To Hell With That Noise

Flanders

ARCHCONSERVATIVE
Sep 23, 2010
7,628
748
205
Here’s a shocker for you:

Senators think a senator would make the best vice presidential pick for Mitt Romney, several of them told The Hill.

Their reasoning: senators’ ability to serve as president; the selection could help Romney in swing states; it would avoid a Sarah Palin-like situation; and having a senator on the ticket could help Republicans win back control of the upper chamber.

A dozen Republican senators offered a variety of opinions when asked by The Hill about their preferences for the No. 2 spot on the GOP presidential ticket.

Senators say Romney should pick one of their own for vice president
By Alexander Bolton - 05/29/12 05:00 AM ET

Senators say Romney should pick one of their own for vice president - TheHill.com

Those senators are serious in spite of Hussein’s administration. Did they forget that three former senators are solely responsible for deepening the mess this country is in at home and abroad?

How could they forget that the Senate ratified the New START Treaty and is preparing to ratify the LOST?

Did they forget that the Senate confirmed Sotomayor and Kagan? Not to mention Constitution-hater Ginsberg?

Did they also forget that the Senate conspired with then-Speaker Nutty Nancy Pelosi in passing Hillarycare II?

Did they forget that Reid and his fellow Democrats block everything except the things Socialists want?

Parenthetically, Sarah Palin was the only non-senator in the hunt in 2008. When McCain lost the election senators could not admit one of their own would have been defeated in a landslide were it not for Sarah on the ticket. They still won’t face it.

Nor will any senator admit that the media was determined to put a siting senator in the White House in an effort to reverse the growing contempt Americans have for the Senate. Result: The country got Hussein, Clinton, and Biden. How’s that been working out?

If you want more try SENATORS John Kerry and John Edwards in 2004. Now, there’s two beauties for you.

And who can forget Senator Kyoto Al Gore who became vice president? Gore will go down in history as the guy who justified unethical behavior on the advice of a lawyer: “My counsel tells me there is no controlling legal authority that says that is any violation of any law.”

Gore hasn’t held elected office since 2000 and he is still a disaster.

And just for balance let’s pay tribute to the 1996 presidential candidate Republican Senator Bob Dole. Newt Gingrich called Dole a tax collector for the welfare state —— and they were friends. What might Gingrich have said if he didn’t like Dole?

Oh yeah! The Senate is a wonderful incubator for vice presidents.

Moving on

Some might say it is unfair to blame Republican senators for the things Democrats did. That would be true except for one thing ——RINO —— like Richard Lugar who won’t campaign for the REPUBLICAN who beat him for the nomination in the primary:


. . . Lugar also repeated his criticism that Mourdock won't be an effective senator unless he drops his position that Washington needs less bipartisanship.

Richard Mourdock might not get to the Senate because Lugar does not practice what he preaches. Apparently, he likes bipartisanship with Democrats in Washington but not with Republicans in Indiana.

Incidentally, Mourdock is correct as far as conservatives go. Conservatives never, never, got anything from bipartisanship. In fact, they lost something every time the country was moved closer to a Socialist, collectivist, society with every piece of bipartisan legislation.

I wish Mr. Mourdock the best of luck, but he may have to learn the truth about bipartisanship the hard way:


Mourdock has said he wants to help build the GOP majority in Washington so that bipartisanship will mean that Democrats will have to join with Republicans.

Richard Lugar won't campaign for Republican Richard Mourdock
By Maureen Groppe, Gannett Washington Bureau

http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/story/2012-05-27/lugar-indiana-senate-mourdock/55237960/1

Murdoch has to learn that bipartisan never existed in Democrat lexicon. It’s been their way or the highway since the FDR years. Proof: There is a herd of RINO in the Senate, but have you ever heard of a DINO (Democrat in name only)?

To be fair to Mourdock he might already know the way of things. I’ll give him the benefit of the doubt and say he wants to shove it down Democrat throats the way they have been shoving it down the throats of the American people for decades.

Returning to a senator-cum-vice president

In short: To hell with that noise.

Finally, the US Senate has been a nest of UN-loving traitors since 1945. If the XVII Amendment is not going to be repealed the Senate has a long way to go to prove it puts the Constitution ahead of the UNIC (United Nations/International Community) before a senator gets another shot at the presidency. A long way to go means at least fifty years accompanied by a lot of legislation strengthening America’s sovereignty instead of abolishing it. Withdrawing from the United Nations would cut the fifty years in half.
 
Last edited:
Repeal the XVII Amendment and the problem diminishes considerably:

Skeletons Haunt Senate Hopefuls
Thirteen candidates have past bankruptcies or criminal records
By Jilly Badanes

Skeletons Haunt Senate Hopefuls | WashingtonGuardian

Crooks and sharpshooters will always go where the money is. Repealing the XVII Amendment won’t change that. Some will fall through the cracks and land in the Senate. Most importantly, repeal will stop long-serving senators from betraying the country for decades just by winning elections funded in large part by the New World Order crowd.

Once again, let me point out that Senate wannabes can usually talk their way out of lapses of good judgement, but not a one of them dares alienate the ruling class by saying they oppose US membership in the United Nations, global government, and United Nations treaties. The media ain’t asking either.
 

Forum List

Back
Top