Bull Ring TPS v edthecynic

[edthecynic]

Since you were too lazy or scared to debate another topic, I challenge you on the question you saked as a diversion.

A) There is no hard evidence for existence of God.

B) There is no hard evidence for how life began

So, how can we declare (for example) the primordial pool to be a scientific theory but Creationism to be not.

Since neither one can be proved yes or no, how can one be discounted?