Trump: No Basic Principles

[The Rabbi]

What a pussy. I pwned you. You asked where you went wrong and I described it in excruciating detail and so you invent a fiction where you asked me to define something.

As usual, you're the one that's been pwned and have to resort to name calling because you have no decent answer to my question. It happens every time, you lose an argument and the invective flows with absolutely no provocation.

You asked where you went wrong. I told you. And you deflected and now you're declaring victory, the surest sign of a loser.

No you didn't. You started talking about something else and then called me a "moron" and a "pussy". I guess that's the way it is with Republicans this year. I didn't declare victory, I asked for clarification, which you have yet to provide. I'm not a mind reader. If you "described it in excruciating detail", it's only in your own mind, IMO. I certainly haven't seen it in a post. If I missed it, feel free to cite the message.

You should be thoroughly embarassed enough to quit this forum. You claimed "principle" is some kind of code word. But you won't say for what or how you know this. You've done nothing but deflect. You asked where you went wrong and I told you. But it made so much sense and was so unrefutable you had to pursue some kind of fictuon that I fastened on one word. I did not.SO what is "principle" a code word for? Racism?

I "described it in excruciating detail". If that's good enough for me, it's good enough for you, you pathetic worm.

OK so now we're going with "I've already covered that."
It's typical for you. Go soak your head.

 

[dblack]

Yet he's still better then most of the other loserterian freaks that want to bring jesus into the oval office. lol

Matthew --- thank you, seriously.

 

[The Rabbi]

What a pussy. I pwned you. You asked where you went wrong and I described it in excruciating detail and so you invent a fiction where you asked me to define something.

As usual, you're the one that's been pwned and have to resort to name calling because you have no decent answer to my question. It happens every time, you lose an argument and the invective flows with absolutely no provocation.

You asked where you went wrong. I told you. And you deflected and now you're declaring victory, the surest sign of a loser.

No you didn't. You started talking about something else and then called me a "moron" and a "pussy". I guess that's the way it is with Republicans this year. I didn't declare victory, I asked for clarification, which you have yet to provide. I'm not a mind reader. If you "described it in excruciating detail", it's only in your own mind, IMO. I certainly haven't seen it in a post. If I missed it, feel free to cite the message.

You should be thoroughly embarassed enough to quit this forum. You claimed "principle" is some kind of code word. But you won't say for what or how you know this. You've done nothing but deflect. You asked where you went wrong and I told you. But it made so much sense and was so unrefutable you had to pursue some kind of fictuon that I fastened on one word. I did not.SO what is "principle" a code word for? Racism?

I "described it in excruciating detail". If that's good enough for me, it's good enough for you, you pathetic worm.

OK so now we're going with "I've already covered that."
It's typical for you. Go soak your head.

 

[Cecilie1200]

I've said this myself. The problem is that Trump's positions today are about 180 degrees from where they were 4 years ago. While people can change, no one in his 60s reverses himself like that unless he is playing an angle.
From the Daily Beast.
Gun Dealer Shoots Straight on Trump: 'No Basic Principles'

Trump has one basic principle: What's good for Donald Trump. Everything else is negotiable in service of that.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Better him than Hillary (or Bernie, or Joe, or Elizabeth, etc. etc. etc.).

I hate to break it to you, but that's not a high bar to clear. In fact, a snake could pretty much slither over that sucker.

 

[konradv]

As usual, you're the one that's been pwned and have to resort to name calling because you have no decent answer to my question. It happens every time, you lose an argument and the invective flows with absolutely no provocation.

You asked where you went wrong. I told you. And you deflected and now you're declaring victory, the surest sign of a loser.

No you didn't. You started talking about something else and then called me a "moron" and a "pussy". I guess that's the way it is with Republicans this year. I didn't declare victory, I asked for clarification, which you have yet to provide. I'm not a mind reader. If you "described it in excruciating detail", it's only in your own mind, IMO. I certainly haven't seen it in a post. If I missed it, feel free to cite the message.

You should be thoroughly embarassed enough to quit this forum. You claimed "principle" is some kind of code word. But you won't say for what or how you know this. You've done nothing but deflect. You asked where you went wrong and I told you. But it made so much sense and was so unrefutable you had to pursue some kind of fictuon that I fastened on one word. I did not.SO what is "principle" a code word for? Racism?

I "described it in excruciating detail". If that's good enough for me, it's good enough for you, you pathetic worm.

OK so now we're going with "I've already covered that." It's typical for you. Go soak your head.

LOL!!! Typical for me?!?! It's your M.O. or should I say, your only O.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Better him than Hillary (or Bernie, or Joe, or Elizabeth, etc. etc. etc.).

I want more than "slightly above criminal" in my president.

I know. This is like a woman saying her lazy unemployed slacker of a husband "at least doesn't beat me". Really? That's the best standard you've got?

 

[Cecilie1200]

Better him than Hillary (or Bernie, or Joe, or Elizabeth, etc. etc. etc.).

I want more than "slightly above criminal" in my president.

I want somebody who will do what needs to be done to make the country better, not somebody to manage our decline.

Which lets Donny Boy out, because his big plan is "just you wait and see, it'll be great!" Not exactly "doing what needs to be done" in my book.

 

[whitehall]

What exactly are "basic principles" and how do you identify them in a candidate? All the criticism seems to be directed at Trump as if he already won the election but what are Sanders/Hillary's "basic principles"? Sanders is a Marxist socialist and Hillary's "basic principles " seem to have evolved from her association with radical left wing guru and creator of "rules for radicals", Professor Saul Alinsky. Marxist socialist Bernie Sanders is what he is but when you factor in Hillary's association with Alinsky and her mental stability of having been abused by her philandering husband for her adult life and her desire to defend his infidelities you have a witches brew of insanity.

 

[S.J.]

Trump has more principles than both Dem candidates put together. Three, if Biden decides to run.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Trump has more principles than both Dem candidates put together. Three, if Biden decides to run.

Again, not a high bar to clear.

Personally, I just don't find "Well, he could be shittier!" to be a compelling campaign slogan.

 

[The Rabbi]

Trump has more principles than both Dem candidates put together. Three, if Biden decides to run.

Again, not a high bar to clear.

Personally, I just don't find "Well, he could be shittier!" to be a compelling campaign slogan.

"Trump:The Top of the Dungheap" just doesnt make me want to run out to support him.

 

[Cecilie1200]

Trump has more principles than both Dem candidates put together. Three, if Biden decides to run.

Again, not a high bar to clear.

Personally, I just don't find "Well, he could be shittier!" to be a compelling campaign slogan.

"Trump:The Top of the Dungheap" just doesnt make me want to run out to support him.

How about "Trump: We Could Do Worse!"?

 

[jillian]

Yet he's still better then most of the other loserterian freaks that want to bring jesus into the oval office. lol

yea libertarians want this country to be ran on religious values. Moron.
From their website : We support full freedom of expression and oppose government censorship, regulation or control of communications media and technology. We favor the freedom to engage in or abstain from any religious activities that do not violate the rights of others. We oppose government actions which either aid or attack any religion.

what so-called libertarians in office or running for office are pro choice?

 

[ScienceRocks]

The reason I call these people loserterians are they use the economic system of liberterians but then push extreme social conservationism down peoples throats. Sorry, but a real libertarian is just leave me alone socially.

It seems to me that they want to cut and gut everything that helps the poor and middle class, while fucking telling us to go to hell in the freedom department. This is worse then liberterianism.

 

[dblack]

Yet he's still better then most of the other loserterian freaks that want to bring jesus into the oval office. lol

yea libertarians want this country to be ran on religious values. Moron.
From their website : We support full freedom of expression and oppose government censorship, regulation or control of communications media and technology. We favor the freedom to engage in or abstain from any religious activities that do not violate the rights of others. We oppose government actions which either aid or attack any religion.

what so-called libertarians in office or running for office are pro choice?

Most of them. Pro-lifers are a minority in the Libertarian party. I've always voted pro-choice, and I've only ever voted for Libertarians.

 

[TNHarley]

Yet he's still better then most of the other loserterian freaks that want to bring jesus into the oval office. lol

yea libertarians want this country to be ran on religious values. Moron.
From their website : We support full freedom of expression and oppose government censorship, regulation or control of communications media and technology. We favor the freedom to engage in or abstain from any religious activities that do not violate the rights of others. We oppose government actions which either aid or attack any religion.

what so-called libertarians in office or running for office are pro choice?

Most of them. Pro-lifers are a minority in the Libertarian party. I've always voted pro-choice, and I've only ever voted for Libertarians.

That is my take on it as well.

 

[jillian]

Yet he's still better then most of the other loserterian freaks that want to bring jesus into the oval office. lol

yea libertarians want this country to be ran on religious values. Moron.
From their website : We support full freedom of expression and oppose government censorship, regulation or control of communications media and technology. We favor the freedom to engage in or abstain from any religious activities that do not violate the rights of others. We oppose government actions which either aid or attack any religion.

what so-called libertarians in office or running for office are pro choice?

Most of them. Pro-lifers are a minority in the Libertarian party. I've always voted pro-choice, and I've only ever voted for Libertarians.

That is my take on it as well.

what so-called libertarian candidates or people in office are pro choice?

see, it's easy to use what you believe your own experience tells you. i understand that. but i can't think off a single so-called libertarian politician who doesn't p;lay the theocrat game

 

[TNHarley]

Yet he's still better then most of the other loserterian freaks that want to bring jesus into the oval office. lol

yea libertarians want this country to be ran on religious values. Moron.
From their website : We support full freedom of expression and oppose government censorship, regulation or control of communications media and technology. We favor the freedom to engage in or abstain from any religious activities that do not violate the rights of others. We oppose government actions which either aid or attack any religion.

what so-called libertarians in office or running for office are pro choice?

Most of them. Pro-lifers are a minority in the Libertarian party. I've always voted pro-choice, and I've only ever voted for Libertarians.

That is my take on it as well.

what so-called libertarian candidates or people in office are pro choice?

see, it's easy to use what you believe your own experience tells you. i understand that. but i can't think off a single so-called libertarian politician who doesn't p;lay the theocrat game

Gary Johnson