Imagine a taxpayer who, for a decade or so, had an average annual income of NEGATIVE $100 million. Would be be included in the "Bottom Quintile" of earners for those years? That's like, less than nothing, right?
And what if that taxpayer was later reported to have an annual of, I don't know, a couple hundred million a year - putting him WELL into the top quintile - would that be a great, inspirational story of upward mobility? If not, why not?
And if this taxpayer inherited, say, half a Billion from his Paternal Unit, at what point - how many Billions - can he claim to have been successful on his own?
And what if that taxpayer was later reported to have an annual of, I don't know, a couple hundred million a year - putting him WELL into the top quintile - would that be a great, inspirational story of upward mobility? If not, why not?
And if this taxpayer inherited, say, half a Billion from his Paternal Unit, at what point - how many Billions - can he claim to have been successful on his own?