Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
At least he didn't make up a phoney video with a different ship and a staged raid trying to pawn it off as the actual attack. In the video I posted, he shows beyond the shadow of a doubt, the difference between the phoney Israeli video and the real deal.Thanks for acknowledging that the 'spokesman' in LoinTurd's video was a troll. All the phrases in my post in quotes were direct quotes from his propaganda.
He should screen those videos for Nazi apologetics *before* he puts 'em up up as 'support' for his 'points'.....
Fuck off. The ship in question in fact carried known Islamic radicals from a mosque that was under investigation by the Turkish govt itself, and the same group had been indicted by the French govt for terrorism as well. When they were asked to stop, the captain told the Israelis to "go back to Austria". Yeah sure, humanitarian shipload of Islamic terrorist animals. Ha ha ha.Defend itself against what? Illegal food? The fact that Israel attacked a ship bring humanitarian aid, say's a lot.Israel is a country recognized internationally, and therefore can and will defend itself, as would any other country. So you can go stick it up your Mohammad.
Keep crying wolf, boy!
I don't care if it was carrying Iran's Revolutionary Guard, you cannot stop a ship in international waters. Period.Fuck off. The ship in question in fact carried known Islamic radicals from a mosque that was under investigation by the Turkish govt itself, and the same group had been indicted by the French govt for terrorism as well. When they were asked to stop, the captain told the Israelis to "go back to Austria". Yeah sure, humanitarian shipload of Islamic terrorist animals. Ha ha ha.
"If you disagree with the video I posted, state the parts of it that are wrong."
Too bad you didn't understand those quotes I posted from the 'narrative' were all deliberate lies.
IFF there was indeed a 'sister ship' - who was it sold to, when, and where is it now? For starters.
Sure you can, if the people it's going to are terrorists that have a history of shooting missiles at Israel, and receiving shiploads of weapons from Iran.I don't care if it was carrying Iran's Revolutionary Guard, you cannot stop a ship in international waters. Period.Fuck off. The ship in question in fact carried known Islamic radicals from a mosque that was under investigation by the Turkish govt itself, and the same group had been indicted by the French govt for terrorism as well. When they were asked to stop, the captain told the Israelis to "go back to Austria". Yeah sure, humanitarian shipload of Islamic terrorist animals. Ha ha ha.
The vessel was carrying humanitarian aid to Gaza and your bullshit lies don't wash.
Nope. That's just your sorry ass excuse to hide the fact that it was an act of piracy.Sure you can, if the people it's going to are terrorists that have a history of shooting missiles at Israel, and receiving shiploads of weapons from Iran.
He points out in the video the difference between the two ships.Too bad you didn't understand those quotes I posted from the 'narrative' were all deliberate lies.
IFF there was indeed a 'sister ship' - who was it sold to, when, and where is it now? For starters.
The ship is in the video, asshole!NO, he *claims* to point it out. The only PROOF would be information about the never-named putative 'sister' ship.
I am familiar with how video can be altered, pixel-by-pixel in each frame. You are the one claiming another ship exists - therefore, it's on you to produce evidence of that ship.
Because the Israeli's illeglly attacked it in international waters.So 'the ship is in the video' - whooopeee. And we know there actually is a second ship HOW?
It's the one you're seeing in the video.The guy in the video claims there is a 'sister' ship AND implies that the Israelis have it.
I don't know it's name........the Jewtannic. Ask the Israeli's what they call it. There the ones that have it.I asked what ought to be a simple question, which I now repeat: "What was the 'sister ship' named and what does the latest record of it state about ownership, etc?"
You can't be this vapid! You talk like a tea bagger.Where is the proof that any such 'sister ship' ever existed?
Can't you find the records of ownership for those ships?
Some Nazi-sucker on a video made that claim: he also claimed some other things which I know are not facts. So there is ample reason to NOT believe what he claims.
Both ships are shown side-by-side in the video.Yanno, the only real proof would be live pics of the two ships side by side.....
There's the two ships in the post above.Not what I stated. And assuredly not what I meant.
It's really quite simple: the claim was made that there are two ships. Since ships are registered, etc, there have to be records available....
