Tom Steyer--"Term Limits"

Discussion in 'Election Forums' started by WillHaftawaite, Dec 1, 2019 at 8:53 AM.

  1. WillHaftawaite
    Offline

    WillHaftawaite USMB Mod Staff Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2013
    Messages:
    52,574
    Thanks Received:
    12,124
    Trophy Points:
    2,250
    Ratings:
    +55,511
    Steyer is campaigning on 'Term Limits'

    Tom Steyer calls out Lindsey Graham and calls for term limits in new South Carolina TV ad

    and is naming only Republicans.

    "This time, the argument he makes isn’t as philosophical. It’s about a specific trio of people in politics today, whose names he treats as shorthand for entrenched power in Washington.

    “Speaking of term limits, I have six words for you: Mitch McConnell, Lindsey Graham, Chuck Grassley,” Steyer says.

    McConnell, Graham and Grassley have been in the Senate for a combined 89 years."

    Why is he only naming Republicans?

    Why doesn't he name some Democrats..?

    Like
    Nancy Pelosi, with 32 years in office.
    Maxine Waters, with 28 years in office
    Jerry Nadler, with 27 years in office
    Adam Schiff, with 18 years in office.

    Why doesn't he mention Boxer, Feinstein, Leahy?

    Numerous others.

    Oh, that's right...

    he's running as a Democrat, and only attacking Republicans for being reelected by their constituents.

    Comments?
     
    • Winner Winner x 4
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Informative Informative x 2
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. petro
    Online

    petro Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2013
    Messages:
    5,489
    Thanks Received:
    1,040
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    The cold north
    Ratings:
    +7,286
    Term limits for all of them.

    Career politician should Not be in our vocabulary. It shouldn't take millions to run for any office either.
     
    • Winner Winner x 3
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. Billy_Kinetta
    Offline

    Billy_Kinetta Paladin of the Lost Hour Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 4, 2013
    Messages:
    42,167
    Thanks Received:
    8,131
    Trophy Points:
    2,060
    Ratings:
    +52,916
    The problem is that early in our development representatives had to - to some degree - be dragged into service. Without the "royalty" aspect, it was just a job, and not a particularly enriching one.

    We now have our own "created" royalty, who fight to gain the title and do everything possible to retain it, because they can become rich and powerful with it.

    Term limits are a good idea.

    That said, Steyer is going nowhere.
     
    • Agree Agree x 5
  4. Tommy Tainant
    Online

    Tommy Tainant Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2016
    Messages:
    20,399
    Thanks Received:
    2,204
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Y Cae Ras
    Ratings:
    +14,751
    Arguing for term limits is a howl of rage from the uneducated underclass. Where is the benefit ?
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
  5. WillHaftawaite
    Offline

    WillHaftawaite USMB Mod Staff Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2013
    Messages:
    52,574
    Thanks Received:
    12,124
    Trophy Points:
    2,250
    Ratings:
    +55,511
    uneducated? Underclass?

    Interesting...
    "Steyer is the founder and former co-senior-managing-partner of Farallon Capital and the co-founder of Onecalifornia Bank, which became (through merger) Beneficial State Bank, an Oakland–based community development bank.[2] Farallon Capital manages $20 billion in capital for institutions and high-net-worth individuals. The firm's institutional investors include college endowments and foundations.[2] Since 1986, Steyer has been a partner and member of the executive committee at Hellman & Friedman, a San Francisco–based $8 billion private equity firm. "
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  6. hjmick
    Offline

    hjmick Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 28, 2007
    Messages:
    20,450
    Thanks Received:
    5,479
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Charleston, SC
    Ratings:
    +11,688

    I could never vote for a guy who wears that belt... I don't care where it's made... or by whom...
     
  7. Mac1958
    Offline

    Mac1958 Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2011
    Messages:
    61,647
    Thanks Received:
    10,978
    Trophy Points:
    2,060
    Location:
    Just another nut on a message board
    Ratings:
    +51,375
    Of course we should have term limits. And those who argue against them claim that "elections are term limits", which is intellectually dishonest in the extreme. Incumbents have several clear advantages in an election, and that's the primary reason they win a lion's share of them. Anyone who pretends to not know that is LYING.

    We can continue to bend over and take this, or we can choose to change the system under which these people have to operate.

    That's up to us.
    .
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 2
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  8. petro
    Online

    petro Gold Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2013
    Messages:
    5,489
    Thanks Received:
    1,040
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    The cold north
    Ratings:
    +7,286
    The benefit would be a person who could concentrate on their job of actually representing the people, and not begging for corporate donations and running for election the minute they are sworn in.

    The uneducated are the fools like you willing to let an elite class hold office for decades, like Royalty.

    Your opinion as a non American is irrelevant here.
     
  9. gipper
    Offline

    gipper Libertarian/Anarchist

    Joined:
    Jan 8, 2011
    Messages:
    30,095
    Thanks Received:
    5,638
    Trophy Points:
    1,130
    Ratings:
    +30,842
    Your post is utterly uneducated.

    We not only need term limits, but also public financing of campaigns. No more private money influencing campaigns.

    While we’re dreaming, let’s also eliminate the War Department, CIA, and all intelligence agencies.
     

Share This Page