TRUMP To DEMS: ‘They Can Come For The Ride, But They Have To Sit In Back’

Democrats shouldn't be allowed on the bus. They can hang on to the sides.
Nonsense they can drive their own bus and quit complaining how other people drive their buses. We can all share the road. But if we don't agree what direction to take, why not drive separate cars ? And just direct traffic so nobody clashes or crashes?
Don't like someone else driving, then drive yourself in your own car and everyone's equal !
 
The interesting political calculation is whether the GOP Senate will (need to?) use the Nuclear Option or wait for a 60 vote majority after 2018.
 
Democrats shouldn't be allowed on the bus. They can hang on to the sides.
Nonsense they can drive their own bus and quit complaining how other people drive their buses. We can all share the road. But if we don't agree what direction to take, why not drive separate cars ? And just direct traffic so nobody clashes or crashes?
Don't like someone else driving, then drive yourself in your own car and everyone's equal !

You should share your car with illegal immigrants that can't afford a car.
 
our friends on the left and in the media love talking about the back of the bus

in fact, they love talking about anything that keeps racial divisiveness front and center in the national narrative

I have to admit, that was one thing President Obama has been really good at
 
The interesting political calculation is whether the GOP Senate will (need to?) use the Nuclear Option or wait for a 60 vote majority after 2018.


Harry Reid is 100% unapologetic about the power the PUBS now have on his watch and THE NUCLEAR OPTION is part of their arsenal.

THANKS HARRY!! CAREFUL WORKING OUT IN YOUR BATHROOM DURING RETIREMENT!
 
Democrats shouldn't be allowed on the bus. They can hang on to the sides.
Nonsense they can drive their own bus and quit complaining how other people drive their buses. We can all share the road. But if we don't agree what direction to take, why not drive separate cars ? And just direct traffic so nobody clashes or crashes?
Don't like someone else driving, then drive yourself in your own car and everyone's equal !

You should share your car with illegal immigrants that can't afford a car.
Sure driving schools can be set up to train any student that school agrees to accept responsibility for. And not impose that on anyone else.

AGREED ColonelAngus

How about developing campuses for military security and prisons, job training education and health and social services
Along the Border:
Www.earnedamnesty.org
Why not reward citizens business investors workers nonprofits and churches for building and managing their own school programs legally, where enrollment is used to track work study credits and responsibility of students to meet requirements of these programs ?

Why not create legal tracks that are paid for owned and managed by the people the workers and their agreed sponsors donors and investors?

Isn't there enough work in this to create paid jobs, internships and ownership for everyone who wants to contribute and be represented?
 
Democrats shouldn't be allowed on the bus. They can hang on to the sides.
Nonsense they can drive their own bus and quit complaining how other people drive their buses. We can all share the road. But if we don't agree what direction to take, why not drive separate cars ? And just direct traffic so nobody clashes or crashes?
Don't like someone else driving, then drive yourself in your own car and everyone's equal !

You should share your car with illegal immigrants that can't afford a car.
Sure driving schools can be set up to train any student that school agrees to accept responsibility for. And not impose that on anyone else.

AGREED ColonelAngus

How about developing campuses for military security and prisons, job training education and health and social services
Along the Border:
Www.earnedamnesty.org
Why not reward citizens business investors workers nonprofits and churches for building and managing their own school programs legally, where enrollment is used to track work study credits and responsibility of students to meet requirements of these programs ?

Why not create legal tracks that are paid for owned and managed by the people the workers and their agreed sponsors donors and investors?

Isn't there enough work in this to create paid jobs, internships and ownership for everyone who wants to contribute and be represented?

Yes. It's straight forward to me.

Snowflakes are of the mindset that people who actually work should pay for an artist to be able to be "CREATIVE".

Pelosi laid out that vision.
 
Liberals are seeing first hand of locking out the minority party on the Hill, rewarding friends and punishing enemies. The true entertainment factor is watching Liberals state that there is a difference and justify Obama. The smart person realizes that this statement made by both Obama and Trump is divisive; equally.
 
He said it because the GOP had driven the economy into the ditch and he didn't want them anywheres near the driver's seat.
Even today, they won't let Bush anywhere near a GOP convention. Look at the failure when his brother trotted him out in Florida. Even Trump pounded him.

But it was unfair. Bush was only following GOP policies. The one thing the GOP is great at is blaming their mess on Democrats and fooling an ignorant America.
Everything about infrastructure Trump says he stole from Democrats.
 
Democrats shouldn't be allowed on the bus. They can hang on to the sides.
Nonsense they can drive their own bus and quit complaining how other people drive their buses. We can all share the road. But if we don't agree what direction to take, why not drive separate cars ? And just direct traffic so nobody clashes or crashes?
Don't like someone else driving, then drive yourself in your own car and everyone's equal !

You should share your car with illegal immigrants that can't afford a car.
Sure driving schools can be set up to train any student that school agrees to accept responsibility for. And not impose that on anyone else.

AGREED ColonelAngus

How about developing campuses for military security and prisons, job training education and health and social services
Along the Border:
Www.earnedamnesty.org
Why not reward citizens business investors workers nonprofits and churches for building and managing their own school programs legally, where enrollment is used to track work study credits and responsibility of students to meet requirements of these programs ?

Why not create legal tracks that are paid for owned and managed by the people the workers and their agreed sponsors donors and investors?

Isn't there enough work in this to create paid jobs, internships and ownership for everyone who wants to contribute and be represented?

Yes. It's straight forward to me.

Snowflakes are of the mindset that people who actually work should pay for an artist to be able to be "CREATIVE".

Pelosi laid out that vision.
Dear ColonelAngus
Again so why not let liberal taxpayers pay their taxes into their own soft programs and social policies,
Let conservatives pay for defense and limited govt, and give taxpayers a choice?

Track by state what % of taxes come and go through which party and divide federal apportionment according to which states pay in. Then divide that by party so Democrats paying for education and health care manage their taxes and representation equally and separately from Republicans paying for defense and free market health care. We can separate funding for abortion, for death penalty, for marriage benefits better by party than trying to mandate one policy for all which people don't agree on. Why not separate similar to religions that fund and run their own programs?
 

American has always been white. White people elected the first Black President. Your race card is overdrawn and expired.
Yea, but not the same whites.
For instance, Republicans want gays dead. But they voted for Obama.
Scientists voted for Obama. Remember, less than 6% are Republican.
College professors and the educated voted mostly for Obama.
White Hispanics voted for Obama.
You see, you could go on and on.
These aren't white people who Republicans want.
Only half the electorate actually voted. The country is 70% white. Trump figured if he could rile up whites and stoke racism, he could make enough angry they would vote, many for the first time. It worked. He had a smart strategy. He concentrated on rural whites in Red States who have been fucked over by the Republicans for generations and made them angry at not only Democrats, but Republicans as well. What have you got to lose wasn't just for blacks.
Now, we'll find out what they have to lose.
 
Democrats shouldn't be allowed on the bus. They can hang on to the sides.
Nonsense they can drive their own bus and quit complaining how other people drive their buses. We can all share the road. But if we don't agree what direction to take, why not drive separate cars ? And just direct traffic so nobody clashes or crashes?
Don't like someone else driving, then drive yourself in your own car and everyone's equal !

You should share your car with illegal immigrants that can't afford a car.
Sure driving schools can be set up to train any student that school agrees to accept responsibility for. And not impose that on anyone else.

AGREED ColonelAngus

How about developing campuses for military security and prisons, job training education and health and social services
Along the Border:
Www.earnedamnesty.org
Why not reward citizens business investors workers nonprofits and churches for building and managing their own school programs legally, where enrollment is used to track work study credits and responsibility of students to meet requirements of these programs ?

Why not create legal tracks that are paid for owned and managed by the people the workers and their agreed sponsors donors and investors?

Isn't there enough work in this to create paid jobs, internships and ownership for everyone who wants to contribute and be represented?

Yes. It's straight forward to me.

Snowflakes are of the mindset that people who actually work should pay for an artist to be able to be "CREATIVE".

Pelosi laid out that vision.
Dear ColonelAngus
Again so why not let liberal taxpayers pay their taxes into their own soft programs and social policies,
Let conservatives pay for defense and limited govt, and give taxpayers a choice?

Track by state what % of taxes come and go through which party and divide federal apportionment according to which states pay in. Then divide that by party so Democrats paying for education and health care manage their taxes and representation equally and separately from Republicans paying for defense and free market health care. We can separate funding for abortion, for death penalty, for marriage benefits better by party than trying to mandate one policy for all which people don't agree on. Why not separate similar to religions that fund and run their own programs?

The government "LOST" over 1000 children in Florida that were supposedly under DCF care.

Do you really trust "THE GOVERNMENT" to handle all that you laid out?
 

Forum List

Back
Top