martybegan
Diamond Member
- Apr 5, 2010
- 85,183
- 35,694
- 2,300
If you think that the law itself that I posted, up against Trump's actions, are not a foundation for discussion/debate sitting on it's own footing, then it is clear that you are conceding your position. Thanks! Your conclusion is a concession. Not sure why you are even here?I don't have to. The law does it for us.Still not quoting properly. You are a special kind of stupid, aren't ya?
No proof at all Trump violated either law. Keep trying.
We'll, it appears we won't know from you, because you aren't parsing anything out.
And speaking of "special kind of stupid", if you can't engage/challenge the wording of the law and deduce for us how it does not apply to Trump, then the only "special" here is you, because you only supply conjecture. Which is not a basis for a counter rebuttal. So, as long as you keep posting, and saying nothing, then you will stay our "special kind" now won't you?
Lets see, maybe this fixed it.
I don't have to do the legwork on this, you are the one trying to convince people he broke these laws. burden of proof on you.
This is a debating forum right, not a court of law? Your silly five word analogy notwithstanding, as a way of dodging the debate, is cute.
At any rate, it doesn't matter, because you aren't about to debate the law with me anyway. As a matter of fact, this crew on the Right isn't debating much of anything as it relates to Trump/Russia. No collusion no obstruction right?
you haven't produced anything to debate about. you copypaste the law, say Trump broke it, then provide zero proof, evidence or even supposition to support it.
You are a version of the South park Underpants gnomes
1. Accuse Trump of bad things
2 ??????????
3. Impeachment!
No, it's my simple point that your accusations are so baseless that they do not merit serious debate. Go find other threads I spend actual time on. They contain ACTUAL POINTS, not the feverish wishes of a mincing moron such as yourself.