Trump-haters making democracy impossible

[cnelsen]

The level of involvement of the Trump campaign with a Russian espionage operation clear meant to help them may be the most crucial question this country has faced in decades.

O

Just politics? Mr. Trump alleged to have a, "fine and wonderful" health plan. Where is it.

So, if Daniel Palos decides a president hasn't been able to accomplish in his first six months what he promised in the campaign, then Daniel Palos' feelings trump the will of the people and the Constitution. OK. Got it.

Prosecute the Washington Post.

 

[eagle1462010]

Supreme Court nominee................check

least amount of new regulations in history.........proposed a 2 cuts for every 1 new regulations but has but them by a factor of 16..............check

Increased border security.............obeying the ICE laws now................proposed 15,000 more agents.....pending.............check.

travel ban............wins most of the decision at the Supreme Court..............check

VA........just signed a law making it easier to FIRE incompetent employees.......546 last count of those fired.......continued the voucher system.....and is hiring more capable employees to run the show.................................check.....

Less ROE's on the battlefield................ISIS is losing ground on all fronts...............MOAB use to clean out bunkers of the Taliban instead of our troops having to go in them.................partial check....he did say it would happen quicker.....

Keystone pipeline.............................check

Reversal of most of the Obama executive orders.................check................

TPP bites the dust...................................check

Paris Accord bites the dust...................check........


Easy to see why they are so pissed off.................they are losing on all fronts no matter how hard they try to take him down..........they are frustrated.............

Poor things...................

 

[eagle1462010]

 

[cnelsen]

This question must be settled. Making this just go away would make collusion with another government's intelligence apparatus OK in our election.This cannot be allowed to happen.

OK, I'll put collusion w another government's intelligence apparatus on the table, and let's have a big examination and publicize the results. All newspapers and networks required to print the raw testimony or go to jail.

If we find there is any collusion or foreign meddling in our elections, we sever diplomatic relations permanently and slap the severest sanctions possible. Any of our citizens or politicians found to be colluding to be given lengthy prison terms.

Deal?

Great.

I'll go first. I'd like to call as my first defendant, Israel. Now you go.

Russia? How'd I guess. I'd like to call as my second defendant. Mexico.

What's that? I couldn't hear you over the sound of the crickets. Whatever, my third defendant is China.

More crickets?

 

[bripat9643]

Making Democracy impossible? The GOP controls everything. The federal government, the Supreme Court, most state legislatures, most governorships..... but everything is the Democrat's fault? LOL

I said nothing about Democrats or Republicans.

You said plenty that proves you are a political retard. No Law enforcement chief of any agency would allow his agents to be used in such an illegal act as shutting down a newspaper.

Who did that?

 

[bripat9643]

When the government is not working in the interests of the people, the people have a right to express their displeasure and the media has the duty to report on the wrongdoings of that government. You would have enthusiastically agreed with that statement last year, what happened? What happened is that you people transitioned back to authoritarian nationalists just because the president is republican. It's one of the reasons that reasonable people see Trump and his supporters as idiots.

"When the government is not working in the interests of the people,"

As I pointed out, you rabid Trump-haters have been attacking him since his first day in office. It had nothing to do with whether the government was working in the interests of the people. You don't get to decide that on his first day in office. And if the government isn't working, that's why we have elections.

"the people have a right to express their displeasure"

Right to express displeasure ( and, boy, do you ever) yes. You rabid Trump-haters are trying to bring him down, overturn the election, invalidate the will of the people. Very different than "expressing displeasure."

"and the media has the duty to report on the wrongdoings of that government."

The media has the obligation to report the wrong-doings fairly. The headline from today's Post proves the rabid Trump-haters don't give a shit about wrong-doing. There is nothing wrong with Jeff Sessions talking about the campaign with anyone he wants. The Post knows that, but they don't care. Their one goal is to bring Trump down. They are traitors.

You are still an idiot, you may be right that Jeff Sessions can talk about the campaign with whoever but the real story you missed is that he apparently lied during Senate confirmation, that's different.

That's a nothing burger.

 

[jillian]

Donald Trump was elected by the people of the United States to a four year term. He is the person we chose to execute the laws of our Republic. We chose him according to the method as provided in our Constitution--the supreme law of the land. You Trump-haters have opposed him from his first day in office--not his policies, but him. You have attacked him like a pack of vicious dogs every minute of every day of his administration--not his policies, but him. In other words, you have spent every day since he took office attacking our democracy itself.

You seek to bring him down. That means you seek to overturn the election. That means you seek to bring down our system of government. That means you and your thug allies think you should replace the democratic will of the people as the supreme power in this land. That means you seek to overturn the Constitution; you seek to subvert the rule of law. That means you are dangerous traitors.

Consider this from today's Washington Post: Sessions discussed Trump campaign with Russian ambassador, per intel intercepts. Do you know what that is? That is a big fat nothing. So what if Sessions discussed the campaign with the Russian ambassador. So fucking what? Jeff Sessions could have made it his mission to discuss the campaign with every leader on earth plus Satan every single day from Iowa through November 8 and no laws would have been broken.

Trump should have federal agents raid the Washington Post on Monday morning and have every person there arrested on charges of treason. He should keep them in jail until the end of his term.

would you like a tissue, whiny little nutter?

I love seeing the pondscum who prevented the government from operating properly for the previous eight years suddenly not understand why no one wants to play with their incomptentent little group

 

[eagle1462010]

Donald Trump was elected by the people of the United States to a four year term. He is the person we chose to execute the laws of our Republic. We chose him according to the method as provided in our Constitution--the supreme law of the land. You Trump-haters have opposed him from his first day in office--not his policies, but him. You have attacked him like a pack of vicious dogs every minute of every day of his administration--not his policies, but him. In other words, you have spent every day since he took office attacking our democracy itself.

You seek to bring him down. That means you seek to overturn the election. That means you seek to bring down our system of government. That means you and your thug allies think you should replace the democratic will of the people as the supreme power in this land. That means you seek to overturn the Constitution; you seek to subvert the rule of law. That means you are dangerous traitors.

Consider this from today's Washington Post: Sessions discussed Trump campaign with Russian ambassador, per intel intercepts. Do you know what that is? That is a big fat nothing. So what if Sessions discussed the campaign with the Russian ambassador. So fucking what? Jeff Sessions could have made it his mission to discuss the campaign with every leader on earth plus Satan every single day from Iowa through November 8 and no laws would have been broken.

Trump should have federal agents raid the Washington Post on Monday morning and have every person there arrested on charges of treason. He should keep them in jail until the end of his term.

would you like a tissue, whiny little nutter?

I love seeing the pondscum who prevented the government from operating properly for the previous eight years suddenly not understand why no one wants to play with their incomptentent little group

Seems to be working just fine........

Obama's legacy is turning to dust....................still more to do............but the Dems are losing badly even with the reruns of the Brady Bunch.......RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA.................

Your side is making themselves look quite Foolish......................Problem with Liars............they have to keep telling lies to cover the last one......sooner or later the truth catches the Lies...................and shows the Liars for what they really are.

 

[cnelsen]

Trump should have federal agents raid the Washington Post on Monday morning and have every person there arrested on charges of treason. He should keep them in jail until the end of his term.

Yeah, the Soviets loved that shit. So do China and North Korea and other totalitarian regimes.

Another "small government" conservative who worships a brutal Communist style police state.

I've never mentioned "small government" on this board. And we're already in a brutal Bolshevik police state, with the Washington Post the propaganda arm of the NKVD. Prosecuting traitors doesn't make one a communist, believe it or not.

 

[Doc1]

Donald Trump was elected by the people of the United States to a four year term. He is the person we chose to execute the laws of our Republic. We chose him according to the method as provided in our Constitution--the supreme law of the land. You Trump-haters have opposed him from his first day in office--not his policies, but him. You have attacked him like a pack of vicious dogs every minute of every day of his administration--not his policies, but him. In other words, you have spent every day since he took office attacking our democracy itself.

You seek to bring him down. That means you seek to overturn the election. That means you seek to bring down our system of government. That means you and your thug allies think you should replace the democratic will of the people as the supreme power in this land. That means you seek to overturn the Constitution; you seek to subvert the rule of law. That means you are dangerous traitors.

Consider this from today's Washington Post: Sessions discussed Trump campaign with Russian ambassador, per intel intercepts. Do you know what that is? That is a big fat nothing. So what if Sessions discussed the campaign with the Russian ambassador. So fucking what? Jeff Sessions could have made it his mission to discuss the campaign with every leader on earth plus Satan every single day from Iowa through November 8 and no laws would have been broken.

Trump should have federal agents raid the Washington Post on Monday morning and have every person there arrested on charges of treason. He should keep them in jail until the end of his term.

would you like a tissue, whiny little nutter?

I love seeing the pondscum who prevented the government from operating properly for the previous eight years suddenly not understand why no one wants to play with their incomptentent little group

You know how we know you are a stupid shit? Obama got every dime he ever wanted after that shut down, so pardon me, but fuck off.

The hilarious thing was this, everybody screamed that the shut down would "kill" the Right.
What happened?
The House changed hands the next year. Dumbasses.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Trump should have federal agents raid the Washington Post on Monday morning and have every person there arrested on charges of treason. He should keep them in jail until the end of his term.

Yeah, the Soviets loved that shit. So do China and North Korea and other totalitarian regimes.

Another "small government" conservative who worships a brutal Communist style police state.

I've never mentioned "small government" on this board. And we're already in a brutal Bolshevik police state, with the Washington Post the propaganda arm of the NKVD. Prosecuting traitors doesn't make one a communist, believe it or not.

Never said you were a Communist. I said you have a lot in common despite your hand wringing against them.

 

[cnelsen]

Donald Trump was elected by the people of the United States to a four year term. He is the person we chose to execute the laws of our Republic. We chose him according to the method as provided in our Constitution--the supreme law of the land. You Trump-haters have opposed him from his first day in office--not his policies, but him. You have attacked him like a pack of vicious dogs every minute of every day of his administration--not his policies, but him. In other words, you have spent every day since he took office attacking our democracy itself.

You seek to bring him down. That means you seek to overturn the election. That means you seek to bring down our system of government. That means you and your thug allies think you should replace the democratic will of the people as the supreme power in this land. That means you seek to overturn the Constitution; you seek to subvert the rule of law. That means you are dangerous traitors.

Consider this from today's Washington Post: Sessions discussed Trump campaign with Russian ambassador, per intel intercepts. Do you know what that is? That is a big fat nothing. So what if Sessions discussed the campaign with the Russian ambassador. So fucking what? Jeff Sessions could have made it his mission to discuss the campaign with every leader on earth plus Satan every single day from Iowa through November 8 and no laws would have been broken.

Trump should have federal agents raid the Washington Post on Monday morning and have every person there arrested on charges of treason. He should keep them in jail until the end of his term.

would you like a tissue, whiny little nutter?

I love seeing the pondscum who prevented the government from operating properly for the previous eight years suddenly not understand why no one wants to play with their incomptentent little group

You are particularly noxious little tribebitch, you know that? The incompetent little group you despise are called Americans, witch.

 

[cnelsen]

Trump should have federal agents raid the Washington Post on Monday morning and have every person there arrested on charges of treason. He should keep them in jail until the end of his term.

Yeah, the Soviets loved that shit. So do China and North Korea and other totalitarian regimes.

Another "small government" conservative who worships a brutal Communist style police state.

I've never mentioned "small government" on this board. And we're already in a brutal Bolshevik police state, with the Washington Post the propaganda arm of the NKVD. Prosecuting traitors doesn't make one a communist, believe it or not.

Never said you were a Communist. I said you have a lot in common despite your hand wringing against them.

Your mistake is you think prosecuting the Washington Post would be the same thing as prosecuting a member of the American press.

 

[occupied]

This question must be settled. Making this just go away would make collusion with another government's intelligence apparatus OK in our election.This cannot be allowed to happen.

OK, I'll put collusion w another government's intelligence apparatus on the table, and let's have a big examination and publicize the results. All newspapers and networks required to print the raw testimony or go to jail.

If we find there is any collusion or foreign meddling in our elections, we sever diplomatic relations permanently and slap the severest sanctions possible. Any of our citizens or politicians found to be colluding to be given lengthy prison terms.

Deal?

Great.

I'll go first. I'd like to call as my first defendant, Israel. Now you go.

Russia? How'd I guess. I'd like to call as my second defendant. Mexico.

What's that? I couldn't hear you over the sound of the crickets. Whatever, my third defendant is China.

More crickets?

Why do you think brute force authoritarianism is the only way to deal with things? All this will be dealt with within the framework of our nation's laws in the fullness of time. The kind of fascistic shit you keep suggesting shows you really have no regard for America being a nation of laws where even the worst are afforded due process. Our nation will survive this without having to resort to the kind of brutal shit they have in Russia.

 

[cnelsen]

So Trump works with Russia to hack our elections and you think you care about our democracy? Are you fucking insane?

Define "hack", twat.

Trump didn't "work with Russia" jerk off. However they all, including Trump, sure as hell worked with Israel.



-------- Forwarded Message --------
Subject: Re: Hillary Clinton to Jewish donors: I’ll be better for Israel than Obama - POLITICO
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2015 12:12:45 -0400
From: Dan Schwerin <[email protected]>
To: Robby Mook <[email protected]>
CC: Oren Shur <[email protected]>, John Podesta <[email protected]>, Jake Sullivan <[email protected]>, Christina Reynolds <[email protected]>


That's basically the goal of the BDS letter.

On Fri, Jul 3, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Robby Mook <[email protected]> wrote:
I was just thinking: has she made a clear statement on Israel yet? I get this question from donors all the time. Does she need to state her principles on Israel before Iran? Or do both at the same time?



On Jul 3, 2015, at 10:00 AM, Oren Shur <[email protected]> wrote:

This article seems to make the case for the Mook approach - clear, direct and principled.

Sent from my iPhone

Begin forwarded message:

From: Ian Sams <[email protected]>
Date: July 3, 2015 at 9:31:09 AM EDT
To: Clips <[email protected]>
Subject: Hillary Clinton to Jewish donors: I’ll be better for Israel than Obama - POLITICO


Clinton signals to Jewish donors: I'll be better for Israel

Hillary Clinton to Jewish donors: I’ll be better for Israel than Obama
But the former secretary of state is sending mixed signals on the president's Iran deal.



By Kenneth P. Vogel and Tarini Parti

7/3/15 6:33 AM EDT

Updated 7/3/15 6:33 AM EDT



Hillary Clinton is privately signaling to wealthy Jewish donors that — no matter the result of the Iranian nuclear negotiations — she will be a better friend to Israel than President Barack Obama.

But, even as donors increasingly push Clinton on the subject in private, they have emerged with sometimes widely varying interpretations about whether she would support a prospective deal, according to interviews with more than 10 influential donors and fundraising operatives.

Story Continued Below

Clinton’s private responses in some ways resemble a foreign policy Rorschach test; donors who see a deal as important to world peace have come away thinking that Clinton shares their perspective, but so, too, do donors who oppose any prospective agreement as compromising Israeli security.

Publicly, she’s expressed support for the negotiating process, which she secretly initiated during her time as secretary of state, but has also said “no deal is better than a bad deal.”

With the talks heading into the home stretch in Vienna, the issue is emerging as an early test for Clinton’s presidential campaign. She’s already struggling to balance two of her biggest strengths as a candidate — her deep foreign policy track record and her vaunted fundraising ability — and that balance could become even trickier if there’s a deal.

“Whatever way you go, there will be some people who won’t like it,” said Sarah Kovner, a prominent New York donor who is a leading bundler for Clinton’s campaign and worked in Bill Clinton’s presidential administration. “You can’t have everybody with you. You’ve got to do what you think is right for the country.”

The negotiations are of intense interest for some Jewish donors whose political giving is animated by their support for Israel. They’re being counted on by Clinton’s allies to donate huge sums for a campaign and a pair of supportive super PACs that, taken together, are expected to raise $2 billion or more.

Clinton’s campaign rejected any suggestion that she’s trying to have it both ways on Iran.

“Her support for the negotiating process and touting support for Israel are not contradictory,” said Clinton spokesman Nick Merrill. “A strong deal is good for Israel in her view.”

And several people who’ve heard her address the issue say the fact that different people can come away with such different interpretations is a testament to her nuanced approach to the issue and her skill as a politician, rather than any vacillation on the subject.

“That’s just smart politics,” said one donor who supports the negotiations and recently talked to her about them. “Because, right now, you have the freedom to say all those things, so why would you commit and box yourself in until you saw what the deal was?”

Clinton recently told another pro-deal donor that she was “very supportive of the negotiating process,” the donor recalled, while a third funder said she boasted of her role in starting the talks. “So it seemed like she was supporting it,” recalled the funder.

And, at a Manhattan fundraiser last week featuring a largely Jewish group of donors, Clinton defended Obama against charges he had weakened the U.S.-Israel relationship, asserting that such criticism stemmed from a “perception” problem, according to a donor who was present. But she also suggested that if she were elected president she could correct that problem and bring the two nations closer.

“Diplomacy is all about personal relationships, and I’ve got my own relationships,” she said, referencing her two-decade association with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu, an ardent opponent of the Iran deal and, occasionally, of Obama. Clinton even cited her rapport with former Israeli ambassador to the U.S. Michael Oren, who last week published a book that was brutally critical of the Obama administration and was timed for release to try to stymie the Iran deal. “I know Michael well, but I haven’t read the book,” she said.

At a fundraiser last month at the Long Island home of Democratic donor Jay Jacobs, Clinton was asked by an Orthodox rabbi about threats to Israel’s security. “She did stress in no uncertain terms her full and fervent support of the state of Israel and the defense of the state of Israel,” recalled Jacobs. “And the people in the audience who heard it seemed to be comfortable with her answer.”

Likewise, donors at a different New York fundraiser seemed to fully accept her answer to a slightly different question about the U.S. interest in the deal, said billionaire hedge fund manager Marc Lasry, a leading Clinton donor. “She said ‘I’m going to do what’s in the best interest of the U.S.,’ and that was the end of it,” Lasry said.

Dan Berger, a Philadelphia lawyer and major Democratic donor who supports the framework of a deal, cautioned that the interests of the U.S. and Israel, “although close, are not identical. It might not be in the best interest of American Jews, but it’s got to be in the best interest of the majority of the people.” He urged Jewish donors “to take a step back and look at the complexity and judge the agreement based on its merits,” adding: “I’d hope Hillary would judge it based on its merits and not on political support.”

Lasry rejected the suggestion that Clinton would even consider the fundraising implications when assessing any deal.

But Clinton’s senior foreign policy advisers have briefed interested wealthy donors on both the negotiations over the deal and its prospects for congressional approval, according to one donor who recently talked to a top Clinton aide.

“It’s a tricky issue for her,” said the donor who was briefed, arguing that Jewish donors who oppose a deal and favor military intervention in Iran “are going to put her in a box.”

Clinton’s allies are carefully monitoring the sensitivities of a handful of hawkish Democratic mega-donors for signs that the Iran talks may be influencing their willingness to write million-dollar super PAC checks. Chief among that group is billionaire Hollywood entrepreneur Haim Saban, who sources say has spoken multiple times with Clinton and her top aides about the deal.

In April, he strongly suggested that Clinton opposed the deal. “I know where she stands, but I can’t talk about it,” Saban told an Israeli television news channel, adding under questioning, “She has an opinion, a very well-defined opinion. And in any case, everything that she thinks and everything she has done and will do will always be for the good of Israel. We don’t need to worry about this.”

He soon backtracked, saying “I have no idea what Hillary thinks about the Iran deal.”

And multiple prominent Jewish donors who joined Saban at a White House meeting with Obama in April to discuss the Iran negotiations said Saban expressed open-mindedness about supporting the deal, though one participant suggested his opinion shouldn’t hold as much weight as those of foreign policy professionals.

“Haim Saban is a very smart businessman who has a tremendous amount of love for the Clintons, but I don’t think he is the most sophisticated policy analyst that there is,” said the donor.

Saban’s representatives did not respond to questions about his interactions with Clinton.

But on Thursday, POLITICO reported that he donated $2 million this year to a super PAC supporting her presidential campaign, which Democratic finance sources interpreted as a sign that Saban’s financial support will not be conditioned on Clinton taking a certain stance on the Iran deal.

Steve Rabinowitz, a Democratic consultant who worked in the Clinton White House and was a co-founder of Jewish Americans Ready for Hillary, argued that the Iran deal isn’t going to be a deciding issue for either donors or voters.

“Do people in my community talk about the Iran deal? Sure. But is it affecting their support for Hillary Clinton? No,” he said. “Iran certainly will — and already has — become a talking point, but it will not move three votes or $3.”

Clinton has the potential to bring along donors like Saban who might have been skeptical of negotiating with Iran, argued the Long Island donor Jacobs. “Hillary has a lot of credibility and support in the Jewish community. It’s broad and deep. People understand that she has fought and has been there as an advocate,” he said. “So when she speaks on the issue, there will be more people in the Jewish community who have perhaps unfairly not appreciated President Obama’s support who will at least give her view a more open-minded assessment.”

If Clinton backs any eventual deal, its proponents will be under pressure to step up their giving — both to the Clinton super PACs and to pro-deal groups — because she is likely to come under heavy fire from deep-pocketed groups that oppose the deal.

“If there’s a deal, and she comes out in favor of it, you can be sure there will be a great deal of fire trained on her,” said Noah Pollak, the executive director of the Emergency Committee for Israel. The conservative group has worked to rally opposition to the talks and this week began airing an ad pressuring New York Democratic Sen. Chuck Schumer, who is considered a key vote on the deal, to oppose it.

The left-leaning Israel advocacy group J Street, which has worked to build support for the deal, is expected to come to the defense of supporters, including potentially Clinton, though on some issues, the group’s members regard her as too hawkish for their tastes.

“For people who speak on these Middle East issues on which we have strong positions, we come to their support and defense on those issues, regardless of party, regardless of candidacy,” said Victor A Kovner, a Democratic donor who chairs J Street’s PAC.

Kovner, like his wife, Sarah Kovner, is backing Clinton, and said he has communicated his support for a deal to the candidate.

“She is familiar with my view, but she has a lot of supporters and advisers on both sides of this question — around the nation, both within the Jewish community and beyond the Jewish community.”

Authors:
View Comments


--
Ian Sams
(423) 915-6592

 

[cnelsen]

This question must be settled. Making this just go away would make collusion with another government's intelligence apparatus OK in our election.This cannot be allowed to happen.

OK, I'll put collusion w another government's intelligence apparatus on the table, and let's have a big examination and publicize the results. All newspapers and networks required to print the raw testimony or go to jail.

If we find there is any collusion or foreign meddling in our elections, we sever diplomatic relations permanently and slap the severest sanctions possible. Any of our citizens or politicians found to be colluding to be given lengthy prison terms.

Deal?

Great.

I'll go first. I'd like to call as my first defendant, Israel. Now you go.

Russia? How'd I guess. I'd like to call as my second defendant. Mexico.

What's that? I couldn't hear you over the sound of the crickets. Whatever, my third defendant is China.

More crickets?

Why do you think brute force authoritarianism is the only way to deal with things? All this will be dealt within the framework of our nation's laws in the fullness of time. The kind of fascistic shit you keep suggesting shows you really have no regard for America being a nation of laws where even the worst are afforded due process. Our nation will survive this without having to resort to the kind of brutal shit they have in Russia.

You think "our nation" still has laws? Ask any Iraqi or Libyan or Syrian about the tender mercies of the framework of our laws. Or would they prefer the "brutal shit" they ahve in Russia?

 

[cnelsen]

Trump should have federal agents raid the Washington Post on Monday morning and have every person there arrested on charges of treason. He should keep them in jail until the end of his term.

Yeah, the Soviets loved that shit. So do China and North Korea and other totalitarian regimes.

Another "small government" conservative who worships a brutal Communist style police state.

I've never mentioned "small government" on this board. And we're already in a brutal Bolshevik police state, with the Washington Post the propaganda arm of the NKVD. Prosecuting traitors doesn't make one a communist, believe it or not.

Never said you were a Communist. I said you have a lot in common despite your hand wringing against them.

More accurately, it's Jews I wring my hands over. Communism just happens to be a favorite vehicle of the Jews for brutality.

 

[cnelsen]

Donald Trump was elected by the people of the United States to a four year term. He is the person we chose to execute the laws of our Republic. We chose him according to the method as provided in our Constitution--the supreme law of the land. You Trump-haters have opposed him from his first day in office--not his policies, but him. You have attacked him like a pack of vicious dogs every minute of every day of his administration--not his policies, but him. In other words, you have spent every day since he took office attacking our democracy itself.

You seek to bring him down. That means you seek to overturn the election. That means you seek to bring down our system of government. That means you and your thug allies think you should replace the democratic will of the people as the supreme power in this land. That means you seek to overturn the Constitution; you seek to subvert the rule of law. That means you are dangerous traitors.

Consider this from today's Washington Post: Sessions discussed Trump campaign with Russian ambassador, per intel intercepts. Do you know what that is? That is a big fat nothing. So what if Sessions discussed the campaign with the Russian ambassador. So fucking what? Jeff Sessions could have made it his mission to discuss the campaign with every leader on earth plus Satan every single day from Iowa through November 8 and no laws would have been broken.

Trump should have federal agents raid the Washington Post on Monday morning and have every person there arrested on charges of treason. He should keep them in jail until the end of his term.

I know this is difficult for you dumbass Trumpettes to get but it is actually possible to be the President of the United Sates without being such a flaming asshole. To not lie every fucking time they open their mouths. Not use their office to personally profit. To actually work at the job instead of golfing all the time & watching TV and sendi g out those really stupid tweets.

Trumps brings on all the shit he gets. You elected a two year old child who was a business cheat & fraud. This is YOUR fault. Quit blaming me for pointing out these things. Blame the asshole you elected.

Go ahead, jackass, take another good long drink from the (((Kool-Aid)))

 

[occupied]

This question must be settled. Making this just go away would make collusion with another government's intelligence apparatus OK in our election.This cannot be allowed to happen.

OK, I'll put collusion w another government's intelligence apparatus on the table, and let's have a big examination and publicize the results. All newspapers and networks required to print the raw testimony or go to jail.

If we find there is any collusion or foreign meddling in our elections, we sever diplomatic relations permanently and slap the severest sanctions possible. Any of our citizens or politicians found to be colluding to be given lengthy prison terms.

Deal?

Great.

I'll go first. I'd like to call as my first defendant, Israel. Now you go.

Russia? How'd I guess. I'd like to call as my second defendant. Mexico.

What's that? I couldn't hear you over the sound of the crickets. Whatever, my third defendant is China.

More crickets?

Why do you think brute force authoritarianism is the only way to deal with things? All this will be dealt within the framework of our nation's laws in the fullness of time. The kind of fascistic shit you keep suggesting shows you really have no regard for America being a nation of laws where even the worst are afforded due process. Our nation will survive this without having to resort to the kind of brutal shit they have in Russia.

You think "our nation" still has laws? Ask any Iraqi or Libyan or Syrian about the tender mercies of the framework of our laws. Or would they prefer the "brutal shit" they ahve in Russia?

Awesome regurgitation of the narrative espoused by the Russian state media, fuck off back to Russia comrade, we will deal with this mess without your worthless input. Your country does in fact put journalists in jail for being critical of your president Putin as well as anyone else that dares demonstrate actual democracy. The title of your topic here makes it seem you actually value democracy but your words tell a different story you infantile borscht sucking Russian scumbag..

 

[Lumpy 1]

Donald Trump was elected by the people of the United States to a four year term. He is the person we chose to execute the laws of our Republic. We chose him according to the method as provided in our Constitution--the supreme law of the land. You Trump-haters have opposed him from his first day in office--not his policies, but him. You have attacked him like a pack of vicious dogs every minute of every day of his administration--not his policies, but him. In other words, you have spent every day since he took office attacking our democracy itself.

You seek to bring him down. That means you seek to overturn the election. That means you seek to bring down our system of government. That means you and your thug allies think you should replace the democratic will of the people as the supreme power in this land. That means you seek to overturn the Constitution; you seek to subvert the rule of law. That means you are dangerous traitors.

Consider this from today's Washington Post: Sessions discussed Trump campaign with Russian ambassador, per intel intercepts. Do you know what that is? That is a big fat nothing. So what if Sessions discussed the campaign with the Russian ambassador. So fucking what? Jeff Sessions could have made it his mission to discuss the campaign with every leader on earth plus Satan every single day from Iowa through November 8 and no laws would have been broken.

Trump should have federal agents raid the Washington Post on Monday morning and have every person there arrested on charges of treason. He should keep them in jail until the end of his term.

would you like a tissue, whiny little nutter?

I love seeing the pondscum who prevented the government from operating properly for the previous eight years suddenly not understand why no one wants to play with their incomptentent little group

Seems to be working just fine........

Obama's legacy is turning to dust....................still more to do............but the Dems are losing badly even with the reruns of the Brady Bunch.......RUSSIA RUSSIA RUSSIA.................

Your side is making themselves look quite Foolish......................Problem with Liars............they have to keep telling lies to cover the last one......sooner or later the truth catches the Lies...................and shows the Liars for what they really are.

Wow, epic 3 post rift there eagle1462010 .....