Tunisian party to sue Israel over hit on abu-Jihad

[kvetch]

Kvetch
would you have an issue if the British had gunned down Begin, Shamir and the Jewish terrorist leaders and not just the actual bombers of.e.g. the King David Hotel??

that might take us deeper into the issues


your comment cannot be more idiotic, kvetch Lots of the jews who fought the british were GUNNED DOWN Lots of the Amerian patriots who fought the Brits in World War II ---were gunned down ----

the specific gentleman who enjoys your support was not engaged in a war-----he was----to your delight-----engaged in entering a country for the purpose of murdering its children. Terrorism is not war------it is crime which is supported by islamo nazis

Rosie

well in northern ireland we just released ALL the terrorists

hundreds of both Irish and pro British and only one pro british "loyalist" ever relapsed

there's politics and terrorost politics...that's what I am leading to

on your point about ***** - cohens

I'm vaguely aware that cohens are priestly levites who must be kept super pure and not diluted

But no, no-one ever told me that hyphenating cohens was an abomination !!!

please tell me more, Motek

 

[toastman]

Tunis' Wafa Party to base charges on old IDF officer's interview regarding 1988 assassination of top PLO operative; international convention that defines such hits as 'crimes against humanity'

Tunisian party to sue Israel over hit on abu-Jihad - Israel News, Ynetnews

lipushi..... you are deflecting as usual

the real issue is....

why is israel so dishonest that it has taken so many years to officially admit what the whole world already knew

shades of the vanunu syndrome here

truth decay stinks you know

You should be ashamed to call yourself a Jew.

It's one thing to disagree with Zionism, but you're a sick fuck

 

[YKohen]

1. Begin and Shamir weren't terrorists who deliberately murdered innocent civilians. And Shamir wasn't even part of the IZL.

2. The King David, as military headquarters, was a legitimate military target by any modern definition. Not quite the same as murdering people on a bus or a normal hotel.

3. THREE warning phone calls were made about the King David beforehand so that ALL people could evacuate. Pity they went unheeded.

Nope: Not the same.

 

[irosie91]

kohen-----The "KING DAVID HOTEL BOMBING" has been a favorite of islamo nazi pigs for more than 50 years because of the word "HOTEL" ------the fact that it was actually a military headquarters is not mentioned in the islamo nazi pig writings ------nor are the issues of how many people died as a result of its machinations

 

[kvetch]

1. Begin and Shamir weren't terrorists who deliberately murdered innocent civilians. And Shamir wasn't even part of the IZL.

2. The King David, as military headquarters, was a legitimate military target by any modern definition. Not quite the same as murdering people on a bus or a normal hotel.

3. THREE warning phone calls were made about the King David beforehand so that ALL people could evacuate. Pity they went unheeded.

Nope: Not the same.

i only used the King David as an example.

How about Deir Yassin, etc where innocent civilians definitely were deliberately killed.

Cant remember exactly who did that, but should they have been brought to justice by early Israel?

As far as i know they were not.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Kvetch
would you have an issue if the British had gunned down Begin, Shamir and the Jewish terrorist leaders and not just the actual bombers of.e.g. the King David Hotel??

that might take us deeper into the issues


your comment cannot be more idiotic, kvetch Lots of the jews who fought the british were GUNNED DOWN Lots of the Amerian patriots who fought the Brits in World War II ---were gunned down ----

the specific gentleman who enjoys your support was not engaged in a war-----he was----to your delight-----engaged in entering a country for the purpose of murdering its children. Terrorism is not war------it is crime which is supported by islamo nazis

Questions about Israel's war of independence.

Independent from whom and who started the war?

 

[YKohen]

United Nations General Assembly Resolution 181
November 29, 1947

A. TERMINATION OF MANDATE, PARTITION AND INDEPENDENCE

The Mandate for Palestine shall terminate as soon as possible but in any case not later than 1 August 1948.

The armed forces of the mandatory Power shall be progressively withdrawn from Palestine, the withdrawal to be completed as soon as possible but in any case not later than 1 August 1948.

The mandatory Power shall advise the Commission, as far in advance as possible, of its intention to terminate the mandate and to evacuate each area. The mandatory Power shall use its best endeavours to ensure that an area situated in the territory of the Jewish State, including a seaport and hinterland adequate to provide facilities for a substantial immigration, shall be evacuated at the earliest possible date and in any event not later than 1 February 1948.

Independent Arab and Jewish States and the Special International Regime for the City of Jerusalem, set forth in Part III of this Plan, shall come into existence in Palestine two months after the evacuation of the armed forces of the mandatory Power has been completed but in any case not later than 1 October 1948. The boundaries of the Arab State, the Jewish State, and the City of Jerusalem shall be as described in Parts II and III below.

The period between the adoption by the General Assembly of its recommendation on the question of Palestine and the establishment of the independence of the Arab and Jewish States shall be a transitional period.

The Avalon Project : UN General Assembly Resolution 181

"This will be a war of extermination and a momentous massacre which will be spoken of like the Mongolian massacres and the Crusades."
- Arab League Secretary General Azzam Pasha, May 15, 1948, the day five Arab armies invaded the new state of Israel, one day after the nation declared its independence

 

[kvetch]

here's the wikipedia account of Deir Yassin

The Deir Yassin massacre took place on April 9, 1948, when around 120 fighters from the Irgun Zevai Leumi and Lohamei Herut Israel Zionist paramilitary groups attacked Deir Yassin near Jerusalem, a Palestinian-Arab village of roughly 600 people.[1] The assault occurred as Jewish militia sought to relieve the blockade of Jerusalem by Palestinian forces during the civil war that preceded the end of British rule in Palestine.[2]

Around 107 villagers were killed during and after the battle for the village, including women and children—some were shot, while others died when hand grenades were thrown into their homes.[3] Several villagers were taken prisoner and may have been killed after being paraded through the streets of West Jerusalem, though accounts vary

 

[irosie91]

Kvetch
would you have an issue if the British had gunned down Begin, Shamir and the Jewish terrorist leaders and not just the actual bombers of.e.g. the King David Hotel??

that might take us deeper into the issues


your comment cannot be more idiotic, kvetch Lots of the jews who fought the british were GUNNED DOWN Lots of the Amerian patriots who fought the Brits in World War II ---were gunned down ----

the specific gentleman who enjoys your support was not engaged in a war-----he was----to your delight-----engaged in entering a country for the purpose of murdering its children. Terrorism is not war------it is crime which is supported by islamo nazis

Questions about Israel's war of independence.

Independent from whom and who started the war?

At the time of Israel's war of Independence----Palestine was part of the BRITISH EMPIRE-------the independence was from THE BRITISH EMPIRE
Factors regarding the CREATION OF A STATE OF WAR-----are usually based on
the differting POVs of the parties involved. According to KING GEORGE
---the american patriots of the USA started a WAR OF REBELLION against just
rulers. According to the Patriots----the British empire was an aggressive oppressor
According to KHARTOUM----the its actions against south sudan were a just response
to unlawful rebellion to just rule According to Turkey its genocide of more than 2 million armenians was a just reaction to rebellion against SHARIAH LAW.
According to the shariah shit hole in which my husband was born----his mother's escape from enslavemnet as a jewish orphan------was A CRIME She did not have permission from the local IMAM to leave


you are really dim------tinnie

 

[YKohen]

here's the wikipedia account of Deir Yassin

And here's the account by the Arabs who were actually there:

Interviews: 50th Anniversary Of Deir Yassin Massacre

In retrospect, Palestinians of today admit that one of the most terrible mistakes they made back in 1948 was to over-report the details of the Deir Yassin massacre. "The goal was to mobilize Arab support for the Palestinians who were slaughtered by the Zionists but what really happened was that more and more Palestinians became scared and left their country," said Hazem Nusseibeh, a leading Palestinian figure who currently lives in Jordan. In 1948 he was among the key figures of the city of Jerusalem.

..."True, there was exchange of fire with the Jews. Prior to the attack, they used to come to the village and distribute leaflets calling for the establishment of friendly and brotherly relations with us offering a formula of 'do not hit us, we won't hit you.' Our youths confronted them and did not listen to them. Our youths used to go out to the eastern side of the village and beat up whatever Jew they saw."

...Mohammed Asaad Radwan Al Yassini, 70, who currently lives in the Old City of Jerusalem, confirmed that some of the men were dressed in women's outfits.

...Did they use speakers and what did they say?

"They called on us to surrender, to throw our weapons and to save ourselves. But we did not imagine them breaking into the village.

...Ali Yousef Jaber, Abu Yousef, is also 70 years old. He lives in Am'ari refugee camp near Ramallah. Excerpts below:

"I would like to stress on the fact that no rape incidents took place. That was part of a big lie that some of the Arabs and some of our leaders invented but were refuted by our villagers. I was among a group of people who went to Saad Eddin Al Aref to talk to him about this. He told us he wanted to frame them and attribute to them a brutal crime. I said to him: if you want to frame them, do not use Deir Yassin, or our women. Do not attribute to us something that never happened, otherwise this is infamy that our village and its people do not deserve...

Interviews: 50th anniversary of Deir Yassin massacre

Gee. Tough call who to believe- a wiki-encyclopedia or the Arab combatants who were there.

 

[irosie91]

Kohen---the DEIR YASSIN libel------is something like the JENIN libel-----it was established and no truthful revelations will ever make it go away. The islamo nazis have PAILFULS of these libels

THE BLOOD LIBELS
THE BUBONIC PLAGUE LIBEL
THE EARTHQUAKE LIBEL (iberian penn.---about 500 years ago)
THE CHOLERA EPIDEMICS (usually an islamic thing in their countries
where cholera is endemic)

there are always some people----more or less----HAPPY TO BELIEVE THEN
----at the level of faith and religion

 

[kvetch]

here's the wikipedia account of Deir Yassin

And here's the account by the Arabs who were actually there:

Interviews: 50th Anniversary Of Deir Yassin Massacre

In retrospect, Palestinians of today admit that one of the most terrible mistakes they made back in 1948 was to over-report the details of the Deir Yassin massacre. "The goal was to mobilize Arab support for the Palestinians who were slaughtered by the Zionists but what really happened was that more and more Palestinians became scared and left their country," said Hazem Nusseibeh, a leading Palestinian figure who currently lives in Jordan. In 1948 he was among the key figures of the city of Jerusalem.

..."True, there was exchange of fire with the Jews. Prior to the attack, they used to come to the village and distribute leaflets calling for the establishment of friendly and brotherly relations with us offering a formula of 'do not hit us, we won't hit you.' Our youths confronted them and did not listen to them. Our youths used to go out to the eastern side of the village and beat up whatever Jew they saw."

...Mohammed Asaad Radwan Al Yassini, 70, who currently lives in the Old City of Jerusalem, confirmed that some of the men were dressed in women's outfits.

...Did they use speakers and what did they say?

"They called on us to surrender, to throw our weapons and to save ourselves. But we did not imagine them breaking into the village.

...Ali Yousef Jaber, Abu Yousef, is also 70 years old. He lives in Am'ari refugee camp near Ramallah. Excerpts below:

"I would like to stress on the fact that no rape incidents took place. That was part of a big lie that some of the Arabs and some of our leaders invented but were refuted by our villagers. I was among a group of people who went to Saad Eddin Al Aref to talk to him about this. He told us he wanted to frame them and attribute to them a brutal crime. I said to him: if you want to frame them, do not use Deir Yassin, or our women. Do not attribute to us something that never happened, otherwise this is infamy that our village and its people do not deserve...

Interviews: 50th anniversary of Deir Yassin massacre

Gee. Tough call who to believe- a wiki-encyclopedia or the Arab combatants who were there.

interesting

but they also say the IZL deliberately killed civilians

you still haven't addressed the issue; only the detals

let me say, so you don't have to

israel does, usually but not always try hard to avoid civilian casualties

unlike the pals and arabs

but there are glaring exceptions, not just unfortuante incidents.......like Deir Yassin could be said to be

what I'm leading up to is illustrated by this wiki account of the Israeli Grapes of Wrath operation in Lebanon.....and its consequences for Israel and the USA, too

"The deaths of civilians in Operation Grapes of Wrath and in particular at Qana have been cited by Al-Qaeda as motivations for its actions and policies towards the United States of America. Mohamed Atta is described in Lawrence Wright's account of the 11 September 2001 attacks to have committed himself to martyrdom in immediate response to the Israel strikes at the beginning of Operation Grapes of Wrath.[7]"

and increasing support for Hezbollah, of course

the same is alleged about bin laden himself about his reaction Israel's invasion of Lebanon in 1982 when 10,000 civilians were killed, which also hugely strengthened Hizbollah

 

[P F Tinmore]

Kvetch
would you have an issue if the British had gunned down Begin, Shamir and the Jewish terrorist leaders and not just the actual bombers of.e.g. the King David Hotel??

that might take us deeper into the issues


your comment cannot be more idiotic, kvetch Lots of the jews who fought the british were GUNNED DOWN Lots of the Amerian patriots who fought the Brits in World War II ---were gunned down ----

the specific gentleman who enjoys your support was not engaged in a war-----he was----to your delight-----engaged in entering a country for the purpose of murdering its children. Terrorism is not war------it is crime which is supported by islamo nazis

Questions about Israel's war of independence.

Independent from whom and who started the war?

At the time of Israel's war of Independence----Palestine was part of the BRITISH EMPIRE-------the independence was from THE BRITISH EMPIRE
Factors regarding the CREATION OF A STATE OF WAR-----are usually based on
the differting POVs of the parties involved. According to KING GEORGE
---the american patriots of the USA started a WAR OF REBELLION against just
rulers. According to the Patriots----the British empire was an aggressive oppressor
According to KHARTOUM----the its actions against south sudan were a just response
to unlawful rebellion to just rule According to Turkey its genocide of more than 2 million armenians was a just reaction to rebellion against SHARIAH LAW.
According to the shariah shit hole in which my husband was born----his mother's escape from enslavemnet as a jewish orphan------was A CRIME She did not have permission from the local IMAM to leave


you are really dim------tinnie

----Palestine was part of the BRITISH EMPIRE-------

The only problem with what you say is that Britain never annexed or otherwise claimed possession of Palestine. It was only an appointed administrator.

 

[irosie91]

There is no question that civilians died at Deir Yassin Deir Yassin was a civilian enclave being USED as an actual military fortress------in fact it was vital in maintaining the siege of east jerusalem ------ there is no question that it was a LEGAL MILITARY TARGET------guilt for civilian deaths-----in legal battle is a very difficult matter

 

[P F Tinmore]

United Nations General Assembly Resolution 181
November 29, 1947

A. TERMINATION OF MANDATE, PARTITION AND INDEPENDENCE

The Mandate for Palestine shall terminate as soon as possible but in any case not later than 1 August 1948.

The armed forces of the mandatory Power shall be progressively withdrawn from Palestine, the withdrawal to be completed as soon as possible but in any case not later than 1 August 1948.

The mandatory Power shall advise the Commission, as far in advance as possible, of its intention to terminate the mandate and to evacuate each area. The mandatory Power shall use its best endeavours to ensure that an area situated in the territory of the Jewish State, including a seaport and hinterland adequate to provide facilities for a substantial immigration, shall be evacuated at the earliest possible date and in any event not later than 1 February 1948.

Independent Arab and Jewish States and the Special International Regime for the City of Jerusalem, set forth in Part III of this Plan, shall come into existence in Palestine two months after the evacuation of the armed forces of the mandatory Power has been completed but in any case not later than 1 October 1948. The boundaries of the Arab State, the Jewish State, and the City of Jerusalem shall be as described in Parts II and III below.

The period between the adoption by the General Assembly of its recommendation on the question of Palestine and the establishment of the independence of the Arab and Jewish States shall be a transitional period.

The Avalon Project : UN General Assembly Resolution 181

"This will be a war of extermination and a momentous massacre which will be spoken of like the Mongolian massacres and the Crusades."
- Arab League Secretary General Azzam Pasha, May 15, 1948, the day five Arab armies invaded the new state of Israel, one day after the nation declared its independence

May 15, 1948, the day five Arab armies invaded the new state of Israel, one day after the nation declared its independence

Could you post a 1948 map of Israel showing where these Arab armies entered Israel?

 

[Jos]

And even in illegal wars
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i1NCyAK3rDA]Israel is Sorry, it's a Mistake - YouTube[/ame]

 

[irosie91]

I could not post up a map showing where the TALIBAN ENTERED AFGHANISTAN from PAKISTAN ----or WHERE HEZBOLLAH ENTERED THE SOUTHERN PART OF LEBANON----OR EVEN WHERE AL QUEIDA ENTERED YEMEN your demand is cynical to the point of obscenity. I can help you understand reality-----the ARMIES OF THE ISLAMO NAZI TERRORIST PIGS DO NOT RIDE IN ON HORSEBACK BLOWING BUGLES AND WAVING FLAGS-----

a very interesting fact regarding ARABIC----is that it varies in 'dialect'----markedly from arab country to arab country-------and --arabic speaking jews can recognize -----from whence this of that of your favorite throat slitters ----emerged---especially if the specific arabic speaking ----has parents or grandparents from the same place I am often amazed at this ID ability----even today

 

[kvetch]

Questions about Israel's war of independence.

Independent from whom and who started the war?

At the time of Israel's war of Independence----Palestine was part of the BRITISH EMPIRE-------the independence was from THE BRITISH EMPIRE
Factors regarding the CREATION OF A STATE OF WAR-----are usually based on
the differting POVs of the parties involved. According to KING GEORGE
---the american patriots of the USA started a WAR OF REBELLION against just
rulers. According to the Patriots----the British empire was an aggressive oppressor
According to KHARTOUM----the its actions against south sudan were a just response
to unlawful rebellion to just rule According to Turkey its genocide of more than 2 million armenians was a just reaction to rebellion against SHARIAH LAW.
According to the shariah shit hole in which my husband was born----his mother's escape from enslavemnet as a jewish orphan------was A CRIME She did not have permission from the local IMAM to leave


you are really dim------tinnie

----Palestine was part of the BRITISH EMPIRE-------

The only problem with what you say is that Britain never annexed or otherwise claimed possession of Palestine. It was only an appointed administrator.

don't defend the wicked brits tinnie

we dont deserve it

Rosie is right, mostly.....

but yes, there is a key difference between wicked brit colonialism

and zionist theft............that is permanent, or so they think!!!

 

[kvetch]

There is no question that civilians died at Deir Yassin Deir Yassin was a civilian enclave being USED as an actual military fortress------in fact it was vital in maintaining the siege of east jerusalem ------ there is no question that it was a LEGAL MILITARY TARGET------guilt for civilian deaths-----in legal battle is a very difficult matter

i totally agree with you here, Motek

that's the difference between you and Mr Y-Kohen, so far at least

you are prepared to tell "inconvenient truths" and be honest

 

[kvetch]

And even in illegal wars
Israel is Sorry, it's a Mistake - YouTube

good quality "pallywood" for a change!!