Trump must not attack Syria-it's a trap.

Ray9

Diamond Member
Jul 19, 2016
2,707
4,467
1,970
It would be a mistake for President Trump to attack Syria in retaliation for alleged chemical attacks on civilians including women and children. While these attacks violate international law against the practice, it isn’t clear that these attacks were initiated and carried out by Bashar al-Assad, Syria’s leader.

It makes little sense for Assad to engage in chemical warfare against non-military targets that would draw the condemnation of the international community. Supposedly he’s done it before but there has never been any solid evidence presented that this is the case. It makes a lot more sense for Assad’s opponents to sacrifice innocent victims using captured chemical weapons in order to bait the United States into attacking Assad.

Trump should exercise restraint and not allow himself to be influenced by democrats and backstabbing republicans in the US who are trying to set him up for making the same mistakes his predecessors have made by immersing the US into conflict involving backward, medieval Middle Eastern countries.

The people who elected Trump did not put him in office to follow in the footsteps of GW Bush who after the World Trade Center was attacked by Saudi Arabia turned around and attacked Iraq that has about as much connection to Saudi Arabia as the US does to Switzerland.

Trump was not handed the keys to the White House to be the guardian angel of victims caught in the crossfire of countries that linger in the middle ages run by zealots of cultural, moral and religious atavism. What sense does it make to become mired in the sewer of the Arab Spring where the saved child victims will just automatically hate the US anyway? No matter what is done these victims will just grow up to kill other Arabs and launch artillery and rockets from the Golan Heights into Israel.

Trump needs to stand his ground and reserve his responses to threats only. The American people have learned a lot about how its government enriches itself at the expense of the blood of its people. Adventurism into Arab wars is like hitting a hive full of African killer bees and the politicians that hail its necessity aren’t going to fight it though many will make investments in its outcome.

This is a trap that Trump needs to avoid for the sake of the American people who put him there to look after their interests.
 
Agree. The USA needs to stop interfering in the Middle East. These people insist on barbarism and have done so for thousands of years. We cannot change that.
 
The globalists cannot allow the wars to end in the Middle East. It’s a manufactured crisis in order to bring millions of refugees into Europe. Remember the end game is the destruction of the West and the eradication of whites. Letting Assad win the war and ending it cannot be tolerated by the globalist pigs.

We should stay the hell out of it and let Muslims kill each other off, or let them be ruled by oppressive regimes, since that is the only way “peace” could ever be obtained with Muslims.
 
Agree. The USA needs to stop interfering in the Middle East. These people insist on barbarism and have done so for thousands of years. We cannot change that.
And because they do, they will not be happy to stop at their own shores. They have chemical and biological weapons which they would not think twice to use, as we have seen. Unless you believe they truly, along with Russia and Iran , have no desire or enough crazy to ever seek more power...
Russia ring a bell?
Britain aims to resettle poisoned Russian ex-spy in the U.S.:...
 
It would be a mistake for President Trump to attack Syria in retaliation for alleged chemical attacks on civilians including women and children. While these attacks violate international law against the practice, it isn’t clear that these attacks were initiated and carried out by Bashar al-Assad, Syria’s leader.
FYI-
It is being reported this morning, that the French have absolute, undeniable proof, that it was Assad.
 
Agree. The USA needs to stop interfering in the Middle East. These people insist on barbarism and have done so for thousands of years. We cannot change that.
And because they do, they will not be happy to stop at their own shores. They have chemical and biological weapons which they would not think twice to use, as we have seen. Unless you believe they truly, along with Russia and Iran , have no desire or enough crazy to ever seek more power...
Russia ring a bell?
Britain aims to resettle poisoned Russian ex-spy in the U.S.:...
It would be a mistake for President Trump to attack Syria in retaliation for alleged chemical attacks on civilians including women and children. While these attacks violate international law against the practice, it isn’t clear that these attacks were initiated and carried out by Bashar al-Assad, Syria’s leader.
FYI-
It is being reported this morning, that the French have absolute, undeniable proof, that it was Assad.
what do the French intend to do about it?
 
The Latest: France to decide on Syria strike within days

Agree. The USA needs to stop interfering in the Middle East. These people insist on barbarism and have done so for thousands of years. We cannot change that.
And because they do, they will not be happy to stop at their own shores. They have chemical and biological weapons which they would not think twice to use, as we have seen. Unless you believe they truly, along with Russia and Iran , have no desire or enough crazy to ever seek more power...
Russia ring a bell?
Britain aims to resettle poisoned Russian ex-spy in the U.S.:...
It would be a mistake for President Trump to attack Syria in retaliation for alleged chemical attacks on civilians including women and children. While these attacks violate international law against the practice, it isn’t clear that these attacks were initiated and carried out by Bashar al-Assad, Syria’s leader.
FYI-
It is being reported this morning, that the French have absolute, undeniable proof, that it was Assad.
what do the French intend to do about it?
 
Agree. The USA needs to stop interfering in the Middle East. These people insist on barbarism and have done so for thousands of years. We cannot change that.
And because they do, they will not be happy to stop at their own shores. They have chemical and biological weapons which they would not think twice to use, as we have seen. Unless you believe they truly, along with Russia and Iran , have no desire or enough crazy to ever seek more power...
Russia ring a bell?
Britain aims to resettle poisoned Russian ex-spy in the U.S.:...
It would be a mistake for President Trump to attack Syria in retaliation for alleged chemical attacks on civilians including women and children. While these attacks violate international law against the practice, it isn’t clear that these attacks were initiated and carried out by Bashar al-Assad, Syria’s leader.
FYI-
It is being reported this morning, that the French have absolute, undeniable proof, that it was Assad.
what do the French intend to do about it?
I dunno? I believe they are working with us to come up with that answer.....

I don't think the president should do anything war like, without congress's consent....

This situation in that region is the mother of all mothers! Lot's of different countries, big and small and tribes are involved and literally could lead us in to world war 3 or Armageddon....

people need to be looking farther down the road of what this retaliation attack could do afterwards and lead to....carefully! :eek:
 
Agree. The USA needs to stop interfering in the Middle East. These people insist on barbarism and have done so for thousands of years. We cannot change that.
And because they do, they will not be happy to stop at their own shores. They have chemical and biological weapons which they would not think twice to use, as we have seen. Unless you believe they truly, along with Russia and Iran , have no desire or enough crazy to ever seek more power...
Russia ring a bell?
Britain aims to resettle poisoned Russian ex-spy in the U.S.:...
It would be a mistake for President Trump to attack Syria in retaliation for alleged chemical attacks on civilians including women and children. While these attacks violate international law against the practice, it isn’t clear that these attacks were initiated and carried out by Bashar al-Assad, Syria’s leader.
FYI-
It is being reported this morning, that the French have absolute, undeniable proof, that it was Assad.
what do the French intend to do about it?
I dunno? I believe they are working with us to come up with that answer.....

I don't think the president should do anything war like, without congress's consent....

This situation in that region is the mother of all mothers! Lot's of different countries, big and small and tribes are involved and literally could lead us in to world war 3 or Armageddon....

people need to be looking farther down the road of what this retaliation attack could do afterwards and lead to....carefully! :eek:
I agree, the US needs to sit down, shut up and never sacrifice our lives for others freedom. If they want freedom they need to stand up and fight for it.
 
It would be a mistake for President Trump to attack Syria in retaliation for alleged chemical attacks on civilians including women and children. While these attacks violate international law against the practice, it isn’t clear that these attacks were initiated and carried out by Bashar al-Assad, Syria’s leader.

It makes little sense for Assad to engage in chemical warfare against non-military targets that would draw the condemnation of the international community. Supposedly he’s done it before but there has never been any solid evidence presented that this is the case. It makes a lot more sense for Assad’s opponents to sacrifice innocent victims using captured chemical weapons in order to bait the United States into attacking Assad.

Trump should exercise restraint and not allow himself to be influenced by democrats and backstabbing republicans in the US who are trying to set him up for making the same mistakes his predecessors have made by immersing the US into conflict involving backward, medieval Middle Eastern countries.

The people who elected Trump did not put him in office to follow in the footsteps of GW Bush who after the World Trade Center was attacked by Saudi Arabia turned around and attacked Iraq that has about as much connection to Saudi Arabia as the US does to Switzerland.

Trump was not handed the keys to the White House to be the guardian angel of victims caught in the crossfire of countries that linger in the middle ages run by zealots of cultural, moral and religious atavism. What sense does it make to become mired in the sewer of the Arab Spring where the saved child victims will just automatically hate the US anyway? No matter what is done these victims will just grow up to kill other Arabs and launch artillery and rockets from the Golan Heights into Israel.

Trump needs to stand his ground and reserve his responses to threats only. The American people have learned a lot about how its government enriches itself at the expense of the blood of its people. Adventurism into Arab wars is like hitting a hive full of African killer bees and the politicians that hail its necessity aren’t going to fight it though many will make investments in its outcome.

This is a trap that Trump needs to avoid for the sake of the American people who put him there to look after their interests.

this is where we will find out if he is different than Bush and Obama,two puppets of the government who let their puppet masters tell them what to do and did not stand up to government corruption.
 
Agree. The USA needs to stop interfering in the Middle East. These people insist on barbarism and have done so for thousands of years. We cannot change that.
And because they do, they will not be happy to stop at their own shores. They have chemical and biological weapons which they would not think twice to use, as we have seen. Unless you believe they truly, along with Russia and Iran , have no desire or enough crazy to ever seek more power...
Russia ring a bell?
Britain aims to resettle poisoned Russian ex-spy in the U.S.:...
It would be a mistake for President Trump to attack Syria in retaliation for alleged chemical attacks on civilians including women and children. While these attacks violate international law against the practice, it isn’t clear that these attacks were initiated and carried out by Bashar al-Assad, Syria’s leader.
FYI-
It is being reported this morning, that the French have absolute, undeniable proof, that it was Assad.
what do the French intend to do about it?
I dunno? I believe they are working with us to come up with that answer.....

I don't think the president should do anything war like, without congress's consent....

This situation in that region is the mother of all mothers! Lot's of different countries, big and small and tribes are involved and literally could lead us in to world war 3 or Armageddon....

people need to be looking farther down the road of what this retaliation attack could do afterwards and lead to....carefully! :eek:

This is literally the dumbest shit I e seen posted today. WW3? Lol
Who would side with Russia & Iran that amounts to more than an ants ass?

No way
 
Agree. The USA needs to stop interfering in the Middle East. These people insist on barbarism and have done so for thousands of years. We cannot change that.

But then Russia will step in.
Damned if ya do,damned if ya dont.
Ya remember Russia squandered a lot of life and wealth in Afghanistan and went home broke with her tail tucked between her legs! If Russia wants to be fucking stupid agin then let her, it’s time the USA woke the fuck up!
 
Agree. The USA needs to stop interfering in the Middle East. These people insist on barbarism and have done so for thousands of years. We cannot change that.
And because they do, they will not be happy to stop at their own shores. They have chemical and biological weapons which they would not think twice to use, as we have seen. Unless you believe they truly, along with Russia and Iran , have no desire or enough crazy to ever seek more power...
Russia ring a bell?
Britain aims to resettle poisoned Russian ex-spy in the U.S.:...
It would be a mistake for President Trump to attack Syria in retaliation for alleged chemical attacks on civilians including women and children. While these attacks violate international law against the practice, it isn’t clear that these attacks were initiated and carried out by Bashar al-Assad, Syria’s leader.
FYI-
It is being reported this morning, that the French have absolute, undeniable proof, that it was Assad.
what do the French intend to do about it?
I dunno? I believe they are working with us to come up with that answer.....

I don't think the president should do anything war like, without congress's consent....

This situation in that region is the mother of all mothers! Lot's of different countries, big and small and tribes are involved and literally could lead us in to world war 3 or Armageddon....

people need to be looking farther down the road of what this retaliation attack could do afterwards and lead to....carefully! :eek:

This is literally the dumbest shit I e seen posted today. WW3? Lol
Who would side with Russia & Iran that amounts to more than an ants ass?

No way
true, we do have enough military might to wipe out the rest of the entire world...no one comes close....!

But would we ever wipe out our enemies by blowing them in to oblivion is not an easy question to answer....

I can see China, maybe No Korea, Iraq, Iran, Venezuela, Syria joining their side, when and if the day came...
 
Agree. The USA needs to stop interfering in the Middle East. These people insist on barbarism and have done so for thousands of years. We cannot change that.

But then Russia will step in.
Damned if ya do,damned if ya dont.
Ya remember Russia squandered a lot of life and wealth in Afghanistan and went home broke with her tail tucked between her legs! If Russia wants to be fucking stupid agin then let her, it’s time the USA woke the fuck up!

Yet they're back again.
 
It would be a mistake for President Trump to attack Syria in retaliation for alleged chemical attacks on civilians including women and children. While these attacks violate international law against the practice, it isn’t clear that these attacks were initiated and carried out by Bashar al-Assad, Syria’s leader.
FYI-
It is being reported this morning, that the French have absolute, undeniable proof, that it was Assad.
Have they divulged it?
 
It would be a mistake for President Trump to attack Syria in retaliation for alleged chemical attacks on civilians including women and children. While these attacks violate international law against the practice, it isn’t clear that these attacks were initiated and carried out by Bashar al-Assad, Syria’s leader.
FYI-
It is being reported this morning, that the French have absolute, undeniable proof, that it was Assad.
Have they divulged it?
I changed the channel so I do not know.... I think Depotoo posted something on it right after me....
 
It would be a mistake for President Trump to attack Syria in retaliation for alleged chemical attacks on civilians including women and children. While these attacks violate international law against the practice, it isn’t clear that these attacks were initiated and carried out by Bashar al-Assad, Syria’s leader.
FYI-
It is being reported this morning, that the French have absolute, undeniable proof, that it was Assad.

They would never EVER lie!!!!!!
 

Forum List

Back
Top