The media season for planting a Republican party presidential candidate has begun in earnest. The 2016 crop consists of Marco Rubio and Chris Christie. Hardly a bumper crop when you look at the number of Republican seedlings the media had to pick from.
As usual, the media will do its best to nominate a Republican that Democrats can live with à la Bob Dole, John McCain, and Mitt Romney. Those three losers should tell Tea Party conservatives its time to begin the process of pruning the wannabes. Right off the bat Rubio and Christie are dead on the vine.
Even if Rubio can shake off his commitment to amnesty for 20 million illegal aliens he is not a guy Tea Partiers conservatives should trust in foreign policy:
Younger Americans better ask what their world will be like if American presidents continue believing they are destined to preside over a New World Order instead of looking out for America first.
I can answer the question. Influence the world by turning the US military over to the United Nations for the common good. There is justification for my answer:
Rubio hopped in bed with the Council on Foreign Relations way back when the bloom was still on his rose:
Bet on this: Rubio must hide his love affair with the globalists. My guess is that he thinks a little doublespeak is the only thing he needs to cash in on all of Barack Taqiyyas foreign policy disasters. Hell have do a lot better than doublespeak because all of Barack Taqiyyas foreign policy disasters originated with the global government crowd. You know a Democrat will give conservatives more of the same. Nominating Rubio makes it a lock.
Next up for the pruning shears
Nobody knows where Chris Christie stands on giving Americas sovereignty over to global government. Hell, nobody know where he stands on US membership in the UN.
Everybody does know that Christie is a Northeast liberal. New Jersey is a big government state. New Jersey is among the states with the nations highest property taxes; highest paid government employees, and highest paid teachers. The cost of public education per child in New Jersey averages over $18,000 a year. As far as as I know Christie did nothing to reverse the cost of big government, or reverse big government itself. Bottom line: New Jerseys liberal voters did not elect Christie because of his conservatism.
NOTE: Northeast liberal can be a political posture or geographic. Christie is both as is Romney.
Christie said this at CPAC:
This conservative wants to hear Christie explain how he intends to implement what conservatives are against before he talks about doing anything else. I doubt if anybody wants to hear We dont get to govern if we dont win. Thats just a variation of the same old bullcrap conservatives heard from McCain and Romney.
Whoever the eventual nominee is, I sure hope he is not going win over Democrat voters by promising to work across the aisle. Christie and Rubio are big on that bullshit. Rubio proved it with his participation in the Gang of Eight, and Christie brags about doing it in New Jersey. Working across the aisle gave the country the welfare state, pubic education, and UN-loving quislings immune from prosecution.
Finally, establishment Republicans still have not heard the message. They cannot win the presidency without conservative votes. Tea Partiers must never lose sight of that fact after the media blitz intensifies for their choice.
As usual, the media will do its best to nominate a Republican that Democrats can live with à la Bob Dole, John McCain, and Mitt Romney. Those three losers should tell Tea Party conservatives its time to begin the process of pruning the wannabes. Right off the bat Rubio and Christie are dead on the vine.
Even if Rubio can shake off his commitment to amnesty for 20 million illegal aliens he is not a guy Tea Partiers conservatives should trust in foreign policy:
Americans must be involved in leading the world... we cannot ignore the reality of who we are and the global importance of this nation.
He pled with younger Americans to consider what their world will look like in ten years if we do nothing.
Younger Americans better ask what their world will be like if American presidents continue believing they are destined to preside over a New World Order instead of looking out for America first.
But how will he practically influence the world without directly getting involved militarily?
Rubios Middle Ground
A third-way foreign policy at CPAC.
By Natalie deMacedo on 3.6.14 | 3:15PM
Rubio's Middle Ground | The American Spectator
I can answer the question. Influence the world by turning the US military over to the United Nations for the common good. There is justification for my answer:
Rubio hopped in bed with the Council on Foreign Relations way back when the bloom was still on his rose:
It turns out Rubio did indeed address the CFR in New York on May 31. According to New York Magazine, Rubio talked foreign policy during a discussion and Q&A. The CFR one-world government crowd was apparently very enamored with Rubio, according to the magazine.
Rubio did not try to hide the fact he rubbed elbows with the globalists.
Rubio Addressed World Government Group in New York
June 3, 2012
» Rubio Addressed World Government Group in New York Alex Jones' Infowars: There's a war on for your mind!
Bet on this: Rubio must hide his love affair with the globalists. My guess is that he thinks a little doublespeak is the only thing he needs to cash in on all of Barack Taqiyyas foreign policy disasters. Hell have do a lot better than doublespeak because all of Barack Taqiyyas foreign policy disasters originated with the global government crowd. You know a Democrat will give conservatives more of the same. Nominating Rubio makes it a lock.
Next up for the pruning shears
Nobody knows where Chris Christie stands on giving Americas sovereignty over to global government. Hell, nobody know where he stands on US membership in the UN.
Everybody does know that Christie is a Northeast liberal. New Jersey is a big government state. New Jersey is among the states with the nations highest property taxes; highest paid government employees, and highest paid teachers. The cost of public education per child in New Jersey averages over $18,000 a year. As far as as I know Christie did nothing to reverse the cost of big government, or reverse big government itself. Bottom line: New Jerseys liberal voters did not elect Christie because of his conservatism.
NOTE: Northeast liberal can be a political posture or geographic. Christie is both as is Romney.
Christie said this at CPAC:
We need to start talking about what were for .not what were against.
Not only are we against Obamacare higher taxes bigger government more intrusion into our constitutional rights but were for a free market society that allows your effort and ingenuity to determine your success, not the cold, hard hand of government to determine winners and losers, which is what this administration has been about.
Christie Talks Conservatism, His Future
Back at CPAC after last year's snub.
By Russ Belli-Estreito on 3.6.14 | 1:17PM
Christie Talks Conservatism, His Future | The American Spectator
This conservative wants to hear Christie explain how he intends to implement what conservatives are against before he talks about doing anything else. I doubt if anybody wants to hear We dont get to govern if we dont win. Thats just a variation of the same old bullcrap conservatives heard from McCain and Romney.
Whoever the eventual nominee is, I sure hope he is not going win over Democrat voters by promising to work across the aisle. Christie and Rubio are big on that bullshit. Rubio proved it with his participation in the Gang of Eight, and Christie brags about doing it in New Jersey. Working across the aisle gave the country the welfare state, pubic education, and UN-loving quislings immune from prosecution.
Finally, establishment Republicans still have not heard the message. They cannot win the presidency without conservative votes. Tea Partiers must never lose sight of that fact after the media blitz intensifies for their choice.