- Nov 26, 2011
- 123,496
- 53,524
- 2,290
- Thread starter
- #61
Two candidates run for office.So what?
The nut of the whole matter is that none of what Wikileaks released about the scurrilous, cheating, bigotry, and treachery of the DNC was given to them by any state actor.
What's more, nobody -but NOBODY- has refuted one single shred of the intellectual debauchery and moral bankruptcy of the DNC in general, and the Clintons in particular, that the leaks exposed.
Um...dummy....we dispute that it was debauchery or moral bankruptcy. What was leaked is far less important than the fact that the leak was covered like real news. No smoking guns....but that didn't matter. The damage was in the PERCEPTION.
Now...eat a dick.
The perception you douche bags push.
And more important than the he details?
So if someone breaks into your porn collection, it's worse than the fact that you have kiddie porn?
One has kiddie porn on his computer. The other has a confession to where he has buried all the bodies of the hookers he has killed.
A hostile third party decides they want the serial killer to win, and so they leak the kiddie porn through their puppets.
Then tards like you come along and say, "The KGB thug did us a favor and I'm okay with it. Thank god our pure as the driven snow candidate won!"