Top quality US education, why the US is going down

frigidweirdo

Diamond Member
Mar 7, 2014
45,063
9,112
2,030
26904281_1794841400812716_5123773963635937042_n.jpg


This is Bolton Academy in Atlanta.

Bolton Academy - 2268 Adams Dr NW, Atlanta, GA - Trulia

In English this "Academy" gets 38% of meeting or exceeding standards.
In Math 37%
In Science 31%
In Social Studies 30%

I wonder why.
 
The rest of the world considers a US education to be the best in the world.

I wonder why?
 
The rest of the world considers a US education to be the best in the world.

I wonder why?

Do they?

Who would that be then? Sudan? Afghanistan? Pakistan?

Certainly not the UK, Germany, Austria, Holland, Belgium, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Ireland etc.
 
The rest of the world considers a US education to be the best in the world.

I wonder why?

Do they?

Who would that be then? Sudan? Afghanistan? Pakistan?

Certainly not the UK, Germany, Austria, Holland, Belgium, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Ireland etc.


And the UK, Germany, Austria, Holland, Belgium, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Ireland etc. Leading the world in what exactly retard?

Here are the world's top seven economies, according to the 2017 IMF forecast:
  • U.S. - $19.4 trillion.
  • China - $11.9 trillion.
  • Japan - $4.9 trillion.
  • Germany - $3.7 trillion.
  • France - $2.575 trillion.
  • U.K. - $2.565 trillion.
  • India - $2.4 trillion.
Britain crashes out of world's top 5 economies - Nov. 22, 2017 - ...
CNN.com › money › news › economy

Feedback
 
26904281_1794841400812716_5123773963635937042_n.jpg


This is Bolton Academy in Atlanta.

Bolton Academy - 2268 Adams Dr NW, Atlanta, GA - Trulia

In English this "Academy" gets 38% of meeting or exceeding standards.
In Math 37%
In Science 31%
In Social Studies 30%

I wonder why.


Yet you still can't tell me this common core math question, go figure


View attachment 173331

Which would be just another example of education in the US going to shit. Politicians just aren't doing their jobs properly.
 
The rest of the world considers a US education to be the best in the world.

I wonder why?

Do they?

Who would that be then? Sudan? Afghanistan? Pakistan?

Certainly not the UK, Germany, Austria, Holland, Belgium, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Ireland etc.


And the UK, Germany, Austria, Holland, Belgium, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Ireland etc. Leading the world in what exactly retard?

Here are the world's top seven economies, according to the 2017 IMF forecast:
  • U.S. - $19.4 trillion.
  • China - $11.9 trillion.
  • Japan - $4.9 trillion.
  • Germany - $3.7 trillion.
  • France - $2.575 trillion.
  • U.K. - $2.565 trillion.
  • India - $2.4 trillion.
Britain crashes out of world's top 5 economies - Nov. 22, 2017 - ...
CNN.com › money › news › economy

Feedback

What are you trying to say, if you cherry pick information, you'll prove anything. Or are you trying to prove that insults rule when making an argument?

Sweden has a population of 5 million people. How the hell do you expect it to compete with the US or raw figures when it has a population less than New York City?

According to the IMF the US is 11th in terms of GDP per capita, which is actually what matters, because this determines how rich individuals are.

Sweden is 15th. But they might not be as rich in monetary terms, but in terms of quality of life, they're much better, though they're trying to screw it up.

The simple fact is you have insulted, again (you don't need to reply to his message, you were on ignore before, and you'll still be on ignore after) and you've shown you're incapable of using facts.

So.....

US education produced you, I'm assuming, and we can then see that US education isn't up to much.
 
The rest of the world considers a US education to be the best in the world.

I wonder why?

Do they?

Who would that be then? Sudan? Afghanistan? Pakistan?

Certainly not the UK, Germany, Austria, Holland, Belgium, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Ireland etc.
Yea, those countries and more:

International students in the U.S., by country of origin 2016/17 | Statistic

Republicans states aren't used to seeing those students. After all, who wants to go to school in a sh!thole?
 
The rest of the world considers a US education to be the best in the world.

I wonder why?

Do they?

Who would that be then? Sudan? Afghanistan? Pakistan?

Certainly not the UK, Germany, Austria, Holland, Belgium, Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Ireland etc.
Yea, those countries and more:

International students in the U.S., by country of origin 2016/17 | Statistic

What are we talking about here?

You've just shown that many students from outside the US go to the US to study.

But study what? High School? University? What?

International students in the UK: who are they really?

Look, 19.8% of international students in the UK are Chinese. Oh, does this prove how great the UK education system is?


UKCISA - international student advice and guidance - International student statistics: UK higher education

There are 91,000 Chinese students in the UK compared to 350,000 in the US. 91,000*5= 455,000, which means the UK has MORE Chinese students per capita than the US does. So, does this mean the UK's education system is better?

Well, the problem is this only talks about university. This doesn't include High School students.

So, basically, after having shown a US High School fucking up badly, you then go talk about something completely irrelevant to try and make some point that is completely irrelevant.

All those years of schooling wasted, huh?
 
Oh, well, that's wonderful. Maybe if the Russians educated themselves a little more, they'd understand the truth.

Of course, I can't talk about the whole education, but in the field of information technology, computer science, mathematics, I believe that US education is the best.
 
Oh, well, that's wonderful. Maybe if the Russians educated themselves a little more, they'd understand the truth.

Of course, I can't talk about the whole education, but in the field of information technology, computer science, mathematics, I believe that US education is the best.

The biggest problem here is how you measure education.

How do you quantify education?

You go to the UK. Oxford and Cambridge are the best universities, right? Are they? Will you get better teaching at Oxford and Cambridge rather than other universities? How can you compare?

The simple answer is you don't compare. You can't unless you go to them all and see and then judge.

What US universities do is ADVERTISE, they essentially tell people they're better.

Yes, sometimes they can attract the "best" professors. But how do you quantify a professor? Some are good at research and really bad at teaching, but you think you're getting the best teaching because.... well because someone has told you that you're getting the best.

Essentially a degree from Harvard goes a long way. Not because of the professors, the teaching etc, but because of the prestige. You're showing the world how good you are because you have this degree. Not because you got the best teaching. Potentially many of those who have done well at Harvard, would have done just as well anywhere else. They'd have learned stuff too, and potentially learned the same stuff. There will be exceptions, when a professor is amazing or whatever, but that can happen anywhere.

For example, I went to a university. I studied politics for one course. The professor was actually the politics professor at a better university. So, I got the education from the better university, but the degree from the not so good university.

What matters?
 
26904281_1794841400812716_5123773963635937042_n.jpg


This is Bolton Academy in Atlanta.

Bolton Academy - 2268 Adams Dr NW, Atlanta, GA - Trulia

In English this "Academy" gets 38% of meeting or exceeding standards.
In Math 37%
In Science 31%
In Social Studies 30%

I wonder why.


Yet you still can't tell me this common core math question, go figure


View attachment 173331
Midnight=M=4 Cups of Food a day, Rusty=R, Cups ped day Difference=D & M>R. So D=M-R
Why does Midnight get more food? He should share with Rusty so they have the same. LOL
 
Last edited:
The simple answer is you don't compare. You can't unless you go to them all and see and then judge.
But I see the level of the IT industry in the US and the US is the undisputed leader of course you can say in the USA a lot of foreign engineers, scientist and so on, but only with the use of foreign specialists have never achieved this result.
At the moment, the US is a "technological and scientific" leader, which would never have been if the US had no better education (or at least one of the best). Or do you know countries with weak education, but with a strong technological and scientific development?

And, for example, in Russia the level of education decreases from year to year (in comparison with the USSR) and has a direct impact on the country's technical and scientific development.

What US universities do is ADVERTISE, they essentially tell people they're better.

Is it bad? Good advertising allows the university to attract the best professors from all over the world and the best students, raising the level of education
 
The simple answer is you don't compare. You can't unless you go to them all and see and then judge.
But I see the level of the IT industry in the US and the US is the undisputed leader of course you can say in the USA a lot of foreign engineers, scientist and so on, but only with the use of foreign specialists have never achieved this result.
At the moment, the US is a "technological and scientific" leader, which would never have been if the US had no better education (or at least one of the best). Or do you know countries with weak education, but with a strong technological and scientific development?

And, for example, in Russia the level of education decreases from year to year (in comparison with the USSR) and has a direct impact on the country's technical and scientific development.

What US universities do is ADVERTISE, they essentially tell people they're better.

Is it bad? Good advertising allows the university to attract the best professors from all over the world and the best students, raising the level of education

Okay, the US does really well at computing.

Take Facebook. Did the US education system make Facebook? Not really. The guy who made it bailed out of university.

The US has certain things going for it. A large population which means when someone is successful, they can be massively successful within their own borders. That's really important. Look at the UK leaving the EU. Now when they want to trade with their closest neighbors, there's going to be more hassle, less profit etc. When eastern European countries entered the EU, their trade increased massively for a reason.

The US has that. 330 million population and you don't need to go through any borders.

Look at China, they have some of the richest people in the world. You get the CCP on your side, and you can get a monopoly and you're going to be massively rich. This money then can be used to make more money, put money into development and the like.

Is advertising bad?

It can be if it's misleading people into thinking they're getting a better education than they actually are. However most don't care. They're not interested in getting an education, they're interested in the potential a degree for that university can give them.
 
Oh, well, that's wonderful. Maybe if the Russians educated themselves a little more, they'd understand the truth.

Of course, I can't talk about the whole education, but in the field of information technology, computer science, mathematics, I believe that US education is the best.

The biggest problem here is how you measure education.

How do you quantify education?

You go to the UK. Oxford and Cambridge are the best universities, right? Are they? Will you get better teaching at Oxford and Cambridge rather than other universities? How can you compare?

The simple answer is you don't compare. You can't unless you go to them all and see and then judge.

What US universities do is ADVERTISE, they essentially tell people they're better.

Yes, sometimes they can attract the "best" professors. But how do you quantify a professor? Some are good at research and really bad at teaching, but you think you're getting the best teaching because.... well because someone has told you that you're getting the best.

Essentially a degree from Harvard goes a long way. Not because of the professors, the teaching etc, but because of the prestige. You're showing the world how good you are because you have this degree. Not because you got the best teaching. Potentially many of those who have done well at Harvard, would have done just as well anywhere else. They'd have learned stuff too, and potentially learned the same stuff. There will be exceptions, when a professor is amazing or whatever, but that can happen anywhere.

For example, I went to a university. I studied politics for one course. The professor was actually the politics professor at a better university. So, I got the education from the better university, but the degree from the not so good university.

What matters?
Higher education in the USA, particularly at Ivy League schools, it more about indoctrination rather than education. Grade inflation is also a huge problem.

This is why the American ruling class, most of it from the Ivy League, is NOT our best and brightest.
 

Forum List

Back
Top