True Israel of God

[gt1085]

The zionist regime is not "israel."

"Israel" as a concept is a function of mythology of faggot rabbis about 700 BCE.

The people of Ancient Isreal are assimilated about 500 BCE according to the mythology.

The tribe of Judah remained delusional douchebags taken care of by the Roman Empire. The Roman Empire had much cooler "gods" than the faggot Yahweh that jews worshiped.

Thus Christianity was born.

Try again only this time include the Roman's and their collapse in the first centuries of the new millenia

 

[gt1085]

The zionist regime is not "israel."

"Israel" as a concept is a function of mythology of faggot rabbis about 700 BCE.

The people of Ancient Isreal are assimilated about 500 BCE according to the mythology.

The tribe of Judah remained delusional douchebags taken care of by the Roman Empire. The Roman Empire had much cooler "gods" than the faggot Yahweh that jews worshiped.

Thus Christianity was born.

Try again only this time include the Roman's and their collapse in the first centuries of the new millenia

 

[Roudy]

The zionist regime is not "israel."

"Israel" as a concept is a function of mythology of faggot rabbis about 700 BCE.

The people of Ancient Isreal are assimilated about 500 BCE according to the mythology.

The tribe of Judah remained delusional douchebags taken care of by the Roman Empire. The Roman Empire had much cooler "gods" than the faggot Yahweh that jews worshiped.

Thus Christianity was born.

Try again only this time include the Roman's and their collapse in the first centuries of the new millenia

How white people changed the Identity of biblical characters from black to white. Pure deception!

Yup, you're definitely a black supremacist.

 

[gt1085]

The zionist regime is not "israel."

"Israel" as a concept is a function of mythology of faggot rabbis about 700 BCE.

The people of Ancient Isreal are assimilated about 500 BCE according to the mythology.

The tribe of Judah remained delusional douchebags taken care of by the Roman Empire. The Roman Empire had much cooler "gods" than the faggot Yahweh that jews worshiped.

Thus Christianity was born.

Try again only this time include the Roman's and their collapse in the first centuries of the new millenia

How white people changed the Identity of biblical characters from black to white. Pure deception!

Yup, you're definitely a black supremacist.

Nope,you are just a white supremacist.Nothing i said was racist.

 

[Roudy]

The zionist regime is not "israel."

"Israel" as a concept is a function of mythology of faggot rabbis about 700 BCE.

The people of Ancient Isreal are assimilated about 500 BCE according to the mythology.

The tribe of Judah remained delusional douchebags taken care of by the Roman Empire. The Roman Empire had much cooler "gods" than the faggot Yahweh that jews worshiped.

Thus Christianity was born.

Try again only this time include the Roman's and their collapse in the first centuries of the new millenia

How white people changed the Identity of biblical characters from black to white. Pure deception!

Afrocentrism
Afrocentrism and melanin theory often cross-pollinate, but Afrocentrism as a separate concept has a historical rather than biological focus. It's important to separate legitimate historical revisionism from the kind Afrocentrists engage in. The early histories and ethnographies of African cultures were written largely by European historians and anthropologists from an imperialist perspective. Thus, these works are often skewed by racism and filled with factual inaccuracies, and are outdated due to new findings in archaeological and historical scholarship. There have been many revisionist works throughout the 20th and 21st centuries that attempt to look at this history from an African perspective, but remain factual. This is simply an attempt to "correct the record." Afrocentrism, on the other hand, engages in distortion and fabrications of its own. One of the central claims of Afrocentrists is that Egypt was ruled by a black race. They use this to claim that Greco-Roman civilization, and by extension, Western civilization, is actually based on black culture. Working from this point, they rewrite many historical figures like Socrates as having been black and shoehorn various events into the ideology.

When called on their bullshit, they tend to justify their factual inaccuracies by claiming that critics are using a Eurocentric methodology that is unable to ascertain a true understanding of history and that only those using the Afrocentric methodology can do so. And just for the record, Ramesses II was a ginger.

Similar crank claims point toward India (implying that the existence of the "Negrito" people, mean that Indian culture comes from blnack Africans, and the Dravidians are so dark that they must be Africans), China (depictions of people in dark materials, imply they were black, for example, Terracotta Army), Japanese (Jomons would have been black, and so did the Ainu, as they used black bronze in their sculptures, and were painted in light-brown, which is clearly white washing from the Japaneses bigots) and the Mongols ("black khans"), in America, rewriting Central America, Aztecs, Mayas, and particularly, the Olmecs, since they had wide noses in their statues, something that maya-quiché completely lack nowdays, no matter the look of Rigoberta Menchú.

 

[Roudy]

The zionist regime is not "israel."

"Israel" as a concept is a function of mythology of faggot rabbis about 700 BCE.

The people of Ancient Isreal are assimilated about 500 BCE according to the mythology.

The tribe of Judah remained delusional douchebags taken care of by the Roman Empire. The Roman Empire had much cooler "gods" than the faggot Yahweh that jews worshiped.

Thus Christianity was born.

Try again only this time include the Roman's and their collapse in the first centuries of the new millenia

How white people changed the Identity of biblical characters from black to white. Pure deception!

Yup, you're definitely a black supremacist.

Nope,you are just a white supremacist.Nothing i said was racist.

Why are you ashamed of being black?

 

[gt1085]

The zionist regime is not "israel."

"Israel" as a concept is a function of mythology of faggot rabbis about 700 BCE.

The people of Ancient Isreal are assimilated about 500 BCE according to the mythology.

The tribe of Judah remained delusional douchebags taken care of by the Roman Empire. The Roman Empire had much cooler "gods" than the faggot Yahweh that jews worshiped.

Thus Christianity was born.

Try again only this time include the Roman's and their collapse in the first centuries of the new millenia

How white people changed the Identity of biblical characters from black to white. Pure deception!

Yup, you're definitely a black supremacist.

Nope,you are just a white supremacist.Nothing i said was racist.

Why are you ashamed of being black?

I DO NOT,DO NOT WANT TO BE EVER BE WHITE.LOL

 

[Roudy]

Try again only this time include the Roman's and their collapse in the first centuries of the new millenia

How white people changed the Identity of biblical characters from black to white. Pure deception!

Yup, you're definitely a black supremacist.

Nope,you are just a white supremacist.Nothing i said was racist.

Why are you ashamed of being black?

I DO NOT,DO NOT WANT TO BE EVER BE WHITE.LOL

You don't have a choice, idiot. You sure sound like you're ashamed of being black.

 

[gt1085]

The zionist regime is not "israel."

"Israel" as a concept is a function of mythology of faggot rabbis about 700 BCE.

The people of Ancient Isreal are assimilated about 500 BCE according to the mythology.

The tribe of Judah remained delusional douchebags taken care of by the Roman Empire. The Roman Empire had much cooler "gods" than the faggot Yahweh that jews worshiped.

Thus Christianity was born.

Try again only this time include the Roman's and their collapse in the first centuries of the new millenia

How white people changed the Identity of biblical characters from black to white. Pure deception!

Afrocentrism
Afrocentrism and melanin theory often cross-pollinate, but Afrocentrism as a separate concept has a historical rather than biological focus. It's important to separate legitimate historical revisionism from the kind Afrocentrists engage in. The early histories and ethnographies of African cultures were written largely by European historians and anthropologists from an imperialist perspective. Thus, these works are often skewed by racism and filled with factual inaccuracies, and are outdated due to new findings in archaeological and historical scholarship. There have been many revisionist works throughout the 20th and 21st centuries that attempt to look at this history from an African perspective, but remain factual. This is simply an attempt to "correct the record." Afrocentrism, on the other hand, engages in distortion and fabrications of its own. One of the central claims of Afrocentrists is that Egypt was ruled by a black race. They use this to claim that Greco-Roman civilization, and by extension, Western civilization, is actually based on black culture. Working from this point, they rewrite many historical figures like Socrates as having been black and shoehorn various events into the ideology.

When called on their bullshit, they tend to justify their factual inaccuracies by claiming that critics are using a Eurocentric methodology that is unable to ascertain a true understanding of history and that only those using the Afrocentric methodology can do so. And just for the record, Ramesses II was a ginger.

Similar crank claims point toward India (implying that the existence of the "Negrito" people, mean that Indian culture comes from blnack Africans, and the Dravidians are so dark that they must be Africans), China (depictions of people in dark materials, imply they were black, for example, Terracotta Army), Japanese (Jomons would have been black, and so did the Ainu, as they used black bronze in their sculptures, and were painted in light-brown, which is clearly white washing from the Japaneses bigots) and the Mongols ("black khans"), in America, rewriting Central America, Aztecs, Mayas, and particularly, the Olmecs, since they had wide noses in their statues, something that maya-quiché completely lack nowdays, no matter the look of Rigoberta Menchú.

Whew,Look you some it any way you please.Facts Don`t Lie.You Come From Us,But was breed out with animals,Your Stupid You don`t NO Shit About History,Exclusively You Own.

 

[gt1085]

How white people changed the Identity of biblical characters from black to white. Pure deception!

Yup, you're definitely a black supremacist.

Nope,you are just a white supremacist.Nothing i said was racist.

Why are you ashamed of being black?

I DO NOT,DO NOT WANT TO BE EVER BE WHITE.LOL

You don't have a choice, idiot. You sure sound like you're ashamed of being black.

lol,Think what You Want don`t give a fuck first,You know nothing,just running your muzzle and i got dam sure don`t want white hehe that`s funny shit.

 

[Roudy]

The zionist regime is not "israel."

"Israel" as a concept is a function of mythology of faggot rabbis about 700 BCE.

The people of Ancient Isreal are assimilated about 500 BCE according to the mythology.

The tribe of Judah remained delusional douchebags taken care of by the Roman Empire. The Roman Empire had much cooler "gods" than the faggot Yahweh that jews worshiped.

Thus Christianity was born.

Try again only this time include the Roman's and their collapse in the first centuries of the new millenia

How white people changed the Identity of biblical characters from black to white. Pure deception!

Afrocentrism
Afrocentrism and melanin theory often cross-pollinate, but Afrocentrism as a separate concept has a historical rather than biological focus. It's important to separate legitimate historical revisionism from the kind Afrocentrists engage in. The early histories and ethnographies of African cultures were written largely by European historians and anthropologists from an imperialist perspective. Thus, these works are often skewed by racism and filled with factual inaccuracies, and are outdated due to new findings in archaeological and historical scholarship. There have been many revisionist works throughout the 20th and 21st centuries that attempt to look at this history from an African perspective, but remain factual. This is simply an attempt to "correct the record." Afrocentrism, on the other hand, engages in distortion and fabrications of its own. One of the central claims of Afrocentrists is that Egypt was ruled by a black race. They use this to claim that Greco-Roman civilization, and by extension, Western civilization, is actually based on black culture. Working from this point, they rewrite many historical figures like Socrates as having been black and shoehorn various events into the ideology.

When called on their bullshit, they tend to justify their factual inaccuracies by claiming that critics are using a Eurocentric methodology that is unable to ascertain a true understanding of history and that only those using the Afrocentric methodology can do so. And just for the record, Ramesses II was a ginger.

Similar crank claims point toward India (implying that the existence of the "Negrito" people, mean that Indian culture comes from blnack Africans, and the Dravidians are so dark that they must be Africans), China (depictions of people in dark materials, imply they were black, for example, Terracotta Army), Japanese (Jomons would have been black, and so did the Ainu, as they used black bronze in their sculptures, and were painted in light-brown, which is clearly white washing from the Japaneses bigots) and the Mongols ("black khans"), in America, rewriting Central America, Aztecs, Mayas, and particularly, the Olmecs, since they had wide noses in their statues, something that maya-quiché completely lack nowdays, no matter the look of Rigoberta Menchú.

Whew,Look you some it any way you please.Facts Don`t Lie.You Come From Us,But was breed out with animals,Your Stupid You don`t NO Shit About History,Exclusively You Own.

We are all one big family, moron. Nobody comes from anybody. You're just ashamed of your race.

 

[Roudy]

Yup, you're definitely a black supremacist.

Nope,you are just a white supremacist.Nothing i said was racist.

Why are you ashamed of being black?

I DO NOT,DO NOT WANT TO BE EVER BE WHITE.LOL

You don't have a choice, idiot. You sure sound like you're ashamed of being black.

lol,Think what You Want don`t give a fuck first,You know nothing,just running your muzzle and i got dam sure don`t want white hehe that`s funny shit.

Ok that's great. When science can change people's racial identity, you can choose the box that says "stay a racist black man". But until then you're stuck being black.

 

[gt1085]

The zionist regime is not "israel."

"Israel" as a concept is a function of mythology of faggot rabbis about 700 BCE.

The people of Ancient Isreal are assimilated about 500 BCE according to the mythology.

The tribe of Judah remained delusional douchebags taken care of by the Roman Empire. The Roman Empire had much cooler "gods" than the faggot Yahweh that jews worshiped.

Thus Christianity was born.

Try again only this time include the Roman's and their collapse in the first centuries of the new millenia

How white people changed the Identity of biblical characters from black to white. Pure deception!

Afrocentrism
Afrocentrism and melanin theory often cross-pollinate, but Afrocentrism as a separate concept has a historical rather than biological focus. It's important to separate legitimate historical revisionism from the kind Afrocentrists engage in. The early histories and ethnographies of African cultures were written largely by European historians and anthropologists from an imperialist perspective. Thus, these works are often skewed by racism and filled with factual inaccuracies, and are outdated due to new findings in archaeological and historical scholarship. There have been many revisionist works throughout the 20th and 21st centuries that attempt to look at this history from an African perspective, but remain factual. This is simply an attempt to "correct the record." Afrocentrism, on the other hand, engages in distortion and fabrications of its own. One of the central claims of Afrocentrists is that Egypt was ruled by a black race. They use this to claim that Greco-Roman civilization, and by extension, Western civilization, is actually based on black culture. Working from this point, they rewrite many historical figures like Socrates as having been black and shoehorn various events into the ideology.

When called on their bullshit, they tend to justify their factual inaccuracies by claiming that critics are using a Eurocentric methodology that is unable to ascertain a true understanding of history and that only those using the Afrocentric methodology can do so. And just for the record, Ramesses II was a ginger.

Similar crank claims point toward India (implying that the existence of the "Negrito" people, mean that Indian culture comes from blnack Africans, and the Dravidians are so dark that they must be Africans), China (depictions of people in dark materials, imply they were black, for example, Terracotta Army), Japanese (Jomons would have been black, and so did the Ainu, as they used black bronze in their sculptures, and were painted in light-brown, which is clearly white washing from the Japaneses bigots) and the Mongols ("black khans"), in America, rewriting Central America, Aztecs, Mayas, and particularly, the Olmecs, since they had wide noses in their statues, something that maya-quiché completely lack nowdays, no matter the look of Rigoberta Menchú.

Whew,Look you some it any way you please.Facts Don`t Lie.You Come From Us,But was breed out with animals,Your Stupid You don`t NO Shit About History,Exclusively You Own.

We are all one big family, moron. Nobody comes from anybody. You're just ashamed of your race.

You stupid we ain`t shit i am not like you were created by us,fuck you mean we all alike lol,You were bred into the human.This is what im talking don`t comment back plz.

 

[Coyote]

This thread does not bear the least resemblance to the OP and hasn't for quite a few pages. Closed.