Trump to Greet Netanyahu by Abandoning ‘2-state’ Doctrine

[Weatherman2020]

Trump to greet Netanyahu by abandoning ‘2-state’ doctrine.

If we assume that the two-state solution was ever viable, it lost even our ability to assume when Arafat rejected a deal giving the Palestinians 93% of what they wanted, in favor of waging a renewed war of terrorism against civilians in Israel.

 

[montelatici]

Again the Zionist propaganda. Arafat was not offered 93% of anything, what was offered was not a sovereign Palestinian state. Arafat received zero, zilch, nada in terms of sovereignty.

What the Israelis offered would have divided the West Bank into three disconnected cantons. Furthermore, In exchange for taking fertile West Bank lands that happen to contain most of the region’s scarce water aquifers (to facilitate the increase in settlements), Israel offered to give up a piece of its own territory in the Negev Desert which was about one-tenth the size of the West Bank land it would annex. The part of the desert offered, included a former toxic waste dump.

Because of the geographic placement of Israel’s proposed West Bank annexations, Palestinians living in their new “independent state” would be forced to cross Israeli territory every time they traveled or shipped goods from one section of the West Bank to another, and Israel could close those routes at will. Israel would also retain a network of “bypass roads” that would crisscross the Palestinian state while remaining sovereign Israeli territory, further dividing the West Bank.

The deal included a requirement that Palestine accept continued Israeli occupation for an undefined period (completely up to Israel) of time over the whole of the Jordan Valley. Palestine would not have had control or free access to its own international borders with Jordan and Egypt. The same for territorial sea and air space. Both would have remained under Israeli control.

Had Arafat agreed to the Israeli offer, the Palestinians would have permanently locked in place forever, the worst aspects of the very occupation they were trying to bring to an end. Palestine would have become a permanent Bantustan.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Again the Zionist propaganda. Arafat was not offered 93% of anything, what was offered was not a sovereign Palestinian state. Arafat received zero, zilch, nada in terms of sovereignty.

What the Israelis offered would have divided the West Bank into three disconnected cantons. Furthermore, In exchange for taking fertile West Bank lands that happen to contain most of the region’s scarce water aquifers (to facilitate the increase in settlements), Israel offered to give up a piece of its own territory in the Negev Desert which was about one-tenth the size of the West Bank land it would annex. The part of the desert offered, included a former toxic waste dump.

Because of the geographic placement of Israel’s proposed West Bank annexations, Palestinians living in their new “independent state” would be forced to cross Israeli territory every time they traveled or shipped goods from one section of the West Bank to another, and Israel could close those routes at will. Israel would also retain a network of “bypass roads” that would crisscross the Palestinian state while remaining sovereign Israeli territory, further dividing the West Bank.

The deal included a requirement that Palestine accept continued Israeli occupation for an undefined period (completely up to Israel) of time over the whole of the Jordan Valley. Palestine would not have had control or free access to its own international borders with Jordan and Egypt. The same for territorial sea and air space. Both would have remained under Israeli control.

Had Arafat agreed to the Israeli offer, the Palestinians would have permanently locked in place forever, the worst aspects of the very occupation they were trying to bring to an end. Palestine would have become a permanent Bantustan.

 

[MJB12741]

Again the Zionist propaganda. Arafat was not offered 93% of anything, what was offered was not a sovereign Palestinian state. Arafat received zero, zilch, nada in terms of sovereignty.

What the Israelis offered would have divided the West Bank into three disconnected cantons. Furthermore, In exchange for taking fertile West Bank lands that happen to contain most of the region’s scarce water aquifers (to facilitate the increase in settlements), Israel offered to give up a piece of its own territory in the Negev Desert which was about one-tenth the size of the West Bank land it would annex. The part of the desert offered, included a former toxic waste dump.

Because of the geographic placement of Israel’s proposed West Bank annexations, Palestinians living in their new “independent state” would be forced to cross Israeli territory every time they traveled or shipped goods from one section of the West Bank to another, and Israel could close those routes at will. Israel would also retain a network of “bypass roads” that would crisscross the Palestinian state while remaining sovereign Israeli territory, further dividing the West Bank.

The deal included a requirement that Palestine accept continued Israeli occupation for an undefined period (completely up to Israel) of time over the whole of the Jordan Valley. Palestine would not have had control or free access to its own international borders with Jordan and Egypt. The same for territorial sea and air space. Both would have remained under Israeli control.

Had Arafat agreed to the Israeli offer, the Palestinians would have permanently locked in place forever, the worst aspects of the very occupation they were trying to bring to an end. Palestine would have become a permanent Bantustan.

BS as usual from Monte.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Again the Zionist propaganda. Arafat was not offered 93% of anything, what was offered was not a sovereign Palestinian state. Arafat received zero, zilch, nada in terms of sovereignty.

What the Israelis offered would have divided the West Bank into three disconnected cantons. Furthermore, In exchange for taking fertile West Bank lands that happen to contain most of the region’s scarce water aquifers (to facilitate the increase in settlements), Israel offered to give up a piece of its own territory in the Negev Desert which was about one-tenth the size of the West Bank land it would annex. The part of the desert offered, included a former toxic waste dump.

Because of the geographic placement of Israel’s proposed West Bank annexations, Palestinians living in their new “independent state” would be forced to cross Israeli territory every time they traveled or shipped goods from one section of the West Bank to another, and Israel could close those routes at will. Israel would also retain a network of “bypass roads” that would crisscross the Palestinian state while remaining sovereign Israeli territory, further dividing the West Bank.

The deal included a requirement that Palestine accept continued Israeli occupation for an undefined period (completely up to Israel) of time over the whole of the Jordan Valley. Palestine would not have had control or free access to its own international borders with Jordan and Egypt. The same for territorial sea and air space. Both would have remained under Israeli control.

Had Arafat agreed to the Israeli offer, the Palestinians would have permanently locked in place forever, the worst aspects of the very occupation they were trying to bring to an end. Palestine would have become a permanent Bantustan.

BS as usual from Monte.

They bend over backwards lying to justify blowing up children in pizza parlors.

 

[MJB12741]

Again the Zionist propaganda. Arafat was not offered 93% of anything, what was offered was not a sovereign Palestinian state. Arafat received zero, zilch, nada in terms of sovereignty.

What the Israelis offered would have divided the West Bank into three disconnected cantons. Furthermore, In exchange for taking fertile West Bank lands that happen to contain most of the region’s scarce water aquifers (to facilitate the increase in settlements), Israel offered to give up a piece of its own territory in the Negev Desert which was about one-tenth the size of the West Bank land it would annex. The part of the desert offered, included a former toxic waste dump.

Because of the geographic placement of Israel’s proposed West Bank annexations, Palestinians living in their new “independent state” would be forced to cross Israeli territory every time they traveled or shipped goods from one section of the West Bank to another, and Israel could close those routes at will. Israel would also retain a network of “bypass roads” that would crisscross the Palestinian state while remaining sovereign Israeli territory, further dividing the West Bank.

The deal included a requirement that Palestine accept continued Israeli occupation for an undefined period (completely up to Israel) of time over the whole of the Jordan Valley. Palestine would not have had control or free access to its own international borders with Jordan and Egypt. The same for territorial sea and air space. Both would have remained under Israeli control.

Had Arafat agreed to the Israeli offer, the Palestinians would have permanently locked in place forever, the worst aspects of the very occupation they were trying to bring to an end. Palestine would have become a permanent Bantustan.

BS as usual from Monte.

They bend over backwards lying to justify blowing up children in pizza parlors.

Just goes to prove one need not necessarily have to be a Palestinian to have a Palestinian mentality.

 

[montelatici]

Again the Zionist propaganda. Arafat was not offered 93% of anything, what was offered was not a sovereign Palestinian state. Arafat received zero, zilch, nada in terms of sovereignty.

What the Israelis offered would have divided the West Bank into three disconnected cantons. Furthermore, In exchange for taking fertile West Bank lands that happen to contain most of the region’s scarce water aquifers (to facilitate the increase in settlements), Israel offered to give up a piece of its own territory in the Negev Desert which was about one-tenth the size of the West Bank land it would annex. The part of the desert offered, included a former toxic waste dump.

Because of the geographic placement of Israel’s proposed West Bank annexations, Palestinians living in their new “independent state” would be forced to cross Israeli territory every time they traveled or shipped goods from one section of the West Bank to another, and Israel could close those routes at will. Israel would also retain a network of “bypass roads” that would crisscross the Palestinian state while remaining sovereign Israeli territory, further dividing the West Bank.

The deal included a requirement that Palestine accept continued Israeli occupation for an undefined period (completely up to Israel) of time over the whole of the Jordan Valley. Palestine would not have had control or free access to its own international borders with Jordan and Egypt. The same for territorial sea and air space. Both would have remained under Israeli control.

Had Arafat agreed to the Israeli offer, the Palestinians would have permanently locked in place forever, the worst aspects of the very occupation they were trying to bring to an end. Palestine would have become a permanent Bantustan.

Israel's Camp David Peace Proposal: Generous Offer or Sham? on JSTOR

 

[montelatici]

Again the Zionist propaganda. Arafat was not offered 93% of anything, what was offered was not a sovereign Palestinian state. Arafat received zero, zilch, nada in terms of sovereignty.

What the Israelis offered would have divided the West Bank into three disconnected cantons. Furthermore, In exchange for taking fertile West Bank lands that happen to contain most of the region’s scarce water aquifers (to facilitate the increase in settlements), Israel offered to give up a piece of its own territory in the Negev Desert which was about one-tenth the size of the West Bank land it would annex. The part of the desert offered, included a former toxic waste dump.

Because of the geographic placement of Israel’s proposed West Bank annexations, Palestinians living in their new “independent state” would be forced to cross Israeli territory every time they traveled or shipped goods from one section of the West Bank to another, and Israel could close those routes at will. Israel would also retain a network of “bypass roads” that would crisscross the Palestinian state while remaining sovereign Israeli territory, further dividing the West Bank.

The deal included a requirement that Palestine accept continued Israeli occupation for an undefined period (completely up to Israel) of time over the whole of the Jordan Valley. Palestine would not have had control or free access to its own international borders with Jordan and Egypt. The same for territorial sea and air space. Both would have remained under Israeli control.

Had Arafat agreed to the Israeli offer, the Palestinians would have permanently locked in place forever, the worst aspects of the very occupation they were trying to bring to an end. Palestine would have become a permanent Bantustan.

BS as usual from Monte.

Absolute fact, as usual, upsets the Hasbara propagandist. You do entertain though.

 

[montelatici]

Again the Zionist propaganda. Arafat was not offered 93% of anything, what was offered was not a sovereign Palestinian state. Arafat received zero, zilch, nada in terms of sovereignty.

What the Israelis offered would have divided the West Bank into three disconnected cantons. Furthermore, In exchange for taking fertile West Bank lands that happen to contain most of the region’s scarce water aquifers (to facilitate the increase in settlements), Israel offered to give up a piece of its own territory in the Negev Desert which was about one-tenth the size of the West Bank land it would annex. The part of the desert offered, included a former toxic waste dump.

Because of the geographic placement of Israel’s proposed West Bank annexations, Palestinians living in their new “independent state” would be forced to cross Israeli territory every time they traveled or shipped goods from one section of the West Bank to another, and Israel could close those routes at will. Israel would also retain a network of “bypass roads” that would crisscross the Palestinian state while remaining sovereign Israeli territory, further dividing the West Bank.

The deal included a requirement that Palestine accept continued Israeli occupation for an undefined period (completely up to Israel) of time over the whole of the Jordan Valley. Palestine would not have had control or free access to its own international borders with Jordan and Egypt. The same for territorial sea and air space. Both would have remained under Israeli control.

Had Arafat agreed to the Israeli offer, the Palestinians would have permanently locked in place forever, the worst aspects of the very occupation they were trying to bring to an end. Palestine would have become a permanent Bantustan.

BS as usual from Monte.

They bend over backwards lying to justify blowing up children in pizza parlors.

And you bend over backwards to justify the real murder of thousands of children by the Israelis.

Mod Edit - Graphic Image Removed

 

[Weatherman2020]

Again the Zionist propaganda. Arafat was not offered 93% of anything, what was offered was not a sovereign Palestinian state. Arafat received zero, zilch, nada in terms of sovereignty.

What the Israelis offered would have divided the West Bank into three disconnected cantons. Furthermore, In exchange for taking fertile West Bank lands that happen to contain most of the region’s scarce water aquifers (to facilitate the increase in settlements), Israel offered to give up a piece of its own territory in the Negev Desert which was about one-tenth the size of the West Bank land it would annex. The part of the desert offered, included a former toxic waste dump.

Because of the geographic placement of Israel’s proposed West Bank annexations, Palestinians living in their new “independent state” would be forced to cross Israeli territory every time they traveled or shipped goods from one section of the West Bank to another, and Israel could close those routes at will. Israel would also retain a network of “bypass roads” that would crisscross the Palestinian state while remaining sovereign Israeli territory, further dividing the West Bank.

The deal included a requirement that Palestine accept continued Israeli occupation for an undefined period (completely up to Israel) of time over the whole of the Jordan Valley. Palestine would not have had control or free access to its own international borders with Jordan and Egypt. The same for territorial sea and air space. Both would have remained under Israeli control.

Had Arafat agreed to the Israeli offer, the Palestinians would have permanently locked in place forever, the worst aspects of the very occupation they were trying to bring to an end. Palestine would have become a permanent Bantustan.

View attachment 112491


Israel's Camp David Peace Proposal: Generous Offer or Sham? on JSTOR

You forgot one thing to share from your link for some reason. Palestinians offer no peace.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Again the Zionist propaganda. Arafat was not offered 93% of anything, what was offered was not a sovereign Palestinian state. Arafat received zero, zilch, nada in terms of sovereignty.

What the Israelis offered would have divided the West Bank into three disconnected cantons. Furthermore, In exchange for taking fertile West Bank lands that happen to contain most of the region’s scarce water aquifers (to facilitate the increase in settlements), Israel offered to give up a piece of its own territory in the Negev Desert which was about one-tenth the size of the West Bank land it would annex. The part of the desert offered, included a former toxic waste dump.

Because of the geographic placement of Israel’s proposed West Bank annexations, Palestinians living in their new “independent state” would be forced to cross Israeli territory every time they traveled or shipped goods from one section of the West Bank to another, and Israel could close those routes at will. Israel would also retain a network of “bypass roads” that would crisscross the Palestinian state while remaining sovereign Israeli territory, further dividing the West Bank.

The deal included a requirement that Palestine accept continued Israeli occupation for an undefined period (completely up to Israel) of time over the whole of the Jordan Valley. Palestine would not have had control or free access to its own international borders with Jordan and Egypt. The same for territorial sea and air space. Both would have remained under Israeli control.

Had Arafat agreed to the Israeli offer, the Palestinians would have permanently locked in place forever, the worst aspects of the very occupation they were trying to bring to an end. Palestine would have become a permanent Bantustan.

BS as usual from Monte.

They bend over backwards lying to justify blowing up children in pizza parlors.

And you bend over backwards to justify the real murder of thousands of children by the Israelis.

Nice picture of what Muslims do to children. How about some 4 years olds with bomb vests for your next post?

 

[montelatici]

Again the Zionist propaganda. Arafat was not offered 93% of anything, what was offered was not a sovereign Palestinian state. Arafat received zero, zilch, nada in terms of sovereignty.

What the Israelis offered would have divided the West Bank into three disconnected cantons. Furthermore, In exchange for taking fertile West Bank lands that happen to contain most of the region’s scarce water aquifers (to facilitate the increase in settlements), Israel offered to give up a piece of its own territory in the Negev Desert which was about one-tenth the size of the West Bank land it would annex. The part of the desert offered, included a former toxic waste dump.

Because of the geographic placement of Israel’s proposed West Bank annexations, Palestinians living in their new “independent state” would be forced to cross Israeli territory every time they traveled or shipped goods from one section of the West Bank to another, and Israel could close those routes at will. Israel would also retain a network of “bypass roads” that would crisscross the Palestinian state while remaining sovereign Israeli territory, further dividing the West Bank.

The deal included a requirement that Palestine accept continued Israeli occupation for an undefined period (completely up to Israel) of time over the whole of the Jordan Valley. Palestine would not have had control or free access to its own international borders with Jordan and Egypt. The same for territorial sea and air space. Both would have remained under Israeli control.

Had Arafat agreed to the Israeli offer, the Palestinians would have permanently locked in place forever, the worst aspects of the very occupation they were trying to bring to an end. Palestine would have become a permanent Bantustan.

BS as usual from Monte.

They bend over backwards lying to justify blowing up children in pizza parlors.

And you bend over backwards to justify the real murder of thousands of children by the Israelis.

Nice picture of what Muslims do to children. How about some 4 years olds with bomb vests for your next post?

It's what Jews do to children, pal.

 

[Weatherman2020]

Again the Zionist propaganda. Arafat was not offered 93% of anything, what was offered was not a sovereign Palestinian state. Arafat received zero, zilch, nada in terms of sovereignty.

What the Israelis offered would have divided the West Bank into three disconnected cantons. Furthermore, In exchange for taking fertile West Bank lands that happen to contain most of the region’s scarce water aquifers (to facilitate the increase in settlements), Israel offered to give up a piece of its own territory in the Negev Desert which was about one-tenth the size of the West Bank land it would annex. The part of the desert offered, included a former toxic waste dump.

Because of the geographic placement of Israel’s proposed West Bank annexations, Palestinians living in their new “independent state” would be forced to cross Israeli territory every time they traveled or shipped goods from one section of the West Bank to another, and Israel could close those routes at will. Israel would also retain a network of “bypass roads” that would crisscross the Palestinian state while remaining sovereign Israeli territory, further dividing the West Bank.

The deal included a requirement that Palestine accept continued Israeli occupation for an undefined period (completely up to Israel) of time over the whole of the Jordan Valley. Palestine would not have had control or free access to its own international borders with Jordan and Egypt. The same for territorial sea and air space. Both would have remained under Israeli control.

Had Arafat agreed to the Israeli offer, the Palestinians would have permanently locked in place forever, the worst aspects of the very occupation they were trying to bring to an end. Palestine would have become a permanent Bantustan.

BS as usual from Monte.

They bend over backwards lying to justify blowing up children in pizza parlors.

And you bend over backwards to justify the real murder of thousands of children by the Israelis.

Nice picture of what Muslims do to children. How about some 4 years olds with bomb vests for your next post?

It's what Jews do to children, pal.

Why does your agenda require lies and propaganda?
We all know you support blowing up babies.

 

[montelatici]

BS as usual from Monte.

They bend over backwards lying to justify blowing up children in pizza parlors.

And you bend over backwards to justify the real murder of thousands of children by the Israelis.

Nice picture of what Muslims do to children. How about some 4 years olds with bomb vests for your next post?

It's what Jews do to children, pal.

Why does your agenda require lies and propaganda?
We all know you support blowing up babies.

There is no agenda, just the presentation of facts. It is not propaganda that Israel has killed thousands of Palestinian children, it's fact. Close to 500 in just one operation in 2014. You people parrot Hasbara propaganda.

Gaza crisis: Toll of operations in Gaza - BBC News

If I supported the killing of babies I wouldn't be criticizing it, you moron.

 

[Weatherman2020]

They bend over backwards lying to justify blowing up children in pizza parlors.

And you bend over backwards to justify the real murder of thousands of children by the Israelis.

Nice picture of what Muslims do to children. How about some 4 years olds with bomb vests for your next post?

It's what Jews do to children, pal.

Why does your agenda require lies and propaganda?
We all know you support blowing up babies.

There is no agenda, just the presentation of facts. It is not propaganda that Israel has killed thousands of Palestinian children, it's fact. Close to 500 in just one operation in 2014. You people parrot Hasbara propaganda.

Gaza crisis: Toll of operations in Gaza - BBC News

If I supported the killing of babies I wouldn't be criticizing it, you moron.

What's international law say about using civilians as human shields and intentionally targeting civilians in war?

Explosive: UN admits Palestinians fired rockets from UNRWA schools « View from Geneva

http://www.jerusalemonline.com/news...watch-hamas-launches-rockets-from-school-6746

Hamas DID use schools and hospitals in Gaza Strip as 'human shields' | Daily Mail Online

Hamas hiding rockets in schools, children's playgrounds, Israel and UN agency say

Let's keep going, this is fun.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Again the Zionist propaganda. Arafat was not offered 93% of anything, what was offered was not a sovereign Palestinian state. Arafat received zero, zilch, nada in terms of sovereignty.

What the Israelis offered would have divided the West Bank into three disconnected cantons. Furthermore, In exchange for taking fertile West Bank lands that happen to contain most of the region’s scarce water aquifers (to facilitate the increase in settlements), Israel offered to give up a piece of its own territory in the Negev Desert which was about one-tenth the size of the West Bank land it would annex. The part of the desert offered, included a former toxic waste dump.

Because of the geographic placement of Israel’s proposed West Bank annexations, Palestinians living in their new “independent state” would be forced to cross Israeli territory every time they traveled or shipped goods from one section of the West Bank to another, and Israel could close those routes at will. Israel would also retain a network of “bypass roads” that would crisscross the Palestinian state while remaining sovereign Israeli territory, further dividing the West Bank.

The deal included a requirement that Palestine accept continued Israeli occupation for an undefined period (completely up to Israel) of time over the whole of the Jordan Valley. Palestine would not have had control or free access to its own international borders with Jordan and Egypt. The same for territorial sea and air space. Both would have remained under Israeli control.

Had Arafat agreed to the Israeli offer, the Palestinians would have permanently locked in place forever, the worst aspects of the very occupation they were trying to bring to an end. Palestine would have become a permanent Bantustan.

Post of the day!

 

[Weatherman2020]

Hamas uses BBC brand for fauxtography propaganda

 

[P F Tinmore]

Hamas uses BBC brand for fauxtography propaganda

Who was Israel's boogyman before there was Hamas?

 

[Weatherman2020]

Hamas uses BBC brand for fauxtography propaganda

Who was Israel's boogyman before there was Hamas?

Muslims have been terrorists for 1,600 years, that is why you love them. You like raping babies.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Hamas uses BBC brand for fauxtography propaganda

Who was Israel's boogyman before there was Hamas?

Muslims have been terrorists for 1,600 years, that is why you love them. You like raping babies.

Ooooo, terrorist.

Let he who is without sin cast the first stone.