Trump’s Approval Ratings Lowest on Record

Toro

Diamond Member
Sep 29, 2005
106,563
41,353
2,250
Surfing the Oceans of Liquidity
At the 500-day mark of his Presidency, tied with Ford.

6429DE61-D305-4ACA-B242-AA038D2E6B52.png


The Daily Shot: Americans Increasingly Priced Out of the Housing Market
 
FAKE NEWS

It's actually an excellent example of "fake news", which in the post the OP glosses over the 2nd part of the table, and ignores the fact that he is only a few percentage points below Obama at the 500 day mark.

Fake News isn't usually blatant lying, it's aggressive spin of a given set of facts to frame them in the viewpoint desired by the author.
 
Fake News isn't usually blatant lying, it's aggressive spin of a given set of facts to frame them in the viewpoint desired by the author.
Then the definition has changed.

The original use of the term was to describe the comically fabricated "news stories" found on Breitbart, WND, Alex Jones, et al., during the Obama administration.

That was before Trump commandeered the term, of course.
.
 
Blah Blah... more hyper Trump hysteria and you know it Toro.
You are a math guy.... so you then know that Obama's numbers are virtually the exact same and within margin of error. You also know that our country is severely divided, and not this divided since the mid 60's.
And that division is the key.
 
Fake News isn't usually blatant lying, it's aggressive spin of a given set of facts to frame them in the viewpoint desired by the author.
Then the definition has changed.

The original use of the term was to describe the comically fabricated "news stories" found on Breitbart, WND, Alex Jones, et al., during the Obama administration.

That was before Trump commandeered the term, of course.
.

Those are of course the most extreme versions of "fake news" and was the original definition.

Yes, Trump did extend the definition, however as we all know definitions can change over time. The concept of a "liberal" is a prime example.
 
Fake News isn't usually blatant lying, it's aggressive spin of a given set of facts to frame them in the viewpoint desired by the author.
Then the definition has changed.

The original use of the term was to describe the comically fabricated "news stories" found on Breitbart, WND, Alex Jones, et al., during the Obama administration.

That was before Trump commandeered the term, of course.
.

Those are of course the most extreme versions of "fake news" and was the original definition.

Yes, Trump did extend the definition, however as we all know definitions can change over time. The concept of a "liberal" is a prime example.
Tough to keep up when partisan politics controls the language.
.
 
Fake News isn't usually blatant lying, it's aggressive spin of a given set of facts to frame them in the viewpoint desired by the author.
Then the definition has changed.

The original use of the term was to describe the comically fabricated "news stories" found on Breitbart, WND, Alex Jones, et al., during the Obama administration.

That was before Trump commandeered the term, of course.
.

Those are of course the most extreme versions of "fake news" and was the original definition.

Yes, Trump did extend the definition, however as we all know definitions can change over time. The concept of a "liberal" is a prime example.
Tough to keep up when partisan politics controls the language.
.

They don't "control" the language. What they do is have the ability to shape the trend of the language because of their ability to use their strength of their numbers and their single mindedness to change definitions over time.

That of course works both positively and negatively.
 
Doing better than Reagan in the republican party?

One has to remember that this type of polling doesn't exactly have a small margin of error. You can probably look at the two poll numbers next to the one of interest and consider them pretty much even. The trending is over I'd say 5-6 different presidents before you get a true "difference"
 
Fake News isn't usually blatant lying, it's aggressive spin of a given set of facts to frame them in the viewpoint desired by the author.
Then the definition has changed.

The original use of the term was to describe the comically fabricated "news stories" found on Breitbart, WND, Alex Jones, et al., during the Obama administration.

That was before Trump commandeered the term, of course.
.
Yes, now fake news means "trump doesn't like it".
 
Fake News isn't usually blatant lying, it's aggressive spin of a given set of facts to frame them in the viewpoint desired by the author.
Then the definition has changed.

The original use of the term was to describe the comically fabricated "news stories" found on Breitbart, WND, Alex Jones, et al., during the Obama administration.

That was before Trump commandeered the term, of course.
.
Yes, now fake news means "trump doesn't like it".

Considering the Media is out to get him, there is plenty of things out there for him not to like.
 

Forum List

Back
Top