To be fair to Newt on the issue of his past marriages.

[beagle9]

Newt is a serial cheater and he will offend again. If he gets into the white house he wil turn it into a adulted rate house.
What he and his present wife did to the ex was dispicable and the ex should have charged her with "alienation of affection" or borrowed from Lorena Bobbet. He is a Shoha Shokha.

Your's is an exact response in which is appropriate & understandable coming from a lady in which to be found upon such an issue, but the thing is, we havn't had a true Christian President with real values as a Christain leaning President in the white house for a long long time now in America.

Hmmmm, and it could be that we have never had what is expected in that form to exist there yet, otherwise to be found in the truest form available as of yet in the nation, by having a good percentage found in a good number in the persons character when or after elected, or by what we would like something like that to be like and then look like, if found ever in that house once elected.

 

[beagle9]

People divorce. I have been divorced once. Yes, getting married was a mistake.

Again, the hypocrisy goes over your head. Small words: Newt is having an affair. He finds out the President is having an affair. Newt runs political ads attacking the President for having an affair.

Newt is caught evading taxes and lying to Congress and is heavily fined. He is the only Speaker in history this has happened to.

He refuses to resign.

The President lies about his affair and Newt impeaches him. He demands the President resign.


Newt the tax evader is currently attacking Romney for not paying enough taxes.

Past AND PRESENT, Newt is a hypocrite.

You have to be a complete sucker and idiot to believe he went to God for forgiveness. He has not changed one bit. This is not a man who has repented. He was a serial hypocrite then, and he is a serial hypocrite now.

So immorality does not apply to Newt? HIS personal life is off limits? Once is a mistake, three time is bad habit.

At our job, there is a guy who has been married three times, and he has been with his current wife for over ten years or better now. He talks about his past to us sometimes, and he admits to his major mistakes in this talk with us, where as he regrets his actions that caused the first one to get away, then he married the second wife (oh boy), where it was without a doubt her fault according to him, that they got divorced in that situation, because she was a complete wreck and a mess in life (was found out later after marrying her), where as the details are long, so I won't go there... To top it off, she had a family that was a complete wreck in life as well, but you know what? He is one of the best workers the company has had for the past 8 years now, and he is a great husband to his current wife of ten years now, and that is all we can go by when dealing with him in life via (his actions, and his record for the last ten years).

For some that is enough to signal the man had changed, but for some who want to hold a person accountable for ever, and with no forgiveness in sight on such issues, then it speaks wonders about those kind of people in life also doesn't it? Not to say that people still can't be fooled in such situations, especially if a person decides to backslide due to unfettered access and such being more available to them in their future situations, as to be found next in life, because yes they can fall again, and people can get fooled again also.

All this nation can do, is to try and balance it all out in the best way possible that they can, but also remember that there are none perfect, no not even one according to the word.

 

[AquaAthena]

I guess when Newt was banging some chicks while he was married to his first wife he was too damn busy to get divorced first.

And then when he was banging some more chicks while he was married to his second wife, he was too damn busy to get divorced first.

The neverending quest for a "soul mate" is an exhausting one I guess.

He should have tried Argentinia. It worked for Mark Sanford.

It sure backfired on John Edwards.... And the Kennedy's and Clintons, including Hillary with Vince.....

Point is, extramarital sex and politics have been around since we can trace our presidents and president wannabes.. I prefer to remember them for the jobs they did or tried to do.

 

[Katzndogz]

No one cares. At least no one in South Carolina cares. The left cares. They don't know what's happening.

What you saw was an insurgency.

 

[Kiki Cannoli]

What people don't understand, and keep forgetting in this life (and I can't understand why with all the experience people have on such a thing), is that there are plenty of people who have never truly found their soul mate in their life, and that they may never find their soul mate in their life all depending, even though they were looking and/or have been looking for that person through out their whole life or lives during.

Newt has been married three times now, and it can only be hoped that he has finally found his soul mate in life, and that it is good that he has since released his first two wives, in so that they to will hopefully someday find their soulmates as well in their lives also.

You see, what the media doesn't think that we understand, is that people can be married to someone in their life, but that doesn't mean that they are happy (or) even that they truly love one another. So if they have made a mistake when they did get married, either to someone they really didn't know in life, until later on down the line, or thought that they could love, but then found out differently later on down the line (what ever the case was), then it is definetly their choice to not be married to that person anymore if were seriously unhappy with one another in the relationship.

Now some people stay together in these situations, because of the children involved by agreement there of (or other reasons), but that doesn't mean that they are like any other married couple in life at that point (or) will ever be at that point. The main thing for both at some given moment, is to do right by the children always when it is possible to do so.

At this point, it just becomes an arrangement until the kids get big enough to deal with a divorce in many cases. So if Newt was un-happy or his wives were also, and a divorce was eminant in each case, then who are we to speculate upon what him and his former wives were going through in each of these marriages, especially the way it is being talked about by us (or) scrutinized by us today ? Hey the women might have seen Newt as incompatible for them in the situation, so they might have wanted out just as well, yet even so they may not have told Newt, but instead they just showed coldness unto him (don't touch me etc.), that may have caused him to go in search of at that point in time, where as both were still trying to hang on even so, but truly didnot love one another anymore, and both of them new that in each situation being delt with.

Now the media is speculating by calling Newt a scumbag and what have you because of his situations in life pertaining to his marriages, but like I said, we truly don't know what the situation was within these marriages as was lived in, or even how these marriges came to be in the first place... Example: What if they got married for reasons like money or fame or things of that nature at those levels, where soon the fun wore off, and they both realized that they really didn't love one another, so should they have been forced by us to stay together?

NOPE !!!

How can we call this man a scumbag and bad person, when we don't even know what the situation was that he was living in back then, or what his wives were living in also, when it came to whether or not these couples were truly compatible in life or not ?

The good thing is, is that Newt isn't trashing his former wife/wives (i.e. the mothers of his & their children together), by saying to us in some kind of cheezy defense of, that they had some serious problems in life, in which may have sent him into the arms of another woman because of, and also that his former wives aren't trashing him as a father of their children together, and this maybe because of the incompatiblity issues or lack of love issues etc. in which they may have gotten married mistakenly over.

People of America today, you know how it is these day's, and more often now than it was back in the old days, where as a man & woman marries, only to find out quickly or sometimes years later, that they had messed up and married the wrong person. Is it our standard these days, to somehow keep people together, just because they look good together?

Newt has a say in this also, but what I found to be so cheezy, is that the networks went out and paid money for Newts former wife, to be questioned by them in hopes to trash him, but didn't have Newt on at the same time to respond to the situation. Now they should have had Newt on to defend himself, in order to give us a fair and balanced understanding of the situation if that is what they hoped that they were supposedly doing. However they didn't, and so these slime ball media outlets talk all kinds of bad about Fox, but then they go and do something far beneath what Fox News does, where as they try and skew the message for political reasons, and then hope we just eat it all up. The show called " Young Turks" was one in specific that was doing this in which I watched the other night.

All fine and dandy. First leave your spouse then jump in the sack with the new schmoopie otherwise you are a spineless lying cheater.

 

[beagle9]

What people don't understand, and keep forgetting in this life (and I can't understand why with all the experience people have on such a thing), is that there are plenty of people who have never truly found their soul mate in their life, and that they may never find their soul mate in their life all depending, even though they were looking and/or have been looking for that person through out their whole life or lives during.

Newt has been married three times now, and it can only be hoped that he has finally found his soul mate in life, and that it is good that he has since released his first two wives, in so that they to will hopefully someday find their soulmates as well in their lives also.

You see, what the media doesn't think that we understand, is that people can be married to someone in their life, but that doesn't mean that they are happy (or) even that they truly love one another. So if they have made a mistake when they did get married, either to someone they really didn't know in life, until later on down the line, or thought that they could love, but then found out differently later on down the line (what ever the case was), then it is definetly their choice to not be married to that person anymore if were seriously unhappy with one another in the relationship.

Now some people stay together in these situations, because of the children involved by agreement there of (or other reasons), but that doesn't mean that they are like any other married couple in life at that point (or) will ever be at that point. The main thing for both at some given moment, is to do right by the children always when it is possible to do so.

At this point, it just becomes an arrangement until the kids get big enough to deal with a divorce in many cases. So if Newt was un-happy or his wives were also, and a divorce was eminant in each case, then who are we to speculate upon what him and his former wives were going through in each of these marriages, especially the way it is being talked about by us (or) scrutinized by us today ? Hey the women might have seen Newt as incompatible for them in the situation, so they might have wanted out just as well, yet even so they may not have told Newt, but instead they just showed coldness unto him (don't touch me etc.), that may have caused him to go in search of at that point in time, where as both were still trying to hang on even so, but truly didnot love one another anymore, and both of them new that in each situation being delt with.

Now the media is speculating by calling Newt a scumbag and what have you because of his situations in life pertaining to his marriages, but like I said, we truly don't know what the situation was within these marriages as was lived in, or even how these marriges came to be in the first place... Example: What if they got married for reasons like money or fame or things of that nature at those levels, where soon the fun wore off, and they both realized that they really didn't love one another, so should they have been forced by us to stay together?

NOPE !!!

How can we call this man a scumbag and bad person, when we don't even know what the situation was that he was living in back then, or what his wives were living in also, when it came to whether or not these couples were truly compatible in life or not ?

The good thing is, is that Newt isn't trashing his former wife/wives (i.e. the mothers of his & their children together), by saying to us in some kind of cheezy defense of, that they had some serious problems in life, in which may have sent him into the arms of another woman because of, and also that his former wives aren't trashing him as a father of their children together, and this maybe because of the incompatiblity issues or lack of love issues etc. in which they may have gotten married mistakenly over.

People of America today, you know how it is these day's, and more often now than it was back in the old days, where as a man & woman marries, only to find out quickly or sometimes years later, that they had messed up and married the wrong person. Is it our standard these days, to somehow keep people together, just because they look good together?

Newt has a say in this also, but what I found to be so cheezy, is that the networks went out and paid money for Newts former wife, to be questioned by them in hopes to trash him, but didn't have Newt on at the same time to respond to the situation. Now they should have had Newt on to defend himself, in order to give us a fair and balanced understanding of the situation if that is what they hoped that they were supposedly doing. However they didn't, and so these slime ball media outlets talk all kinds of bad about Fox, but then they go and do something far beneath what Fox News does, where as they try and skew the message for political reasons, and then hope we just eat it all up. The show called " Young Turks" was one in specific that was doing this in which I watched the other night.

All fine and dandy. First leave your spouse then jump in the sack with the new schmoopie otherwise you are a spineless lying cheater.

All fine and dandy as well, and I agree whole heartedly with you, yet these things are based upon if they are at all possible to retain within the relationship as you speak of, I mean before it gets out of hand. So yes it is better to remain strong or disiplined in a situation that expects these things in which you say should be the case always as it should be in any relationship. However, many struggle to know if they truly love their spouse and/or if they ever did love them in some cases or rather if they had actually married the right person to begin with as somtimes is also the case. Also where there are kids involved, it usually causes a usery to take place next, where as the family is kept together for the sake of the children, but in these cases either the husband is used or the wife gets used just for the sake of the children, where as one is wanting to have the cake and to eat it to, while somehow keeping the marrige intact (IT NEVER WORKS). Many open up the door to just about anything if not careful when confused and un-happy in their lives for what ever reason or whatever temptation they may find themselves involved in.

What about the good friend or sister or brother sometimes in these cases, that had taken the husband or wife away also from another? There are so many ways that trust can be violated in these situations, that it isn't funny these days as to what goes on or has gone on in it all. So all that can be done next, is to deal with all the fall out, and then to seek forgiveness and a new mind hopefully, in order to restore that which the devil had destroyed in ones life.

It just all depends on just how weak one had become in their life maybe as a result of (as sometimes is the case) during a marriage that has not truly been grounded or nutured properly in many cases, and this is all depending on the varible circumstances in which they had come together under in the first place (or) how it is that they had become so weak after a while, and so for many of them (as is the case by the numbers we are seeing these days), we then see next these kind of things going on in which they may not have understood at the time, until that situation presented itself to them in their lives next & the consequences that come crashing in on them as a result of.

It doesn't always nessesarily mean it began with having sex in every situation either, otherwise when these things get to rolling in the begining, they may soon move into having sex soon there after, where as at that point it can become a tangled web in which people weave for themselves that they struggle to get out of, but usually only gets worse ande worse.

It is shame that people aren't more content with each other these days, but in many cases societies and this new generational free thinking and/or bombardment from every angle imaginable (especially from hollywood), can take the best of the best down in a heart beat if not careful, it's so wonder we see what we see today in people we thought we would never see these things in, but we know why we do anymore.

This is why it is good for people to try and interject constantly their faith, values, morals, and also the ten comandments into their lives daily, especially while living as a family together, in which pertains to what a family truly is defined as to them in their lives under these things. Unify and stay strong, in order that the evil one not have his way with us when he catches us weak and beat down by societals woe's & temptations. Many have been insnared by the devil, and it is our job to take heed of that always, and to forgive them once they break those chains in which had binded them with and/or tied their hands in life with.

Without forgiveness, we as a people are lost forever, and therefore we cannot recieve forgiveness due to our un-willingness to give forgiveness as we should be willing to do also in this imperfect life we all live within.

 

[mskafka]

Newt is a serial cheater and he will offend again. If he gets into the white house he wil turn it into a adulted rate house.
What he and his present wife did to the ex was dispicable and the ex should have charged her with "alienation of affection" or borrowed from Lorena Bobbet. He is a Shoha Shokha.

Your's is an exact response in which is appropriate & understandable coming from a lady in which to be found upon such an issue, but the thing is, we havn't had a true Christian President with real values as a Christain leaning President in the white house for a long long time now in America.

Hmmmm, and it could be that we have never had what is expected in that form to exist there yet, otherwise to be found in the truest form available as of yet in the nation, by having a good percentage found in a good number in the persons character when or after elected, or by what we would like something like that to be like and then look like, if found ever in that house once elected.

Like them, agree with them...or not-both Bush Jr. and Obama are pretty monogamous.

 

[beagle9]

Newt is a serial cheater and he will offend again. If he gets into the white house he wil turn it into a adulted rate house.
What he and his present wife did to the ex was dispicable and the ex should have charged her with "alienation of affection" or borrowed from Lorena Bobbet. He is a Shoha Shokha.

Your's is an exact response in which is appropriate & understandable coming from a lady in which to be found upon such an issue, but the thing is, we havn't had a true Christian President with real values as a Christain leaning President in the white house for a long long time now in America.

Hmmmm, and it could be that we have never had what is expected in that form to exist there yet, otherwise to be found in the truest form available as of yet in the nation, by having a good percentage found in a good number in the persons character when or after elected, or by what we would like something like that to be like and then look like, if found ever in that house once elected.

Like them, agree with them...or not-both Bush Jr. and Obama are pretty monogamous.

Bush Jr. ?? I didn't know that he was somehow running yet again (i.e. running as in literally running from his record yes) but not in any election...smile

 

[mskafka]

but the thing is, we havn't had a true Christian President with real values as a Christain leaning President in the white house for a long long time now in America.

Is monogamy not a real value? Bush seemed to be Christian-leaning; Obama doesn't seem as interested in religion. It probably wasn't something that was regularly thrust into his life, when he was growing up. That's why I laugh when people call him a Muslim.

We have certainly had our share of players in the White House in the past.

 

[Valox]

Newt was monogamous with several women at the same time.

There is no higher moral ground a man take. All these attacks on this man's character need to stop. They are simply ludicrous.

 

[asaratis]

Sorry. libs. Newt's requirements to run for POTUS include only that he be a natural born citizen at least 35 years old. There's no moral construct that can outweigh his ability to lead this nation. I wouldn't care if he'd had fifteen wives, or lived with fifteen women outside of marriage. He is infinitely more qualified to be CiC than the Marxist asshole, Obama.

You libs are just attacking Newt because there's nothing good to show that your boy king has done for the first term...and you KNOW Newt will make him look like a fool in the upcoming debates.

 

[Jackson]

We are looking for a strong leader. Monogamy is not synomynous with strength as a leader. Look at Obama.

Boldness, ideas, the ability to articulate those ideas and get the Congress to work across the aisle is the most important issues of the day. We have stalemates in Congress everyday. We can't pass a friggin' budget!

We have leader who is against the common man and getting jobs and off unemployment! Gingrich has solutions for all of these problems and the know how to get the Congress to work again.

South Carolina took all of these issues into account. They thought about the candidate and weighed the pros and cons of each and voted. It was a landslide for Gingrich. I can't help but think this may follow in the next states when the people vote.

 

[Valox]

Sorry. libs. Newt's requirements to run for POTUS include only that he be a natural born citizen at least 35 years old. There's no moral construct that can outweigh his ability to lead this nation. I wouldn't care if he'd had fifteen wives, or lived with fifteen women outside of marriage. He is infinitely more qualified to be CiC than the Marxist asshole, Obama.

You libs are just attacking Newt because there's nothing good to show that your boy king has done for the first term...and you KNOW Newt will make him look like a fool in the upcoming debates.

The hypocrisy of the family value GOP goes right over your head. It is most amusing to watch family value republicans rationalize away Newt's behavior.

Plus, there is no way in hell that you or they would have the same nonchalant attitude if Obama was a chronic adulterer who popped the bad news to one his wives as she was recovering from cancer.

In addition, Newt has shown that he cannot be a leader. He couldn't stand the political heat in the 90's and cut and ran from the House.

 

[tinydancer]

Wow you leftists liberal aren't going to vote for him?

Holy shit! Holy toledo! Huggy isn't going to vote for Newt!!!! OMG Neither is Lakhota!!!!

Break the fucking news.

 

[beagle9]

but the thing is, we havn't had a true Christian President with real values as a Christain leaning President in the white house for a long long time now in America.

Is monogamy not a real value? Bush seemed to be Christian-leaning; Obama doesn't seem as interested in religion. It probably wasn't something that was regularly thrust into his life, when he was growing up. That's why I laugh when people call him a Muslim.

We have certainly had our share of players in the White House in the past.

Monogomy is most defintely a value, and so is forgiveness and everything else that goes with being a Christian in life... Why is it that people aren't willing to forgive Newt for his personal life, in which had nothing to do with his job performance? I know why, it's because the opposition must hold onto every straw they can hold onto, in order to hopefully defeat Newt soon enough with those straws, even if it is a risk to them when they do this either for political reasons or other.

The media in these situations, have a following/base that is comprised of hundreds of thousands of followers/listeners, for which inturn at some point do back a specific media outlet 100% and all of the time. So when a politician runs who is against some of the things in which that base or following don't like, then the media outlet that represents it's followers, will use everything that it's got in it's arsenal, in order to destroy that politician, and even a good majority along with it if they think that they can get away with it as a bonus to be found in it all.

The media (specific ones) do have this as their agenda, in order to make the people they don't support "un-electable" in the end if at all possible. So what we have here in this nation, is these huge media firms and their constitiuencies who are loyal to these media firms, supporting specific cultures and beliefs held by these cultures and/or groups in this nation in unity of, going against these canidates like a cat going after a mouse. These certain or specific media outlets are used as their followers voice piece and backers, for which basically work for these constituencies and/or base of followers, in which they are deeply indebted to. So much for freedom of the press in the way that we think it all should be right? The press is in no way free in these situations to report in an unbiased and fair and balanced way. It is instead tied to these groups and their ideologies and/or causes big time these days. So it's really the media outlet who controls the mega phone the best, that will put their guy or gal over the top, as so to further the agenda's in which they feel so strongly about as a group or media outlet who represents that group.

 

[mskafka]

but the thing is, we havn't had a true Christian President with real values as a Christain leaning President in the white house for a long long time now in America.

Is monogamy not a real value? Bush seemed to be Christian-leaning; Obama doesn't seem as interested in religion. It probably wasn't something that was regularly thrust into his life, when he was growing up. That's why I laugh when people call him a Muslim.

We have certainly had our share of players in the White House in the past.

Monogomy is most defintely a value, and so is forgiveness and everything else that goes with being a Christian in life... Why is it that people aren't willing to forgive Newt for his personal life, in which had nothing to do with his job performance? I know why, it's because the opposition must hold onto every straw they can hold onto, in order to hopefully defeat Newt soon enough with those straws, even if it is a risk to them when they do this either for political reasons or other.

The media in these situations, have a following/base that is comprised of hundreds of thousands of followers/listeners, for which inturn at some point do back a specific media outlet 100% and all of the time. So when a politician runs who is against some of the things in which that base or following don't like, then the media outlet that represents it's followers, will use everything that it's got in it's arsenal, in order to destroy that politician, and even a good majority along with it if they think that they can get away with it as a bonus to be found in it all.

The media (specific ones) do have this as their agenda, in order to make the people they don't support "un-electable" in the end if at all possible. So what we have here in this nation, is these huge media firms and their constitiuencies who are loyal to these media firms, supporting specific cultures and beliefs held by these cultures and/or groups in this nation in unity of, going against these canidates like a cat going after a mouse. These certain or specific media outlets are used as their followers voice piece and backers, for which basically work for these constituencies and/or base of followers, in which they are deeply indebted to. So much for freedom of the press in the way that we think it all should be right? The press is in no way free in these situations to report in an unbiased and fair and balanced way. It is instead tied to these groups and their ideologies and/or causes big time these days. So it's really the media outlet who controls the mega phone the best, that will put their guy or gal over the top, as so to further the agenda's in which they feel so strongly about as a group or media outlet who represents that group.

That is true. We haven't seen unbiased journalism in our lifetimes; and we likely never will. There are networks and publishings that support both sides, so no one is left out.

I can forgive Newt. I don't personally dislike the guy. But he has a level of narcissism that is astounding. Predicting him in the White House-no huge difference from what we've experienced in the last 30 years. Will his arrogance usher in war with Iran? That worries me. Our military is tired. I haven't checked, but I'm guessing that he holds the typical "they hate us for our freedoms" belief; which I happen to disagree with. And no...Ron Paul didn't give me that idea.

If his plan is to put America back to work....fine...get in there with haste. If his plan is to continue with the Project for the New American Century, I fear for the future of this country. That is a BAD plan, and will ultimately destroy the US if it is followed-as it was during Bush's administration. It's a whole other can of worms than the economy, our jobs, etc... It is the single biggest reason that I changed parties 8 years ago.

 

[Too Tall]

I guess when Newt was banging some chicks while he was married to his first wife he was too damn busy to get divorced first.

And then when he was banging some more chicks while he was married to his second wife, he was too damn busy to get divorced first.

The neverending quest for a "soul mate" is an exhausting one I guess.

He should have tried Argentinia. It worked for Mark Sanford.

You only have one side of the story, but yet you are sure that he was the scumbag eh?

A guy who cheats on his wife? And then runs ads about Clinton cheating on HIS wife, just before an election?

Yeah. I am sure he's a hypocritical scumbag. A bigger scumbag than Clinton, and that's really saying something.

Perhaps you have a link to any ad that Gingrich ran about Clinton cheating on his wife. You just made that up huh!

 

[beagle9]

Is monogamy not a real value? Bush seemed to be Christian-leaning; Obama doesn't seem as interested in religion. It probably wasn't something that was regularly thrust into his life, when he was growing up. That's why I laugh when people call him a Muslim.

We have certainly had our share of players in the White House in the past.

Monogomy is most defintely a value, and so is forgiveness and everything else that goes with being a Christian in life... Why is it that people aren't willing to forgive Newt for his personal life, in which had nothing to do with his job performance? I know why, it's because the opposition must hold onto every straw they can hold onto, in order to hopefully defeat Newt soon enough with those straws, even if it is a risk to them when they do this either for political reasons or other.

The media in these situations, have a following/base that is comprised of hundreds of thousands of followers/listeners, for which inturn at some point do back a specific media outlet 100% and all of the time. So when a politician runs who is against some of the things in which that base or following don't like, then the media outlet that represents it's followers, will use everything that it's got in it's arsenal, in order to destroy that politician, and even a good majority along with it if they think that they can get away with it as a bonus to be found in it all.

The media (specific ones) do have this as their agenda, in order to make the people they don't support "un-electable" in the end if at all possible. So what we have here in this nation, is these huge media firms and their constitiuencies who are loyal to these media firms, supporting specific cultures and beliefs held by these cultures and/or groups in this nation in unity of, going against these canidates like a cat going after a mouse. These certain or specific media outlets are used as their followers voice piece and backers, for which basically work for these constituencies and/or base of followers, in which they are deeply indebted to. So much for freedom of the press in the way that we think it all should be right? The press is in no way free in these situations to report in an unbiased and fair and balanced way. It is instead tied to these groups and their ideologies and/or causes big time these days. So it's really the media outlet who controls the mega phone the best, that will put their guy or gal over the top, as so to further the agenda's in which they feel so strongly about as a group or media outlet who represents that group.

That is true. We haven't seen unbiased journalism in our lifetimes; and we likely never will. There are networks and publishings that support both sides, so no one is left out.

I can forgive Newt. I don't personally dislike the guy. But he has a level of narcissism that is astounding. Predicting him in the White House-no huge difference from what we've experienced in the last 30 years. Will his arrogance usher in war with Iran? That worries me. Our military is tired. I haven't checked, but I'm guessing that he holds the typical "they hate us for our freedoms" belief; which I happen to disagree with. And no...Ron Paul didn't give me that idea.

If his plan is to put America back to work....fine...get in there with haste. If his plan is to continue with the Project for the New American Century, I fear for the future of this country. That is a BAD plan, and will ultimately destroy the US if it is followed-as it was during Bush's administration. It's a whole other can of worms than the economy, our jobs, etc... It is the single biggest reason that I changed parties 8 years ago.

Yes, and Romney is a corporate guy, who has multi-millions, but yet he is chasing after a $400,000 dollar a year job?

All he is, is a corporate plant, that will take us back to what was going on before in this nation, in which failed so many but enriched the few, in which destroyed the middle class and still is destroying the middle class in this nation to date, and all due to the dis-respect it has caused since then upon the American workforces... There are business people right now, who need to be in jail for what they had going against the American people in this nation for greed. Why we don't hold treason trials to this day, is flat outright amazing to me really.

The attrocities commited that were surrounding the issues of these illegals, who were fast replacing good Americans in their jobs all across this nation in the scheme of all schemes, that which made these American workers dependent on the government for hand outs instead of working, is un-believeable really. Yes it has been getting cleaned up slowly, but what about the punishments, just like what the OWS crowd is calling for on Wall Street? Do they all just walk free now ?