'Hostile agents' says you, citing the same imaginary pseudo-legal batshit you made up. No court, nor any US law has ever found illegal immigrants are 'hostile agents'. What's the use of a legal argument that no court nor law recognizes? You might as well be one of those sovereign citizen idiots babbling about the fringes on flags. Is that really all you have? You, making shit up, backed by nothing and contradicted by the courts? As Wong makes it very clear when reviewing the legal foundation of birth right citizeship: Children, born in England, of such aliens were therefore natural-born subjects. But the children, born within the realm, of foreign ambassadors, or the children of alien enemies, born during and within their hostile occupation of part of the King's dominions, were not natural-born subjects because not born within the allegiance, the obedience, or the power, or, as would be said at this day, within the jurisdiction, of the King." US v. Wong Kim Ark (1898) You have no rational retort to this founded in caselaw or US law. But instead, the wasteland of ignorance also known as your imagination.