Torture Is Wrong: Israel's Supreme Court Weighs In

Originally posted by DKSuddeth

not many stories of vietnamese troop carriers hovering off the pacific coast waiting to invade, were there? :rolleyes:

1)Who do you think began the Vietnam War after Dien Bien Fu?

2)Who ended the Vietnam war?

3)Why was the war designed to lose instead of winning?

1) Democrat President

2) Republican President

3) Repayment to certain American industries for contributions and support of many of our representatives elected to government.
 
Originally posted by ajwps
[

Name one people or religion that has lived peacefully with Muslims anywhere in the world. [/B]

I never said the co-existence has always been peaceful, but Christians and Jews have always lived within Muslim nations. Yes there are many instances of extremist Muslims committing hate crimes against Christians and Jews in those countries. However, there have been just as many cases throughout history of Christian nations committing hate crimes against Jews and people of other faiths and even other Christians that had a slightly different interpretation.
But thankfully, with the rise of secularism, these types of things no longer occur much in nations housing mostly Christians. Oops, I forgot about Milosevic. Well, at least they don't occur as much as they used to.
 
Originally posted by menewa

I never said the co-existence has always been peaceful, but Christians and Jews have always lived within Muslim nations. Yes there are many instances of extremist Muslims committing hate crimes against Christians and Jews in those countries. However, there have been just as many cases throughout history of Christian nations committing hate crimes against Jews and people of other faiths and even other Christians that had a slightly different interpretation. But thankfully, with the rise of secularism, these types of things no longer occur much in nations housing mostly Christians. Oops, I forgot about Milosevic. Well, at least they don't occur as much as they used to.

So you again state that unknown Muslim nations have always existed in peace with other peoples in their lands. Just a few extremist Muslims committing hate crimes instead of Muslim countries that neither killed or made diminis (sub-humans) of those living among the Muslims in their countries. Show me a country where Muslims live in peace with Christians on their holy soil

So far you haven't named even ONE MUSLIM NATION that has lived in peace with those of other religions or non-Muslims in Islamic countries.

I'm still waiting for that one Muslim country that allowed infidels to live in peace with the Islamic people of any land.
 
Just a quick FYI -

The A-Bombs were dropped on Japan because the upcoming invasion casualty estimates were in the millions. Whether or not the Soviet invasion threat is legit is beside the point. The invasion was indeed being planned as the logical conclusion of the war until the new wonder weapons entered the American arsenal.

Literally millions of Japanese men, women and children were feverishly training to repel the invasion that everyone knew was coming. The Japanese were tough as hell to clear from the Pacific Islands, their ferocity would have been unimaginable with the invasion of their homeland and especially the defense of their Emperor / God, Hirohito.

Another interesting fact is that both Nagasaki and Hiroshima were major industrial centers - America did not chose those sites due to their civilian populations. There were other, larger cities that we could have targeted but didn't, because their war making capacity wasn't what Nagasaki and Hiroshima were.
 
Also, correct me if I'm wrong, but this is what I've learned...

The United States actually requested help from the Russians to qwell the Japanese threat, even though their "land grabbing" was obvious. However, the Russians conveniently waited for the major hostilities end (aka, Japan's surrender) before trying to send troops in and "restore order" (aka, grab more land). By that time, we conveniently told them to bug off.

Having pulled that stunt, and in effect, pretending to be our allies, a lot of tension between the two nations was caused, only adding to everything that began the cold war. I don't doubt that we noticed what they were doing, and wanted to scare off the Russians with a show of our power. However, the primary reason for the bomb has already been stated, ever so eloquently by ajwps and NightTrain.

-Douglas
 
Originally posted by Shazbot
Also, correct me if I'm wrong, but this is what I've learned...

The United States actually requested help from the Russians to qwell the Japanese threat, even though their "land grabbing" was obvious. However, the Russians conveniently waited for the major hostilities end (aka, Japan's surrender) before trying to send troops in and "restore order" (aka, grab more land). By that time, we conveniently told them to bug off.

Having pulled that stunt, and in effect, pretending to be our allies, a lot of tension between the two nations was caused, only adding to everything that began the cold war. I don't doubt that we noticed what they were doing, and wanted to scare off the Russians with a show of our power. However, the primary reason for the bomb has already been stated, ever so eloquently by ajwps and NightTrain.

-Douglas

As far as my history education has taken me thus far, you've nailed it.
 
I think you're correct, Shazbot. The Soviets weren't interested in fighting Japan, they really had their hands full with the Germans. Only when their front against the Germans was going well and Japan was clearly on the ropes, did they show interest in entering the Pacific theatre.

I agree that showing the world our new wonder weapon was a beneficial side effect, but that was not the reason for using it.

I watched a History Channel show about Germany's efforts to perfect the atomic bomb and jet propulsion a while back. As it turns out, Japan actually had an operational prototype flying before the end of the war, courtesy of a German sub (1 of 3) that made the voyage without being sunk.
 
Originally posted by NightTrain
I think you're correct, Shazbot. The Soviets weren't interested in fighting Japan, they really had their hands full with the Germans. Only when their front against the Germans was going well and Japan was clearly on the ropes, did they show interest in entering the Pacific theatre.

I agree that showing the world our new wonder weapon was a beneficial side effect, but that was not the reason for using it.

I watched a History Channel show about Germany's efforts to perfect the atomic bomb and jet propulsion a while back. As it turns out, Japan actually had an operational prototype flying before the end of the war, courtesy of a German sub (1 of 3) that made the voyage without being sunk.

I think you are both right, not only about Russians, but USA as well. Yeah, the US would have won, eventually a ground war. But at a cost we would not have wanted to sustain. See that is the point of having the most terrible weapons, the other guy pays the price.

IF the Japanese had surrendered, when offered, the bomb would not have dropped. If after the first, they had surrendered, the second would not have dropped.

They lost, get over it.
 
Originally posted by ajwps

So you again state that unknown Muslim nations have always existed in peace with other peoples in their lands. Just a few extremist Muslims committing hate crimes instead of Muslim countries that neither killed or made diminis (sub-humans) of those living among the Muslims in their countries. Show me a country where Muslims live in peace with Christians on their holy soil

So far you haven't named even ONE MUSLIM NATION that has lived in peace with those of other religions or non-Muslims in Islamic countries.

I'm still waiting for that one Muslim country that allowed infidels to live in peace with the Islamic people of any land. [/B]

Check out this piece:
http://www.dawanet.com/nonmuslim/intro/war/war9.html

Islamic tolerance towards people of other faiths is what made their initial conquests so successful.
 
Originally posted by NightTrain


Your facts are clear that America had to use WMDs clearly not allowed by the conventions of war in a time where the Queens Roxbury Rules and the norms of civilization are temporarily halted for the saving of lives.

War time is a suspension of the ordinary liberties for the protection of civilization. The enemy tortures and kills for their moon-god and to destroy all who do not believe in their prophet.

America and their allies have destroyed cities full of civiliians in WW2 with continuous rains of bombs,i.e., Dresden Germany, etc.

Only if wars could be ended and peace and justice rule the entire world but that is a dream. In the meantime, cruel and inhumane techniques are needed to safeguard our and future generations to enjoy the fruits of liberty.

For the time being, mankind is not as civilized as they would like to believe and we are not above them in the game of WAR.
 
Originally posted by menewa

Check out this piece:
http://www.dawanet.com/nonmuslim/intro/war/war9.html Islamic tolerance towards people of other faiths is what made their initial conquests so successful.
[/QUOTE]

Your site about the nature of Islam and Muslims was very enlightening but not one single word was truth Muhammad. The entire site is nothing more or less than Al-Taqiyya or lying for Allah as a deed approved by the prophet. Your site is a Muslim propaganda site and has no bearing in reality.

Here is the home page of your Muslim site. I still wait for one Muslim country that allows its non-Muslims citizens to live in peace. Apparently you can't.

http://www.dawanet.com/nonmuslim/intro/index-2.html
 
"Name one people or religion that has lived peacefully with Muslims anywhere in the world. The Muslims lived next to other countries because they did not have the military power to defeat them, ergo they lived in a state of non-peace but really ready to strike when and if they could"

From about 950-1000 C.E. there was a very large gathering of Christians, Jews, and Muslims in the city of Jerusalem. Hundreds of people from those three religions lived peacefully together in one city. Nothing happened, no blood bath no massacre. So that’s two religions that have lived peacefully with the Muslims.

In the US there are plenty of Muslims more likely to smile and say hello then to pull out a Kukri and stab you.
 
Originally posted by ajwps

Your site about the nature of Islam and Muslims was very enlightening but not one single word was truth Muhammad. The entire site is nothing more or less than Al-Taqiyya or lying for Allah as a deed approved by the prophet. Your site is a Muslim propaganda site and has no bearing in reality.

Here is the home page of your Muslim site. I still wait for one Muslim country that allows its non-Muslims citizens to live in peace. Apparently you can't.


Everything on that site is backed up by recorded history. Your prejudice has blinded your eyes to any truth that counters your stance against Muslims.
Fact is that Christians and Jews live peacefully among Muslims in almost every Middle Eastern nation.
Okay, here's one name: Iraq. Christians have lived here since before the Ottoman Empire all the way through to the US occupation.
 
Originally posted by deaddude

"Name one people or religion that has lived peacefully with Muslims anywhere in the world. The Muslims lived next to other countries because they did not have the military power to defeat them, ergo they lived in a state of non-peace but really ready to strike when and if they could"

From about 950-1000 C.E. there was a very large gathering of Christians, Jews, and Muslims in the city of Jerusalem. Hundreds of people from those three religions lived peacefully together in one city. Nothing happened, no blood bath no massacre. So that’s two religions that have lived peacefully with the Muslims.

In the US there are plenty of Muslims more likely to smile and say hello then to pull out a Kukri and stab you.
[/QUOTE]

Really? From what source did you learn this information about the Muslims living peacefully with the infidels in Jerusalem from 950-1000 ACE?

WRONG

http://www.palestinefacts.org/pf_early_palestine_brief_history.php

In the 9th century, Palestine was conquered by the Fatimid dynasty, which had risen to power in North Africa. The Fatimids had many enemies - the Seljuks, Karmatians, Byzantines, and Bedouins - and Palestine became a battlefield. Under the Fatimid caliph al Hakim (996-1021), the Christians and Jews were harshly suppressed, and many churches were destroyed. In 1099.......


Now give me one Muslim country that live in peace with any other people or religion....
 
Originally posted by menewa [/QUOTE

Everything on that site is backed up by recorded history. Your prejudice has blinded your eyes to any truth that counters your stance against Muslims.

Okay Muslim... Facts fabricated out of pure Al-Taqiyya which is why Islam is one big fat lie.

Fact is that Christians and Jews live peacefully among Muslims in almost every Middle Eastern nation.

What makes you such a lying son of the moon-god Allah?

Okay, here's one name: Iraq. Christians have lived here since before the Ottoman Empire all the way through to the US occupation.

Yes Christians and Jews lived in Iraq since the Ottoman Muslim impire until the time of Saddam. The infidels were treated according to Qur'an as dimini or subserviant to the will of the Muslims, pay infidel taxes to the Caliphs and not allowed to participate in any social or governmental activities. Periodically the loving Muslims murdered men, women and children and stole their property and possessions with no consequence.

You have to be the dumbest Muslim on the face of the earth.
 
Originally posted by ajwps

[What makes you such a lying son of the moon-god Allah?

Yes Christians and Jews lived in Iraq since the Ottoman Muslim impire until the time of Saddam. The infidels were treated according to Qur'an as dimini or subserviant to the will of the Muslims, pay infidel taxes to the Caliphs and not allowed to participate in any social or governmental activities. Periodically the loving Muslims murdered men, women and children and stole their property and possessions with no consequence.

You have to be the dumbest Muslim on the face of the earth. [/B]

Jews, Christians and Muslims all originated in the same area of the earth and have always lived together. Yes, at times Muslims have persecuted Jews and Christians. In the same way that Christians have at times persecuted Jews, Muslims and Animists. In fact, Christians committed the largest genocide in history against American Indians. History doesn't tell of any such genocide undertaken by any Muslim nation or empire. Members of all these religions have all committed terrible crimes against those that are different. You cannot reasonably claim that practitioners of Islam are any more violent or evil than practitioners of Judaism, Christianity, Hinduism, Animism, etc.

Also, what's up with this moon god nonsense. Muslims, Jews and Christians all worship the same God. The faiths are intertwined like a muscadine vine. I think this important fact, that they all share a common origin, both in faith and geography, proves they can all live peacably together. However, as long as people continue to exhibit prejudice based on ignorance, the world is in for a lot more hurtin'.
 
Originally posted by menewa

.... You cannot reasonably claim that practitioners of Islam are any more violent or evil than practitioners of Judaism, Christianity, Hinduism, Animism, etc.

Your proof that there is no difference is seen in the fact that it is only the Muslim who causes 99% of the attacks against their fellow man around the world solely because of their belief that the world must become Muslim.

Also, what's up with this moon god nonsense. Muslims, Jews and Christians all worship the same God. The faiths are intertwined like a muscadine vine. I think this important fact, that they all share a common origin, both in faith and geography, proves they can all live peacably together. However, as long as people continue to exhibit prejudice based on ignorance, the world is in for a lot more hurtin'.

llah - the Moon God

The Archeology of The Middle East
The religion of Islam has as its focus of worship a deity by the name of "Allah." The Muslims claim that Allah in pre-Islamic times was the biblical God of the Patriarchs, prophets, and apostles. The issue is thus one of continuity. Was "Allah" the biblical God or a pagan god in Arabia during pre-Islamic times? The Muslim's claim of continuity is essential to their attempt to convert Jews and Christians for if "Allah" is part of the flow of divine revelation in Scripture, then it is the next step in biblical religion. Thus we should all become Muslims. But, on the other hand, if Allah was a pre-Islamic pagan deity, then its core claim is refuted. Religious claims often fall before the results of hard sciences such as archeology. We can endlessly speculate about the past or go and dig it up and see what the evidence reveals. This is the only way to find out the truth concerning the origins of Allah. As we shall see, the hard evidence demonstrates that the god Allah was a pagan deity. In fact, he was the Moon-god who was married to the sun goddess and the stars were his daughters.

Archeologists have uncovered temples to the Moon-god throughout the Middle East. From the mountains of Turkey to the banks of the Nile, the most wide-spread religion of the ancient world was the worship of the Moon-god. In the first literate civilization, the Sumerians have left us thousands of clay tablets in which they described their religious beliefs. As demonstrated by Sjoberg and Hall, the ancient Sumerians worshipped a Moon-god who was called many different names. The most popular names were Nanna, Suen and Asimbabbar. His symbol was the crescent moon. Given the amount of artifacts concerning the worship of this Moon-god, it is clear that this was the dominant religion in Sumeria. The cult of the Moon-god was the most popular religion throughout ancient Mesopotamia. The Assyrians, Babylonians, and the Akkadians took the word Suen and transformed it into the word Sin as their favorite name for the Moon-god. As Prof. Potts pointed out, "Sin is a name essentially Sumerian in origin which had been borrowed by the Semites."

In ancient Syria and Canna, the Moon-god Sin was usually represented by the moon in its crescent phase. At times the full moon was placed inside the crescent moon to emphasize all the phases of the moon. The sun-goddess was the wife of Sin and the stars were their daughters. For example, Istar was a daughter of Sin. Sacrifices to the Moon-god are described in the Pas Shamra texts. In the Ugaritic texts, the Moon-god was sometimes called Kusuh. In Persia, as well as in Egypt, the Moon-god is depicted on wall murals and on the heads of statues. He was the Judge of men and gods. The Old Testament constantly rebuked the worship of the Moon-god (see: Deut. 4:19;17:3; II Kngs. 21:3,5; 23:5; Jer. 8:2; 19:13; Zeph. 1:5, etc.) When Israel fell into idolatry, it was usually the cult of the Moon-god. As a matter of fact, everywhere in the ancient world, the symbol of the crescent moon can be found on seal impressions, steles, pottery, amulets, clay tablets, cylinders, weights, earrings, necklaces, wall murals, etc. In Tell-el-Obeid, a copper calf was found with a crescent moon on its forehead. An idol with the body of a bull and the head of man has a crescent moon inlaid on its forehead with shells. In Ur, the Stela of Ur-Nammu has the crescent symbol placed at the top of the register of gods because the Moon-god was the head of the gods. Even bread was baked in the form of a crescent as an act of devotion to the Moon-god. The Ur of the Chaldees was so devoted to the Moon-god that it was sometimes called Nannar in tablets from that time period.

A temple of the Moon-god has been excavated in Ur by Sir Leonard Woolley. He dug up many examples of moon worship in Ur and these are displayed in the British Museum to this day. Harran was likewise noted for its devotion to the Moon-god. In the 1950's a major temple to the Moon-god was excavated at Hazer in Palestine. Two idols of the moon god were found. Each was a stature of a man sitting upon a throne with a crescent moon carved on his chest . The accompanying inscriptions make it clear that these were idols of the Moon-god. Several smaller statues were also found which were identified by their inscriptions as the "daughters" of the Moon-god. What about Arabia? As pointed out by Prof. Coon, "Muslims are notoriously loath to preserve traditions of earlier paganism and like to garble what pre-Islamic history they permit to survive in anachronistic terms."

During the nineteenth century, Amaud, Halevy and Glaser went to Southern Arabia and dug up thousands of Sabean, Minaean, and Qatabanian inscriptions which were subsequently translated. In the 1940's, the archeologists G. Caton Thompson and Carleton S. Coon made some amazing discoveries in Arabia. During the 1950's, Wendell Phillips, W.F. Albright, Richard Bower and others excavated sites at Qataban, Timna, and Marib (the ancient capital of Sheba). Thousands of inscriptions from walls and rocks in Northern Arabia have also been collected. Reliefs and votive bowls used in worship of the "daughters of Allah" have also been discovered. The three daughters, al-Lat, al-Uzza and Manat are sometimes depicted together with Allah the Moon-god represented by a crescent moon above them. The archeological evidence demonstrates that the dominant religion of Arabia was the cult of the Moon-god.

In Old Testament times, Nabonidus (555-539 BC), the last king of Babylon, built Tayma, Arabia as a center of Moon-god worship. Segall stated, "South Arabia's stellar religion has always been dominated by the Moon-god in various variations." Many scholars have also noticed that the Moon-god's name "Sin" is a part of such Arabic words as "Sinai," the "wilderness of Sin," etc. When the popularity of the Moon-god waned elsewhere, the Arabs remained true to their conviction that the Moon-god was the greatest of all gods. While they worshipped 360 gods at the Kabah in Mecca, the Moon-god was the chief deity. Mecca was in fact built as a shrine for the Moon-god.

This is what made it the most sacred site of Arabian paganism. In 1944, G. Caton Thompson revealed in her book, The Tombs and Moon Temple of Hureidha, that she had uncovered a temple of the Moon-god in southern Arabia. The symbols of the crescent moon and no less than twenty-one inscriptions with the name Sin were found in this temple. An idol which may be the Moon-god himself was also discovered. This was later confirmed by other well-known archeologists.

The evidence reveals that the temple of the Moon-god was active even in the Christian era. Evidence gathered from both North and South Arabia demonstrate that Moon-god worship was clearly active even in Muhammad's day and was still the dominant cult. According to numerous inscriptions, while the name of the Moon-god was Sin, his title was al-ilah, i.e. "the deity," meaning that he was the chief or high god among the gods. As Coon pointed out, "The god Il or Ilah was originally a phase of the Moon God." The Moon-god was called al-ilah, i.e. the god, which was shortened to Allah in pre-Islamic times. The pagan Arabs even used Allah in the names they gave to their children. For example, both Muhammad's father and uncle had Allah as part of their names.

The fact that they were given such names by their pagan parents proves that Allah was the title for the Moon-god even in Muhammad's day. Prof. Coon goes on to say, "Similarly, under Mohammed's tutelage, the relatively anonymous Ilah, became Al-Ilah, The God, or Allah, the Supreme Being."

This fact answers the questions, "Why is Allah never defined in the Qur'an? Why did Muhammad assume that the pagan Arabs already knew who Allah was?" Muhammad was raised in the religion of the Moon-god Allah. But he went one step further than his fellow pagan Arabs. While they believed that Allah, i.e. the Moon-god, was the greatest of all gods and the supreme deity in a pantheon of deities, Muhammad decided that Allah was not only the greatest god but the only god.

In effect he said, "Look, you already believe that the Moon-god Allah is the greatest of all gods. All I want you to do is to accept that the idea that he is the only god. I am not taking away the Allah you already worship. I am only taking away his wife and his daughters and all the other gods." This is seen from the fact that the first point of the Muslim creed is not, "Allah is great" but "Allah is the greatest," i.e., he is the greatest among the gods. Why would Muhammad say that Allah is the "greatest" except in a polytheistic context? The Arabic word is used to contrast the greater from the lesser. That this is true is seen from the fact that the pagan Arabs never accused Muhammad of preaching a different Allah than the one they already worshipped. This "Allah" was the Moon-god according to the archeological evidence. Muhammad thus attempted to have it both ways. To the pagans, he said that he still believed in the Moon-god Allah. To the Jews and the Christians, he said that Allah was their God too. But both the Jews and the Christians knew better and that is why they rejected his god Allah as a false god.

Al-Kindi, one of the early Christian apologists against Islam, pointed out that Islam and its god Allah did not come from the Bible but from the paganism of the Sabeans. They did not worship the God of the Bible but the Moon-god and his daughters al-Uzza, al-Lat and Manat. Dr. Newman concludes his study of the early Christian-Muslim debates by stating, "Islam proved itself to be...a separate and antagonistic religion which had sprung up from idolatry." Islamic scholar Caesar Farah concluded "There is no reason, therefore, to accept the idea that Allah passed to the Muslims from the Christians and Jews." The Arabs worshipped the Moon-god as a supreme deity. But this was not biblical monotheism. While the Moon-god was greater than all other gods and goddesses, this was still a polytheistic pantheon of deities. Now that we have the actual idols of the Moon-god, it is no longer possible to avoid the fact that Allah was a pagan god in pre-Islamic times. Is it any wonder then that the symbol of Islam is the crescent moon? That a crescent moon sits on top of their mosques and minarets? That a crescent moon is found on the flags of Islamic nations? That the Muslims fast during the month which begins and ends with the appearance of the crescent moon in the sky?

CONCLUSION
The pagan Arabs worshipped the Moon-god Allah by praying toward Mecca several times a day; making a pilgrimage to Mecca; running around the temple of the Moon-god called the Kabah; kissing the black stone; killing an animal in sacrifice to the Moon-god; throwing stones at the devil; fasting for the month which begins and ends with the crescent moon; giving alms to the poor, etc.

Here is one archeological finds of the pre-Islamic carved moon gods with the Muslim crescent moon carved into the chest. This is the god Muhammad made into his diety.
The Muslim's claim that Allah is the God of the Bible and that Islam arose from the religion of the prophets and apostles is refuted by solid, overwhelming archeological evidence. Islam is nothing more than a revival of the ancient Moon-god cult. It has taken the symbols, the rites, the ceremonies, and even the name of its god from the ancient pagan religion of the Moon-god. As such, it is sheer idolatry and must be rejected by all those who follow the Torah and Gospel.
 
AJWPS. You still keep bringing up historical issues that are linked to Judaism, Christianity and Islam. You speak of the pagan past of the Arabs, but Jews and the Gentile converts also have a pagan past. Jews used to believe in a pantheon before eventually denouncing that and accepting the belief in one God, Yahweh. Christian Europe was heavily influenced by their pagan past, just look at the holidays of Christmas and Easter. These are definitely a mixing of ancient pagan traditions with the more recent Christian beliefs. All three faiths have pagan pasts, but they've all moved past it to a monotheistic belief system.
You still cannot prove that Muslims want to eradicate all other religions. Your "99%" stat is garbage.
Do you even know any Muslims personally?
The corner store by my apartment is run by Palastinian immigrants. They are some of the most tolerant and soft spoken people I've met. They are certainly not violent and bent on world domination.
However, I still give this argument up. Your entire stance is based on a prejudice that you attempt to justify through cut-and-past rhetoric taken from hate-based web sites. Your argument is therefore uncouth and invalid.
Have a good life.
 
Originally posted by menewa

AJWPS. You still keep bringing up historical issues that are linked to Judaism, Christianity and Islam. You speak of the pagan past of the Arabs, but Jews and the Gentile converts also have a pagan past. Jews used to believe in a pantheon before eventually denouncing that and accepting the belief in one God, Yahweh.

Really???? What pantheon of gods did the HEBREWS (Jewish people were not present before entering the holy land with Joshua) worship before accepting G-d. By the way, the word Yahweh is not a Jewish name for G-d but simply a Muslim's interpreation of the Hebrew name Adon-i. I speak the Hebrew language and you apparenatly do not Mr. Arab.

Christian Europe was heavily influenced by their pagan past, just look at the holidays of Christmas and Easter. These are definitely a mixing of ancient pagan traditions with the more recent Christian beliefs. All three faiths have pagan pasts, but they've all moved past it to a monotheistic belief system.
You still cannot prove that Muslims want to eradicate all other religions. Your "99%" stat is garbage.


I cannot speak for Christian beliefs but you as a Muslim apparently are an expert. I'll just bet that they might disagree with your understanding of Christianity....

Do you even know any Muslims personally?

I do. I work with them every day of the workweek.

The corner store by my apartment is run by Palastinian immigrants. They are some of the most tolerant and soft spoken people I've met. They are certainly not violent and bent on world domination.

How do you know they are tolerant, soft spoken behind the back of the infidels or do not desire world domination for Allah and Muhammad as clearly a part of the Qur'an book of hate? Unless you are one of them, you are lying in either case.

However, I still give this argument up. Your entire stance is based on a prejudice that you attempt to justify through cut-and-past rhetoric taken from hate-based web sites. Your argument is therefore uncouth and invalid.

Perfect description of yourself and the Islamic dogma and the vilest murderers of their own children ever to inhabit the planet earth.

Have a good life.

And may Allah the Beneficient bless all Muslims soon find all of his believers in his paradise with little boy sex toys and black-eyed reusable virgins.

Since you understand so very much, let me give you a blessing in Arabic.

Kus-a-tuk.....
 

Forum List

Back
Top