Trump: FBI is totally unable to stop the national security leakers

The Devil’s Chessboard: Allen Dulles, the CIA, and the Rise of America’s Secret Government , David Talbot, (New York: HarperCollins, 2015)
The Devil's Chessboard: Allen Dulles, the CIA, and the Rise of America's Secret Government , David Talbot, (New York: HarperCollins, 2015) | The Huffington Post
Some passages of The Devil’s Chessboard have a plaintive tone, a kind of lament about the irreparable harm the fanaticism of fighting the Cold War against Soviet Russia (and its alleged proxies all over the world) had on shaping a set of unaccountable secret institutions that have both distorted our politics and undermined the “democratic” principles for which the U.S. supposedly stands.


Exceedingly rare among baby boomer journalists and public intellectuals, Talbot does not shy away from pointing to the uncomfortable facts surrounding Allen Dulles’s life’s work. He chronicles Dulles’s secret activities just after World War Two as a young intelligence agent in Europe helping to establish “ratlines” so Nazis considered useful to the United States in the new Cold War against the Soviet Union could escape prosecution. Talbot also unpacks Dulles’s foundational role, first as a deputy director and then climbing to become director, in setting the course for the newly-formed CIA after President Harry S. Truman signed the National Security Act of 1947.


What followed under Dulles’s leadership were many unaccountable CIA projects that had to remain secret or spun with propaganda to suit the widely-held Cold War fantasies of the period lest they be shown to be so contrary to America’s self image they might generate opposition.


Secret CIA activities in the 1950s under Dulles’s watch included horrifying experiments in “de-patterning” and “mind control” involving LSD and hypnosis (often on unwitting subjects) to try to develop the means to “turn” Soviet agents (MKULTRA). Subsequently, Dulles led the CIA in its first experiments in “regime change” with the coups in Iran in 1953 and Guatemala in 1954. It was Dulles’s CIA that played a key role in killing the nationalist leader Patrice Lumumba in the Congo in 1960, and setting up the failed Bay of Pigs invasion of 1961.


At times The Devil’s Chessboard reads like an engaging spy novel proving yet again that fact is stranger than fiction. The book is full of intrigue and revelations that should make any fair-minded reader cringe at what the CIA has done in our name over the years.


Talbot’s social analysis of the period includes an excellent summation of the work of the great American sociologist C. Wright Mills (who died in 1962) whose book, The Power Elite (1956), cuts through the rabid Cold War ideology of the time to grapple with the darker side of the “American Century.”
 
If you want to know the truth about the JFK assassination, look no further than Talbot. He unpacks the motivations of the Deep State quite clearly, just as does other noted liberal, Berkley professor emeritus Peter Dale Scott.

Mike Lofgren, noted GOP staffer would have no argument with either of them. This is not a partisan issue.

If giving information over to Wikileaks about the nefarious deeds of the Deep State makes one a traitor, then your allegiance is not to the Constitution, it is to the Unelected shadow government. Manning is most definitely not a traitor.


Perhaps Manning's only crime is not knowing that Wikileaks is, in fact, a CIA honeypot. They don't release any information unless it benefits the aims and goals of the Deep State.
 
Last edited:
On top of all that, Marxism is a political socio-economic philosophy, not a governing process. If it were adopted by constitutional means, but however by the sovereign will of the people, who are you to argue against the will of the people? Are you to saying you would destroy the constitution in order to avoid socialism or Marxism? Do you have so little faith in the American people?

It matters not whether the US is governed by Marxism, Socialism, Capitalism, Fascism, Corporatism, Oligarchy etc. for any term of years. Who cares? It would only be for a term of years. Try it out. If you don't think it would work, it will fail. Haven't we seen that with Obama? Didn't we see that with Carter's policies?

What matters is the rule of law and the Constitution. What matters is the sovereign right of the people to choose how they govern themselves. I may not agree with what they choose, I may not agree with what others say, but I will defend and protect the Bill of Rights, and the separation of powers laid out in the Constitution.

That is the issue here.

I abhor the very fact that the IC is turning this nation into a police state. There are intellectuals on all sides of the political spectrum that see this happening. Did you ever see the speech noted LIBERAL Naomi Wolf, gave to the libertarian forum during the Obama administration? She STILL saw the danger, even then.

If you can't see the danger that still lurks, then you are being blind.

Here's just one good example the liberal folks have pointed out.
The West’s Moral Hypocrisy on Yemen
The West’s Moral Hypocrisy on Yemen – Consortiumnews


You need to divorce politics from the governing process. We need to join with liberals, progressives, greens, libertarians, everyone, to defend our republic against those elites who would seek to undermine the sovereign citizens right to determine their own destiny.
 
Last edited:
iRe9rsu.gif

 
These seditious traitors WILL stand trial.
Anyone who thinks President Trump won't root out these bastards is fucking delusional!
Then when they are charged the official opposition party AKA LIB MSM will be screaming their fucking heads off calling Trump Hitler. You watch and see.
Amendment 1

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Constitution of the United States of America

Thomas Jefferson

The people are the only censors of their governors: and even their errors will tend to keep these to the true principles of their institution. To punish these errors too severely would be to suppress the only safeguard of the public liberty. The way to prevent these irregular interpositions of the people is to give them full information of their affairs thro’ the channel of the public papers, & to contrive that those papers should penetrate the whole mass of the people. The basis of our governments being the opinion of the people, the very first object should be to keep that right; and were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter. But I should mean that every man should receive those papers & be capable of reading them.

Those that would shut down newspapers because they are critical of a public figure, are traitors to this nation. That is you, Dannyboy
 
These seditious traitors WILL stand trial.
Anyone who thinks President Trump won't root out these bastards is fucking delusional!
Then when they are charged the official opposition party AKA LIB MSM will be screaming their fucking heads off calling Trump Hitler. You watch and see.
Amendment 1

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Constitution of the United States of America

Thomas Jefferson

The people are the only censors of their governors: and even their errors will tend to keep these to the true principles of their institution. To punish these errors too severely would be to suppress the only safeguard of the public liberty. The way to prevent these irregular interpositions of the people is to give them full information of their affairs thro’ the channel of the public papers, & to contrive that those papers should penetrate the whole mass of the people. The basis of our governments being the opinion of the people, the very first object should be to keep that right; and were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter. But I should mean that every man should receive those papers & be capable of reading them.

Those that would shut down newspapers because they are critical of a public figure, are traitors to this nation. That is you, Dannyboy
You stupid cocksucker!
"Freedom of the press" doesn't mean the fucking Lib MSM can create bullshit lies and try to pass them off as 'news'.
Yesterday Chrissy Matthews said: "Loretta Lynch went into Bill Clinton's airplane for a couple of minutes to talk about their grandkids and golf".
TOTAL FUCKING BULLSHIT LIE!!!!!!
His panel of radical LIB Obama asslickers sat there and didn't utter a fucking word to dispute the lie.
Matthews KNEW he was lying!!!!! He didn't give a shit.
You call that bullshit "freedom of the press"?
The famous 'dossier' the NYTs claimed the Russians had on Trump turned out to be bullshit.
A few days ago the BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!! on MSNBC was that the "Russians were making a 'dossier' of Trump's physiological profile". When someone pointed out that every fucking country in the world has a 'dossier' of every fucking head of state on the planet the BREAKING NEWS lasted as long as a popcorn fart in a wind storm.
When the FBI investigations are concluded and the finished report states categorically that no one in the Trump campaign had any contact with 'Russian agents' YOU won't believe the FBI.
You scream your stupid head off that a 'bipartisan investigation must "get to the bottom of what YOU believe is the opposite of what the FBI investigations found.
You're an idiot! Go stick your tongue back up Hillary's asshole!
 
Many in the press are saying these leaks are generated for basically two reasons:

Trump's been bashing the entire intel community for months and months

the intel community is alarmed by Trump's (read that Bannon's) behavior so far, and feel the need to counterbalance this insanity

both points are entirely true
 
These seditious traitors WILL stand trial.
Anyone who thinks President Trump won't root out these bastards is fucking delusional!
Then when they are charged the official opposition party AKA LIB MSM will be screaming their fucking heads off calling Trump Hitler. You watch and see.
Amendment 1

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

Constitution of the United States of America

Thomas Jefferson

The people are the only censors of their governors: and even their errors will tend to keep these to the true principles of their institution. To punish these errors too severely would be to suppress the only safeguard of the public liberty. The way to prevent these irregular interpositions of the people is to give them full information of their affairs thro’ the channel of the public papers, & to contrive that those papers should penetrate the whole mass of the people. The basis of our governments being the opinion of the people, the very first object should be to keep that right; and were it left to me to decide whether we should have a government without newspapers or newspapers without a government, I should not hesitate a moment to prefer the latter. But I should mean that every man should receive those papers & be capable of reading them.

Those that would shut down newspapers because they are critical of a public figure, are traitors to this nation. That is you, Dannyboy
You stupid cocksucker!
"Freedom of the press" doesn't mean the fucking Lib MSM can create bullshit lies and try to pass them off as 'news'.
Yesterday Chrissy Matthews said: "Loretta Lynch went into Bill Clinton's airplane for a couple of minutes to talk about their grandkids and golf".
TOTAL FUCKING BULLSHIT LIE!!!!!!
His panel of radical LIB Obama asslickers sat there and didn't utter a fucking word to dispute the lie.
Matthews KNEW he was lying!!!!! He didn't give a shit.
You call that bullshit "freedom of the press"?
The famous 'dossier' the NYTs claimed the Russians had on Trump turned out to be bullshit.
A few days ago the BREAKING NEWS!!!!!!! on MSNBC was that the "Russians were making a 'dossier' of Trump's physiological profile". When someone pointed out that every fucking country in the world has a 'dossier' of every fucking head of state on the planet the BREAKING NEWS lasted as long as a popcorn fart in a wind storm.
When the FBI investigations are concluded and the finished report states categorically that no one in the Trump campaign had any contact with 'Russian agents' YOU won't believe the FBI.
You scream your stupid head off that a 'bipartisan investigation must "get to the bottom of what YOU believe is the opposite of what the FBI investigations found.
You're an idiot! Go stick your tongue back up Hillary's asshole!

Issa says there needs to be an independent investigation.
 
losers of society have such self greed they would rather hate the President and put the entire Country at risk just to prove their selfish point and standing.
That sounds exactly like Trump when Obama was POTUS!
 
Ya'll were making love to the FBI when they were investigating Hilary's emails. Now y'all hate the FBI. Lol.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: PK1
Many in the press are saying these leaks are generated for basically two reasons:

Trump's been bashing the entire intel community for months and months

the intel community is alarmed by Trump's (read that Bannon's) behavior so far, and feel the need to counterbalance this insanity

both points are entirely true

. . . . says the spook.
 

Forum List

Back
Top