Title 18, "Misprision of treason" filed in District Court

[DiveCon]

your delusional rantings are not worthy of the courts time

 

[stannrodd]

your delusional rantings are not worthy of the courts time

Chris !! ...

delusional Rantings are usually filed in the Round filing cabinet under the clerks desk... along with empty coke cans, used condoms, soiled Kleenex, apple cores etc.

It's called RUBBISH. Why are you surprised or pissed off .. it's what normally happens to rubbish.

 

[Fizz]

why dont you just march into the judges office and make a citizens arrest? clearly the judge is part of the treasonous conspiracy!!

 

[PhysicsExist]

why dont you just march into the judges office and make a citizens arrest? clearly the judge is part of the treasonous conspiracy!!

Is that how the world works? Damn, what reality do you live in? I bet it's the same one where Physics don't exist on 9/11.

BuildingWhat? - Building 7 | Stand with the 911 families demanding a NEW Building 7 investigation - What is Building 7 ?

In its July 2008 Draft Report for Public Comment, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) initially claimed that Building 7 collapsed 40% slower than free fall acceleration.

Why would NIST want to say Building 7 did not experience free fall? NIST’s lead technical investigator, Shyam Sunder, stated in the WTC 7 technical briefing that free fall could only happen when an object “has no structural components below it.”[ii] The only way for a building to have no structural components below it is to remove the lower structural components with an external force such as explosives. If the upper part of a building is crushing its lower structural components, in other words, doing the work of removing them, not all of its energy will be converted into motion and its descent will not be free fall.

A high school physics teacher named David Chandler objected to NIST’s initial claim, pointing out that, based on video footage of Building 7’s destruction, NIST’s claim contradicted “a publicly visible, easily measurable quantity.”[iii] Mr. Chandler wrote a comment to NIST, saying, “Acknowledgement of and accounting for an extended period of free fall in the collapse of WTC 7 must be a priority if NIST is to be taken seriously.”[iv]

Responding to the criticism, NIST in its final report issued in November 2008 did finally acknowledge that Building 7 descended at free fall. According to NIST, “This free fall drop continued for approximately 8 stories, or 32.0 meters (105 ft), the distance traveled between times t = 1.75 s and t = 4.0 s [a period of 2.25 seconds].”[v] However, NIST did not attempt to explain how Building 7’s free fall descent could have occurred.

“The collapse we see cannot be due to a column failure, or a few column failures, or a sequence of column failures. All 24 interior columns and 58 perimeter columns had to have been removed over the span of 8 floors low in the building simultaneously to within a small fraction of a second, and in such a way that the top half of the building remains intact and uncrumpled.”

Only explosives can instantaneously remove 8 stories allowing the upper structure to accelerate downwards in free fall. The absolute free fall of Building 7 over a period of 2.25 seconds is by itself overwhelming evidence that explosives were used to bring down the building.​

 

[Christophera]

your delusional rantings are not worthy of the courts time

That is exactly what the perpetrators would want people to believe.

The facts are different.

http://algoxy.com/psych/9-11title_18.disclosure.html

 

[Ozmar]

Here's my evidence about 911!

christopher a brown 911 - Google Search

 

[DiveCon]

your delusional rantings are not worthy of the courts time

That is exactly what the perpetrators would want people to believe.

The facts are different.

you and facts are not on the same planet

 

[Fizz]

why dont you just march into the judges office and make a citizens arrest? clearly the judge is part of the treasonous conspiracy!!

Is that how the world works? Damn, what reality do you live in? I bet it's the same one where Physics don't exist on 9/11.

BuildingWhat? - Building 7 | Stand with the 911 families demanding a NEW Building 7 investigation - What is Building 7 ?

In its July 2008 Draft Report for Public Comment, the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) initially claimed that Building 7 collapsed 40% slower than free fall acceleration.

Why would NIST want to say Building 7 did not experience free fall? NIST’s lead technical investigator, Shyam Sunder, stated in the WTC 7 technical briefing that free fall could only happen when an object “has no structural components below it.”[ii] The only way for a building to have no structural components below it is to remove the lower structural components with an external force such as explosives. If the upper part of a building is crushing its lower structural components, in other words, doing the work of removing them, not all of its energy will be converted into motion and its descent will not be free fall.

A high school physics teacher named David Chandler objected to NIST’s initial claim, pointing out that, based on video footage of Building 7’s destruction, NIST’s claim contradicted “a publicly visible, easily measurable quantity.”[iii] Mr. Chandler wrote a comment to NIST, saying, “Acknowledgement of and accounting for an extended period of free fall in the collapse of WTC 7 must be a priority if NIST is to be taken seriously.”[iv]

Responding to the criticism, NIST in its final report issued in November 2008 did finally acknowledge that Building 7 descended at free fall. According to NIST, “This free fall drop continued for approximately 8 stories, or 32.0 meters (105 ft), the distance traveled between times t = 1.75 s and t = 4.0 s [a period of 2.25 seconds].”[v] However, NIST did not attempt to explain how Building 7’s free fall descent could have occurred.

“The collapse we see cannot be due to a column failure, or a few column failures, or a sequence of column failures. All 24 interior columns and 58 perimeter columns had to have been removed over the span of 8 floors low in the building simultaneously to within a small fraction of a second, and in such a way that the top half of the building remains intact and uncrumpled.”

Only explosives can instantaneously remove 8 stories allowing the upper structure to accelerate downwards in free fall. The absolute free fall of Building 7 over a period of 2.25 seconds is by itself overwhelming evidence that explosives were used to bring down the building.​

ok, mr physics idiot..... tell us all how long it took for the building to collapse. then tell us how long it would take for the building to collapse if it fell at free fall speed like you keep claiming.

 

[Rat in the Hat]

I wonder if Christophera and Citizen Pat ever won this case?

 

[slackjawed]

I assure you he is getting three squares and a cot......

 

[waltky]

Another pharma colossal rip-off...

The problem with prescription drug prices
6 May,`18 - What one city did to fight high drug prices reveals a drug supply chain in which just about every link can benefit when prices go up

Every company can make profits, but this is profiteering. This is gouging.The Rockford File is the story of how one very expensive prescription drug threatened to financially cripple an entire city. That city is Rockford, Illinois, an old industrial town outside of Chicago. Rather than using a health insurance company, Rockford has, for years, paid its own health care costs for its 1,000 employees and their dependents. When Rockford got hit with the drug bill it was so enormous the mayor at the time set out to understand why. Larry Morrissey: Everybody's asking the question, "Why is health care so expensive?" Because the fix is in. That's the answer. That's the short answer. When Larry Morrissey was mayor of Rockford he was hit with a crisis: the city was bleeding money.

Correspondent Lesley Stahl with Don Haviland​

Lesley Stahl: You found out that the health care budget was going bust.

Larry Morrissey: Yea, the budget was out of control.

Lesley Stahl: And you had to squeeze other things. Like what?

Larry Morrissey: Hiring police and firefighters. Keeping firetrucks and other equipment on the streets. We started realizing that pharmaceutical costs were skyrocketing.

Express Scripts HQ​

Lesley Stahl: And I heard that it was just one drug.

Larry Morrissey: One particular drug called Acthar.

In 2015, two small children of Rockford employees were treated with Acthar, a drug that's been on the market since 1952. It's used to treat a rare and potentially fatal condition called infantile spasms that afflicts about 2,000 babies a year.

Lesley Stahl: Do you remember how much was on the budget for those two babies?

Larry Morrissey: We were spending hundreds of thousands of dollars for these sick baby cases.

Lesley Stahl: Close to $500,000-- is what we heard.

Larry Morrissey: Combined, yeah.

Lesley Stahl: Combined.

Larry Morrissey: Yeah.

"Every company can make profits, but this is profiteering. This is gouging."[]/url]

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/the-problem-with-prescription-drug-prices/