Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump, Trump

[zaangalewa]

Since a long time we (=the western world) have the problem the poor became more poor and the rich more rich. Now - an effect of the phenomenon Trump, I guess - have additionally the problem that the number of millionaires worldwide is sinking.

Did you get a job because of Trump? Do you know someone who got a job because of Trump?

The poor became, poorer, in the USA than elsewhere?

I hate this waste of words and energy. Everyone knows since a very long time now that the income of the poorer 50% of the populations in the western world did not grow since decades. That's not only money - that's also a big deficite in justice.

The poor of California are worst off then the poor in Liberia?

Liberia? Where's Liberia? What do you know about Liberia? Nothing, isn't it? Only one other "shit hole" country of the rest of the world, isn't it?

The poor in Brazil have it better than the poor here?

Oh by the way: What are doing the totally stupid and criminal pentecostal churches from the 19th century of the USA in Brazil in the beginning of the third millenium? Why steal US-American criminals the money of the poor people of Brazil with conjuring tricks?

The poor in Mexico come here by the millions because they would prefer worst conditions?

The people who come over the border between the USA and Mexico come from all over South-America. The Monroe Doctrine made clear only the USA is able to overtake the reponsibility for the nations of South-America. And what did you do there since 1823? Did you create a paradise there or do you destroy the paradises there?

When you speak, it is pure ignorance.

Fascinating: Your stupidity let me sense what anger could be.

Trump is also ruining the wealth of millionaires?

Yes. Trump costs.

Yet the stock market has set a record high.

Roulette is a nice game.

Employment has set a record high.

Good qualified jobs or slavery jobs?

Corporations, companies, individuals enjoyed a huge reduction in taxes.

Do they? The last calculation I heard was Trump costed every US-American of the so called "middle class" every year additionally $670.

Again, when you speak it is pure ignorance.

Jobs, yes, I can say I have a job because of Trump.

Okay. That's a reason for you to defend him (If you are not such a machine-gun-liar as Trump is on him own). Will you lose this job, when he will not be any longer president of the USA?

 

[Bush92]

I was against Trump, but with all the violence, hate, and vile insults of the left of the recent days, I am now going to join the simple Americans, and join the fight to stop the radical Leftists.

Liberty must at all hazards be supported. We have a right to it, derived from our Maker. But if we had not, our fathers have earned and bought it for us, at the expense of their ease, their estates, their pleasure, and their blood.

John Adams, A Dissertation on the Canon and Feudal Law, 1765

They have went insane. It’s truly becoming a danger to our entire Western society and our NATO alliance. Democrats have went off the rails and help our enemies.

 

[Bush92]

Since a long time we (=the western world) have the problem the poor became more poor and the rich more rich. Now - an effect of the phenomenon Trump, I guess - have additionally the problem that the number of millionaires worldwide is sinking.

Did you get a job because of Trump? Do you know someone who got a job because of Trump?

The poor became, poorer, in the USA than elsewhere?

I hate this waste of words and energy. Everyone knows since a very long time now that the income of the poorer 50% of the populations in the western world did not grow since decades. That's not only money - that's also a big deficite in justice.

The poor of California are worst off then the poor in Liberia?

Liberia? Where's Liberia? What do you know about Liberia? Nothing, isn't it? Only one other "shit hole" country of the rest of the world, isn't it?

The poor in Brazil have it better than the poor here?

Oh by the way: What are doing the totally stupid and criminal pentecostal churches from the 19th century of the USA in Brazil in the beginning of the third millenium? Why steal US-American criminals the money of the poor people of Brazil with conjuring tricks?

The poor in Mexico come here by the millions because they would prefer worst conditions?

The people who come over the border between the USA and Mexico come from all over South-America. The Monroe Doctrine made clear only the USA is able to overtake the reponsibility for the nations of South-America. And what did you do there since 1823? Did you create a paradise there or do you destroy the paradises there?

When you speak, it is pure ignorance.

Fascinating: Your stupidity let me sense what anger could be.

Trump is also ruining the wealth of millionaires?

Yes. Trump costs.

Yet the stock market has set a record high.

Roulette is a nice game.

Employment has set a record high.

Good qualified jobs or slavery jobs?

Corporations, companies, individuals enjoyed a huge reduction in taxes.

Do they? The last calculation I heard was Trump costed every US-American of the so called "middle class" every year additionally $670.

Again, when you speak it is pure ignorance.

Jobs, yes, I can say I have a job because of Trump.

Okay. That's a reason for you to defend him (If you are not such a machine-gun-liar as Trump is on him own). Will you lose this job, when he will not be any longer president of the USA?

Liberia is an West African nation established as a homeland for freed slaves from the United States of America. I served in combat with three men from Liberia as they are allowed to join US Armed Forces. One of them went back and became a warlord in Liberia. Cold blooded killer. I mean cold. What do ya do? I choose to protect my community and not have dumb shit like “sanctuary cities.”

 

[elektra]

Okay. That's a reason for you to defend him (If you are not such a machine-gun-liar as Trump is on him own). Will you lose this job, when he will not be any longer president of the USA?

I am sorry but you really are an idiot, I challenged you to provide a factual response to your opinion. To validate your opinion. You responded, with nothing but an opinionated rant. You reiterated your opinion. You did not provide one fact to prove anything you believe.

Trump did nothing to create the World that you hate. Trump did not create the poor. Democrats and Socialism did that. The lack of Capitalism and the Justice of the USA in the World is the problem. The World needs more Trump and a Great America.

Your opinion rings simply as a rant from a lunatic.

I gave you plenty of chances to respond with fact. You ignore your blatant errors. You respond with Adam Smith when nobody mentioned the character. It is as if you have a head full of anger and needed a place to vomit.

 

[elektra]

Intentional ignorance is your problem. Trump is not a hero nor is the USA a holy nation. I guess the best is "you" call indeed all your soldiers back to the USA and will try to live in your own country in peace, prosperity and harmony before your nation tries to tell others what they have to do or not to do.

This is a classic liberal leftist progressive communist marxist rant.

Freedom and Justice is not something we force on peoples. Freedom and Justice is what people naturally want. That is why people of all nations attempt to come to the USA. That is why our military fights.

Get over it, if you are against us, you are the bad guy.

 

[dudmuck]

Okay. That's a reason for you to defend him (If you are not such a machine-gun-liar as Trump is on him own). Will you lose this job, when he will not be any longer president of the USA?

I am sorry but you really are an idiot, I challenged you to provide a factual response to your opinion. To validate your opinion. You responded, with nothing but an opinionated rant. You reiterated your opinion. You did not provide one fact to prove anything you believe.

Trump did nothing to create the World that you hate. Trump did not create the poor. Democrats and Socialism did that. The lack of Capitalism and the Justice of the USA in the World is the problem. The World needs more Trump and a Great America.

Your opinion rings simply as a rant from a lunatic.

I gave you plenty of chances to respond with fact. You ignore your blatant errors. You respond with Adam Smith when nobody mentioned the character. It is as if you have a head full of anger and needed a place to vomit.

3 people have as much wealth as half the country, and this is democrats fault how?

 

[elektra]

3 people have as much wealth as half the country, and this is democrats fault how?

I never made a statement in which your response applies. If you care to discuss this as a topic I am more than happy to.

 

[elektra]

3 people have as much wealth as half the country, and this is democrats fault how?

Why is it a problem that 3 people are rich? How does that affect you in the least?

 

[dudmuck]

3 people have as much wealth as half the country, and this is democrats fault how?

Why is it a problem that 3 people are rich? How does that affect you in the least?

Back in 2016, a working paper published by a group of academics from such esteemed institutions as the University of Oxford, London School of Economics and Cornell University found that as the rich get richer the rest of us get grumpier.

De Neve and his colleagues measured the share of taxable income held by the top 1 per cent in each country over time, and charted that against reported levels of life satisfaction and positive or negative emotional wellbeing across the population.

The findings were quite clear: in societies where the richest control the majority of the country’s income, the population as a whole is more likely to report feeling “stressed”, “worried” or “angry”.

“We started our research by asking if income inequality at the very top really matters to the life evaluation of the average person,” said De Neve’s co-author Nattavudh Powdthavee of the LSE. “The results have shown conclusively that it does.”

The logic behind their theory is not complicated. As the rich get richer, they are responsible for pricing certain goods and services out of the reach of the rest of the population – think top schools, the best hospitals and property in particularly desirable locations.

The world’s richest became $1 trillion wealthier in 2017 and here’s why that should worry us

 

[elektra]

The logic behind their theory is not complicated. As the rich get richer, they are responsible for pricing certain goods and services out of the reach of the rest of the population – think top schools, the best hospitals and property in particularly desirable locations.

The world’s richest became $1 trillion wealthier in 2017 and here’s why that should worry us

The rich do not control the top schools? Typically they are controlled by socialists and democrat politicians.

The best hospitals were built by the rich? Many rich people use their money to end disease? For free! Your idea that the rich would prevent anyone from receiving medical care at a hospital is really insane.

Yes, the rich do control property in desirable locations. A lot of that has to do with zoning and simply how things work in a free world.

The rich price goods out of reach of the rest of the population? Which goods and services do you speak of. Specifically.

Just because you feel stressed, and can find a study that says so, does not make it the fault of the rich. It also does not support your original post.

3 rich people stop you from having which service and or goods, how?

 

[dudmuck]

The logic behind their theory is not complicated. As the rich get richer, they are responsible for pricing certain goods and services out of the reach of the rest of the population – think top schools, the best hospitals and property in particularly desirable locations.

The world’s richest became $1 trillion wealthier in 2017 and here’s why that should worry us

The rich do not control the top schools? Typically they are controlled by socialists and democrat politicians.

The best hospitals were built by the rich? Many rich people use their money to end disease? For free! Your idea that the rich would prevent anyone from receiving medical care at a hospital is really insane.

Yes, the rich do control property in desirable locations. A lot of that has to do with zoning and simply how things work in a free world.

The rich price goods out of reach of the rest of the population? Which goods and services do you speak of. Specifically.

Just because you feel stressed, and can find a study that says so, does not make it the fault of the rich. It also does not support your original post.

3 rich people stop you from having which service and or goods, how?

for schools; how parents buy college admissions.
for healthcare: Compared to higher-income Americans, low-income people face greater barriers to accessing medical care.

study shows, overall well being drops as national inequality rises.

Nick Bryer, the head of inequality campaigns at Oxfam, said: "This adds to a growing body of evidence that extreme inequality is bad for everybody. It is bad for social cohesion, it's bad for economic growth, and it's bad for democracy."

 

[elektra]

for schools; how parents buy college admissions.
for healthcare: Compared to higher-income Americans, low-income people face greater barriers to accessing medical care.

study shows, overall well being drops as national inequality rises.

Nick Bryer, the head of inequality campaigns at Oxfam, said: "This adds to a growing body of evidence that extreme inequality is bad for everybody. It is bad for social cohesion, it's bad for economic growth, and it's bad for democracy."

Is that your idea of discussing something, you go to google, link to propaganda, and I must follow your link and respond? You have no knowledge in your head, you must google everything?

Just cause you can use the extreme liberal propaganda platform known as google to find links to others who have formed your opinion does not make what you believe even close to the truth.

How about quoting from your link, offering your reasoning as to how that quote supports your post?

 

[dudmuck]

for schools; how parents buy college admissions.
for healthcare: Compared to higher-income Americans, low-income people face greater barriers to accessing medical care.

study shows, overall well being drops as national inequality rises.

Nick Bryer, the head of inequality campaigns at Oxfam, said: "This adds to a growing body of evidence that extreme inequality is bad for everybody. It is bad for social cohesion, it's bad for economic growth, and it's bad for democracy."

Is that your idea of discussing something, you go to google, link to propaganda, and I must follow your link and respond? You have no knowledge in your head, you must google everything?

Just cause you can use the extreme liberal propaganda platform known as google to find links to others who have formed your opinion does not make what you believe even close to the truth.

How about quoting from your link, offering your reasoning as to how that quote supports your post?

This is from a report generated by a joint effort between Said Business School and policy analysis department at Cornell University.

You can hear the same message from PBS, which as about as unbiased as you can get.

 

[elektra]

You can hear the same message from PBS, which as about as unbiased as you can get.

I literally did laugh out loud, at this comment. PBS is not biased. You are about as naive as they come. I will get back to your other comments. Even though you can not quote your links and offer commentary that is relevant to the original assertion you attempted to articulate. I can go as far as to say, your links have nothing to do with you opinion that you posted.

 

[dudmuck]

You can hear the same message from PBS, which as about as unbiased as you can get.

I literally did laugh out loud, at this comment. PBS is not biased. You are about as naive as they come. I will get back to your other comments. Even though you can not quote your links and offer commentary that is relevant to the original assertion you attempted to articulate. I can go as far as to say, your links have nothing to do with you opinion that you posted.

you had asked, why is it a problem that 3 people are rich? How does that affect you in the least?

I had answered your question, and the PBS link explains it better than I could.
Its a report on medical research showing that people are less happy in a more unequal society.

 

[elektra]

you had asked, why is it a problem that 3 people are rich? How does that affect you in the least?

I had answered your question, and the PBS link explains it better than I could.
Its a report on medical research showing that people are less happy in a more unequal society.

You did not answer, your own statements, I asked about your opinion that you posted. You linked? As if all you need to do is go to google, which is a liberal biased progressive democrat search engine. A google search that is one sided, that offers their bias is your answer. And at that you seem to have not read what you linked to otherwise why can you not articulate what you believe based on a google search?

I must do your work for you? It is very simple, you have no idea what you speak of, you heard something and you have chosen to believe it. Why? Why be angry at three people who did work for what they got, three people that did not take it from you. Three people that give many others high paying jobs, something that you can not do. They give jobs to others, you can not give jobs to others.

 

[elektra]

3 rich people stop you from having which service and or goods, how?

for schools; how parents buy college admissions.
[/QUOTE]
I read your first link, you stated 3 people keep the poor out of colleges. That link has nothing to do with 3 people keeping anyone out of college.

That is a sloppy google search fumbling for the answer to your wrong headed opinion.

funny, that was a dud, kind of like being in muck, dudmuck, fitting user name.

 

[dudmuck]

3 rich people stop you from having which service and or goods, how?

for schools; how parents buy college admissions.

I read your first link, you stated 3 people keep the poor out of colleges. That link has nothing to do with 3 people keeping anyone out of college.

That is a sloppy google search fumbling for the answer to your wrong headed opinion.

funny, that was a dud, kind of like being in muck, dudmuck, fitting user name.[/QUOTE]
Class sizes are fixed.
When a rich kid gets bought into college, it prevents another qualified kid from getting a good education.
This is not an opinion, its objective truth.

The report i linked to is a joint effort between several universities, showing how rising inequality degrades society. This is not my opinion, its just objective research done by top experts in the field.

Duckduckgo and bing return the same results, i could have used those.

 

[elektra]

The report i linked to is a joint effort between several universities, showing how rising inequality degrades society. This is not my opinion, its just objective research done by top experts in the field.

Duckduckgo and bing return the same results, i could have used those.

You linked to articles, you never linked to a report. I followed all four of your links, they are to articles, opinion pieces. You post links to articles without reading the article let alone the report. All you have shown is that you are lazy or do not know how to actually research your opinion and tell us why you think the way you do.

You did link to the article on rich Democrat Donors who broke laws to get their kids in school.

Yes, in this thread we acknowledge the crimes of the rich democrats, thank you for affirming what we know about rich democrats.

another dud post which if one reads bogs oneself down in the muck, thanks for trying?

 

[dudmuck]

The report i linked to is a joint effort between several universities, showing how rising inequality degrades society. This is not my opinion, its just objective research done by top experts in the field.

Duckduckgo and bing return the same results, i could have used those.

You linked to articles, you never linked to a report. I followed all four of your links, they are to articles, opinion pieces. You post links to articles without reading the article let alone the report. All you have shown is that you are lazy or do not know how to actually research your opinion and tell us why you think the way you do.

You did link to the article on rich Democrat Donors who broke laws to get their kids in school.

Yes, in this thread we acknowledge the crimes of the rich democrats, thank you for affirming what we know about rich democrats.

another dud post which if one reads bogs oneself down in the muck, thanks for trying?

The report is referenced from this article.
The actual report is here.

The article about the wealthy buying their kids into school doesnt say anything about party affiliation. In either case, its another example of the rich propping themselves up by pushing everyone else down.