Town mulls recommending guns for all

Discussion in 'Current Events' started by Abbey Normal, Dec 7, 2006.

  1. Abbey Normal
    Offline

    Abbey Normal Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2005
    Messages:
    4,825
    Thanks Received:
    391
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Mid-Atlantic region
    Ratings:
    +391
    I'm guessing crime stats would go down.

    Town mulls recommending guns for all
    By Jon Hurdle
    Thu Dec 7, 11:10 AM ET

    PHILADELPHIA (Reuters) - A tiny town in western Pennsylvania could ask all of its residents to own guns, if a proposal under consideration on Wednesday wins approval from local officials.

    Under the proposed law, residents of Cherry Tree, Pennsylvania, would be asked to own guns and know how to use them. Cherry Tree, some 70 miles northeast of Pittsburgh, has about 400 residents.

    The town council was scheduled to vote on the proposed "Civil Protection Ordinance" on Wednesday evening.

    Introduced last month by resident Henry Statkowski, the measure recommends that "all heads of households maintain a firearm along with ammunition."

    In written comments, Statkowski said homeowners have a right and a responsibility to defend against intruders rather than calling police and waiting for help to arrive.

    The measure would send a message to "burglars, ne'er-do-wells and other criminal elements," Statkowski wrote.

    The male head of the household has the responsibility to defend the family from intruders, he also wrote.

    "I don't believe your wife would appreciate it very much if you said, 'Honey, I'll wait until the police arrive and have them defend your life,'" he wrote.

    Statkowski could not be reached for comment.

    Chad Ramsey, a spokesman for the national gun-control group the Brady Campaign, dismissed the proposal as "ridiculously silly."

    The measure was unlikely to pass because state law prevents municipalities from making their own gun laws, Ramsey said. He said about 40 percent of Pennsylvania households own guns.

    Aaron Fry, owner of the Cherry Tree Cafe, said he did not understand why the measure was necessary because guns are common. "Every house has a couple of guns," he said.

    http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20061207/od_nm/usa_guns_dc_2
     
  2. KarlMarx
    Offline

    KarlMarx Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 9, 2004
    Messages:
    3,231
    Thanks Received:
    490
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    ...
    Ratings:
    +490
    Guns for all and all for guns..... Alexander Dumas would have been proud....
     
  3. theHawk
    Online

    theHawk Registered Conservative

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2005
    Messages:
    10,901
    Thanks Received:
    2,072
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Germany
    Ratings:
    +5,788

    Wouldn't that state law be unconstitutional? No law can enfringe on the right to carry arms....
     
  4. Abbey Normal
    Offline

    Abbey Normal Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2005
    Messages:
    4,825
    Thanks Received:
    391
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Mid-Atlantic region
    Ratings:
    +391
    I would argue that the intent of the legislation was to stop the State from enacting laws that restrict gun ownership. Expansion should be fine. Some research on legislative intent would help clear it up, if we're lucky.
     

Share This Page