Trapped In Your Car By An Angry Mob; What Would You Do?

[Sarah G]

I'd pull this out of the trunk and go to town...

Overcompensating?

 

[G.T.]

You really woke up this morning, and wondered: how can I make a tyhread where I can fantasize running over a liberal with my car, and not sound like a murderous punk?

Get a life, dude. There's people with different views ALL around you. BOO!

Just like the hippie OWSers waking up and wondering how they can intimidate people going to work, preach socialist and communist ideals, and not sound like a punk??

YEA MAN, just like that

 

[grunt11b]

In FL we no longer have to flee.

The phrase, "I was in fear for my life" allows me to open fire

I remember when they implemented that law, the crime rate dropped dramatically almost over night. It's amazing how much crime drops when they know you can just shoot there asses for just showing up.

 

[grunt11b]

Offer them a job, they'll run like hell for sure.

Soap,shampoo and toothbrush being thrown out in the middle of them should scatter them pretty good.

 

[grunt11b]

Hartwig said witnesses had differing accounts of what happened, with some saying the driver appeared to have gunned the Mercedes into the victims in frustration and others saying he had been provoked by activists pounding on his car.


Mercedes hits 2 Occupy Oakland protesters

Officers gathered information from the driver and witnesses, and now the Oakland Police Department will handle the investigation, Hartwig said.

And video of the Oakland incident.

Caught on camera: Car runs over #OccupyOakland protester - storyful

Read more: Mercedes hits 2 Occupy Oakland protesters

I find it to be hysterical to be honest. The left remind of me school yard bullies. They bully and bully and bully, then when someone finally steps up and blasts them, they run off and cry to the police about it. WHat a bunch of pussies.

 

[earlycuyler]

Offer them a job, they'll run like hell for sure.

Soap,shampoo and toothbrush being thrown out in the middle of them should scatter them pretty good.

You forgot the disposable razors. Or better yet, a giant magnet. It would tug all the face piercings, and make them run off.

 

[grunt11b]

It was in California.

You're probably screwed there, the State there supports the recipient over the law abiding citizen in all cases, which explains why it is so bad there right now.

 

[grunt11b]

As a co-owner of a gun shop and having a CHL, I would unleash my .45 Gold Cup on their ass!

You have good taste in weaponry my friend. Personally, I am a Ruger man - someday, I MAY get a Colt.

I had a P-95. The Ruger P - series is the AK-47 of hand guns. When I bought mine I shot the crap out of it and never cleaned it. it lived under the seat of my truck. Went boom every time I pulled the trigger. I may buy another one here soon and get my CCW.

.40 cal Smith for me, but if it's in the house I have no issues with 12 gauge .00 buck shot.

 

[old navy]

The Internet Tough Guys trying to out-tough each other on this thread makes it PURE GOLD!

dang, I was going to respond until you wrote this. oh, what the hell.

Here's some of my collection. Bring on the mob.

 

[earlycuyler]

The Internet Tough Guys trying to out-tough each other on this thread makes it PURE GOLD!

Not really, mostly allot of agreeing going on. You are right though, I think the thread was derailed. It was originally about a OWS doofas that got run over for jumping in front of a car.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

You have good taste in weaponry my friend. Personally, I am a Ruger man - someday, I MAY get a Colt.

I had a P-95. The Ruger P - series is the AK-47 of hand guns. When I bought mine I shot the crap out of it and never cleaned it. it lived under the seat of my truck. Went boom every time I pulled the trigger. I may buy another one here soon and get my CCW.

.40 cal Smith for me, but if it's in the house I have no issues with 12 gauge .00 buck shot.

.40 Cal. S&W is what my oldest daughter carries. A lot of gun for a little girl but she's shown she can handle it.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Depends on the laws in the state you're in.

Self Defense Statutes
(Texas Penal Code)

"A person is justified in using deadly force against another to protect his property to the degree he reasonably believes the force is immediately necessary to prevent the other's imminent commission of arson, burglary, robbery, theft during the nighttime or criminal mischief during the nighttime, and he reasonably believes that the property cannot be protected by any other means."

Here in LA I can shoot your ass through the door from inside my house if I reasonably believe you are attempting to break in and harm me.

California Penal Code 197 states; Homicide is also justifiable when committed by any person in any of the following cases: 1. When resisting any attempt to murder any person, or to commit a felony, or to do some great bodily injury upon any person; or, 2. When committed in defense of habitation, property, or person, against one who manifestly intends or endeavors, by violence or surprise, to commit a felony, or against one who manifestly intends and endeavors, in a violent, riotous or tumultuous manner, to enter the habitation of another for the purpose of offering violence to any person therein; or, 3. When committed in the lawful defense of such person, or of a wife or husband, parent, child, master, mistress, or servant of such person, when there is reasonable ground to apprehend a design to commit a felony or to do some great bodily injury, and imminent danger of such design being accomplished; but such person, or the person in whose behalf the defense was made, if he was the assailant or engaged in mutual combat, must really and in good faith have endeavored to decline any further struggle before the homicide was committed; or, 4. When necessarily committed in attempting, by lawful ways and means, to apprehend any person for any felony committed, or in lawfully suppressing any riot, or in lawfully keeping and preserving the peace.
So the use of deadly force may be justifiable when necessary to resist the attempt to commit a forcible and life-threatening crime, provided that a reasonable person in the same or similar situation would believe that -
(a) the person killed intended to commit a forcible and life-threatening crime;
(b) there was imminent danger of such crime being accomplished; and
(c) the person acted under the belief that such force was necessary to save himself or herself or another from death or a forcible and life-threatening crime.

LA = Louisiana, not Los Angeles.

 

[mudwhistle]

The gun owners here are cracking me up.

So are the libs, but for different reasons.

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

The gun owners here are cracking me up.

So are the libs, but for different reasons.

Oh yeah.....am I the only gun owner in the thread that said they WOULDN'T brandish their firearm in that situation?

 

[Lonestar_logic]

Here in LA I can shoot your ass through the door from inside my house if I reasonably believe you are attempting to break in and harm me.

California Penal Code 197 states; Homicide is also justifiable when committed by any person in any of the following cases: 1. When resisting any attempt to murder any person, or to commit a felony, or to do some great bodily injury upon any person; or, 2. When committed in defense of habitation, property, or person, against one who manifestly intends or endeavors, by violence or surprise, to commit a felony, or against one who manifestly intends and endeavors, in a violent, riotous or tumultuous manner, to enter the habitation of another for the purpose of offering violence to any person therein; or, 3. When committed in the lawful defense of such person, or of a wife or husband, parent, child, master, mistress, or servant of such person, when there is reasonable ground to apprehend a design to commit a felony or to do some great bodily injury, and imminent danger of such design being accomplished; but such person, or the person in whose behalf the defense was made, if he was the assailant or engaged in mutual combat, must really and in good faith have endeavored to decline any further struggle before the homicide was committed; or, 4. When necessarily committed in attempting, by lawful ways and means, to apprehend any person for any felony committed, or in lawfully suppressing any riot, or in lawfully keeping and preserving the peace.
So the use of deadly force may be justifiable when necessary to resist the attempt to commit a forcible and life-threatening crime, provided that a reasonable person in the same or similar situation would believe that -
(a) the person killed intended to commit a forcible and life-threatening crime;
(b) there was imminent danger of such crime being accomplished; and
(c) the person acted under the belief that such force was necessary to save himself or herself or another from death or a forcible and life-threatening crime.

LA = Louisiana, not Los Angeles.

Hahaha I was wondering when you were going to catch that! Too funny!!

I've known for quite some time you were in N'awlins. I was just giving you grief.

Laissez le bon temp rouler!

 

[earlycuyler]

The gun owners here are cracking me up.

So are the libs, but for different reasons.

Oh yeah.....am I the only gun owner in the thread that said they WOULDN'T brandish their firearm in that situation?

No, I checked the floor it, and let lose with a belt fed machine gun. I know that in some CCW states that brandishing your fire arm will get your ticket pulled.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

California Penal Code 197 states; Homicide is also justifiable when committed by any person in any of the following cases: 1. When resisting any attempt to murder any person, or to commit a felony, or to do some great bodily injury upon any person; or, 2. When committed in defense of habitation, property, or person, against one who manifestly intends or endeavors, by violence or surprise, to commit a felony, or against one who manifestly intends and endeavors, in a violent, riotous or tumultuous manner, to enter the habitation of another for the purpose of offering violence to any person therein; or, 3. When committed in the lawful defense of such person, or of a wife or husband, parent, child, master, mistress, or servant of such person, when there is reasonable ground to apprehend a design to commit a felony or to do some great bodily injury, and imminent danger of such design being accomplished; but such person, or the person in whose behalf the defense was made, if he was the assailant or engaged in mutual combat, must really and in good faith have endeavored to decline any further struggle before the homicide was committed; or, 4. When necessarily committed in attempting, by lawful ways and means, to apprehend any person for any felony committed, or in lawfully suppressing any riot, or in lawfully keeping and preserving the peace.
So the use of deadly force may be justifiable when necessary to resist the attempt to commit a forcible and life-threatening crime, provided that a reasonable person in the same or similar situation would believe that -
(a) the person killed intended to commit a forcible and life-threatening crime;
(b) there was imminent danger of such crime being accomplished; and
(c) the person acted under the belief that such force was necessary to save himself or herself or another from death or a forcible and life-threatening crime.

LA = Louisiana, not Los Angeles.

Hahaha I was wondering when you were going to catch that! Too funny!!

I've known for quite some time you were in N'awlins. I was just giving you grief.

Laissez le bon temp rouler!

Cool... thought you were going Moonglow on me who earlier chimed in that Oakland was in LA. EVen though I'm sure he meant L.A., both are equally absurd.

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

The Internet Tough Guys trying to out-tough each other on this thread makes it PURE GOLD!

Good grief, don't get your granny panties in such a bunch.

 

[old navy]

The gun owners here are cracking me up.

So are the libs, but for different reasons.

Oh yeah.....am I the only gun owner in the thread that said they WOULDN'T brandish their firearm in that situation?

I was just playing along. Even in the 2A friendly Commonweatlh of Virginia, unwarrented display of a firearm is taken seriously. I don't usually put myself in a place where I need to pull my firearm. I surely will not attend any Outhouse Wall Street events.

 

[AmericanFirst]

The Internet Tough Guys trying to out-tough each other on this thread makes it PURE GOLD!

What is gold is the ows loons proving us right.