To Beat Obama Being Nice Won't Work

[bodecea]

I'm curious as to how the assumption is made that "nice doesn't work" when you've never tried it.

Actually just being alive means a conservative isn't being nice to you.
We've been playing catcher to the mud-slinging the left has done over the last decade plus. It's time we gave it back to them......in spades if need be. But our weapon is the truth.

Nothing could be dirtier than the truth to the left.

Ah, I think you are saying a very interesting thing right there.

No wonder I see those stickers on car windows saying "Liberal Hunting License". Some of you really do believe we don't deserve to live.

 

[bodecea]

I'm curious as to how the assumption is made that "nice doesn't work" when you've never tried it.

Actually just being alive means a conservative isn't being nice to you.

We've been playing catcher to the mud-slinging the left has done over the last decade plus. It's time we gave it back to them......in spades if need be. But our weapon is the truth.

Nothing could be dirtier than the truth to the left.

In fact we should sling so much mud...that even monster trucks as Bigfoot would have a hard time traversing the trail.

Time for the gloves to come off.

Your hands have been covered in muck so long, you think it's gloves.

 

[Full-Auto]

December 6, 2011
Beat Back Barack
By William L. Gensert


There has been much talk lately about the need for the Republican presidential nominee to move to the center. This is a mistake. The only way to beat Barack Obama is to oppose him rigorously, relentlessly, and without remorse.

This election needs a fiscal, foreign policy, and economic conservative. The man to defeat Obama must present the nation a clear choice between further socialism under Obama's control or prosperity through economic freedom, but that's not all; he will need to show the world who Barack Obama is.

Americans may be inattentive, or even self-involved, but we are not idiots. Anyone can see the almost three years of failed Obama governance and know that the meme which the legacy media is trying to sell is a lie. Obama is not just a failure; he is a spectacular failure -- and it's not George Bush's fault, or that of an obstructionist Congress.

For the first two years of his presidency, Barack Obama had super-majorities in both houses of Congress. That's 100% of 2 out of the 3 branches of government (Legislative, Judicial, and Executive). He could have done anything he wanted -- immigration reform, tax increases for the 1%, or a stimulus twice as large. He added $5 trillion to the national debt in less than three years; he could have doubled that, if he chose.

Instead, he gave us Dodd-Frank Financial Reform, which frankly reformed nothing, making it impossible for businesses to get loans and people to get mortgages, while making credit cards and bank accounts more expensive for everyone. Does anyone remember free checking, or low-interest credit cards with no fee? Well, the president fixed that for us.

He gave us ObamaCare, the means by which our government restricts care to the sick while making it more expensive for the healthy -- all while scaring business into constraining employment and hoarding cash, instead of hiring and investing.

Before the passage of ObamaCare, 80% of Americans were satisfied with their health insurance. Yet Barack Obama felt the need to fix it. Some have said that getting his name in the history books was more important to him than actually fixing what was broken.

He shut down the oil industry in the Gulf, and any fossil fuel development on land, off our coasts, or at sea, simply to raise the price of all energy to the point where his green energy dreams would be cost-effective. Remember $2-a-gallon gasoline or home heating oil under $1? It wasn't that long ago. Barack Obama fixed that for us.

After suffering a Barack shellac in the 2010 midterms, the president still controls one and a half of the three branches of government, while the Republicans control but half of one branch, the House of Representatives. Yet the president's message is not remorse for two years of dismal policy and economic disaster; it is that the Republicans have prevented him from solving the country's problems. This is how he will run in 2012.

Americans, despite how "lazy" and "soft" Barack Obama believes us to be, can see how bad things are, and even though some may buy the president's lies, most are going to lay responsibility for the nation's woes right where it belongs: at Barack Obama's feet.

Obama's only concern, since losing the House last year, has been his own reelection. The constant campaigning in Darth Vader's bus -- made in Canada because, despite blowing tens of billions of dollars on bailing out car companies, Obama couldn't find an American-made bus acceptable for a king -- his non-involvement in the Super-Committee's debt reduction negotiation, the delay of the Keystone XL pipeline, and the proposing of the American Jobs Act -- which is basically the same as the failed Stimulus, just half as big -- all display our president as a non-participant in the exercise of active governing, while fully immersed in his eternal reelection campaign.

Where does he go from here? Straight for the jugular, I fear, because he needs to destroy those who dare to oppose. What other option does he have with his record?

Barack Obama will fight dirty. The nation needs a candidate who will do the same. After all, anyone who thinks that one of Herman Cain's accusers, Sharon Bialek, living in the same building as David Axelrod is a coincidence is delusional. Obama will run the most negative campaign in recent history. There will be allegations of racism, of corruption, of incompetence. The Republican nominee needs to understand that in order to beat someone at mud-wrestling, you must get in the mud.

Friedrich Nietzsche wrote in Beyond Good and Evil that "he who fights monsters should see to it that he himself does not become a monster." No truer words were ever written.

Yet to do battle with Mr. Obama, any candidate will have to become something of a monster, aggressive and unremitting, without pause or embarrassment. Nothing should be off the table: Obama's associations with Bill Ayers, the former terrorist; his decades-long relationship with the race-baiting Jeremiah Wright, the religious zealot of "God damn America" fame; all the czars and disastrous nominations like Van Jones, an avowed "truther," and Elizabeth Warren, who takes credit for the moral underpinnings of the OWS crowd, and Craig Becker, Obama's recess appointment to the NLRB who is busy pushing through a pogrom of forced unionization and governmental control of industry by regulatory fiat, and Lisa Jackson, who as head of the EPA has made it her life's goal to destroy America's manufacturing, electrical generation, and fossil fuel industries, also through regulation, and the failed and incompetent Eric Holder, with his Fast and Furious program, where the administration sought to bolster support for gun control by deliberately arming Mexican drug cartels, resulting in hundreds of deaths in Mexico and one in America...as well as all the golf, all the vacations, the crony capitalism, the disregard for the Constitution. On and on it goes, because Barack Obama has provided, in less than three years, plenty of ammunition to do battle against his most dismal presidency.

The Republican candidate cannot take the high road like John McCain and refuse to fight. Barack Obama will not be constrained; he will use whatever he can against whoever is his opponent, without reservation, including every underhanded trick and lie at his disposal. The legacy media will not only support him in this, but they will be complicit in his dirty politics.

While conservatism is a set of principles for economic governance, liberalism is a religion for world control. Like any creed, it must be believed wholeheartedly. Then, all else loses significance. The rule of law, moral convention, and civility mean nothing to someone confident that he is on the side of what is right and just. As long as such people are true to the liberal faith, no law or ethic need apply to their actions.

The Republicans have to understand that mindset and get dirty -- fight with both hands -- for this election will be a battle to the death for the nation, and perhaps the world.

Barack Obama is the ultimate of bullies. Yet, like most bullies, it is the challenge he fears, the truth he despises. The ultimate terror for Barack Obama is that the world will see who he really is: a petty man of little talent and few gifts.

The Republican candidate needs to show the world this truth.

Read more: Articles: Beat Back Barack

You shouldnt be nice to any damn democrat, ever................

Of course family gets a pass, you dont get to choose those members.

 

[Truthmatters]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

Like being nice has EVER been an option the right considers in elections or any other time.

 

[Truthmatters]

the republican party have been about mostly hate my entire adult life.

Its their fortay

 

[Full-Auto]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

Like being nice has EVER been an option the right considers in elections or any other time.

I m glad they gave it up in 2000

The fact that repubs even assembled for a protest had the left pissing their pants.

 

[Truthmatters]

Gave it up, they gave it up after Ike left office.

Look at you with your guns a blazing and constant hate spew.

Merry christmas you lovely christian

 

[Full-Auto]

Gave it up, they gave it up after Ike left office.

Look at you with your guns a blazing and constant hate spew.

Merry christmas you lovely christian

You guys are lowlife and the evidence is in.

How many more americans do you low life intend on killing to undermine the second?

 

[The T]

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

Like being nice has EVER been an option the right considers in elections or any other time.

I m glad they gave it up in 2000

The fact that repubs even assembled for a protest had the left pissing their pants.

Like overbred dogs that you don't take for a walk but a pull...

 

[Truthmatters]

aww the christian love is flowing now

 

[occupied]

I was just reading another thread complaining how the tone of news stories about republicans was negative more often than democrats and then here comes this little gem instructing them to be extra negative. It's not the media who is negative to republicans, it is the republicans who are just plain negative.

 

[Truthmatters]

They have been for decades.

They cheat in elections.

They take corporate money to do corporate bidding.

They tanked the world economy twice in one lifetime.

They spew hate on Americans who dont agree with them.

They lie about EVERYONE they are up against.

They are the party of hate.

 

[WillowTree]

I'm curious as to how the assumption is made that "nice doesn't work" when you've never tried it.

McCain tried it asswarp.

 

[mudwhistle]

Newt against Obama is like fighting fire with fire.

Obama has a swelled head and so does Newt.

The difference being Newt has real accomplishments in his life whereas Obama has none. Most of Obama's accomplishments were stolen from someone else or given to him on what he promised to do in the future yet never materialized.

They say Newt is a flawed candidate. Well who isn't?

They say Newt has too much baggage. Trust me, the baggage Newt has, real or imagined by the left, pales in comparison to the baggage Obama has. The baggage Obama is carrying around isn't just from hurt feelings or jealousy from other Congressional members in Newt's past. Obama's baggage is corruption to it's core. He's someone who is willing to do anything it takes to get reelected regardless of the consequences. Do you think Newt would stoop that low??? Seriously??

 

[mudwhistle]

They have been for decades.

They cheat in elections.

They take corporate money to do corporate bidding.

They tanked the world economy twice in one lifetime.

They spew hate on Americans who dont agree with them.

They lie about EVERYONE they are up against.

They are the party of hate.

I know the Democrats are.


Jeeze. That was too easy.

 

[Photonic]

I was just reading another thread complaining how the tone of news stories about republicans was negative more often than democrats and then here comes this little gem instructing them to be extra negative. It's not the media who is negative to republicans, it is the republicans who are just plain negative.

I find it funny when they tell people they are being nice just by letting them live. As if they have some right to take your life because they disagree with you. No wonder they love it when the police abuse their authority against people they disagree with.

 

[California Girl]

I was just reading another thread complaining how the tone of news stories about republicans was negative more often than democrats and then here comes this little gem instructing them to be extra negative. It's not the media who is negative to republicans, it is the republicans who are just plain negative.

I find it funny when they tell people they are being nice just by letting them live. As if they have some right to take your life because they disagree with you. No wonder they love it when the police abuse their authority against people they disagree with.

I find it funny that some people are stupid enough to defend politicians.

 

[Photonic]

I was just reading another thread complaining how the tone of news stories about republicans was negative more often than democrats and then here comes this little gem instructing them to be extra negative. It's not the media who is negative to republicans, it is the republicans who are just plain negative.

I find it funny when they tell people they are being nice just by letting them live. As if they have some right to take your life because they disagree with you. No wonder they love it when the police abuse their authority against people they disagree with.

I find it funny that some people are stupid enough to defend politicians.

This too!

 

[bodecea]

I'm curious as to how the assumption is made that "nice doesn't work" when you've never tried it.

McCain tried it asswarp.

Suuuuure he did. Now tell us, what was Palin doing in the meantime?


And tell us that McCain had a chance to win at all. That's worth a laugh or two.

 

[rightwinger]

I was just reading another thread complaining how the tone of news stories about republicans was negative more often than democrats and then here comes this little gem instructing them to be extra negative. It's not the media who is negative to republicans, it is the republicans who are just plain negative.

I find it funny when they tell people they are being nice just by letting them live. As if they have some right to take your life because they disagree with you. No wonder they love it when the police abuse their authority against people they disagree with.

I find it funny that some people are stupid enough to defend politicians.

Hmmmm...

Some people are STOOPID

How profound