Titanic was an inside job

The "metal" used on the Titanic was inferior.

And who decided to use this inferior metal?

Rogue members of the British Parliament.



The Rothchilds no doubt. In conjunction with the Fed, the CIA, MI-6 and of course Tom Jones. He is Irish you know. Not a long walk in logic to know there has to be an Irishman involved.

I always thought that whistling of the Irish Spring song was subliminal.
 
clearly the weak attempt at humour by someone ignorant of the failures of the 9/11 commission


My Titanic assertions have as much scientific validity as your 9-11 assertions

Prove me wrong

He has proved you 9/11 coincidence theorists wrong many times in the past.Not his fault you only see what you want to see and hear only what you want to hear.:rolleyes:
 
clearly the weak attempt at humour by someone ignorant of the failures of the 9/11 commission


My Titanic assertions have as much scientific validity as your 9-11 assertions

Prove me wrong

He has proved you 9/11 coincidence theorists wrong many times in the past.Not his fault you only see what you want to see and hear only what you want to hear.:rolleyes:

Titanic was an inside job

Obviously a dry run by our Government for 9-11

Ever notice the Titanic sank at freefall speeds?
 
My Titanic assertions have as much scientific validity as your 9-11 assertions

Prove me wrong

He has proved you 9/11 coincidence theorists wrong many times in the past.Not his fault you only see what you want to see and hear only what you want to hear.:rolleyes:

Titanic was an inside job

Obviously a dry run by our Government for 9-11

Ever notice the Titanic sank at freefall speeds?

the sad reality is that the titanic received more investigation than building 7 did from the 9/11 commission as it was omitted from the report...and despite your inane comments the fact is wtc 7 did collapse at near free fall speed...no such disturbing fact exist in regards to the titanic other than in your inept little imaginings..it is just some bizarre attempt to distract from the fact of a free fall collapse of wtc 7
 
He has proved you 9/11 coincidence theorists wrong many times in the past.Not his fault you only see what you want to see and hear only what you want to hear.:rolleyes:

Titanic was an inside job

Obviously a dry run by our Government for 9-11

Ever notice the Titanic sank at freefall speeds?

the sad reality is that the titanic received more investigation than building 7 did from the 9/11 commission as it was omitted from the report...and despite your inane comments the fact is wtc 7 did collapse at near free fall speed...no such disturbing fact exist in regards to the titanic other than in your inept little imaginings..it is just some bizarre attempt to distract from the fact of a free fall collapse of wtc 7

I got your back eots!

Titanic was a dry run for 9-11

No way ice is stronger than metal..

The Titanic sunk at freefall speeds.
 
He has proved you 9/11 coincidence theorists wrong many times in the past.Not his fault you only see what you want to see and hear only what you want to hear.:rolleyes:

Titanic was an inside job

Obviously a dry run by our Government for 9-11

Ever notice the Titanic sank at freefall speeds?

the sad reality is that the titanic received more investigation than building 7 did from the 9/11 commission as it was omitted from the report...and despite your inane comments the fact is wtc 7 did collapse at near free fall speed...no such disturbing fact exist in regards to the titanic other than in your inept little imaginings..it is just some bizarre attempt to distract from the fact of a free fall collapse of wtc 7

The building wasn't attacked so there was no reason for the Commission to investigate it. 3WTC was also destroyed? You're not up in arms about that? Wonder why loser? :cuckoo:

7WTC didn't fall at free fall speeds. It collapsed slower than free fall speeds would have indicated. There is no footage of the end of the collapse so it can't be determined.

Sucks to be you.
 
Titanic sunk at freefall speeds. There is only one way it could sink that fast..


Controlled Demo!
 
Titanic was an inside job

Obviously a dry run by our Government for 9-11

Ever notice the Titanic sank at freefall speeds?

the sad reality is that the titanic received more investigation than building 7 did from the 9/11 commission as it was omitted from the report...and despite your inane comments the fact is wtc 7 did collapse at near free fall speed...no such disturbing fact exist in regards to the titanic other than in your inept little imaginings..it is just some bizarre attempt to distract from the fact of a free fall collapse of wtc 7

The building wasn't attacked so there was no reason for the Commission to investigate it. 3WTC was also destroyed? You're not up in arms about that? Wonder why loser? :cuckoo:

7WTC didn't fall at free fall speeds. It collapsed slower than free fall speeds would have indicated. There is no footage of the end of the collapse so it can't be determined.

Sucks to be you.

nist now admits free fall speed for the visible portion of the collapse...of course it was attacked even if not the primary target and explosives have been use in other building attacks before including the wtc...so your statement is pointless ...wtc3 did not collapse at free fall speed in fact it did not even collapse and it was not a 47 story skyscraper...loser
 
There is no physical means for the Titanic to sink at "Freefal Speeds" without a well executed controlled demo

Everyone knows ice cannot sink a metal ship.
 
There is no physical means for the Titanic to sink at "Freefal Speeds" without a well executed controlled demo

Everyone knows ice cannot sink a metal ship.

the only point you could possible have is the one on the top of your pinhead

Yea...yea.....You "debunkers" are all the same

You can't debate the issue so you attack the messenger

What are you....Some paid Government dupe?
 
the sad reality is that the titanic received more investigation than building 7 did from the 9/11 commission as it was omitted from the report...and despite your inane comments the fact is wtc 7 did collapse at near free fall speed...no such disturbing fact exist in regards to the titanic other than in your inept little imaginings..it is just some bizarre attempt to distract from the fact of a free fall collapse of wtc 7

The building wasn't attacked so there was no reason for the Commission to investigate it. 3WTC was also destroyed? You're not up in arms about that? Wonder why loser? :cuckoo:

7WTC didn't fall at free fall speeds. It collapsed slower than free fall speeds would have indicated. There is no footage of the end of the collapse so it can't be determined.

Sucks to be you.

nist now admits free fall speed for the visible portion of the collapse...of course it was attacked even if not the primary target and explosives have been use in other building attacks before including the wtc...so your statement is pointless ...wtc3 did not collapse at free fall speed in fact it did not even collapse and it was not a 47 story skyscraper...loser

It was a bldg ajacent hit by debris.
Just like WTC7.
It was demolished.
Somehow you missed that.
You're quite the "researcher"
 
the sad reality is that the titanic received more investigation than building 7 did from the 9/11 commission as it was omitted from the report...and despite your inane comments the fact is wtc 7 did collapse at near free fall speed...no such disturbing fact exist in regards to the titanic other than in your inept little imaginings..it is just some bizarre attempt to distract from the fact of a free fall collapse of wtc 7

The building wasn't attacked so there was no reason for the Commission to investigate it. 3WTC was also destroyed? You're not up in arms about that? Wonder why loser? :cuckoo:

7WTC didn't fall at free fall speeds. It collapsed slower than free fall speeds would have indicated. There is no footage of the end of the collapse so it can't be determined.

Sucks to be you.

nist now admits free fall speed for the visible portion of the collapse...of course it was attacked even if not the primary target and explosives have been use in other building attacks before including the wtc...so your statement is pointless ...wtc3 did not collapse at free fall speed in fact it did not even collapse and it was not a 47 story skyscraper...loser

this loser never knows ANY facts about anything obviously in the fact he is unaware that nist now admits to freefall speed.:lol:This known disinfo agent is so delusional he'll tell someone that they hvae proved nothing in their 60 plus posts when that poster only has like 30 or so.more proof how he knows nothing about facts.:lol::lol::lol:
 
One of the biggest coverups in history was the myth that the Titanic somehow sank after hitting an iceberg. How stupid do they think people are?

Ice is FROZEN WATER it is not stronger than metal. If the Titanic really struck an iceberg, the iceberg would have sank.

If you don't believe me, try an experiment at home. Take a block of ice out of your freezer and hit it with a hammer. What breaks? The hammer or the ice?

I so appreciate that someone is finally trying to get the truth out there!!! :clap2:
 
One of the biggest coverups in history was the myth that the Titanic somehow sank after hitting an iceberg. How stupid do they think people are

Ice is FROZEN WATER it is not stronger than metal. If the Titanic really struck an iceberg, the iceberg would have sank.

If you don't believe me, try an experiment at home. Take a block of ice out of your freezer and hit it with a hammer. What breaks? The hammer or the ice?

:rofl:

Well, I can see one candidate for the stupidity prize! The Titanic is not the only ship to be sunk by an iceberg. The most recent was a cruise ship, 'The Explorer'

But sometime early yesterday, the Explorer, fondly known in the maritime world as “the little red ship,” quietly struck ice.
There were the alarms, then the captain’s voice on the public address system calling the 100 passengers and the crew of about 50 to the lecture hall, according to passengers’ accounts on the radio and others relayed from rescuers and the tour operator.
In the lecture hall, they were told that water was creeping in through a fist-size hole punched into the ship’s starboard. As it flooded the grinding engine room, the power failed. The ship ceased responding.
“We all got a little nervous when the ship began to list sharply, and the lifeboats still hadn’t been lowered,” John Cartwright, a Canadian, told CBC radio.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/11/24/world/americas/24ship.html?_r=1&pagewanted=1&th&emc=th

As for ice not being able to hole metal, I would suggest a marine engineer would know better than your goodself.

Graham Hockley, of the Institute of Marine Engineering, Science and Technology, said: “The ship is relatively small compared with the potential size of an iceberg. The top of the iceberg may be 50 metres away but it may have a second false summit under the water. If the ship strikes a point on the iceberg at a right angle, the force can be concentrated into a small area and puncture the hull

Iceberg blamed as passengers flee holed ship in icy waters - Times Online

So much for your conspiracy theory. Pity you didn't do your homework!
 

Forum List

Back
Top