If you are sick of the pablum media-supported wannabes force-feed the country, change your diet with Ted Cruz’s foreign policy. Here’s a small taste:
You gotta love a guy who diplomatically says “To hell with Peace Without Victory.”
A president with a worldview stated in this next excerpt is the exact opposite of everything the United Nations has been dumping on Americans since 1945:
This is the one that chokes the UN-loving global government crowd:
NOTE: It is fair to say that Ted Cruz does not want to keep the world safe for democracy. You can even say that Ted Cruz is campaigning against America’s most destructive president ever —— Woodrow Wilson.
I have never watched a presidential debate, but I will record them next year if Cruz is there. Ted Cruz’s attendance makes fast-forwarding through the worn-out horse manure worth the effort:
Every wannabe who advocates amnesty, a path to citizenship, or whatever they call it these days must also support this:
The debate moderator should ask every wannabe to state his position on accepting, or rejecting, the UN’s authority to force immigrants on this country. Better still, Ted Cruz could ask Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio if they put-in with the United Nations deciding which, and how many, immigrants get citizenship?
Incidentally, Democrats have an easy time of it in presidential debates because their party created the immigration disaster along with everything else that is wrong in this country. In short: Democrats have only to repeat the usual liberal garbage they spouted in every election since FDR without fear of getting hit with embarrassing questions.
One final issue with sovereignty implications.
It will take a superabundant of conservative Americans in both Houses of Congress to do what is best for the country regardless of Democrats:
Turnabout is fair play
For decades, the parasite class complained that every industrialized country —— except America —— had some form of universal healthcare. Should abolishing birthright citizenship get off the ground, I can already hear Lefties the world over begin their caterwauling the instant Americans turn the international argument back on the open-borders crowd:
. . . speaking out for freedom “is qualitatively different from saying U.S. military forces should intervene to force democracy on foreign lands.”
Cruz says he is a hawk on some issues, like preventing Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons. But on other foreign policy questions, like whether to support the Syrian rebels in their fight against Bashar al-Assad, he is more hesitant because he doesn’t see how it will benefit American interests.
Cruz says “if and when U.S. military force is required,” it should only “proceed under three preconditions.” You might call it the “Cruz Doctrine.”
“First, it should begin with a clearly stated objective at the outset. It should be directly tied to U.S. national security,” he said.
XXXXX
Cruz says he is a hawk on some issues, like preventing Iran from obtaining nuclear weapons. But on other foreign policy questions, like whether to support the Syrian rebels in their fight against Bashar al-Assad, he is more hesitant because he doesn’t see how it will benefit American interests.
XXXXX
Cruz says “if and when U.S. military force is required,” it should only “proceed under three preconditions.” You might call it the “Cruz Doctrine.”
“First, it should begin with a clearly stated objective at the outset. It should be directly tied to U.S. national security,” he said.
You gotta love a guy who diplomatically says “To hell with Peace Without Victory.”
“Second, we should use overwhelming force to that objective. We should not have rules of engagement that tie the hands of our soldiers and sailors and airmen and Marines.”
A president with a worldview stated in this next excerpt is the exact opposite of everything the United Nations has been dumping on Americans since 1945:
The final point in the Cruz Doctrine is that the U.S. military should not be asked to help birth democratic societies.
“Third, we should get the heck out,” he said. “It is not the job of the U.S. military to engage in nation building to turn foreign countries into democratic utopias.”
“Third, we should get the heck out,” he said. “It is not the job of the U.S. military to engage in nation building to turn foreign countries into democratic utopias.”
This is the one that chokes the UN-loving global government crowd:
. . . he doesn’t believe America should use the military to help spread democracy abroad.
NOTE: It is fair to say that Ted Cruz does not want to keep the world safe for democracy. You can even say that Ted Cruz is campaigning against America’s most destructive president ever —— Woodrow Wilson.
I have never watched a presidential debate, but I will record them next year if Cruz is there. Ted Cruz’s attendance makes fast-forwarding through the worn-out horse manure worth the effort:
. . . a far more interesting — and important — debate is the one likely to emerge between Sens. Marco Rubio of Florida and Ted Cruz of Texas.”
The Cruz Doctrine: Ted Cruz Opens Up About His Foreign Policy Worldview
Jamie Weinstein
10:55 PM 04/28/2015
Ted Cruz Opens Up About His Foreign Policy Worldview The Daily Caller
Jamie Weinstein
10:55 PM 04/28/2015
Ted Cruz Opens Up About His Foreign Policy Worldview The Daily Caller
Every wannabe who advocates amnesty, a path to citizenship, or whatever they call it these days must also support this:
The U.S. State Department announced this week that the first major contingent of Syrian refugees, 9,000 of them, have been hand-selected by the United Nations for resettlement into communities across the United States.
. . . the U.S. government has been the most active of all nations in accepting Islamic refugees from other war-torn countries, such as Iraq, Somalia and the Democratic Republic of Congo.
Now, the Syrians will be added to the mix. They are cleared for refugee status by the U.N. high commissioner on refugees (UNHCR), who assigns them to various countries.
“The United States accepts the majority of all UNHCR referrals from around the world. Last year, we reached our goal of resettling nearly 70,000 refugees from nearly 70 countries. And we plan to lead in resettling Syrians as well,” the statement reads. “We are reviewing some 9,000 recent UNHCR referrals from Syria. We are receiving roughly a thousand new ones each month, and we expect admissions from Syria to surge in 2015 and beyond.”
XXXXX
. . . the U.S. government has been the most active of all nations in accepting Islamic refugees from other war-torn countries, such as Iraq, Somalia and the Democratic Republic of Congo.
Now, the Syrians will be added to the mix. They are cleared for refugee status by the U.N. high commissioner on refugees (UNHCR), who assigns them to various countries.
XXXXX
“The United States accepts the majority of all UNHCR referrals from around the world. Last year, we reached our goal of resettling nearly 70,000 refugees from nearly 70 countries. And we plan to lead in resettling Syrians as well,” the statement reads. “We are reviewing some 9,000 recent UNHCR referrals from Syria. We are receiving roughly a thousand new ones each month, and we expect admissions from Syria to surge in 2015 and beyond.”
The debate moderator should ask every wannabe to state his position on accepting, or rejecting, the UN’s authority to force immigrants on this country. Better still, Ted Cruz could ask Jeb Bush and Marco Rubio if they put-in with the United Nations deciding which, and how many, immigrants get citizenship?
The United States, with its commitment to accepting 70,000 displaced people a year, absorbs more refugees than all other countries combined. This number is understated, however, as once refugees get to the United States they are placed on a fast track to citizenship and are able to get their extended families to join them in the states under the government’s Refuge Family Reunification program.
The State Department works to place refugees in 180 cities across 49 states.
The State Department works to place refugees in 180 cities across 49 states.
U.N. sending thousands of Muslims to America
Posted By Leo Hohmann On 12/11/2014 @ 7:53 pm
U.N. sending thousands of Muslims to America
Posted By Leo Hohmann On 12/11/2014 @ 7:53 pm
U.N. sending thousands of Muslims to America
Incidentally, Democrats have an easy time of it in presidential debates because their party created the immigration disaster along with everything else that is wrong in this country. In short: Democrats have only to repeat the usual liberal garbage they spouted in every election since FDR without fear of getting hit with embarrassing questions.
One final issue with sovereignty implications.
It will take a superabundant of conservative Americans in both Houses of Congress to do what is best for the country regardless of Democrats:
The Civil War era’s 14th Amendment, granting automatic citizenship to any baby born on American soil, is a proud achievement of the Party of Lincoln.
But now House Republicans are talking about abolishing birthright citizenship.
The 14th Amendment, King told the panel, “did not contemplate that anyone who would sneak into the United States and have a baby would have automatic citizenship conferred on them.” Added King, “I’d suggest it’s our job here in this Congress to decide who will be citizens, not someone in a foreign country that can sneak into the United States and have a baby and then go home with the birth certificate.”
But now House Republicans are talking about abolishing birthright citizenship.
XXXXX
The 14th Amendment, King told the panel, “did not contemplate that anyone who would sneak into the United States and have a baby would have automatic citizenship conferred on them.” Added King, “I’d suggest it’s our job here in this Congress to decide who will be citizens, not someone in a foreign country that can sneak into the United States and have a baby and then go home with the birth certificate.”
Turnabout is fair play
For decades, the parasite class complained that every industrialized country —— except America —— had some form of universal healthcare. Should abolishing birthright citizenship get off the ground, I can already hear Lefties the world over begin their caterwauling the instant Americans turn the international argument back on the open-borders crowd:
. . . King said the United States in this case should follow “almost every other industrialized country” in abolishing birthright citizenship.
House Republicans try to gut a key American principle
By Dana Milbank Opinion writer April 29 at 6:11 PM
House Republicans try to gut a key American principle - The Washington Post
By Dana Milbank Opinion writer April 29 at 6:11 PM
House Republicans try to gut a key American principle - The Washington Post
