usmbguest5318
Gold Member
- Thread starter
- #41
I asked a question. I would appreciate an answer. Did any liberals give Obama grief because he didn't even know how many states there are? I think not. And yet, here you are. verbally castrating Trump for a minor mistake. You people are such hypocrites. Trump has done more for this country in less than a year than obama did in eight years, yet you hate Trump. Why is that?He praised a country about their health system. YetHe has no clue about that country...does this guy do his homework before going up there?
I'm sorry but if you can see how stupid this guy, something is wrong with you too.
FYI: AIN'T a lefty and don't like Hillary.He praised a country about their health system. Yet he has no clue about that country...does this guy do his homework before going up there?
Thank you!!!
Truly, there are several key things that the gaffe illustrates or suggests, and they really don't have much to do with any nation beyond the U.S:
Let's be clear. The reason the error is noteworthy is because Trump made it and he made it after having made attestations such as those noted above and he made the mistake he did in the setting where he made it.
- It's one more piece of evidence that we cannot rely on even the most basic promises/assertions Trump makes.
- Trump said he'll hire the best people. Among those people are speechwriters, ostensibly "the best" ones. Did they do their homework, or even just proofread the document? Or run "spellcheck?" That speech and the luncheon at which it was delivered didn't "sneak up on" anybody. It was not an impromptu event or speech.
- That Trump twice in one read speech "mispronounced" Namibia, as is claimed, suggests the quality control process at the WH just isn't working.
- Trump has numerous times boasted that he is smart. Once again we see he is not.
- Do smart people flub the name of a nation, while talking to the head of state of that nation at an event one is hosting, and not notice it, not apologize, not correct themselves, or immediately do/say something other than leave it to folks back in Washington to "atone" for one's error?
- Screw, smart in a "book smart" way. How about just smart enough to be courteous?
- The gaffe repetition suggests Trump is/was not himself fully engaged in what he's doing. It seems as though someone just handed him a speech and he just stood up and read it. Mind you, there's no one right way to get a speech composed and delivered, but all the right ways involve doing at least one "dry run" of the thing and making sure the damn thing doesn't have misspellings, grammatical errors and other tripping points in it. That's just how smart people go about things that are important; they don't leave it to chance.
I'm not going to be drawn into a tu quoque line of discourse/debate because there is no arguing in such cases. The tu quoque line of defense is fallacious from the start; thus there is no point in trying to counter-argue it. Doing so is to just enter the "rabbit hole," as it were.Remember when Obama said there were 57 states? I didn't see any liberals calling him on that one. Talk about DUMB.
He knows how many states there are you moron.
The "57 states" thing was a gaffe. There're no two ways about that.
- Did he repeat it twice in the same speech?
- Did he make the gafe as he delivered a speech he was reading?
- Was he POTUS at the time?
- Did Obama repeatedly make claims about being smart?
- Was he speaking to his a room full of Democrats or a room full of foreign heads of state?
- Even ignoring the "Nambia" gaffe, is one also to ignore some 200+ others made in the space of just two years (if that long), and many of which are flat out wrong on point of fact, not point of view, point of fact?
I'm not going to be drawn into a tu quoque line of discourse/debate because there is no arguing in such cases. The tu quoque line of defense is fallacious from the start; thus there is no point in trying to counter-argue it. Doing so is to just enter the "rabbit hole," as it were.