Trump "'The Tone Is Hatred'

[konradv]

Why is Trump so butthurt? He should know that you reap what you sow.

There would be no trump without obama... karma is a bitch

The question still remains, why is Trump so butthurt? If he got in because of Obama, he should be happy.

 

[konradv]

Why is Trump so butthurt? He should know that you reap what you sow.

Nothing he has done or said, justifies the vile behavior of you lefties. YOU are the ones sowing.

What vile behavior have I exhibited? That's pure projection on your part. Whoever disagrees on the slightest point is instantly labelled an enemy. Dangerous stuff in a country that purports to be free. Nothing great about that. Another lie from the Trumpster that you've swallowed whole.

Your pretense that you didn't catch that I was referring to you, plural, thus the use of the word "ones", was a dodge so that you don't have to defend the behavior of the vile left. Which is understandable as it is indefensible. As, you lied and dodged in your post, my point stands. Nothing he has done or said, justifies the vile behavior of you lefties. YOU are the ones sowing.

Why should I have to defend what others do or say. If there's a dodge, it's that you didn't even try to defend Trump; you attacked "vile lefties".

In my first response to you, I pointed out the truth that Trump has not sown the hate referenced in the OP.

Thus you claim that I did not, was just another lie from you.

I pointed out that the sowing of hate that you brought up, was actually being done by vile lefties.


That is the relevance.

Are you done dodging and lying now?


Prepared to make your case that Trump was sowing hatred?

"Look at that face! Would anyone vote for that? Can you imagine that, the face of our next president. I mean, she's a woman, and I'm not supposed to say bad things, but really, folks, come on. Are we serious?"

...and that was about a fellow Republican that had the nerve to run against him!

 

[Correll]

Nothing he has done or said, justifies the vile behavior of you lefties. YOU are the ones sowing.

What vile behavior have I exhibited? That's pure projection on your part. Whoever disagrees on the slightest point is instantly labelled an enemy. Dangerous stuff in a country that purports to be free. Nothing great about that. Another lie from the Trumpster that you've swallowed whole.

Your pretense that you didn't catch that I was referring to you, plural, thus the use of the word "ones", was a dodge so that you don't have to defend the behavior of the vile left. Which is understandable as it is indefensible. As, you lied and dodged in your post, my point stands. Nothing he has done or said, justifies the vile behavior of you lefties. YOU are the ones sowing.

Why should I have to defend what others do or say. If there's a dodge, it's that you didn't even try to defend Trump; you attacked "vile lefties".

In my first response to you, I pointed out the truth that Trump has not sown the hate referenced in the OP.

Thus you claim that I did not, was just another lie from you.

I pointed out that the sowing of hate that you brought up, was actually being done by vile lefties.


That is the relevance.

Are you done dodging and lying now?


Prepared to make your case that Trump was sowing hatred?

"Look at that face! Would anyone vote for that? Can you imagine that, the face of our next president. I mean, she's a woman, and I'm not supposed to say bad things, but really, folks, come on. Are we serious?"

...and that was about a fellow Republican that had the nerve to run against him!

Yes, harsh language.

But on the other hand.

 

[IcebergSlim]

Why is Trump so butthurt? He should know that you reap what you sow.

There would be no trump without obama... karma is a bitch

There would be no trump without obama...


Sure....elaborate, would you?

 

[IcebergSlim]

Why is Trump so butthurt? He should know that you reap what you sow.

Nothing he has done or said, justifies the vile behavior of you lefties. YOU are the ones sowing.

What vile behavior have I exhibited? That's pure projection on your part. Whoever disagrees on the slightest point is instantly labelled an enemy. Dangerous stuff in a country that purports to be free. Nothing great about that. Another lie from the Trumpster that you've swallowed whole.

Your pretense that you didn't catch that I was referring to you, plural, thus the use of the word "ones", was a dodge so that you don't have to defend the behavior of the vile left. Which is understandable as it is indefensible. As, you lied and dodged in your post, my point stands. Nothing he has done or said, justifies the vile behavior of you lefties. YOU are the ones sowing.

Why should I have to defend what others do or say. If there's a dodge, it's that you didn't even try to defend Trump; you attacked "vile lefties".

In my first response to you, I pointed out the truth that Trump has not sown the hate referenced in the OP.

Thus you claim that I did not, was just another lie from you.

I pointed out that the sowing of hate that you brought up, was actually being done by vile lefties.


That is the relevance.

Are you done dodging and lying now?


Prepared to make your case that Trump was sowing hatred?

I pointed out that the sowing of hate that you brought up, was actually being done by vile lefties.


This, in a nutshell, is the Essence of Correll....there are bricks endowed with more self awareness....

 

[Correll]

Nothing he has done or said, justifies the vile behavior of you lefties. YOU are the ones sowing.

What vile behavior have I exhibited? That's pure projection on your part. Whoever disagrees on the slightest point is instantly labelled an enemy. Dangerous stuff in a country that purports to be free. Nothing great about that. Another lie from the Trumpster that you've swallowed whole.

Your pretense that you didn't catch that I was referring to you, plural, thus the use of the word "ones", was a dodge so that you don't have to defend the behavior of the vile left. Which is understandable as it is indefensible. As, you lied and dodged in your post, my point stands. Nothing he has done or said, justifies the vile behavior of you lefties. YOU are the ones sowing.

Why should I have to defend what others do or say. If there's a dodge, it's that you didn't even try to defend Trump; you attacked "vile lefties".

In my first response to you, I pointed out the truth that Trump has not sown the hate referenced in the OP.

Thus you claim that I did not, was just another lie from you.

I pointed out that the sowing of hate that you brought up, was actually being done by vile lefties.


That is the relevance.

Are you done dodging and lying now?


Prepared to make your case that Trump was sowing hatred?

I pointed out that the sowing of hate that you brought up, was actually being done by vile lefties.


This, in a nutshell, is the Essence of Correll....there are bricks endowed with more self awareness....

Says the man without a point.

 

[IcebergSlim]

What vile behavior have I exhibited? That's pure projection on your part. Whoever disagrees on the slightest point is instantly labelled an enemy. Dangerous stuff in a country that purports to be free. Nothing great about that. Another lie from the Trumpster that you've swallowed whole.

Your pretense that you didn't catch that I was referring to you, plural, thus the use of the word "ones", was a dodge so that you don't have to defend the behavior of the vile left. Which is understandable as it is indefensible. As, you lied and dodged in your post, my point stands. Nothing he has done or said, justifies the vile behavior of you lefties. YOU are the ones sowing.

Why should I have to defend what others do or say. If there's a dodge, it's that you didn't even try to defend Trump; you attacked "vile lefties".

In my first response to you, I pointed out the truth that Trump has not sown the hate referenced in the OP.

Thus you claim that I did not, was just another lie from you.

I pointed out that the sowing of hate that you brought up, was actually being done by vile lefties.


That is the relevance.

Are you done dodging and lying now?


Prepared to make your case that Trump was sowing hatred?

I pointed out that the sowing of hate that you brought up, was actually being done by vile lefties.


This, in a nutshell, is the Essence of Correll....there are bricks endowed with more self awareness....

Says the man without a point.

Let me get a crayon, Brick

You Boldly Assert that the descriptions of Trump as a callow, indolent, ignorant, incompetent blowhard are "lies"......

On what is that Bold Assertion based?

 

[Correll]

Your pretense that you didn't catch that I was referring to you, plural, thus the use of the word "ones", was a dodge so that you don't have to defend the behavior of the vile left. Which is understandable as it is indefensible. As, you lied and dodged in your post, my point stands. Nothing he has done or said, justifies the vile behavior of you lefties. YOU are the ones sowing.

Why should I have to defend what others do or say. If there's a dodge, it's that you didn't even try to defend Trump; you attacked "vile lefties".

In my first response to you, I pointed out the truth that Trump has not sown the hate referenced in the OP.

Thus you claim that I did not, was just another lie from you.

I pointed out that the sowing of hate that you brought up, was actually being done by vile lefties.


That is the relevance.

Are you done dodging and lying now?


Prepared to make your case that Trump was sowing hatred?

I pointed out that the sowing of hate that you brought up, was actually being done by vile lefties.


This, in a nutshell, is the Essence of Correll....there are bricks endowed with more self awareness....

Says the man without a point.

Let me get a crayon, Brick

You Boldly Assert that the descriptions of Trump as a callow, indolent, ignorant, incompetent blowhard are "lies"......

On what is that Bold Assertion based?

Your pretense that you didn't catch that I was referring to you, plural, thus the use of the word "ones", was a dodge so that you don't have to defend the behavior of the vile left. Which is understandable as it is indefensible. As, you lied and dodged in your post, my point stands. Nothing he has done or said, justifies the vile behavior of you lefties. YOU are the ones sowing.

Why should I have to defend what others do or say. If there's a dodge, it's that you didn't even try to defend Trump; you attacked "vile lefties".

In my first response to you, I pointed out the truth that Trump has not sown the hate referenced in the OP.

Thus you claim that I did not, was just another lie from you.

I pointed out that the sowing of hate that you brought up, was actually being done by vile lefties.


That is the relevance.

Are you done dodging and lying now?


Prepared to make your case that Trump was sowing hatred?

I pointed out that the sowing of hate that you brought up, was actually being done by vile lefties.


This, in a nutshell, is the Essence of Correll....there are bricks endowed with more self awareness....

Says the man without a point.

Let me get a crayon, Brick

You Boldly Assert that the descriptions of Trump as a callow, indolent, ignorant, incompetent blowhard are "lies"......

On what is that Bold Assertion based?

I disputed the claim that Trump had sown "hatred".

I stand by that.

Would you like to address what I actually said, instead of asking me to defend the voices in your head?

 

[IcebergSlim]

Why should I have to defend what others do or say. If there's a dodge, it's that you didn't even try to defend Trump; you attacked "vile lefties".

In my first response to you, I pointed out the truth that Trump has not sown the hate referenced in the OP.

Thus you claim that I did not, was just another lie from you.

I pointed out that the sowing of hate that you brought up, was actually being done by vile lefties.


That is the relevance.

Are you done dodging and lying now?


Prepared to make your case that Trump was sowing hatred?

I pointed out that the sowing of hate that you brought up, was actually being done by vile lefties.


This, in a nutshell, is the Essence of Correll....there are bricks endowed with more self awareness....

Says the man without a point.

Let me get a crayon, Brick

You Boldly Assert that the descriptions of Trump as a callow, indolent, ignorant, incompetent blowhard are "lies"......

On what is that Bold Assertion based?

Why should I have to defend what others do or say. If there's a dodge, it's that you didn't even try to defend Trump; you attacked "vile lefties".

In my first response to you, I pointed out the truth that Trump has not sown the hate referenced in the OP.

Thus you claim that I did not, was just another lie from you.

I pointed out that the sowing of hate that you brought up, was actually being done by vile lefties.


That is the relevance.

Are you done dodging and lying now?


Prepared to make your case that Trump was sowing hatred?

I pointed out that the sowing of hate that you brought up, was actually being done by vile lefties.


This, in a nutshell, is the Essence of Correll....there are bricks endowed with more self awareness....

Says the man without a point.

Let me get a crayon, Brick

You Boldly Assert that the descriptions of Trump as a callow, indolent, ignorant, incompetent blowhard are "lies"......

On what is that Bold Assertion based?

I disputed the claim that Trump had sown "hatred".

I stand by that.

Would you like to address what I actually said, instead of asking me to defend the voices in your head?

Then you tell me why the Stormfront types find so much to cheer in what Trump has been saying?

Are they hearing someone else?

 

[Correll]

In my first response to you, I pointed out the truth that Trump has not sown the hate referenced in the OP.

Thus you claim that I did not, was just another lie from you.

I pointed out that the sowing of hate that you brought up, was actually being done by vile lefties.


That is the relevance.

Are you done dodging and lying now?


Prepared to make your case that Trump was sowing hatred?

I pointed out that the sowing of hate that you brought up, was actually being done by vile lefties.


This, in a nutshell, is the Essence of Correll....there are bricks endowed with more self awareness....

Says the man without a point.

Let me get a crayon, Brick

You Boldly Assert that the descriptions of Trump as a callow, indolent, ignorant, incompetent blowhard are "lies"......

On what is that Bold Assertion based?

In my first response to you, I pointed out the truth that Trump has not sown the hate referenced in the OP.

Thus you claim that I did not, was just another lie from you.

I pointed out that the sowing of hate that you brought up, was actually being done by vile lefties.


That is the relevance.

Are you done dodging and lying now?


Prepared to make your case that Trump was sowing hatred?

I pointed out that the sowing of hate that you brought up, was actually being done by vile lefties.


This, in a nutshell, is the Essence of Correll....there are bricks endowed with more self awareness....

Says the man without a point.

Let me get a crayon, Brick

You Boldly Assert that the descriptions of Trump as a callow, indolent, ignorant, incompetent blowhard are "lies"......

On what is that Bold Assertion based?

I disputed the claim that Trump had sown "hatred".

I stand by that.

Would you like to address what I actually said, instead of asking me to defend the voices in your head?

Then you tell me why the Stormfront types find so much to cheer in what Trump has been saying?

Are they hearing someone else?

YOu want me to explain why someone else imagines that Trump's policies could be good for them?

Not my job.

Do you want to make the case that Trump was "sowing hatred" or drop the matter?

 

[Rustic]

Why is Trump so butthurt? He should know that you reap what you sow.

There would be no trump without obama... karma is a bitch

There would be no trump without obama...


Sure....elaborate, would you?

Easy, the delusion of the socialist nanny state make people change direction...

 

[IcebergSlim]

Why is Trump so butthurt? He should know that you reap what you sow.

There would be no trump without obama... karma is a bitch

There would be no trump without obama...


Sure....elaborate, would you?

Easy, the delusion of the socialist nanny state make people change direction...

So as not to disturb the chalk outline?

 

[WaitingFor2020]

So we have the headlines of the "Trump national Guard" in just 3 days 192,000 results!
View attachment 113019

AP: Trump admin considers using 100,000 National Guard troops for immigration raids
AP: Trump admin considers using 100,000 National Guard troops for immigration raids
Trump team considers deploying National Guard for immigrant roundup

This is such a perfect example of the "Hatred tone" . Is the head line True?
NO!

1. Trump Administration Didn't Consider it
The AP story begins with the words: "The Trump administration considered a proposal to mobilize as many as 100,000 National Guard troops to round up unauthorized immigrants, including millions living nowhere near the Mexico border, according to a draft memo obtained by The Associated Press."

The term "Trump administration" implies a group close to the president, and generally the president himself. There is absolutely no evidence that President Trump ever knew about this memo, or that anyone close to him knew about it.

Moreover, there is no evidence to suggest that the administration "considered" it.
According to a DHS source quoted by Reuters, it was an "'early, early version' of a document being prepared by staff for Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly."
2. John Kelly Didn't Write it

The original AP story states (emphasis added): "Governors in the 11 states would have a choice whether to have their guard troops participate, according to the memo, written by U.S. Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly, a retired four-star Marine general."

However, as noted above, it was a "document being prepared by staff for Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly." According to Reuters: "Discussion of the National Guard was dropped before the memo ever made it to Kelly's desk, the official said."
(Now I'm shouting!!! KELLY NEVER WROTE IT!!
It's understandable that the Associated Press would think Kelly wrote the memo because it has his name on it. However, they apparently failed to do even the most basic research before publication, and had to be corrected by Reuters.

The revised AP story states: "A DHS official described the document as a very early draft that was not seriously considered and never brought to Homeland Security Secretary John Kelly for approval."

3. Nowhere is the 100,000 Number Mentioned

AP's tweet, as well as the lede in their official story, pushes the "100,000 National Guard troops" narrative. The memo never once mentions numbers of National Guard troops, let alone 100,000.

Heres what the memo does say about the National Guard:
"Section 287(g) of the Immigration and Nationality Act authorizes me to enter into an agreement with a state or political subdivision thereof, for the purpose of authorizing qualified officers or employees of the state or subdivision to perform the functions of an immigration officer. This grant of authority, known as the 287(g) program, has been a highly successful force multiplier that authorizes state or local law enforcement personnel to perform all law enforcement functions specified in section 287(a) of the INA, including the authority to investigate, identify, apprehend, arrest, detain, and conduct searches of an alien for the purposes of enforcing the immigration laws...

Pursuant to Title 32 of the United States code, State National Guard components are employees of their respective states and are under the command of their Governors when they are not in federal service. Based on their training and experience, these men and women are particularly well-suited to assist in the enforcement of federal immigration law and augment border security operations by Department components.

To maximize participation by state and local jurisdictions in the enforcement of federal immigration law, I am directing the director of ICE to engage with all willing and qualified law enforcement jurisdictions for the purpose of entering into agreements under Section 287(g) of the INA.

Additionally, I am directing the commissioner of CBP and the director of ICE to immediately engage with the Governors of the states adjacent to the land border with Mexico and those States adjoining such border States for the purpose of entering into agreements under Section 287(g) of the INA to authorize qualified members of the State National Guard, while such members are not in federal service, or qualified members of a state militia or state defense force under the command of the Governor, to perform the functions of an immigration officer in relation to the investigation, apprehension, and detention of aliens in the United States."

100,000 is nowhere to be seen.

The Associated Press was also rebutted by White House Press Secretary Sean Spicer, who said the story was "100% not true."
The entire memo can be read here.

So folks... here is exactly WHY
View attachment 113020
Poll: Mainstream media continues to lose the public's trust

Let the ethnic cleansing begin!

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Why is Trump so butthurt? He should know that you reap what you sow.

Nothing he has done or said, justifies the vile behavior of you lefties.

YOU are the ones sowing.

Rodham Rodents

They are the sowers who live in sewers.

 

[WaitingFor2020]

Trump Approval

38% -2

EN FUEGO!

It can't be that high !

I voted for him, I don't approve of him (but I'd vote for him again).

Given the loser of an election this was (with the exception of the left getting it's ass kicked at all levels), I can't imagine he'd get more that 25%.

I voted for him, I don't approve of him (but I'd vote for him again).


Where do they find you people?

Wherever you see red.

lol dumbest map ever.

Yes, it is. Too bad the map doesn't show the obvious: mostly major cities and urban areas are in blue and then some obvious blue states: NM, CO and the New England states.

 

[IcebergSlim]

Trump Approval

38% -2

EN FUEGO!

It can't be that high !

I voted for him, I don't approve of him (but I'd vote for him again).

Given the loser of an election this was (with the exception of the left getting it's ass kicked at all levels), I can't imagine he'd get more that 25%.

I voted for him, I don't approve of him (but I'd vote for him again).


Where do they find you people?

Wherever you see red.

lol dumbest map ever.

Yes, it is. Too bad the map doesn't show the obvious: mostly major cities and urban areas are in blue and then some obvious blue states: NM, CO and the New England states.

Gotta steal that gif.....thanks..

 

[Rustic]

Trump Approval

38% -2

EN FUEGO!

It can't be that high !

I voted for him, I don't approve of him (but I'd vote for him again).

Given the loser of an election this was (with the exception of the left getting it's ass kicked at all levels), I can't imagine he'd get more that 25%.

I voted for him, I don't approve of him (but I'd vote for him again).


Where do they find you people?

Wherever you see red.

lol dumbest map ever.

Yes, it is. Too bad the map doesn't show the obvious: mostly major cities and urban areas are in blue and then some obvious blue states: NM, CO and the New England states.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Nothing he has done or said, justifies the vile behavior of you lefties. YOU are the ones sowing.

What vile behavior have I exhibited? That's pure projection on your part. Whoever disagrees on the slightest point is instantly labelled an enemy. Dangerous stuff in a country that purports to be free. Nothing great about that. Another lie from the Trumpster that you've swallowed whole.

Your pretense that you didn't catch that I was referring to you, plural, thus the use of the word "ones", was a dodge so that you don't have to defend the behavior of the vile left. Which is understandable as it is indefensible. As, you lied and dodged in your post, my point stands. Nothing he has done or said, justifies the vile behavior of you lefties. YOU are the ones sowing.

Why should I have to defend what others do or say. If there's a dodge, it's that you didn't even try to defend Trump; you attacked "vile lefties".

In my first response to you, I pointed out the truth that Trump has not sown the hate referenced in the OP.

Thus you claim that I did not, was just another lie from you.

I pointed out that the sowing of hate that you brought up, was actually being done by vile lefties.


That is the relevance.

Are you done dodging and lying now?


Prepared to make your case that Trump was sowing hatred?

"Look at that face! Would anyone vote for that? Can you imagine that, the face of our next president. I mean, she's a woman, and I'm not supposed to say bad things, but really, folks, come on. Are we serious?"

...and that was about a fellow Republican that had the nerve to run against him!

Calamity Carly

Some ugly woman are bitter, heartless, and vindictive because of it. Ask the thousands of people she caused to lose their jobs about her nastiness. The fact that she ran at all shows how defensively conceited she is.

 

[Sun Devil 92]

It can't be that high !

I voted for him, I don't approve of him (but I'd vote for him again).

Given the loser of an election this was (with the exception of the left getting it's ass kicked at all levels), I can't imagine he'd get more that 25%.

I voted for him, I don't approve of him (but I'd vote for him again).


Where do they find you people?

Wherever you see red.

lol dumbest map ever.

It's the dumbest map ever because when you adjust it for people, i.e. VOTERS, it looks like this:

I'm O.K. with that.

HIllary did win the popular vote.

But the answer is still the same: Wherever you see red.

 

[healthmyths]

I voted for him, I don't approve of him (but I'd vote for him again).


Where do they find you people?

Wherever you see red.

lol dumbest map ever.

It's the dumbest map ever because when you adjust it for people, i.e. VOTERS, it looks like this:

I'm O.K. with that.

HIllary did win the popular vote.

But the answer is still the same: Wherever you see red.

And Trump knew as well as anyone that "electoral college" votes is what wins!
Now don't you idiots suppose if it was JUST popular votes that the NATIVE NEW YORKER and TV star knew that the concentration would be in
Calif./NY and then visit/spend time/advertise like crazy to win at least NEW YORK? Trump is a practical business man who KNEW what electoral college votes
were necessary and unlike Hillary didn't just count on rust belt democrats who Trump knew would be amenable to him!
No the bottom line as any good business person knows what is the quickest, least expensive way to win and Trump did that...again if it were "popular votes" you don't think the guy who had over 2 billion viewers of the years of the Apprentice didn't know that? GEEZ you really think that???