Trump campaign DID collude with Russia

Status
Not open for further replies.
actually there was, illegal wiretaps on people working in Trump tower by the Obama FBI and DOJ using the fake Russian dossier as rationale.

Actually bullshit

All wiretaps were legal and no court filing ever even TRIED to claim otherwise.


If the rationale for he wiretaps was fraudulent

It wasn't


so you think the Russian dossier was all true? if so, you are the only one who does.

Who said it needs to all be true?


If it was used to justify spying on American citizens it must be true.
 
Put the word "inadvertent" in there instead of "illegal" and its just as bad. The NSA had no business monitoring the opposition party during an election. Instead of using "plumbers" use "legal surveillance" by bending the rules.

Page was no longer with the campaign at the time the warrant was issued. The Trump campaign spent the entire previous month feverishly backpeddling and spinning in an attempt to minimize Page's role in the campaign.
 
Actually bullshit

All wiretaps were legal and no court filing ever even TRIED to claim otherwise.


If the rationale for he wiretaps was fraudulent

It wasn't


so you think the Russian dossier was all true? if so, you are the only one who does.

Who said it needs to all be true?


If it was used to justify spying on American citizens it must be true.
As the court approved the application four times, yes. Unless you're asserting that the court is somehow incompetent.
 
Bullshit. There was no illegal surveilance by Obama's admin of Trump campaign.

actually there was, illegal wiretaps on people working in Trump tower by the Obama FBI and DOJ using the fake Russian dossier as rationale.

Actually bullshit

All wiretaps were legal and no court filing ever even TRIED to claim otherwise.


If the rationale for he wiretaps was fraudulent

It wasn't


so you think the Russian dossier was all true? if so, you are the only one who does.

:1041::1041::1041:

It was fraudulent!

It wasn't all true!

..so which one is it?
 
actually there was, illegal wiretaps on people working in Trump tower by the Obama FBI and DOJ using the fake Russian dossier as rationale.

Actually bullshit

All wiretaps were legal and no court filing ever even TRIED to claim otherwise.


If the rationale for he wiretaps was fraudulent

It wasn't


so you think the Russian dossier was all true? if so, you are the only one who does.

:1041::1041::1041:

It was fraudulent!

It wasn't all true!

..so which one is it?


both, and paid for by the Hillary campaign, then used as justification to spy on American citizens for political reasons only.
 
illegal surveillance by the Obama admin of the Trump campaign

Bullshit. There was no illegal surveilance by Obama's admin of Trump campaign.


actually there was, illegal wiretaps on people working in Trump tower by the Obama FBI and DOJ using the fake Russian dossier as rationale.
There is no evidence Obama ordered wiretapping of trump tower. However, considering the recent indictments of Manafort, its certainly was justified to tap is foreign communications. But it just so happens that Manafort was living in trump tower.
Legal experts explain it.

So in summary, simultaneously Obama wasnt doing enough to stop russian influence, yet he was also illegally wiretapping trump tower. Great argument there.
 
If the rationale for he wiretaps was fraudulent

It wasn't


so you think the Russian dossier was all true? if so, you are the only one who does.

Who said it needs to all be true?


If it was used to justify spying on American citizens it must be true.
As the court approved the application four times, yes. Unless you're asserting that the court is somehow incompetent.


the court accepted the data presented in the warrants as valid and true, it wasn't. the court was lied to
 
The dems/Hillary "colluded" with a foreign national

British nationals ARE NOT ADVERSARIAL GOVERNMENTS.

It is silly for rightwingers to even bring that up as an equivalent.

Steel was a retired British operative. Now why is the DNC willing to use a foreign British operative, paid by Fusion GPS and then the DNC hides those financial contributions through a lawyers firm, involves top FBI officials appointed by Democrats of this foreign threat, but uses no secondary sources (like the CIA) that is involved with foreign government interests and influence. It’s ok to make up a FISA warrant using only Steel as the most (laughable) “credible” source, and manipulate that warrant when it fails to pass a FISA judge the first time, so Hillary Clinton can listen in on Trump. Mrs Clinton has a history of corruption that’s not far from within her “character” to do this. There is an apparent money trail through Mrs Clinton, and those she worked with internationally, that’s not been found with President Trump.
 
illegal surveillance by the Obama admin of the Trump campaign

Bullshit. There was no illegal surveilance by Obama's admin of Trump campaign.


actually there was, illegal wiretaps on people working in Trump tower by the Obama FBI and DOJ using the fake Russian dossier as rationale.
There is no evidence Obama ordered wiretapping of trump tower. However, considering the recent indictments of Manafort, its certainly was justified to tap is foreign communications. But it just so happens that Manafort was living in trump tower.
Legal experts explain it.

So in summary, simultaneously Obama wasnt doing enough to stop russian influence, yet he was also illegally wiretapping trump tower. Great argument there.


Hillary lost, the American people chose Trump. Trump is doing a great job.
all of this is nothing but butthurt dems and libs who cannot accept the fact that Hillary was/is a criminal and was rejected by the American voters. and yes, before you say it, except for California, land of fruits and nuts.
 
try "extremely careless" vs "grossly negligent" but I guess that change can only be made when the Clintons commit a crime.

Having 130+ plus staffers with no clearance, many of whom are routinely handling material outside of their clearance for more than a year after their applications, is not only grossly negligent, it's dangerously incompetent.

Certainly, if Clinton was guilty, the Trump team is orders of magnitude worse.
 
Last edited:
It wasn't


so you think the Russian dossier was all true? if so, you are the only one who does.

Who said it needs to all be true?


If it was used to justify spying on American citizens it must be true.
As the court approved the application four times, yes. Unless you're asserting that the court is somehow incompetent.


the court accepted the data presented in the warrants as valid and true, it wasn't. the court was lied to
Show us what was presented to the court and then show us why it was not true, dope. You have no idea as to what was presented or how it was corroborated.
So yes, then? The courts are incompetent?
 
I'm sure it was all planned beginning in 2013 when Trump said he met a lot of oligarchs in Russia.


Eric trump once said, ‘Well, we don’t rely on American banks. We have all the funding we need out of Russia.’

Trump Jr.'s love affair with Moscow - POLITICO

Jul 12, 2017 - At the conference, he showed a deep familiarity with the Moscow real estate market and the Russian economy. “We see a lot of money pouring in from Russia,” he said of Trump Organization properties. “There's indeed a lot of money coming for new-builds and resale reflecting a trend in the Russian ...
 
illegal surveillance by the Obama admin of the Trump campaign

Bullshit. There was no illegal surveillance by Obama's admin of Trump campaign.

It looks like Obama did spy on Trump, just as he apparently did to me

Find me the words ILLEGAL SURVEILANCE in there.

You fools don't understand what you read, thats why it so easy to manipulate you into beliving bullshit.

Obtaining a warrant to begin wire taps under false pretenses is not within the law.
 
try "extremely careless" vs "grossly negligent" but I guess that change can only be made when the Clintons commit a crime.

Having 130+ plus staffers with no clearance, many of whom are routinely handling material outside of their clearance for more than a year after their applications, is not only grossly negligent, it's dangerously incompetent.

Certainly, if Clinton was guilty, the Trump team is orders of magnitude worse.


If people with no security clearance are handling classified data, they should be prosecuted. Can you give us a list of the 130 people who are doing this? If you have the list please send it to the FBI.

Yes, everyone who violates classified data laws should be prosecuted including Clinton, Huma, Lynch, Comey, et. al.
 
I'm sure it was all planned beginning in 2013 when Trump said he met a lot of oligarchs in Russia.


Eric trump once said, ‘Well, we don’t rely on American banks. We have all the funding we need out of Russia.’

Trump Jr.'s love affair with Moscow - POLITICO

Jul 12, 2017 - At the conference, he showed a deep familiarity with the Moscow real estate market and the Russian economy. “We see a lot of money pouring in from Russia,” he said of Trump Organization properties. “There's indeed a lot of money coming for new-builds and resale reflecting a trend in the Russian ...


there is nothing illegal about doing business with foreign banks. Rich americans, like Pelosi, Clinton, Gates, Buffet, Soros, Kochs, etc do it every day. So do most American corporations. nice try, but FAIL
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top