To those who oppose the Keystone XL pipeline for environmental reasons

Once again the far left posts known far left propaganda and expects others to prove them wrong!

Driving is hazardous and yet you still do it, why?

Why build a pipeline that is of no benefit?

Driving is hazardous and yet you still do it, why?
He's a chicken shit New Yorker. You know, the ones that banned fracking in their state.
Once again the far left posts known far left propaganda and expects others to prove them wrong!

Driving is hazardous and yet you still do it, why?

Why build a pipeline that is of no benefit?

Driving is hazardous and yet you still do it, why?
He's a chicken shit New Yorker. You know, the ones that banned fracking in their state.

Kosh is incapable of naming a single unique benefit to the US to building the Keystone pipeline.

Can you ?
Yeah- here's five of them... to the back of your head, Brotch. :slap:

lol, you can't name a single benefit. No wonder you're having a meltdown.
 
Why build a pipeline that is of no benefit?

Driving is hazardous and yet you still do it, why?
He's a chicken shit New Yorker. You know, the ones that banned fracking in their state.
Why build a pipeline that is of no benefit?

Driving is hazardous and yet you still do it, why?
He's a chicken shit New Yorker. You know, the ones that banned fracking in their state.

Kosh is incapable of naming a single unique benefit to the US to building the Keystone pipeline.

Can you ?
Yeah- here's five of them... to the back of your head, Brotch. :slap:

lol, you can't name a single benefit. No wonder you're having a meltdown.
Whatever you say, dear. It is useless conversing with you or those of your mindset. So have a read about what the Department of State said about the Alberta Clipper pipeline, which is practically identical to the Keystone in design, scope, and purpose...

Permit for Alberta Clipper Pipeline Issued
 
Driving is hazardous and yet you still do it, why?
He's a chicken shit New Yorker. You know, the ones that banned fracking in their state.
Driving is hazardous and yet you still do it, why?
He's a chicken shit New Yorker. You know, the ones that banned fracking in their state.

Kosh is incapable of naming a single unique benefit to the US to building the Keystone pipeline.

Can you ?
Yeah- here's five of them... to the back of your head, Brotch. :slap:

lol, you can't name a single benefit. No wonder you're having a meltdown.
Whatever you say, dear. It is useless conversing with you or those of your mindset. So have a read about what the Department of State said about the Alberta Clipper pipeline, which is practically identical to the Keystone in design, scope, and purpose...

Permit for Alberta Clipper Pipeline Issued

That's not Keystone.
 
What if the people who own the property that the pipeline is going through don't want it on their land? Can they overrule business as would be right? Or does business get to trample their private property?
 
I've never said how much your country needs my country in particular. You import from a wide variety of sources as need be.

I have said we are your number one supplier. Which is a fact. Oh and we do buy not only refined products back but raw crude as well.

It's called commerce between two friendly nations.

Like from the Bakkens. Did you know it was the Bakken crude travelling on rail was what ignited in the Lac Megantic rail disaster?

I believe that transporting crude needs to be discussed vigorously to have a proper debate on which method we employ. From what I've researched intently as a conservationist I'm picking my poison. I choose pipeline over rail and transport truck.

Rail to me is a disaster waiting to happen because rail lines go thru many cities and towns and I sure as hell don't want to see another Lac Megantic EVAH.

Close to 50 people burned alive man. With Bakken crude on rail.

Lac-Megantic-Oil-Fire.jpg
Far left propaganda..

You are one ignorant fuck. All you do is spew far right wing propaganda. NEVER anything with documentation.

Posting far left propaganda is documentation of far left religious propaganda..

Is the Kalamazoo River pipeline spill propaganda? What do you know about it Kosh? What do you know about diluted bitumen (dilbit) and what happens to it when it spills into waterways?

PLEASE show me you have a brain...I will be waiting...

The far left drones commenting about brains that is real rich!

Do you drive a car? why?

AGAIN...Is the Kalamazoo River pipeline spill propaganda? What do you know about it Kosh? What do you know about diluted bitumen (dilbit) and what happens to it when it spills into waterways?

Do clean up methods used for an oil spill work on a diluted bitumen (dilbit) spill? How are they different Kosh?

Stop being a mindless parrot and answer my questions.

PLEASE show me you have a brain...I will be waiting...

OK... 700 barrels flowing in one mile and the pipeline spills! Takes 3 hours to stop ... 2,100 barrels!
But 1 million barrels in one tanker traveling ONE mile has a spill..


Exxon Valdez spilling 251,000 BARRELS of oil into the sound
The amount of oil spilled could fill 125 Olympic-sized swimming pools.
As many as 2,800 sea otters, 300 harbor seals, 900 bald eagles and 250,000 seabirds died in the days following the disaster.
1,300 miles of coastline were hit by the oil spill.
1,000 harlequin ducks were killed by the oil spill, in addition to many chronic injuries that occurred as a result of the long term effects of the spill.
The cleanup required about 10,000 workers, 1,000 boats and roughly 100 airplanes and helicopters.
Four deaths were directly associated with cleanup efforts.
The spill caused over $300 million of economic harm to more than 32 thousand people whose livelihoods depended on commercial fishing.
Tourism spending decreased by eight percent in south central Alaska and by 35 percent in southwest Alaska in the year after the spill.
There was a loss of 9,400 visitors and $5.5 million in state spending.
Many fish populations were harmed during the spill. For example, sand lance populations went down in 1989 and 1990, herring returns were significantly fewer in 1992 and 1994 and adult fish had high rates of viral infections.
Pink salmon embryos continued to be harmed and killed by oil that remained on stones and gravel of stream banks through at least 1993. As a result, the southwestern part of Prince William Sound lost 1.9 million or 28 percent of its potential stock of wild pink salmon. By 1992, this part of the sound still had 6 percent less of the wild pink salmon stock than was estimated to have existed if the spill had not occurred.
Two years following the Exxon Valdez spill, the economic losses to recreational fishing were estimated to be $31 million.
Twelve years after the spill, oil could still be found on half of the 91 randomly selected beaches surveyed.
Three species of cormorant, the common loon, the harbor seal, the harlequin duck, the pacific herring and the pigeon guillemot still have not fully recovered.
Campaign Oceana
 
What if the people who own the property that the pipeline is going through don't want it on their land? Can they overrule business as would be right? Or does business get to trample their private property?
Public policy constitutes public use. If eminent domain is employed, then the People should be getting appropriate Infrastructure as well through any promotion of the general welfare.
 

Forum List

Back
Top