The polls are still open and tales of voter fraud are surfacing. What is it going to be like tomorrow? Do not make the mistake of thinking a stolen election here and there means nothing in the long run. Let’s not forget that passing the healthcare bill came about because of a stolen Senate seat: Traumatic shock is the only way to describe Al Franken’s successful theft: trauma (noun) plural traumas or traumata 1. Medicine. A serious injury or shock to the body, as from violence or an accident. 2. Psychiatry. An emotional wound or shock that creates substantial, lasting damage to the psychological development of a person, often leading to neurosis. noun, attributive Often used to modify another noun: a trauma center; a trauma team. [Greek.] — traumatic (adjective) — traumatically (adverb) It’s hard to imagine Al Gore doing more harm than Al Franken had he, Gore, succeeded in stealing the presidency in 2000. Even after the Affordable Care Act is repealed the traumatic shock caused by one stolen election is substantial and lasting. For one thing the Supreme Court will never regain the trust it lost in upholding the ACA. The High Court’s integrity withstood some really corrupt political decisions over the decades, but upholding the ACA is the one that will corrode the public’s trust in the Court in the years ahead. And all because of Al Franken. Incidentally, notice what Panetta was up to 28 years before Benghazi: Republicans take no chances on election fraud By: John Gizzi 11/6/2012 04:00 AM Republicans taking no chances on election fraud - Conservative News You could fill a library with nothing else but commentaries on crooked elections. Go all the way back to the nineteenth century and read everything that has been said about wonderful democracy, about majority rules, about government by the people, blah, blah, blah, and one thing stands out ——nothing has been done to stop election fraud. In truth, early voting laws insures even more dishonesty. For two hundred years all of the saviors who went into government, along with all of those brilliant judges they write about long after they are dead, could not prevent ineligible voters from voting. The lot of them combined could not handle an ineligible president starting with Chester A. Arthur (1829-1986); so how in hell can anybody expect them to do anything about election fraud? Who’s counting? All of the engineers using all of the technology that is portrayed in the movies cannot design a cheat-proof voting machine. Computer Geeks in moving pictures can do everything; in real life they can’t get an accurate count of the votes cast. I don’t know who first expressed this truism but it applies in American elections more than it applies anywhere else: I’m so used to the media protecting Hussein I don’t notice it anymore. Still, I wish talking heads would tell us who is doing the counting in Hussein’s Arab Spring. Do you think it’s the Muslim Brotherhood? Finally, nothing was more sickening throughout this election cycle than the media. One bunch of talking heads told us replacing one man would bring better government. Talking heads tried to convince everyone that replacing only ONE man would solve all of the problems that have been festering since the Great Depression. I always thought that that was a sly way of telling us how awesome the president, any president, is even if you disagreed with his policies. Another media group told us that keeping Hussein would continue good government. All of the horseshit aside, “the most important election in our lifetimes” was aimed at getting that 50 or so percent of eligible voters who never vote to go out and vote for the same kind of liars, crooks, perverts, and scoundrels who presided over election frauds throughout the last century. I can’t wait until the suckers realize they’ve been had.