Behavioral experts tend to focus on an individuals current thinking process that will then affect potential future life events and/or situations. Nevertheless, contemporary times tend to ignore a crucial preceding step of a preceding life event/circumstances/situations that will affect current thinking process which in turn may affect future life events and/or situations. For purposes of clarity and simplification, I will designate preceding life event/circumstances/situation as level one, current thinking process as level two, and future life events and/or situations as level three. An important notation is that each level must be satisfied before the next level can be discussed and its occurrence in effect. Contemporary times tend to ignore a preceding life event/circumstances/situations and assume that the current thinking process is the life event/circumstances/situations which is not always the case. You cannot move from an is state to an ought state. Thus, you cannot say that the current thinking process ought to be the future life events and/or situations. Experts are trying to modify the current thinking process without any consideration to the preceding life event/circumstances/situations. An important note: Preceding life event/circumstances/situations is difficult to becoming extinct. It may even override intensive modification of current thinking process. Thus, it is inaccurate and outrageous for experts to assume that future life events and/or situations is the complete and direct result of current thinking process. These hypocritical experts talk about correlation does not equal to causation. Hence, it is not just the current thinking process that may affect the future life events and/or situations. It could be that a preceding life event/circumstances/situations affecting the current thinking process, which then affects the future life events and/or situations. The self-fulfilling prophecy is NOT necessarily the foundational basis for the outcome of a specific situation contrary to the assumed notion that it is. Why? Because it implies at starting at level 2 the current thinking process which is simply not always the case. This is not to say that some people wont start at the current thinking process. This theory only offers a possible explanation as to why the current thinking process modification techniques may not work.