Trumps Lawyers Issue Legal Response Kicking House Democrats In The Balls

[The Original Tree]

The President has the sole power to determine Foreign Policy. A delay in Foreign Policy is his right, and even with what I consider an unconstitutional limit on how long a president can with hold or delay Foreign Aid, the President still released it within that artificial deadline.

NO IT IS NOT the president's perogative on foreign aid passed by congress.

IT BROKE THE LAW, the Impoundment control act of 1974....

please stop lying.

Dear Child of Hell. Calling someone telling the truth a liar because you are a liar, is committing the offense of lying and doubling down on slander and false accusations. You will be held accountable for that on Judgment Day.

There was no violation of a so called "Impoundment Control Act" The funds were released within the time frame required. In fact, I would venture to say that this so called "Impoundment Act" is going to end up at SCOTUS and found Unconstitutional due to your little COUP 2.0 in the future.

 

[Butch_Coolidge]

It's a childish, and ridiculous statement and defense, written for kindergarteners imo.

Geez, I hope he has a better defense than that......??

Well with your legal expertise, everyone should be terrified. [emoji1787]


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[Butch_Coolidge]

This stuff is priceless.

Trump's legal team spelled out in great detail exactly why the House Democrat's partisan impeachment was a total sham. It illustrates why Democrats wanted to use Russian Collusion and not the Whistleblower as evidence of wrongdoing. It also shows that Democrats knew their arguments wouldn't stand up in a court of law which renders their claims of obstruction of congress totally unfounded. When Trump took congress to court in response to their demands for documents and witnesses....they immediately withdrew their demands. Then they rushed to impeach instead.

January 19, 2020
Trump’s attorneys issue a powerful response to the Articles of Impeachment
By Andrea Widburg
Anyone who has watched a Trump rally or followed Trump’s Twitter feed knows that he’s been open about his disdain for the House’s impeachment proceedings. However, now that the House formally delivered the Articles of Impeachment to the Senate, Trump’s lawyers can finally make known the President’s official legal stand against the Democrats’ blatant political effort to overturn the 2016 election.

In five-and-a-half fiery pages, Jay Alan Sekulow and Pat A. Cipollone attack both the impeachment process and the legal and factual bases (or lack thereof) underlying the articles of impeachment. Sekulow and Cipollone understand that the real audience is the American people, so the document is written in ordinary English, not legalese.

Regarding the entire impeachment, the lawyers state that this warped process attacks the American people and free elections:

The Articles of Impeachment submitted by House Democrats are a dangerous attack on the right of the American people to freely choose their President. This is a brazen and unlawful attempt to overturn the results of the 2016 election and interfere with the 2020 election-now just months away. The highly partisan and reckless obsession with impeaching the President began the day he was inaugurated and continues to this day.​

For the first Article of Impeachment, which alleges “abuse of power,” Sekulow and Cipollone explain that, contrary to the Constitution’s demand for “high Crimes and Misdemeanors,” the first Article fails to state any legal violation. Not only does it fail to identify actual legal wrongdoing, the facts alleged also fail to show that Trump abused his powers:

At all times, the President has faithfully and effectively executed the duties of his Office on behalf of the American people. The President's actions on the July 25,2019, telephone call with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine (the "July 25 call"), as well as on the earlier April 21, 2019, telephone call (the "April 21 call"), and in all surrounding and related events, were constitutional, perfectly legal, completely appropriate, and taken in furtherance of our national interest.​

The attorneys also note that the best evidence is the telephone call transcript, which Trump released immediately. Ukrainian officials, from President Zelenskyy on down, all support the transcript and the tenor of Trump’s deals with Ukraine.

Read more here.....https://www.americanthinker.com/blo..._response_to_the_articles_of_impeachment.html

Read the full legal response here...."Dangerous, Brazen and Unlawful" -- BREAKING: Trump Defense Team Files First Response to Sham Impeachment -- WITH FULL DOCUMENT​

So, these same assfucks were dancing in the streets when Republivcans tried to undue the 1996 election?
Really?
That is their argument?

Typical Republican bullshit. They do something & then argue the other side can't do it.

I’m sure a lot of things may have occurred 24 years ago. Nothing to do with Don. Were you a volunteer for hilly’s campaign? Is that why you have cramps this month. They say chocolate may help.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[RealDave]

This stuff is priceless.

Trump's legal team spelled out in great detail exactly why the House Democrat's partisan impeachment was a total sham. It illustrates why Democrats wanted to use Russian Collusion and not the Whistleblower as evidence of wrongdoing. It also shows that Democrats knew their arguments wouldn't stand up in a court of law which renders their claims of obstruction of congress totally unfounded. When Trump took congress to court in response to their demands for documents and witnesses....they immediately withdrew their demands. Then they rushed to impeach instead.

January 19, 2020
Trump’s attorneys issue a powerful response to the Articles of Impeachment
By Andrea Widburg
Anyone who has watched a Trump rally or followed Trump’s Twitter feed knows that he’s been open about his disdain for the House’s impeachment proceedings. However, now that the House formally delivered the Articles of Impeachment to the Senate, Trump’s lawyers can finally make known the President’s official legal stand against the Democrats’ blatant political effort to overturn the 2016 election.

In five-and-a-half fiery pages, Jay Alan Sekulow and Pat A. Cipollone attack both the impeachment process and the legal and factual bases (or lack thereof) underlying the articles of impeachment. Sekulow and Cipollone understand that the real audience is the American people, so the document is written in ordinary English, not legalese.

Regarding the entire impeachment, the lawyers state that this warped process attacks the American people and free elections:

The Articles of Impeachment submitted by House Democrats are a dangerous attack on the right of the American people to freely choose their President. This is a brazen and unlawful attempt to overturn the results of the 2016 election and interfere with the 2020 election-now just months away. The highly partisan and reckless obsession with impeaching the President began the day he was inaugurated and continues to this day.​

For the first Article of Impeachment, which alleges “abuse of power,” Sekulow and Cipollone explain that, contrary to the Constitution’s demand for “high Crimes and Misdemeanors,” the first Article fails to state any legal violation. Not only does it fail to identify actual legal wrongdoing, the facts alleged also fail to show that Trump abused his powers:

At all times, the President has faithfully and effectively executed the duties of his Office on behalf of the American people. The President's actions on the July 25,2019, telephone call with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine (the "July 25 call"), as well as on the earlier April 21, 2019, telephone call (the "April 21 call"), and in all surrounding and related events, were constitutional, perfectly legal, completely appropriate, and taken in furtherance of our national interest.​

The attorneys also note that the best evidence is the telephone call transcript, which Trump released immediately. Ukrainian officials, from President Zelenskyy on down, all support the transcript and the tenor of Trump’s deals with Ukraine.

Read more here.....https://www.americanthinker.com/blo..._response_to_the_articles_of_impeachment.html

Read the full legal response here...."Dangerous, Brazen and Unlawful" -- BREAKING: Trump Defense Team Files First Response to Sham Impeachment -- WITH FULL DOCUMENT​

So, these same assfucks were dancing in the streets when Republivcans tried to undue the 1996 election?
Really?
That is their argument?

Typical Republican bullshit. They do something & then argue the other side can't do it.

I’m sure a lot of things may have occurred 24 years ago. Nothing to do with Don. Were you a volunteer for hilly’s campaign? Is that why you have cramps this month. They say chocolate may help.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The Constitution has not change. You assfucks used to loce the Constitution & now your defend a man that pisses on it every day.,

Why is that?

The Constitution says Congress decides where money is to spent., Your orange hero said " Fuck that. I want my wall"

 

[QuickHitCurepon]

The Democrats are working on a pipe dream and are going to be horribly disappointed for a long time.

 

[Butch_Coolidge]

This stuff is priceless.

Trump's legal team spelled out in great detail exactly why the House Democrat's partisan impeachment was a total sham. It illustrates why Democrats wanted to use Russian Collusion and not the Whistleblower as evidence of wrongdoing. It also shows that Democrats knew their arguments wouldn't stand up in a court of law which renders their claims of obstruction of congress totally unfounded. When Trump took congress to court in response to their demands for documents and witnesses....they immediately withdrew their demands. Then they rushed to impeach instead.

January 19, 2020
Trump’s attorneys issue a powerful response to the Articles of Impeachment
By Andrea Widburg
Anyone who has watched a Trump rally or followed Trump’s Twitter feed knows that he’s been open about his disdain for the House’s impeachment proceedings. However, now that the House formally delivered the Articles of Impeachment to the Senate, Trump’s lawyers can finally make known the President’s official legal stand against the Democrats’ blatant political effort to overturn the 2016 election.

In five-and-a-half fiery pages, Jay Alan Sekulow and Pat A. Cipollone attack both the impeachment process and the legal and factual bases (or lack thereof) underlying the articles of impeachment. Sekulow and Cipollone understand that the real audience is the American people, so the document is written in ordinary English, not legalese.

Regarding the entire impeachment, the lawyers state that this warped process attacks the American people and free elections:

The Articles of Impeachment submitted by House Democrats are a dangerous attack on the right of the American people to freely choose their President. This is a brazen and unlawful attempt to overturn the results of the 2016 election and interfere with the 2020 election-now just months away. The highly partisan and reckless obsession with impeaching the President began the day he was inaugurated and continues to this day.​

For the first Article of Impeachment, which alleges “abuse of power,” Sekulow and Cipollone explain that, contrary to the Constitution’s demand for “high Crimes and Misdemeanors,” the first Article fails to state any legal violation. Not only does it fail to identify actual legal wrongdoing, the facts alleged also fail to show that Trump abused his powers:

At all times, the President has faithfully and effectively executed the duties of his Office on behalf of the American people. The President's actions on the July 25,2019, telephone call with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine (the "July 25 call"), as well as on the earlier April 21, 2019, telephone call (the "April 21 call"), and in all surrounding and related events, were constitutional, perfectly legal, completely appropriate, and taken in furtherance of our national interest.​

The attorneys also note that the best evidence is the telephone call transcript, which Trump released immediately. Ukrainian officials, from President Zelenskyy on down, all support the transcript and the tenor of Trump’s deals with Ukraine.

Read more here.....https://www.americanthinker.com/blo..._response_to_the_articles_of_impeachment.html

Read the full legal response here...."Dangerous, Brazen and Unlawful" -- BREAKING: Trump Defense Team Files First Response to Sham Impeachment -- WITH FULL DOCUMENT​

So, these same assfucks were dancing in the streets when Republivcans tried to undue the 1996 election?
Really?
That is their argument?

Typical Republican bullshit. They do something & then argue the other side can't do it.

I’m sure a lot of things may have occurred 24 years ago. Nothing to do with Don. Were you a volunteer for hilly’s campaign? Is that why you have cramps this month. They say chocolate may help.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The Constitution has not change. You assfucks used to loce the Constitution & now your defend a man that pisses on it every day.,

Why is that?

The Constitution says Congress decides where money is to spent., Your orange hero said " Fuck that. I want my wall"

Your English is getting better, but the Russian still comes through in your posts.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[skookerasbil]

This stuff is priceless.

Trump's legal team spelled out in great detail exactly why the House Democrat's partisan impeachment was a total sham. It illustrates why Democrats wanted to use Russian Collusion and not the Whistleblower as evidence of wrongdoing. It also shows that Democrats knew their arguments wouldn't stand up in a court of law which renders their claims of obstruction of congress totally unfounded. When Trump took congress to court in response to their demands for documents and witnesses....they immediately withdrew their demands. Then they rushed to impeach instead.

January 19, 2020
Trump’s attorneys issue a powerful response to the Articles of Impeachment
By Andrea Widburg
Anyone who has watched a Trump rally or followed Trump’s Twitter feed knows that he’s been open about his disdain for the House’s impeachment proceedings. However, now that the House formally delivered the Articles of Impeachment to the Senate, Trump’s lawyers can finally make known the President’s official legal stand against the Democrats’ blatant political effort to overturn the 2016 election.

In five-and-a-half fiery pages, Jay Alan Sekulow and Pat A. Cipollone attack both the impeachment process and the legal and factual bases (or lack thereof) underlying the articles of impeachment. Sekulow and Cipollone understand that the real audience is the American people, so the document is written in ordinary English, not legalese.

Regarding the entire impeachment, the lawyers state that this warped process attacks the American people and free elections:

The Articles of Impeachment submitted by House Democrats are a dangerous attack on the right of the American people to freely choose their President. This is a brazen and unlawful attempt to overturn the results of the 2016 election and interfere with the 2020 election-now just months away. The highly partisan and reckless obsession with impeaching the President began the day he was inaugurated and continues to this day.​

For the first Article of Impeachment, which alleges “abuse of power,” Sekulow and Cipollone explain that, contrary to the Constitution’s demand for “high Crimes and Misdemeanors,” the first Article fails to state any legal violation. Not only does it fail to identify actual legal wrongdoing, the facts alleged also fail to show that Trump abused his powers:

At all times, the President has faithfully and effectively executed the duties of his Office on behalf of the American people. The President's actions on the July 25,2019, telephone call with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine (the "July 25 call"), as well as on the earlier April 21, 2019, telephone call (the "April 21 call"), and in all surrounding and related events, were constitutional, perfectly legal, completely appropriate, and taken in furtherance of our national interest.​

The attorneys also note that the best evidence is the telephone call transcript, which Trump released immediately. Ukrainian officials, from President Zelenskyy on down, all support the transcript and the tenor of Trump’s deals with Ukraine.

Read more here.....https://www.americanthinker.com/blo..._response_to_the_articles_of_impeachment.html

Read the full legal response here...."Dangerous, Brazen and Unlawful" -- BREAKING: Trump Defense Team Files First Response to Sham Impeachment -- WITH FULL DOCUMENT​

So, these same assfucks were dancing in the streets when Republivcans tried to undue the 1996 election?
Really?
That is their argument?

Typical Republican bullshit. They do something & then argue the other side can't do it.

I’m sure a lot of things may have occurred 24 years ago. Nothing to do with Don. Were you a volunteer for hilly’s campaign? Is that why you have cramps this month. They say chocolate may help.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The Constitution has not change. You assfucks used to loce the Constitution & now your defend a man that pisses on it every day.,

Why is that?

The Constitution says Congress decides where money is to spent., Your orange hero said " Fuck that. I want my wall"

LOL...…..we're gonna find out in the next couple of weeks all about the Constitution vs. makey-uppey interpretations of the Constitution.

Grab some extra sticks of butter at the stores this week s0n...……….

Maybe some of this too...…. PREPARATION H® Multi-Symptom Pain Relief Cream | PREPARATION H®

...........trust me.....you're gonna need it. Its gonna get very stingy.

 

[Butch_Coolidge]

This stuff is priceless.

Trump's legal team spelled out in great detail exactly why the House Democrat's partisan impeachment was a total sham. It illustrates why Democrats wanted to use Russian Collusion and not the Whistleblower as evidence of wrongdoing. It also shows that Democrats knew their arguments wouldn't stand up in a court of law which renders their claims of obstruction of congress totally unfounded. When Trump took congress to court in response to their demands for documents and witnesses....they immediately withdrew their demands. Then they rushed to impeach instead.

January 19, 2020
Trump’s attorneys issue a powerful response to the Articles of Impeachment
By Andrea Widburg
Anyone who has watched a Trump rally or followed Trump’s Twitter feed knows that he’s been open about his disdain for the House’s impeachment proceedings. However, now that the House formally delivered the Articles of Impeachment to the Senate, Trump’s lawyers can finally make known the President’s official legal stand against the Democrats’ blatant political effort to overturn the 2016 election.

In five-and-a-half fiery pages, Jay Alan Sekulow and Pat A. Cipollone attack both the impeachment process and the legal and factual bases (or lack thereof) underlying the articles of impeachment. Sekulow and Cipollone understand that the real audience is the American people, so the document is written in ordinary English, not legalese.

Regarding the entire impeachment, the lawyers state that this warped process attacks the American people and free elections:

The Articles of Impeachment submitted by House Democrats are a dangerous attack on the right of the American people to freely choose their President. This is a brazen and unlawful attempt to overturn the results of the 2016 election and interfere with the 2020 election-now just months away. The highly partisan and reckless obsession with impeaching the President began the day he was inaugurated and continues to this day.​

For the first Article of Impeachment, which alleges “abuse of power,” Sekulow and Cipollone explain that, contrary to the Constitution’s demand for “high Crimes and Misdemeanors,” the first Article fails to state any legal violation. Not only does it fail to identify actual legal wrongdoing, the facts alleged also fail to show that Trump abused his powers:

At all times, the President has faithfully and effectively executed the duties of his Office on behalf of the American people. The President's actions on the July 25,2019, telephone call with President Volodymyr Zelenskyy of Ukraine (the "July 25 call"), as well as on the earlier April 21, 2019, telephone call (the "April 21 call"), and in all surrounding and related events, were constitutional, perfectly legal, completely appropriate, and taken in furtherance of our national interest.​

The attorneys also note that the best evidence is the telephone call transcript, which Trump released immediately. Ukrainian officials, from President Zelenskyy on down, all support the transcript and the tenor of Trump’s deals with Ukraine.

Read more here.....https://www.americanthinker.com/blo..._response_to_the_articles_of_impeachment.html

Read the full legal response here...."Dangerous, Brazen and Unlawful" -- BREAKING: Trump Defense Team Files First Response to Sham Impeachment -- WITH FULL DOCUMENT​

So, these same assfucks were dancing in the streets when Republivcans tried to undue the 1996 election?
Really?
That is their argument?

Typical Republican bullshit. They do something & then argue the other side can't do it.

I’m sure a lot of things may have occurred 24 years ago. Nothing to do with Don. Were you a volunteer for hilly’s campaign? Is that why you have cramps this month. They say chocolate may help.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

The Constitution has not change. You assfucks used to loce the Constitution & now your defend a man that pisses on it every day.,

Why is that?

The Constitution says Congress decides where money is to spent., Your orange hero said " Fuck that. I want my wall"

LOL...…..we're gonna find out in the next couple of weeks all about the Constitution vs. makey-uppey interpretations of the Constitution.

Grab some extra sticks of butter at the stores this week s0n...……….

Maybe some of this too...…. PREPARATION H[emoji2400] Multi-Symptom Pain Relief Cream | PREPARATION H[emoji2400]

...........trust me.....you're gonna need it. Its gonna get very stingy.

You can’t scare them. They like Ass play. Just another Saturday night.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

 

[EvilCat Breath]

18 minutes.

18 minutes after the election results were in, democrats vowed to begin impeachment.

It started earlier than that.

Could Trump Be Impeached Shortly After He Takes Office? - Politico, April 2016

BECAUSE OF WHAT TRUMP said and did on his campaign...

OF COURSE impeachment would be on everyone's tongue, not because they were creating things to do it, to get him out of office,but because of how he thought and what he said his stances were, WERE IMPEACHABLE OFFENSES...

From your article;


Donald Trump isn’t even the Republican nominee yet. But his incendiary rhetoric, most notably about killing the families of terrorists and bringing back torture, has critics on the right and the left discussing the most extreme of countermeasures at an unusually early point in the race.

“Impeachment” is already on the lips of pundits, newspaper editorials, constitutional scholars, and even a few members of Congress. From the right, Washington attorney Bruce Fein puts the odds at 50/50 that a President Trump commits impeachable offenses as president.

You people need to be eithervcompletely defeated and/or relocated to your own One Party Rule country. Modern Progressives are no longer Americans

you are the party that supports lawlessness, and a monarchy, a King, instead of a constitutional republic.... you are the danger to our Nation!

Then you need to do something about it. It's the future of the nation. Gather your forces.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

That was then, and this is now, years later. When the incident first happened, vs developing a diplomatic policy to handle it.

Nice try but the underlying principle of giving Ukraine aid so it can ward off the rapacious Russians hasn't changed at all,
has it. When you defend a lie it makes you part of that lie.

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

The Constitution has not change. You assfucks used to loce the Constitution & now your defend a man that pisses on it every day.,

Why is that?

The Constitution says Congress decides where money is to spent., Your orange hero said " Fuck that. I want my wall"

Grow a brain stem, you clown!
All the little leftist piss-ant judges have tried to stop the POTUS from taking excess funds from a military fund and applying it to the wall and failed. Appeals Court Allows Trump To Divert $3.6 Billion In Military Funds For Border Wall

His number one job is to make the nation secure and the leftist judges and deviant democrat politicians are trying to thwart him but they are failing. If you were any stupider you would be in a pot sitting on a window sill.

 

[Wapasha]

18 minutes.

18 minutes after the election results were in, democrats vowed to begin impeachment.

It started earlier than that.

Could Trump Be Impeached Shortly After He Takes Office? - Politico, April 2016

Pelosi said they have been working on impeaching Trump for over 2 1/2 years. As if the intentions and agenda of these fools have not been completely transparent.

 

[Wapasha]

The Constitution has not change. You assfucks used to loce the Constitution & now your defend a man that pisses on it every day.,

Why is that?

The Constitution says Congress decides where money is to spent., Your orange hero said " Fuck that. I want my wall"

It was Congress, who loves to shirk their Constitutional duties by writing legislation to empower the president to perform their duties for them. Congress wrote a law to empower Trump to use money to build his wall.

Funny how the dems love and applaud their president who uses his pen and his phone to circumvent Congress. but the next election cycle, they squeal like stuck pigs when a Republican is the Preezy, armed with the laws congress passed to legally circumvent Congress.

Stop encouraging Congress to create an ever more powerful executive, it will spare you a lot of tears when your guy is not president..

 

[Wapasha]

first, let me ask... what do you think a high misdemeanor is....?

It's not what i think it is, it's what the definition of a high misdemeanor was back in the day when the Constitution was written.

Nathan Bailey’s Etymological Dictionary of 1721:

High MISDEMEANOR, a Crime of a heinous nature, next to high Treason​

 

[lantern2814]

18 minutes.

18 minutes after the election results were in, democrats vowed to begin impeachment.

It started earlier than that.

Could Trump Be Impeached Shortly After He Takes Office? - Politico, April 2016

BECAUSE OF WHAT TRUMP said and did on his campaign...

OF COURSE impeachment would be on everyone's tongue, not because they were creating things to do it, to get him out of office,but because of how he thought and what he said his stances were, WERE IMPEACHABLE OFFENSES...

From your article;


Donald Trump isn’t even the Republican nominee yet. But his incendiary rhetoric, most notably about killing the families of terrorists and bringing back torture, has critics on the right and the left discussing the most extreme of countermeasures at an unusually early point in the race.

“Impeachment” is already on the lips of pundits, newspaper editorials, constitutional scholars, and even a few members of Congress. From the right, Washington attorney Bruce Fein puts the odds at 50/50 that a President Trump commits impeachable offenses as president.

You people need to be eithervcompletely defeated and/or relocated to your own One Party Rule country. Modern Progressives are no longer Americans

you are the party that supports lawlessness, and a monarchy, a King, instead of a constitutional republic.... you are the danger to our Nation!

No, uneducated Gruberites like you are the true danger. Your total TDS renders your rantings meaningless. Now quit fantasizing about getting high ( seeing as you emphasized that word countless times) and learn something instead of lying all the time.

 

[Care4all]

The President has the sole power to determine Foreign Policy. A delay in Foreign Policy is his right, and even with what I consider an unconstitutional limit on how long a president can with hold or delay Foreign Aid, the President still released it within that artificial deadline.

NO IT IS NOT the president's perogative on foreign aid passed by congress.

IT BROKE THE LAW, the Impoundment control act of 1974....

please stop lying.

Dear Child of Hell. Calling someone telling the truth a liar because you are a liar, is committing the offense of lying and doubling down on slander and false accusations. You will be held accountable for that on Judgment Day.

There was no violation of a so called "Impoundment Control Act" The funds were released within the time frame required. In fact, I would venture to say that this so called "Impoundment Act" is going to end up at SCOTUS and found Unconstitutional due to your little COUP 2.0 in the future.

I do not lie. You are ill-informed.


Impeachment: White House broke law by withholding Ukraine aid, GAO says

White House violated the law by freezing Ukraine aid, GAO says


GAO concludes Trump administration broke law by withholding Ukraine aid - CNNPolitics


https://www.washingtonpost.com/busi...0ea7aa-37a3-11ea-9c01-d674772db96b_story.html

 

[Indeependent]

The President has the sole power to determine Foreign Policy. A delay in Foreign Policy is his right, and even with what I consider an unconstitutional limit on how long a president can with hold or delay Foreign Aid, the President still released it within that artificial deadline.

NO IT IS NOT the president's perogative on foreign aid passed by congress.

IT BROKE THE LAW, the Impoundment control act of 1974....

please stop lying.

Dear Child of Hell. Calling someone telling the truth a liar because you are a liar, is committing the offense of lying and doubling down on slander and false accusations. You will be held accountable for that on Judgment Day.

There was no violation of a so called "Impoundment Control Act" The funds were released within the time frame required. In fact, I would venture to say that this so called "Impoundment Act" is going to end up at SCOTUS and found Unconstitutional due to your little COUP 2.0 in the future.

I do not lie. You are ill-informed.


Impeachment: White House broke law by withholding Ukraine aid, GAO says

White House violated the law by freezing Ukraine aid, GAO says


GAO concludes Trump administration broke law by withholding Ukraine aid - CNNPolitics


https://www.washingtonpost.com/busi...0ea7aa-37a3-11ea-9c01-d674772db96b_story.html

Kewl story...

 

[Care4all]

first, let me ask... what do you think a high misdemeanor is....?

It's not what i think it is, it's what the definition of a high misdemeanor was back in the day when the Constitution was written.

Nathan Bailey’s Etymological Dictionary of 1721:

High MISDEMEANOR, a Crime of a heinous nature, next to high Treason​

then what was a High CRIME? Why list both High Crimes and Misdemeanors....

Hamilton, in federalist papers #65 said it was ''breaking the public trust, an abuse of power.''

which is similar to treason, on a lesser level.... breaking the public's trust, is government corruption.... abusing the power the public gave the president or a dereliction of duty to put what is best, for the USA first.... not always is breaking a law or statute....

AS an extreme example: A president has every right to choose supreme court justices, but if he had two openings and appointed a Michael Avanatti and a Jeffrey Epstein if he were alive, or an Ivanka Trump, and Melania Trump, that would be an abuse of power, a break of the public's trust in him, though not breaking any law.....

or another exaggerated example could be him staying in his PJ's and watching tv all day and every day... and never showing up for work... it breaks no laws, but still an abuse of the power we give the president, in the sense of a dereliction of duty....



Though, the Constitution does leave it up to congress to decide....

 

[Superbadbrutha]

"Dangerous, Brazen and Unlawful" -- BREAKING: Trump Defense Team Files First Response to Sham Impeachment -- WITH FULL DOCUMENT

Pretty much spells everything out.....any honest lawyer with a rudimentary background would agree with this statement.

The fact is, most hyper-partisan hacks, who have their head buried in Trump's posterior, would think that Trump's team kicked the "House Democrats In The Balls."
Where as liberal Constitutional scholars, think otherwise.
‘Alternative law:’ Constitutional scholar on the Dershowitz defense of Trump
So, there we have it! Each sides hyper-partisans have their take, but who is Constitutionally right?

Alan is a democrat and won’t vote for trump,, he’s telling all of you democrats you have TDS.. get help

Dershowitz is an ass clown and has already had to eat his words.

 

[busybee01]

Trump used lowlife like Giuliani because he would not face any opposition to do illegal things. The government employees who came forward and provided what information they had are patriots. Col Vindman is a patriot who put his life on the line for this country. You are a piece of lowlife garbage.

Just fuck off! You post is so moronic it refutes itself. Vindman put his life on the line...LOL!

^You are the moron who attacks our soldiers. You fuck off you piece of filth.