Tulsa Got It Right!

Discussion in 'Politics' started by GotZoom, Jun 8, 2005.

  1. GotZoom
    Offline

    GotZoom Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 20, 2005
    Messages:
    5,719
    Thanks Received:
    366
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Cordova, TN
    Ratings:
    +366
    I love when someone gets it right!

    -----

    Tulsa Zoo to Feature Biblical Display
    Wednesday, June 08, 2005

    TULSA, Okla. — The Tulsa Zoo will add a display featuring the biblical account of creation following complaints to a city board about other displays with religious significance, including a Hindu elephant statue.

    The Tulsa Park and Recreation Board voted 3-1 on Tuesday in favor of a display depicting God's creation of the world in six days and his rest on the seventh, as told in Genesis, the first book of the Bible.

    The vote came after more than two hours of public comment from a standing-room-only crowd.

    Zoo employees, religious leaders and others spoke in opposition, saying religion shouldn't be part of the taxpayer-funded scientific institution.

    But those who favored the creationist exhibit, including Mayor Bill LaFortune (search), argued that the zoo already displayed religious items, including the statue of the Hindu god, Ganesh, outside the elephant exhibit and a marble globe inscribed with an American Indian saying: "The earth is our mother. The sky is our father."

    "I see this as a big victory," said Dan Hicks, the Tulsa resident who approached the zoo with the idea. "It's a matter of fairness. To not include the creationist view would be discrimination."

    Hundreds of people signed a petition supporting the exhibit.

    The new display will include a disclaimer that says it represents one view. City attorneys also advised it be placed alongside other cultures' views of creation.

    Tulsa Zoo exhibit curator Kathleen Buck-Miser estimated it would take about six months to research and organize the exhibit. She expressed qualms about the zoo delving into theological debate.

    "I'm afraid we are going in the wrong direction," she said.

    Board member Dale McNamara, who voted against the proposal, agreed.

    "I do not like the idea of scripture at the zoo," she said.

    Zoo officials had argued that the zoo does not advocate religion and that displays like the elephant statue are meant to show the animal's image among cultures. The same exhibit includes the Republican Party's elephant symbol.hleen Buck-Miser estimated it would take about six months to research and organize the exhibit. She expressed qualms about the zoo delving into theological debate.

    "I'm afraid we are going in the wrong direction," she said.

    Board member Dale McNamara, who voted against the proposal, agreed.

    "I do not like the idea of scripture at the zoo," she said.

    Zoo officials had argued that the zoo does not advocate religion and that displays like the elephant statue are meant to show the animal's image among cultures. The same exhibit includes the Republican Party's elephant symbol.

    http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,158950,00.html
     
  2. colehart
    Offline

    colehart Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2005
    Messages:
    70
    Thanks Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Ratings:
    +9
    The best thing to do is take down anything that is representative of religion. Zoos should not be in the business of explaining culture. I go to the zoo to not only look at the animals, but to learn about "THEM" not the culture of the people that worship them.
     
  3. ScreamingEagle
    Offline

    ScreamingEagle Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2004
    Messages:
    12,887
    Thanks Received:
    1,610
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,159
    Good for Tulsa - otherwise known as the Buckle of the Bible Belt :halo:
     
  4. TheEnemyWithin
    Online

    TheEnemyWithin Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    Of course Tulsa got it right! We're Oklahoma...the only state besides Utah where every single county went for that evil lying war-mongering Dubbya. :p:
     
  5. Mr. P
    Offline

    Mr. P Senior Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2004
    Messages:
    11,329
    Thanks Received:
    618
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    South of the Mason Dixon
    Ratings:
    +620
    Ridiculous!
     
  6. Shattered
    Online

    Shattered Guest

    Ratings:
    +0
    Not that I really give a rip, since I don't live in Tulsa.. But what on earth does a biblical display have to do with ones ability to see animals in a man-made area depicting their natural habitat?
     
  7. colehart
    Offline

    colehart Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2005
    Messages:
    70
    Thanks Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Ratings:
    +9

    Absolutely nothing! That's why they demanded equal time if the zoo refused(which they did) to take down the Hindu religious symbol.
     
  8. Trigg
    Offline

    Trigg Active Member

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2004
    Messages:
    774
    Thanks Received:
    69
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    midwest
    Ratings:
    +69
    They should get equal time, what's good for the Hindu religion is good for the Christians.
     
  9. colehart
    Offline

    colehart Member

    Joined:
    May 31, 2005
    Messages:
    70
    Thanks Received:
    9
    Trophy Points:
    6
    Ratings:
    +9
    The Hindu religious symbol was put in place "first". There were complaints from Christians to take it down as it had nothing to do with a zoo setting. The zoo board refused and so now we have another religious display at the zoo. I wonder how many more will be put up before it gets even more ridiculous?
     

Share This Page