Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Wrong. The cooling trend is much longer then ever thought.We are in the down part of the sun cycle, but the general trend is still toward higher temperatures.
Wrong. The cooling trend is much longer then ever thought.We are in the down part of the sun cycle, but the general trend is still toward higher temperatures.
And hold on a sec, you admit that the SUN matters? Don't get caught doing that, you'll be kicked out of the AGW church.
Know what Anthropogenic means?
Wrong. The cooling trend is much longer then ever thought.We are in the down part of the sun cycle, but the general trend is still toward higher temperatures.
And hold on a sec, you admit that the SUN matters? Don't get caught doing that, you'll be kicked out of the AGW church.
Know what Anthropogenic means?
And physics has firmly established the absorbtion spectra of CO2. And the fact that we have had rapid increases in CO2 and CH4 in the past, and the result, in every case, was rapid warming. That the initial cause was trapp volcanics in no way changes the result, simply because now the cause is the activities of man.
Like your stand on evolution, your talking points reveal a deep misunderstanding of how science is done, and how conclusions are reached.
And physics has firmly established the absorbtion spectra of CO2. And the fact that we have had rapid increases in CO2 and CH4 in the past, and the result, in every case, was rapid warming. That the initial cause was trapp volcanics in no way changes the result, simply because now the cause is the activities of man.
Like your stand on evolution, your talking points reveal a deep misunderstanding of how science is done, and how conclusions are reached.
You may want to examine what you don't understand. Most of us understand science just fine in terms of how hypotheses are tested and how conclusions are reached.. I would say it is you that does not understand science. It isn't science that you believe in or are practicing. What you are practicing is faith in the religion that is AGW. After all you don't really understand the science behind it as well as your cherry picked experts. Therefore it is simply a faith that you have that one group of people is right and you have chosen to ignore the rest, much like a christian only has faith in Jesus' and ignores budha or the spirits native american's believed in.
You are such a flat earther.
We've already dispensed with all this junk science. Now run off and watch some cartoons.
Give me a break.
And physics has firmly established the absorbtion spectra of CO2. And the fact that we have had rapid increases in CO2 and CH4 in the past, and the result, in every case, was rapid warming. That the initial cause was trapp volcanics in no way changes the result, simply because now the cause is the activities of man.
Like your stand on evolution, your talking points reveal a deep misunderstanding of how science is done, and how conclusions are reached.
You may want to examine what you don't understand. Most of us understand science just fine in terms of how hypotheses are tested and how conclusions are reached.. I would say it is you that does not understand science. It isn't science that you believe in or are practicing. What you are practicing is faith in the religion that is AGW. After all you don't really understand the science behind it as well as your cherry picked experts. Therefore it is simply a faith that you have that one group of people is right and you have chosen to ignore the rest, much like a christian only has faith in Jesus' and ignores budha or the spirits native american's believed in.
Atmospheric CO2 causes the earth to retain heat.
This was proved experimentally in 1859.
We have increased atmospheric CO2 by 40% in the last 200 years.
We are adding 8 billion tons of CO2 to the atmosphere every year.
You may want to examine what you don't understand. Most of us understand science just fine in terms of how hypotheses are tested and how conclusions are reached.. I would say it is you that does not understand science. It isn't science that you believe in or are practicing. What you are practicing is faith in the religion that is AGW. After all you don't really understand the science behind it as well as your cherry picked experts. Therefore it is simply a faith that you have that one group of people is right and you have chosen to ignore the rest, much like a christian only has faith in Jesus' and ignores budha or the spirits native american's believed in.
Atmospheric CO2 causes the earth to retain heat.
This was proved experimentally in 1859.
We have increased atmospheric CO2 by 40% in the last 200 years.
We are adding 8 billion tons of CO2 to the atmosphere every year.
If our atmosphere was that simple you would have your case made. Except our atmosphere is far from that simple. It is truly laughable to watch you people trying to convince yourselves that you understand any of this when you obviously dont' understand even basic concepts like what constitutes an actual correllation. Do yourself a favor, take a math class and learn how to derive a correct correlation co-efficient, run CO2 numbers over time with temperature over time and let us know what the number is. THEN tell us if you have a case.
What we do know about you is that first and foremost you're a died in the wool liberal. Global warming is a liberal religion. That's really why you believe in it. Not because you understand the science and certainly not because you've evaluated the contradictory evidence.
Atmospheric CO2 causes the earth to retain heat.
This was proved experimentally in 1859.
We have increased atmospheric CO2 by 40% in the last 200 years.
We are adding 8 billion tons of CO2 to the atmosphere every year.
If our atmosphere was that simple you would have your case made. Except our atmosphere is far from that simple. It is truly laughable to watch you people trying to convince yourselves that you understand any of this when you obviously dont' understand even basic concepts like what constitutes an actual correllation. Do yourself a favor, take a math class and learn how to derive a correct correlation co-efficient, run CO2 numbers over time with temperature over time and let us know what the number is. THEN tell us if you have a case.
What we do know about you is that first and foremost you're a died in the wool liberal. Global warming is a liberal religion. That's really why you believe in it. Not because you understand the science and certainly not because you've evaluated the contradictory evidence.
Why is Venus hotter than Mercury?
You may want to examine what you don't understand. Most of us understand science just fine in terms of how hypotheses are tested and how conclusions are reached.. I would say it is you that does not understand science. It isn't science that you believe in or are practicing. What you are practicing is faith in the religion that is AGW. After all you don't really understand the science behind it as well as your cherry picked experts. Therefore it is simply a faith that you have that one group of people is right and you have chosen to ignore the rest, much like a christian only has faith in Jesus' and ignores budha or the spirits native american's believed in.
Atmospheric CO2 causes the earth to retain heat.
This was proved experimentally in 1859.
We have increased atmospheric CO2 by 40% in the last 200 years.
We are adding 8 billion tons of CO2 to the atmosphere every year.
If our atmosphere was that simple you would have your case made. Except our atmosphere is far from that simple. It is truly laughable to watch you people trying to convince yourselves that you understand any of this when you obviously dont' understand even basic concepts like what constitutes an actual correllation. Do yourself a favor, take a math class and learn how to derive a correct correlation co-efficient, run CO2 numbers over time with temperature over time and let us know what the number is. THEN tell us if you have a case.
What we do know about you is that first and foremost you're a died in the wool liberal. Global warming is a liberal religion. That's really why you believe in it. Not because you understand the science and certainly not because you've evaluated the contradictory evidence.
You are such a flat earther.
We've already dispensed with all this junk science. Now run off and watch some cartoons.
Atmospheric CO2 causes the earth to retain heat.
This was proved experimentally in 1859.
We have increased atmospheric CO2 by 40% in the last 200 years.
We are adding 8 billion tons of CO2 to the atmosphere every year.
If our atmosphere was that simple you would have your case made. Except our atmosphere is far from that simple. It is truly laughable to watch you people trying to convince yourselves that you understand any of this when you obviously dont' understand even basic concepts like what constitutes an actual correllation. Do yourself a favor, take a math class and learn how to derive a correct correlation co-efficient, run CO2 numbers over time with temperature over time and let us know what the number is. THEN tell us if you have a case.
What we do know about you is that first and foremost you're a died in the wool liberal. Global warming is a liberal religion. That's really why you believe in it. Not because you understand the science and certainly not because you've evaluated the contradictory evidence.
Give us some contradictory evidence to evaluate, Bern. Something out of a real scientific journal, such as Nature, Science, or the Journal of Geo-physics.
