“Trump Under Investigation Narrative” Begins Falling Apart – ABC: No Mueller-Trump Investigation…

[bripat9643]

The snowflakes in here love to say this, but it turns out to be another one of their big lies:

“Trump Under Investigation Narrative” Begins Falling Apart – ABC: No Mueller-Trump Investigation…​

Almost every intellectually honest political observer recognized the Washington Post report about President Trump being under investigation appeared manufactured on the thinnest of available anonymous precepts.

In the wake of the Post report, when Asst. AG Rod Rosenstein delivered an unanticipated press release stating not to trust media reports from “anonymous officials” all doubt was essentially confirmed. There is no ‘there’ there; and President Trump was not/is not under investigation. Just another failed media attempt by The Washington Post to undermine the administration, with a blend of partisanship designed to generate an ideological self-fulfilling prophecy.

Yes, that means the prior Washington Post report was entirely false; which makes that the eleventh time CNN, The New York Times, or the Washington Post has run a report that was entirely false. They know it, it’s not false by accident – it is false by design.​

 

[Norman]

A other baseless fake narrative dies. What a surprise.

Will they have to attempt to kill more politicians who disagree with them in return?

 

[Care4all]

Rosenstein also said the Justice dept would NOT confirm one way or the other....it is their policy not to say whether someone is under investigation or not...

so once again, it was STILL left open with us left hanging...no confirmation of an investigation on trump, but no denial either....from the justice dept.

 

[theDoctorisIn]

"Your anonymous sources are wrong because my anonymous sources say so!"

 

[Rustic]

Rosenstein also said the Justice dept would NOT confirm one way or the other....it is their policy not to say whether someone is under investigation or not...

so once again, it was STILL left open with us left hanging...no confirmation of an investigation on trump, but no denial either....from the justice dept.

… And still no Russian connection. Lol

 

[OKTexas]

Just another example why there should be no press shield law to protect reporters that knowingly distribute classified information. If they were required by law to name their sources this crap would stop.


.

 

[Care4all]

Just another example why there should be no press shield law to protect reporters that knowingly distribute classified information. If they were required by law to name their sources this crap would stop.


.

we would also only be given the news big govt wanted us to have....which is worse?

if it's not information that's going to get someone killed or reduce our national security then I think we should have it...it's OUR gvt, we pay them....they work for US....too much, that is of no security issue, is kept from us imo.

 

[Rustic]

Just another example why there should be no press shield law to protect reporters that knowingly distribute classified information. If they were required by law to name their sources this crap would stop.


.

we would also only be given the news big govt wanted us to have....which is worse?

if it's not information that's going to get someone killed or reduce our national security then I think we should have it...it's OUR gvt, we pay them....they work for US....too much, that is of no security issue, is kept from us imo.

The federal government works for us? Why don't you tell them that… What a fucking joke LOL

 

[OKTexas]

Just another example why there should be no press shield law to protect reporters that knowingly distribute classified information. If they were required by law to name their sources this crap would stop.


.

we would also only be given the news big govt wanted us to have....which is worse?

if it's not information that's going to get someone killed or reduce our national security then I think we should have it...it's OUR gvt, we pay them....they work for US....too much, that is of no security issue, is kept from us imo.

So you think publishing the DNC and Podesta emails was a good thing?


.

 

[Care4all]

Just another example why there should be no press shield law to protect reporters that knowingly distribute classified information. If they were required by law to name their sources this crap would stop.


.

we would also only be given the news big govt wanted us to have....which is worse?

if it's not information that's going to get someone killed or reduce our national security then I think we should have it...it's OUR gvt, we pay them....they work for US....too much, that is of no security issue, is kept from us imo.

So you think publishing the DNC and Podesta emails was a good thing?


.

those were private entity's emails....the govt was not keeping them from us, the DNC workers nor Podesta works for us, the tax payer....

 

[OKTexas]

Just another example why there should be no press shield law to protect reporters that knowingly distribute classified information. If they were required by law to name their sources this crap would stop.


.

we would also only be given the news big govt wanted us to have....which is worse?

if it's not information that's going to get someone killed or reduce our national security then I think we should have it...it's OUR gvt, we pay them....they work for US....too much, that is of no security issue, is kept from us imo.

So you think publishing the DNC and Podesta emails was a good thing?


.

those were private entity's emails....the govt was not keeping them from us, the DNC workers nor Podesta works for us, the tax payer....

They were obtained by criminal activity, just like government leaks. I guess you're a moral relativist like most regressives.


.

 

[TheDude]

The snowflakes in here love to say this, but it turns out to be another one of their big lies:

“Trump Under Investigation Narrative” Begins Falling Apart – ABC: No Mueller-Trump Investigation…​

Almost every intellectually honest political observer recognized the Washington Post report about President Trump being under investigation appeared manufactured on the thinnest of available anonymous precepts.

In the wake of the Post report, when Asst. AG Rod Rosenstein delivered an unanticipated press release stating not to trust media reports from “anonymous officials” all doubt was essentially confirmed. There is no ‘there’ there; and President Trump was not/is not under investigation. Just another failed media attempt by The Washington Post to undermine the administration, with a blend of partisanship designed to generate an ideological self-fulfilling prophecy.

Yes, that means the prior Washington Post report was entirely false; which makes that the eleventh time CNN, The New York Times, or the Washington Post has run a report that was entirely false. They know it, it’s not false by accident – it is false by design.​

Lib nation has reach new depths, and it's progressive.

 

[easyt65]

After you conduct a witch hunt for 10+ months and can't produce any evidence, I guess the best way to save face is by declaring the target of your witch hunt was never under investigation.

 

[Care4all]

After you conduct a witch hunt for 10+ months and can't produce any evidence, I guess the best way to save face is by declaring the target of your witch hunt was never under investigation.

Your Benghazi / Obama/ Hillary witch hunt lasted 4 straight years, 9 investigations and no criminality was found

 

[brummelben]

The snowflakes in here love to say this, but it turns out to be another one of their big lies:

“Trump Under Investigation Narrative” Begins Falling Apart – ABC: No Mueller-Trump Investigation…​

Almost every intellectually honest political observer recognized the Washington Post report about President Trump being under investigation appeared manufactured on the thinnest of available anonymous precepts.

In the wake of the Post report, when Asst. AG Rod Rosenstein delivered an unanticipated press release stating not to trust media reports from “anonymous officials” all doubt was essentially confirmed. There is no ‘there’ there; and President Trump was not/is not under investigation. Just another failed media attempt by The Washington Post to undermine the administration, with a blend of partisanship designed to generate an ideological self-fulfilling prophecy.

Yes, that means the prior Washington Post report was entirely false; which makes that the eleventh time CNN, The New York Times, or the Washington Post has run a report that was entirely false. They know it, it’s not false by accident – it is false by design.​

Did Donald lie to us, when he himself said he was under investigation?

 

[brummelben]

After you conduct a witch hunt for 10+ months and can't produce any evidence, I guess the best way to save face is by declaring the target of your witch hunt was never under investigation.

There has never been a 10 month investigation, its only in your wet dreams.

 

[Theowl32]

Libs usual response to truth...

 

[Care4all]

Just another example why there should be no press shield law to protect reporters that knowingly distribute classified information. If they were required by law to name their sources this crap would stop.


.

we would also only be given the news big govt wanted us to have....which is worse?

if it's not information that's going to get someone killed or reduce our national security then I think we should have it...it's OUR gvt, we pay them....they work for US....too much, that is of no security issue, is kept from us imo.

So you think publishing the DNC and Podesta emails was a good thing?


.

those were private entity's emails....the govt was not keeping them from us, the DNC workers nor Podesta works for us, the tax payer....

They were obtained by criminal activity, just like government leaks. I guess you're a moral relativist like most regressives.


.

The two different examples are not equivalent....

 

[brummelben]

Libs usual response to truth...

The only truth is the federal investigation of not only the trump administration but his transition team as well.

 

[ColonelAngus]

That Trump/Putin collusion isn't helping relations in Syria.

Trump isn't acting like a Russian Spy.