Trump Supporters Dating Site: Married People OK, Gays Go Away

A more accurate data suggests that 3.8% of American people are part of the LGBT community. So Trump hates Muslims, immigrants, Mexicans and now, the LGBT and obviously wants all of them to leave the country. This resembles Hitler trying to make Germany exclusive for the Aryan race. I've always wondered if he'd support LGBT if he were alive. However, many gay dating websites that offer counselling sessions for homosexuals are still popping up in major cities such as LA, NY etc. Such platforms are necessary for the community folk who fall into depression after hearing worrisome news like this :/


Are you joking?
 
A more accurate data suggests that 3.8% of American people are part of the LGBT community. So Trump hates Muslims, immigrants, Mexicans and now, the LGBT and obviously wants all of them to leave the country. This resembles Hitler trying to make Germany exclusive for the Aryan race. I've always wondered if he'd support LGBT if he were alive. However, many gay dating websites that offer counselling sessions for homosexuals are still popping up in major cities such as LA, NY etc. Such platforms are necessary for the community folk who fall into depression after hearing worrisome news like this :/


Are you joking?


That idiot is probably another moonbat sock. They're all that stupid.
 
123123

Oh I could care less - but seeing that 80% of white evangelicals voted for the Orange guy and they are the biggest consumers of porn - it's worth pointing out.

This site will be VERY popular with holier-than-thous for the Pussy Grabber! :wink:

Exit polls show white evangelical voters voted in high numbers for Donald Trump, 80-16 percent, according to exit poll results. That’s the most they have voted for a Republican presidential candidate since 2004, when they overwhelmingly chose President George W. Bush by a margin of 78-21 percent. Their support for Trump will likely be seen as part of the reason the GOP candidate performed unexpectedly well in Tuesday’s election, according to Five Thirty Eight.​

Porn in the USA: Conservatives are biggest consumers

You could care less? Then I guess that means you care. As to the rest of your post ???? So? I don't see what you weirdos are complaining about, honestly.
I often wonder why so many posters say they ‘could care less’ when they actually mean they ‘couldn’t care less’?
 
So what if they are? Do you have a problem with that? I guess evangelicals are sexually adventurous people. Why is this something that I should care about?

Maybe you should focus on your own problems and issues? :dunno:

I don't think you understand ardent evangelicals. Church leaders drum their heads up with family values, loyalty to spouse, sex outside of marriage is wrong, and guilt - lots and lots of guilt.

In this manner they become sexually repressed, having been taught it was wrong for anything other than marital procreation.. So they have affairs or watch porn when nobody's looking because they are CURIOUS - they may even secretly explore same sex urges.

And that explains why Utahans, two thirds of whom belong to the Mormon Church, are the top consumers of subscription porn.
 
Last edited:
So what if they are? Do you have a problem with that? I guess evangelicals are sexually adventurous people. Why is this something that I should care about?

Maybe you should focus on your own problems and issues? :dunno:

I don't think you understand ardent evangelicals. Church leaders drum their heads up with family values, loyalty to spouse, sex outside of marriage is wrong, and guilt - lots and lots of guilt.

In this manner they become sexually repressed, having been taught it was wrong for anything other than marital procreation.. So they have affairs or watch porn when nobody's looking because they are CURIOUS - they may even secretly explore same sex urges.

And that explains why Utahans, two thirds of whom belong to the Mormon Church, are the top consumers of subscription porn.

Nope.
Washington DC views more porn than any other state in the union, and ranks among the lowest in church attendance.
Who pays to view porn has absolutely nothing to do with who is using porn.
Arkansas BTW has the lowest porn viewership than any other state, which ranks among the highest in church attendance.
Sorry to burst your little spin zone there.
There is no correlation with going to church and looking at porn, that is ridiculous. And stupid.
And going to church, apparently makes people view less.
 
So what if they are? Do you have a problem with that? I guess evangelicals are sexually adventurous people. Why is this something that I should care about?

Maybe you should focus on your own problems and issues? :dunno:

I don't think you understand ardent evangelicals. Church leaders drum their heads up with family values, loyalty to spouse, sex outside of marriage is wrong, and guilt - lots and lots of guilt.

In this manner they become sexually repressed, having been taught it was wrong for anything other than marital procreation.. So they have affairs or watch porn when nobody's looking because they are CURIOUS - they may even secretly explore same sex urges.

And that explains why Utahans, two thirds of whom belong to the Mormon Church, are the top consumers of subscription porn.

Nope.
Washington DC views more porn than any other state in the union, and ranks among the lowest in church attendance.
Who pays to view porn has absolutely nothing to do with who is using porn.
Arkansas BTW has the lowest porn viewership than any other state, which ranks among the highest in church attendance.
Sorry to burst your little spin zone there.
There is no correlation with going to church and looking at porn, that is ridiculous. And stupid.
And going to church, apparently makes people view less.

You present no evidence - only hunches

You Lose

America\'s Bible Belt states indulge in more online porn than other less religious states
 
So what if they are? Do you have a problem with that? I guess evangelicals are sexually adventurous people. Why is this something that I should care about?

Maybe you should focus on your own problems and issues? :dunno:

I don't think you understand ardent evangelicals. Church leaders drum their heads up with family values, loyalty to spouse, sex outside of marriage is wrong, and guilt - lots and lots of guilt.

In this manner they become sexually repressed, having been taught it was wrong for anything other than marital procreation.. So they have affairs or watch porn when nobody's looking because they are CURIOUS - they may even secretly explore same sex urges.

And that explains why Utahans, two thirds of whom belong to the Mormon Church, are the top consumers of subscription porn.

Nope.
Washington DC views more porn than any other state in the union, and ranks among the lowest in church attendance.
Who pays to view porn has absolutely nothing to do with who is using porn.
Arkansas BTW has the lowest porn viewership than any other state, which ranks among the highest in church attendance.
Sorry to burst your little spin zone there.
There is no correlation with going to church and looking at porn, that is ridiculous. And stupid.
And going to church, apparently makes people view less.

You present no evidence - only hunches

You Lose

America\'s Bible Belt states indulge in more online porn than other less religious states


Nope.... 2017 Year in Review – Pornhub Insights
And this is from the source.
You are doing two things...
1) You take a very specific statistic that is a small portion of society, and try to apply it to say something about the population as a whole. Spin doctors do this all the time. The number of people who pay for porn is a teensy % of porn viewers overall. Miniscule. That demographic has no bearing on the rest of the population.
2) You are taking anonymous data and trying to apply a demographic to it. That doesn't work.
3) It doesn't pass the smell test.
The truth is males between 18-30, it is estimated 79% look at porn on a regular basis. Trying to say religion plays a part in that is absurd.
 
Nope.... 2017 Year in Review – Pornhub Insights
And this is from the source.
You are doing two things...
1) You take a very specific statistic that is a small portion of society, and try to apply it to say something about the population as a whole. Spin doctors do this all the time. The number of people who pay for porn is a teensy % of porn viewers overall. Miniscule. That demographic has no bearing on the rest of the population.
2) You are taking anonymous data and trying to apply a demographic to it. That doesn't work.
3) It doesn't pass the smell test.
The truth is males between 18-30, it is estimated 79% look at porn on a regular basis. Trying to say religion plays a part in that is absurd.

Pornhub didn't address the subject of religion. They would have no clue what their users do in their private lives.

My data shows very clear trends. You need to study up on the effects of religious sexual repression.

the effects of religious sexual repression
 
Pornhub didn't address the subject of religion. They would have no clue what their users do in their private lives.

My data shows very clear trends. You need to study up on the effects of religious sexual repression.

the effects of religious sexual repression

Hahaha...you do realize you just made my point?
You say "They would have no clue what their users do in their private lives."...as to why my data would be erroneous...well...HELLOO???....that is what I said about yours! There is no way to know the religious details of millions of users in any state. Just because that state may have 5% more religious people, doesn't in any way mean anything.
You are talking about the majority of people. Porn use, especially males, ranges according to age anywhere from 65% to 80%. When that percentage of the total population views porn, it is absurd to try to derive any specific demographic from such a massive data pool.
 
Pornhub didn't address the subject of religion. They would have no clue what their users do in their private lives.

My data shows very clear trends. You need to study up on the effects of religious sexual repression.

the effects of religious sexual repression

Hahaha...you do realize you just made my point?
You say "They would have no clue what their users do in their private lives."...as to why my data would be erroneous...well...HELLOO???....that is what I said about yours! There is no way to know the religious details of millions of users in any state. Just because that state may have 5% more religious people, doesn't in any way mean anything.
You are talking about the majority of people. Porn use, especially males, ranges according to age anywhere from 65% to 80%. When that percentage of the total population views porn, it is absurd to try to derive any specific demographic from such a massive data pool.

Nope sorry, when a credit card is used for a porn subscription they know what states those are coming from. And don't talk to me about a state like Utah or Oklahoma or Alabama doesn't have minimally 25% more highly religious as a state like California or Utah or New York. Remember, 80% of Utah residents belong to the Mormon Church and they are number ONE in porn subscriptions.

5%? LoL :lol:

Most religious (around 2/3 to 3/4)
America’s Most (and Least) Religious States

Least religious (less than half)
America’s Most (and Least) Religious States
 
Same sex lovers have no idea how to deal with those that reject same sex advances. The best they can do is accuse men of wanting to look at naked ladies as if that is a bad thing.
 
So what if they are? Do you have a problem with that? I guess evangelicals are sexually adventurous people. Why is this something that I should care about?

Maybe you should focus on your own problems and issues? :dunno:

I don't think you understand ardent evangelicals. Church leaders drum their heads up with family values, loyalty to spouse, sex outside of marriage is wrong, and guilt - lots and lots of guilt.

In this manner they become sexually repressed, having been taught it was wrong for anything other than marital procreation.. So they have affairs or watch porn when nobody's looking because they are CURIOUS - they may even secretly explore same sex urges.

And that explains why Utahans, two thirds of whom belong to the Mormon Church, are the top consumers of subscription porn.

Again . . . so what? Why on earth should I care? What they do or not do in their bedrooms is their own business, right?
 
Pornhub didn't address the subject of religion. They would have no clue what their users do in their private lives.

My data shows very clear trends. You need to study up on the effects of religious sexual repression.

the effects of religious sexual repression

Hahaha...you do realize you just made my point?
You say "They would have no clue what their users do in their private lives."...as to why my data would be erroneous...well...HELLOO???....that is what I said about yours! There is no way to know the religious details of millions of users in any state. Just because that state may have 5% more religious people, doesn't in any way mean anything.
You are talking about the majority of people. Porn use, especially males, ranges according to age anywhere from 65% to 80%. When that percentage of the total population views porn, it is absurd to try to derive any specific demographic from such a massive data pool.

Nope sorry, when a credit card is used for a porn subscription they know what states those are coming from. And don't talk to me about a state like Utah or Oklahoma or Alabama doesn't have minimally 25% more highly religious as a state like California or Utah or New York. Remember, 80% of Utah residents belong to the Mormon Church and they are number ONE in porn subscriptions.

5%? LoL :lol:

Most religious (around 2/3 to 3/4)
America’s Most (and Least) Religious States

Least religious (less than half)
America’s Most (and Least) Religious States

So? Shall we assume that you are an anti-porn crusader?
 
Nope.... 2017 Year in Review – Pornhub Insights
And this is from the source.
You are doing two things...
1) You take a very specific statistic that is a small portion of society, and try to apply it to say something about the population as a whole. Spin doctors do this all the time. The number of people who pay for porn is a teensy % of porn viewers overall. Miniscule. That demographic has no bearing on the rest of the population.
2) You are taking anonymous data and trying to apply a demographic to it. That doesn't work.
3) It doesn't pass the smell test.
The truth is males between 18-30, it is estimated 79% look at porn on a regular basis. Trying to say religion plays a part in that is absurd.

Pornhub didn't address the subject of religion. They would have no clue what their users do in their private lives.

My data shows very clear trends. You need to study up on the effects of religious sexual repression.

the effects of religious sexual repression

Yet you do? Interesting! Lol.
 

Forum List

Back
Top