Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Those of us who were born into a "different America" and grew up in that America can remember when she was a proud nation, had the respect of most of the world, and was looked up to. We were a free country. The feeling was almost palpable. We could be very proud to say we were Americans and could travel in safety to other countries without being booed, hissed and spat upon.
How badly we have fallen. But by staying informed, being vigilant, working together, it's possible to bring that America back, if not for ourselves, then for our children and grandchildren. Americans have a tendency to forget - let's hope the shameful, despotic performance of this administration will teach us to remember ... for a long, long time and keep us fighting back against tyranny.
so this never happened during Clintons 8 years?......that old lunatic Ross Perot was right wasnt he, about if NAFTA is passed you will hear the sucking sound of jobs being sucked out of the country....and who signed NAFTA?.....
george hubert walker bush created the NAFTA treaty/trade agreement, clinton, before he was president, promised he would see NAFTA through if he became president, and if it passed a vote in congress, he would sign the bill....he campaigned saying such...
looking back on it, it seems like the big lobbies for NAFTA, must have gotten clinton to agree to signing it, for their financial support of his presidential run....
presidents are just puppets of those behind the curtain...scary...
Actually Reagan had proposed something sort of like NAFTA. And it was doubtless an old idea by then.
Do you have any support for the idea that Clinton was essentially bribed into supporting NAFTA, as opposed to the concept he thought it was a good idea?
Probably not. Merely practicing your well-rehearsed "seagull" method of posting: fly in, dump a load of crap, and fly out again.
Actually NAFTA has been very helpful, creating thousands of jobs, many more than were lost. This is why the unemployment rate was at record lows in the years following its passage and why trade with Mexico and Canada have soared.
But facts are stubborn things.
george hubert walker bush created the NAFTA treaty/trade agreement, clinton, before he was president, promised he would see NAFTA through if he became president, and if it passed a vote in congress, he would sign the bill....he campaigned saying such...
looking back on it, it seems like the big lobbies for NAFTA, must have gotten clinton to agree to signing it, for their financial support of his presidential run....
presidents are just puppets of those behind the curtain...scary...
Actually Reagan had proposed something sort of like NAFTA. And it was doubtless an old idea by then.
Do you have any support for the idea that Clinton was essentially bribed into supporting NAFTA, as opposed to the concept he thought it was a good idea?
Probably not. Merely practicing your well-rehearsed "seagull" method of posting: fly in, dump a load of crap, and fly out again.
Actually NAFTA has been very helpful, creating thousands of jobs, many more than were lost. This is why the unemployment rate was at record lows in the years following its passage and why trade with Mexico and Canada have soared.
But facts are stubborn things.
He bucked the Party on the issue, if memory serves me....there were many Democrats opposed to it, same with welfare reform, there were many Democrats opposed to it, but he did it anyway....and you don't see that "bucking of the Party" in many democratic Politicians imo....unless of course, there is some sort of financial gain in it for them.
Actually Reagan had proposed something sort of like NAFTA. And it was doubtless an old idea by then.
Do you have any support for the idea that Clinton was essentially bribed into supporting NAFTA, as opposed to the concept he thought it was a good idea?
Probably not. Merely practicing your well-rehearsed "seagull" method of posting: fly in, dump a load of crap, and fly out again.
Actually NAFTA has been very helpful, creating thousands of jobs, many more than were lost. This is why the unemployment rate was at record lows in the years following its passage and why trade with Mexico and Canada have soared.
But facts are stubborn things.
He bucked the Party on the issue, if memory serves me....there were many Democrats opposed to it, same with welfare reform, there were many Democrats opposed to it, but he did it anyway....and you don't see that "bucking of the Party" in many democratic Politicians imo....unless of course, there is some sort of financial gain in it for them.
Clinton bucked the party with welfare reform too.
What financial gain was there in that for him?
Your points are heading into conspiracy theory territory. Nor do you have anything remotely resembling facts to back you up.
IOW, a typical post for you.
He bucked the Party on the issue, if memory serves me....there were many Democrats opposed to it, same with welfare reform, there were many Democrats opposed to it, but he did it anyway....and you don't see that "bucking of the Party" in many democratic Politicians imo....unless of course, there is some sort of financial gain in it for them.
Clinton bucked the party with welfare reform too.
What financial gain was there in that for him?
Your points are heading into conspiracy theory territory. Nor do you have anything remotely resembling facts to back you up.
IOW, a typical post for you.
thank you so much, your hollow and transparent posts contribute so much to this board as well!
He bucked the Party on the issue, if memory serves me....there were many Democrats opposed to it, same with welfare reform, there were many Democrats opposed to it, but he did it anyway....and you don't see that "bucking of the Party" in many democratic Politicians imo....unless of course, there is some sort of financial gain in it for them.
Clinton bucked the party with welfare reform too.
What financial gain was there in that for him?
Your points are heading into conspiracy theory territory. Nor do you have anything remotely resembling facts to back you up.
IOW, a typical post for you.
thank you so much, your hollow and transparent posts contribute so much to this board as well!
Well done.
And with just a tiny fraction of "The Speech", (A Time For Choosing) to boot. Far and away the greatest political speech of all time. (Lincoln who? Kennedy what?)
YouTube - "A Time for Choosing" by Ronald Reagan
Sadly, and I swear this is the first time I've done this here (I think) but I think we passed the point of no return under "W" Bush. Hard to nail down the exact date and there is no doubt that Gore or Kerry would have been worse (as Obama proves daily). Still, there is no going back to limited government sanity. At least not w/o or before a truely devistating economic crash the likes of which we have never seen. (God knows if we will ever recover to half of what we once were once that happens)
On edit:
I forgot to add... have a nice day!
Well done.
And with just a tiny fraction of "The Speech", (A Time For Choosing) to boot. Far and away the greatest political speech of all time. (Lincoln who? Kennedy what?)
YouTube - "A Time for Choosing" by Ronald Reagan
Sadly, and I swear this is the first time I've done this here (I think) but I think we passed the point of no return under "W" Bush. Hard to nail down the exact date and there is no doubt that Gore or Kerry would have been worse (as Obama proves daily). Still, there is no going back to limited government sanity. At least not w/o or before a truely devistating economic crash the likes of which we have never seen. (God knows if we will ever recover to half of what we once were once that happens)
On edit:
I forgot to add... have a nice day!
You really think it was Medicare Part B and the patriot act that broke the camels Back? Please we lost the idea of a limited Fed As a result of the Civil war, and have been steadily shedding any remnants of a Federal Republic ever since. You want to look to the single biggest cause of the loss of the idea of limited Federal Power look no further than the liberal Dominated courts, and public Education system. The First one bends the meaning of the constitution and continuously rules in favor of ever expanding Federal Power and diminishing States Rights, and the latter Brain washes our Youth into thinking FDR was the greatest president ever and his Socialist Policies saved us from the Great Depression.
Frankly we have not had a chance to get it back for a couple Generations now.
The Reagan video now has well over 200,000 views - just a few days ago it had about 6000 views.
Remarkable!!! The video is being shared among tens of thousands of new viewers each day!!
And now given Democrat Pelosi's startling desire to want to investigate those speaking out against the Ground Zero Mosque - well, the Democrat Party lunacy gets easier and easier to expose...
YouTube - "Those Voices Don't Speak for the Rest of Us"
The Reagan video now has well over 200,000 views - just a few days ago it had about 6000 views.
Remarkable!!! The video is being shared among tens of thousands of new viewers each day!!
And now given Democrat Pelosi's startling desire to want to investigate those speaking out against the Ground Zero Mosque - well, the Democrat Party lunacy gets easier and easier to expose...
YouTube - "Those Voices Don't Speak for the Rest of Us"
Of course it has had lots of views. I got it on a right wing viral email thing.
The Reagan video now has well over 200,000 views - just a few days ago it had about 6000 views.
Remarkable!!! The video is being shared among tens of thousands of new viewers each day!!
And now given Democrat Pelosi's startling desire to want to investigate those speaking out against the Ground Zero Mosque - well, the Democrat Party lunacy gets easier and easier to expose...
YouTube - "Those Voices Don't Speak for the Rest of Us"
Of course it has had lots of views. I got it on a right wing viral email thing.
One of many methods - the response to the video has been very positive and strong - and deservedly so. Great video.
Amazing how Reagan's words from 1964 ring so powerfully true today.
Remarkable President.
Remarkable Man.
God Bless Ronald Reagan...
A surplus or deficit is the difference between revenue and expenses. If you change the way you calculate deficits and surpluses then you must do so for all years or administrations, otherwise it makes little sense.Nice try but no, Clinton had a surplus in 1999 of 125.6 billion dollar and a 69 billion dollar surplus in 1998, something the Gipper never did.Is this the same type lie that said clinton had a surplus when he left office?
History of Deficits and Surpluses In The United States
I knew I was going to get a fish. it's a myth there wasn't any surplus
The government can have a surplus even if it has trillions in debt, but it cannot have a surplus if that debt increased every year. This article is about surplus/deficit, not the debt. However, it analyzes the debt to prove there wasn't a surplus under Clinton.
The Myth of the Clinton Surplus
I predicted Obama would be where he is now even before he was elected.
I based this prediction on the economic downturn being painful and prolonged.
The right wing media's influence on the people of America.
And the stupidity of a lot of Americans with their short memory and attention spans.
I was of course ridiculed for my prediction at the time, because everyone knew the economy was just adjusting and would bounce back in 6 months or so.
