To Faux News they all look alike

[Annie]

I don't think that the front page of the NYT is partisan at the expense of objectivity. But I must admit, I don't really read it much for the front page...

You don't think that the planned attack on JFK airport belonged on page 38? Shame. That's where it wound up on Sunday last.

 

[Truthmatters]

that story is a non story

 

[maineman]

You don't think that the planned attack on JFK airport belonged on page 38? Shame. That's where it wound up on Sunday last.

I had no idea where the story was...as I said, I don't subscribe and I don't read it for the news - my nephews who both live in manhattan do but certainly not me - I read it solely for the editorials..and I do so online...

Perhaps they did not think that a story about a supposed foiled terror plot without a lot of meat on the bone was newsworthy. I wonder, if the charges turn out to be dropped and the "plot" turns out to be not a plot at all, will the Post and the Daily News have the stories of the dropping of those charges on page one above the fold, or perhaps, on page 38?

 

[Annie]

I had no idea where the story was...as I said, I don't subscribe and I don't read it for the news - my nephews who both live in manhattan do but certainly not me - I read it solely for the editorials..and I do so online...

Perhaps they did not think that a story about a supposed foiled terror plot without a lot of meat on the bone was newsworthy. I wonder, if the charges turn out to be dropped and the "plot" turns out to be not a plot at all, will the Post and the Daily News have the stories of the dropping of those charges on page one above the fold, or perhaps, on page 38?

and like jimmah, Playboy for the articles, never for the pics. Right. Lust in the heart.

 

[William Joyce]

no. I am against any and all journalism that sacrifices objectivity for partisanship.

So.... you're against journalism, period.

Since when did indictment morph into conviction?

Since his lawyer tried to think of a way to explain $90,000 in cash in a plastic bag in the freezer.

 

[maineman]

and like jimmah, Playboy for the articles, never for the pics. Right. Lust in the heart.

comparing the front page of the New York Times to a Playboy fold out is just plain weird! but I guess you have a partial excuse because you are a girl.

 

[Gunny]

Dan Rather knowingly ran a story he knew to be unproven, with documentation his expert told him was a forgery, just before an election. Remind me, since I was not here then, what was your position on that?

How about all the red X's on conservative politicians by a certain Cable news organization? Or the purposeful arrangement of pictures where parts of words are framed in the picture to make the person look bad?

How about the insistance of the MSM to run stories with a "source" an Iraqi Police Captain, that they were told repeatedly was NOT a Police Captain at all?

How about green helmet guy in Lebanon? Or the doctoring of pictures from Lebanon to look worse then the situation was?

MM wasn't here either when the Rather thing went down.

 

[Gunny]

Rather I heard of and he paid a pretty ehfty price for that one dont you think?

The others sound like bullshit to me.

As usual, you would be wrong.

 

[lieberalism]

sniff, FOX NEWS makes mistakes because they have a politcal agenda. Unlike CNN (Communist News Network.)

sniff, Anderson Cooper is out to make America a fascist nation, like Bill O'Reilly.

 

[Chips Rafferty]

comparing the front page of the New York Times to a Playboy fold out is just plain weird! but I guess you have a partial excuse because you are a girl.

I don't know, MM. It IS about as trustworthy as Playboy.

I prefer to refer to it as The Eschew Pork Times. I hear you have to be circumcised, Charlie Chaplinesque, have kiss-curls, and get around in a period Polish Zoo-suit and a Homburg hat to be qualified to buy a copy of it.

 

[lieberalism]

 

[red states rule]

just like when they Identified Mark Foley as Rep. Mark Foley D-FL

"they" all look alike, and all pedophiles just gotta be democrats!

FOX News makes a mistake, libs scream right wing conspiracy

CNN and MSNBC make a mistake, libs say it was an honest mistake

 

[red states rule]

no. I am against any and all journalism that sacrifices objectivity for partisanship.

As long as they support the Dem party and put their opinon on the front page ,MM sees them as objective

 

[red states rule]

Both are liers as well as assholes

 

[Truthmatters]

As usual, you would be wrong.

Proof of any of the other stories?

 

[Truthmatters]

sniff, FOX NEWS makes mistakes because they have a politcal agenda. Unlike CNN (Communist News Network.)

sniff, Anderson Cooper is out to make America a fascist nation, like Bill O'Reilly.

Who says CNN isnt a right leaning channel?

 

[red states rule]

Who says CNN isnt a right leaning channel?

The Clinton News Network is just another mouthpiece for the left

 

[Superlative]

The Clinton News Network is just another mouthpiece for the left

Thats a new one. Good stuff.


Sorry im not up with all the derogatory slang.

 

[red states rule]

Thats a new one. Good stuff.


Sorry im not up with all the derogatory slang.

Watching CNN is like watching a DNC infomercial

 

[Superlative]

Watching CNN is like watching a DNC infomercial

Watching you is like a live link to Newsmax.