DEFLECTION NOTED! The man went into Trump's event with the expressed intent to disrupt the event, that is a crime. Why do you regressives alway get out the knee pads to suck the dicks of criminals?
Guy, it isn't a crime to disrupt a Nazi Rally. Not particularly smart, but not a crime.
Now to address your deflection. I've already said in another thread that the cop in Chicago crossed the line. Was he justified in shooting the kid, YES. Was he justified in continuing to shoot after the kid went down and the threat was ended, NO. Would the kid have lived if the cop had stopped when he should have, we don't know, but the cop should have been charged and he was.
No, he wasn't justified in shooting the kid, and he should have been charged 14 months ago. The only reason why he was charged now was because the CPD got sued for this dash-cam video. I would also like to know why other video, like 86 minutes of video from a nearby Burger King, were deleted by the CPD. It isn't just this one cop, that's the point.
That being said, cops killing blacks with no justification is extremely rare. Of all the people that die at the hands of police only 25% are black and 95% of the shootings are justified as discovered in a recent WAPO study.
WaPo Admits 'Vast Majority' of Police Shootings Justified
So take your regressive bullshit political rhetoric and shove it.
So your argument is that when the cops investigate themselves, and there is no video, they always find the shooting is justified. Amazing how that works out.
Except no one buys it. We recently had a puma that had to be shot by the police in this city, and a columnist joked that the Police tried to put a drop-piece in it's paw. "No need for that this time, Clancy!"
Thanks for proving exactly how intellectually dishonest you are, now feel free to fuck off. Happy Thanksgiving.