpās Obama-wiretapped-me claim ā literally
...chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, which means he's in charge of investigating President Trump's evidence-free allegation that President Barack Obama wiretapped his offices.
But Nunes doesn't seem particularly worried that the current president accused the former president of a crime. Echoing so many Republican defenses of Trump's tweets, he suggested Tuesday that Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value.
Here's what Nunes said:
The president is a neophyte to politics. Heās been doing this a little over a year. And I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. " Analysis | This may be the worst defense of Trumpās Obama-wiretapped-me claim ā literally
3. Looks like Trump was dead wrong?
WaPo spin: "... Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value."
The actual quote has a different meaning: "....I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. "
The 'literally' refers to the term 'wiretap.'
4. But the facts are these:
"The FBI investigated a Trump server in its Russia probe, but no charges are expected by John Solomon and Sara Carter
The months-long [Obama] FBI counterintelligence investigation into Russian efforts to influence the 2016 presidential campaign briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election but has not gathered evidence of election tampering to date that would warrant criminal charges against any of the presidentās associates, Circa has learned." FBI probe of Donald Trump and Russia during election yielded no evidence of crimes
Get that???
"....the [Obama] FBI ... briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election..."
surĀ·veil
sÉrĖvÄl/
verb
past tense: surveilled; past participle: surveilled
keep (a person or place) under surveillance.
as in "he deployed FBI agents to surveil the offices of those companies"
Trump was correct with respect to his being surveilled by the Obama administration.
Wrong again.. The DNC refused to let anyone see their servers. Now why would that be? did it even happen?
That's a lie...and easily proven so.
"....statement does not mean that the U.S. has ādirect evidence of senior official-level involvement,ā Hennessey said.
Without more definitive statements, itās difficult for some technical experts to take the governmentās word on faith, she and others have said.
āThereās no evidence that this was done by the state itself, only evidence it was done by non-state actors that might be Russian-speaking,ā said Jeffrey Carr, CEO of the cyber security consultancy firm Taia Global, referring to the evidence available to the public.
That evidence, which was released by private threat assessment companies rather than official channels, indicates hackers used Cyrillic keyboards and operated during Moscow working hours.
But indicators of identity like timestamps, language preferences and IP addresses ācan be manipulated or faked rather easily,ā said Juan Andres Guerrero-Saade, a senior security researcher at Kaspersky Lab."
Does the U.S. government really know who hacked Democrats' emails?
Next?
- Nov 14, 2011
- 120,819
- 65,689
- 2,635
I already explained how they hacked the election, which you just confirmed... "You can hack a computer, you can try to influence an election"You can hack a computer, you can try to influence an election, but you can't hack an election.Of course they could... hack into their private email and dump the contents into the public domain to sway Americans to vote against Hillary. You're not the sharpest tool in the shed, are ya?You can't hack an election. It's a meaningless term.You too are welcome to take your beef to the 17 U.S. agencies which have confirmed Russia hacked the election.Your deflection is noted and discarded. Take your issues up with the 17 U.S. agencies which have confirmed Russia did indeed hack the election. Hell, even Trump encouraged them.
Wrong again.. The DNC refused to let anyone see their servers. Now why would that be? did it even happen?
Words mean things.
NYcarbineer
Diamond Member
You can hack a computer, you can try to influence an election, but you can't hack an election.Of course they could... hack into their private email and dump the contents into the public domain to sway Americans to vote against Hillary. You're not the sharpest tool in the shed, are ya?You can't hack an election. It's a meaningless term.You too are welcome to take your beef to the 17 U.S. agencies which have confirmed Russia hacked the election.Your deflection is noted and discarded. Take your issues up with the 17 U.S. agencies which have confirmed Russia did indeed hack the election. Hell, even Trump encouraged them.
Wrong again.. The DNC refused to let anyone see their servers. Now why would that be? did it even happen?
Words mean things.
So you concede the fact that Russian hackers tried to influence our election.
- Aug 10, 2009
- 168,037
- 16,519
- 2,165
- Banned
- #38
Who is "they"? Not the president.They made 2 request one for criminal, which was turned down.Alt Righties continue to scream lies.
No president can order a wire tap, period.
The 2nd for national security, which was granted.
- Sep 9, 2012
- 40,718
- 13,425
- 2,280
Urbana man charged with living, voting in U.S. illegally
Illegal immigrant charged for voter fraud
You said one, I gave you two.
Illegal immigrant charged for voter fraud
You said one, I gave you two.
Nah, the true story is you have yet to find even one illegal alien who voted in the election, no less, 3 million. Have you forgotten already? You're senile.Poor, demented, PoliticalHack ... how do you wiretap a computer?Trump exposed the Obamunist attempt to "wiretap" his campaign....all the Leftists laughed....and were outraged that he targeted their messiah.
The Trump tweet:
"Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!"
6:35 AM - 4 Mar 2017
1. The short story: Trump was correct, the NYTimes, WaPo, and every Liberal cable show....split hairs to make it seem that Trump was wrong.
Read on:
2. Here's the spin that the Washington Post put on the story:
"This may be the worst defense of Trumpās Obama-wiretapped-me claim ā literally
...chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, which means he's in charge of investigating President Trump's evidence-free allegation that President Barack Obama wiretapped his offices.
But Nunes doesn't seem particularly worried that the current president accused the former president of a crime. Echoing so many Republican defenses of Trump's tweets, he suggested Tuesday that Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value.
Here's what Nunes said:
The president is a neophyte to politics. Heās been doing this a little over a year. And I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. " Analysis | This may be the worst defense of Trumpās Obama-wiretapped-me claim ā literally
3. Looks like Trump was dead wrong?
WaPo spin: "... Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value."
The actual quote has a different meaning: "....I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. "
The 'literally' refers to the term 'wiretap.'
4. But the facts are these:
"The FBI investigated a Trump server in its Russia probe, but no charges are expected by John Solomon and Sara Carter
The months-long [Obama] FBI counterintelligence investigation into Russian efforts to influence the 2016 presidential campaign briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election but has not gathered evidence of election tampering to date that would warrant criminal charges against any of the presidentās associates, Circa has learned." FBI probe of Donald Trump and Russia during election yielded no evidence of crimes
Get that???
"....the [Obama] FBI ... briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election..."
surĀ·veil
sÉrĖvÄl/
verb
past tense: surveilled; past participle: surveilled
keep (a person or place) under surveillance.
as in "he deployed FBI agents to surveil the offices of those companies"
Trump was correct with respect to his being surveilled by the Obama administration.
Hey, Ugly....did you hear?
With out illegal alien votes, the ones that Obama told them to cast, ....
....Trump won the popular vote and the electoral.
True story.
Billy_Bob
Diamond Member
Trump exposed the Obamunist attempt to "wiretap" his campaign....all the Leftists laughed....and were outraged that he targeted their messiah.
The Trump tweet:
"Terrible! Just found out that Obama had my "wires tapped" in Trump Tower just before the victory. Nothing found. This is McCarthyism!"
6:35 AM - 4 Mar 2017
1. The short story: Trump was correct, the NYTimes, WaPo, and every Liberal cable show....split hairs to make it seem that Trump was wrong.
Read on:
2. Here's the spin that the Washington Post put on the story:
"This may be the worst defense of Trumpās Obama-wiretapped-me claim ā literally
...chairman of the House Intelligence Committee, which means he's in charge of investigating President Trump's evidence-free allegation that President Barack Obama wiretapped his offices.
But Nunes doesn't seem particularly worried that the current president accused the former president of a crime. Echoing so many Republican defenses of Trump's tweets, he suggested Tuesday that Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value.
Here's what Nunes said:
The president is a neophyte to politics. Heās been doing this a little over a year. And I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. " Analysis | This may be the worst defense of Trumpās Obama-wiretapped-me claim ā literally
3. Looks like Trump was dead wrong?
WaPo spin: "... Trump's allegation simply shouldn't be taken at face value."
The actual quote has a different meaning: "....I think a lot of the things that he says, you guys sometimes take literally. "
The 'literally' refers to the term 'wiretap.'
It should be understood to mean 'placed under surveillance.'
4. But the facts are these:
"The FBI investigated a Trump server in its Russia probe, but no charges are expected by John Solomon and Sara Carter
The months-long [Obama] FBI counterintelligence investigation into Russian efforts to influence the 2016 presidential campaign briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election but has not gathered evidence of election tampering to date that would warrant criminal charges against any of the presidentās associates, Circa has learned." FBI probe of Donald Trump and Russia during election yielded no evidence of crimes
Get that???
"....the [Obama] FBI ... briefly investigated a computer server tied to Donald Trump's businesses near the end of the election..."
surĀ·veil
sÉrĖvÄl/
verb
past tense: surveilled; past participle: surveilled
keep (a person or place) under surveillance.
as in "he deployed FBI agents to surveil the offices of those companies"
Trump was correct with respect to his being surveilled by the Obama administration.
Not one shred of evidence of a single illegally tapped Trump phone has been produced.
You're an idiot. Still.
So Flynn's voice and his conversation transcript, while on a Trump Tower phone are a fraud? Really?
Similar threads
- Replies
- 5
- Views
- 116
- Replies
- 17
- Views
- 130
- Replies
- 7
- Views
- 96
- Replies
- 371
- Views
- 3K
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 570
- Views
- 5K
- Replies
- 15
- Views
- 53
- Replies
- 36
- Views
- 272
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8039
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 469
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-