Those Darned Rich Folks

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 6, 2008
124,898
60,271
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
1.The bête noire of the Left…the ‘rich’….

Actually, the ‘curse’ they use is a left-over from the aristocracy characterized by the Marie Antoinette quote "Let them eat cake" is the traditional translation of the French phrase "Qu'ils mangent de la brioche", supposedly spoken by "a great princess" upon learning that the peasants had no bread. Since brioche was a luxury bread enriched with butter and eggs, the quotation would reflect the princess's disregard for the peasants, or her poor understanding of their situation.” Let them eat cake - Wikipedia

Therein lies the power that the Left wields by controlling the language. The use it not just to point out the imaginary ‘rich,’ but also for the imaginary ‘poor.’

There is no poverty in America like that pictured in Dickens, no home, no heat, no food, but that’s what the Democrats want one to imagine when they embezzle taxpayer funds to ‘fight poverty,’ meaning ‘buy votes.’


And that Marie Antoinette slander of the rich?

Once, the rich rode in carriages, the rest of the people walked. Today both ride in cars, whether or not they are all the same model.

“Nobody, not even Bill Gates, lives like Marie Antoinette. And nobody in the US lives like her peasants. “ Cochrane's Questions About Inequality - Econlib




2. Today’s poor are the richest poor in history, and the real meaning of poverty, no home, no heat, no food, doesn’t exist as any more than a rounding error.

Thanks to control of government schools, many are manipulated to believe the hype. Bet most don’t even know that Republicans freed the slaves and gave women the vote. And Democrat tax policy is the greatest bar to economic success.



3. Based on life choices, and personal responsibility everyone in America has the opportunity to improve their lot.

"...economic mobility. About 60 percent of the households that were in the lowest income quintile in 1999 were in a higher quintile ten years later. During the same decade, almost 40 percent of the richest households fell to a lower quintile. This is a nation where you can rise or fall. It is a nation where you can climb the economic ladder based not on who you are born to, or what class you are born into, but based on your talents, your passion, your perseverance, and the content of your character." https://imprimisarchives.hillsdale.edu/file/archives/pdf/2013_05_Imprimis.pdf



But the Democrats, the Liberals, Progressives have found a way to weaponize language for their own power....

Tell the less well-brought up that there are rich people living off their sweat....."...they'll put y'all back in chains..."




....with the sort of empty promise to steal from those 'darned rich folks, and, voila!....elected office.
 
Last edited:
What kind of an idiot thinks he has a chance of winning by promising a 97.5% tax rate on billionaires?

Besides some crotchety old curmudgeon socialist, I mean.
 
Seems like there’s lots of resentment towards “billionaires” on the right these days, too.


Link?
Don't need a link. You can read it right here on USMB just about every day.


Link or lie.



It appears that the curriculum of government schooling includes dispensation for lying as long as it is directed at the Right.

Have you noticed that I never lie?

Does that irritate you?

BTW.....are you a government school grad?
 
Seems like there’s lots of resentment towards “billionaires” on the right these days, too.


Link?

I’ll link it the next time I see it.

But there’s a lot of rhetoric about “globalist” billionaires who want open borders and cheap immigrant labor flooding into America from the right.


"I’ll link it the next time I see it."

I'll leave a light in the window for you.....




Perhaps I was wrong, but I always believed you had a modicum of intelligence.....and if that were the case, you wouldn't mistake a dislike of globalism, of global governance, of communism, socialism, fascism, Democrat policies for a disrespect for those who earned their wealth.
You didn't now that?
 
Seems like there’s lots of resentment towards “billionaires” on the right these days, too.

Part of what made the ‘debate’ last night such a performance art joke was the pretense of a bunch of rich people competing to sound like the one who resents rich people the most in their quest to win a job that would make them richer.
 
1.The bête noire of the Left…the ‘rich’….

Actually, the ‘curse’ they use is a left-over from the aristocracy characterized by the Marie Antoinette quote "Let them eat cake" is the traditional translation of the French phrase "Qu'ils mangent de la brioche", supposedly spoken by "a great princess" upon learning that the peasants had no bread. Since brioche was a luxury bread enriched with butter and eggs, the quotation would reflect the princess's disregard for the peasants, or her poor understanding of their situation.” Let them eat cake - Wikipedia

Therein lies the power that the Left wields by controlling the language. The use it not just to point out the imaginary ‘rich,’ but also for the imaginary ‘poor.’

There is no poverty in America like that pictured in Dickens, no home, no heat, no food, but that’s what the Democrats want one to imagine when they embezzle taxpayer funds to ‘fight poverty,’ meaning ‘buy votes.’


And that Marie Antoinette slander of the rich?

Once, the rich rode in carriages, the rest of the people walked. Today both ride in cars, whether or not they are all the same model.

“Nobody, not even Bill Gates, lives like Marie Antoinette. And nobody in the US lives like her peasants. “ Cochrane's Questions About Inequality - Econlib




2. Today’s poor are the richest poor in history, and the real meaning of poverty, no home, no heat, no food, doesn’t exist as any more than a rounding error.

Thanks to control of government schools, many are manipulated to believe the hype. Bet most don’t even know that Republicans freed the slaves and gave women the vote. And Democrat tax policy is the greatest bar to economic success.



3. Based on life choices, and personal responsibility everyone in America has the opportunity to improve their lot.

"...economic mobility. About 60 percent of the households that were in the lowest income quintile in 1999 were in a higher quintile ten years later. During the same decade, almost 40 percent of the richest households fell to a lower quintile. This is a nation where you can rise or fall. It is a nation where you can climb the economic ladder based not on who you are born to, or what class you are born into, but based on your talents, your passion, your perseverance, and the content of your character." https://imprimisarchives.hillsdale.edu/file/archives/pdf/2013_05_Imprimis.pdf



But the Democrats, the Liberals, Progressives have found a way to weaponize language for their own power....

Tell the less well-brought up that there are rich people living off their sweat....."...they'll put y'all back in chains..."


Econlib is all republicans.
And the other stuff is old.
Just a few weeks ago: inequality reaches highest level in decades.

Poverty still a problem, and is actually generated by our system.
 
Seems like there’s lots of resentment towards “billionaires” on the right these days, too.


Link?

I’ll link it the next time I see it.

But there’s a lot of rhetoric about “globalist” billionaires who want open borders and cheap immigrant labor flooding into America from the right.


"I’ll link it the next time I see it."

I'll leave a light in the window for you.....




Perhaps I was wrong, but I always believed you had a modicum of intelligence.....and if that were the case, you wouldn't mistake a dislike of globalism, of global governance, of communism, socialism, fascism, Democrat policies for a disrespect for those who earned their wealth.
You didn't now that?

Here’s an article

America’s richest billionaires support open borders | Free West Media
 
Seems like there’s lots of resentment towards “billionaires” on the right these days, too.

Part of what made the ‘debate’ last night such a performance art joke was the pretense of a bunch of rich people competing to sound like the one who resents rich people the most in their quest to win a job that would make them richer.



They could have saved a place for the mentors....



clinton-paytoplay.jpg
 
1.The bête noire of the Left…the ‘rich’….

Actually, the ‘curse’ they use is a left-over from the aristocracy characterized by the Marie Antoinette quote "Let them eat cake" is the traditional translation of the French phrase "Qu'ils mangent de la brioche", supposedly spoken by "a great princess" upon learning that the peasants had no bread. Since brioche was a luxury bread enriched with butter and eggs, the quotation would reflect the princess's disregard for the peasants, or her poor understanding of their situation.” Let them eat cake - Wikipedia

Therein lies the power that the Left wields by controlling the language. The use it not just to point out the imaginary ‘rich,’ but also for the imaginary ‘poor.’

There is no poverty in America like that pictured in Dickens, no home, no heat, no food, but that’s what the Democrats want one to imagine when they embezzle taxpayer funds to ‘fight poverty,’ meaning ‘buy votes.’


And that Marie Antoinette slander of the rich?

Once, the rich rode in carriages, the rest of the people walked. Today both ride in cars, whether or not they are all the same model.

“Nobody, not even Bill Gates, lives like Marie Antoinette. And nobody in the US lives like her peasants. “ Cochrane's Questions About Inequality - Econlib




2. Today’s poor are the richest poor in history, and the real meaning of poverty, no home, no heat, no food, doesn’t exist as any more than a rounding error.

Thanks to control of government schools, many are manipulated to believe the hype. Bet most don’t even know that Republicans freed the slaves and gave women the vote. And Democrat tax policy is the greatest bar to economic success.



3. Based on life choices, and personal responsibility everyone in America has the opportunity to improve their lot.

"...economic mobility. About 60 percent of the households that were in the lowest income quintile in 1999 were in a higher quintile ten years later. During the same decade, almost 40 percent of the richest households fell to a lower quintile. This is a nation where you can rise or fall. It is a nation where you can climb the economic ladder based not on who you are born to, or what class you are born into, but based on your talents, your passion, your perseverance, and the content of your character." https://imprimisarchives.hillsdale.edu/file/archives/pdf/2013_05_Imprimis.pdf



But the Democrats, the Liberals, Progressives have found a way to weaponize language for their own power....

Tell the less well-brought up that there are rich people living off their sweat....."...they'll put y'all back in chains..."


Econlib is all republicans.
And the other stuff is old.
Just a few weeks ago: inequality reaches highest level in decades.

Poverty still a problem, and is actually generated by our system.




What nonsense.

You're just one of the suckers who refuses to open their eyes to the scam.


Poverty is no home, no heat, no food.


As per the OP:2. Today’s poor are the richest poor in history, and the real meaning of poverty, no home, no heat, no food, doesn’t exist as any more than a rounding error.

Thanks to control of government schools, many are manipulated to believe the hype. Bet most don’t even know that Republicans freed the slaves and gave women the vote. And Democrat tax policy is the greatest bar to economic success.



The Democrat definition of poverty is simply folks with a bit smaller TV than their 'rich' neighbor.


Wise up, you dunce.
 
What kind of an idiot thinks he has a chance of winning by promising a 97.5% tax rate on billionaires?

Besides some crotchety old curmudgeon socialist, I mean.

Hmm, every time one of you Rumpsters throw out a number it grows and grows each time. The real number is 70% on anything earned in a fiscal year above X million dollars after adjustment. That is the figure that was suggested. Of course, you don't remember when the real figure was 90% for anything over $250,000 do you? It paid for frivolous things like Water Works (dams, city water works, canals, etc.), Interstates, Bridges, Put Men on the Moon, paid for at least 3 wars, and much much more. Today, we can't even afford to fix our bridges or replace the pipes that are eaten up with rust and lead. In order to get an Astronaut onto the Space Station we have to thumb a ride with the Russians. We can't afford to effectively help in major emergencies anymore.

Although this was done by the entertainment world, it hits the nail right on the head.



Can you imagine if any Politician were to say this today? As true as this is, just how long would they exist in the political world if they did. Yes, the Rich paid for most of the really great programs that was created with a little help from everyone else. America WAS the greatest Country in the world. We aren't anymore. We could be again but not by following the losers we see attempting to be leaders today. And this includes Rump.
 


The link names a specific person and the reason for the disagreement....and it isn't the wealth.


The Left has the majority of the wealth in politics

I direct you to

51VJZGTgHeL._SX328_BO1,204,203,200_.jpg




“The New Leviathan,” David Horowitz and Jacob Laksin

  1. In the conventional wisdom, it is Republicans and the political right, with their corporate sponsors and big-money donors who make up the “party of the rich,” while progressives speak for the poor and powerless.
    1. And conservatives are agents of an economic “ruling class” organized to defend its social privileges.
    2. And Democrats are the party of “working Americans and their families.”
    3. They're for the powerful, we're for the people!” Al Gore, Google
  2. This is standard progressive folklore. Provably false.
  3. As of 2009, the financial assets of the 115 major tax-exempt foundations of the Left add up to $104.56 billlion. Not only is this total not less than the financial assets of the 75 foundations of the Right, it was more than ten times greater! [p. 8]
    1. Bradley, Olin, Scaife, the “Big Three” conservative foundations, not one has assets exceeding $1 billion. (Olin has been defunct since 2005).
i. Scaife Foundation has assets totaling $244 million.

ii. Bradley Foundation, $623 million.

  1. Fourteen progressive foundations do, including Gates, Ford, Robert Wood Johnson, Hewlett, Kellogg, Packard, MacArthur, Mellon, Rockefeller, Casey, Carnegie, Simons, Heinz, and the Open Society Institute.
i. Ford alone has 16 times what Bradley has.

ii. Soros has claimed that he has donated over $7 billion to his Open Society organizations.

iii. The leading Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, $33 billion.

  1. With over $100 billion in tax-exempt assets at their disposal, left-wing foundations have been able to invest massively greater amounts in their beneficiary groups. Ford gave more in one year than Scaife in 40!
    1. “By compiling a computerized record of nearly all his contributions over the last four decades, The Washington Post found that Scaife and his family's charitable entities have given at least $340 million to conservative causes and institutions… The Ford Foundation gave away $491 million in 1998 alone.” http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/politics/special/clinton/stories/scaifemain050299.htm
  2. Soros money supported and catalyzed theMcCain-Feingold Act, which banned ‘soft money,’ stripping the two major parties of their financial base. This allowed Soros to create a “Shadow Party,” designed to funnel massive amounts of capital into organizations that would assume the role that the political parties traditionally played.
    1. A 527 group is a private, tax-exempt political organization set up under Section 527 of the U.S. tax code. Such groups have been around for years but never took center stage until 2004, when they became major players. That's because McCain-Feingold shut the door on unlimited contributions (so-called "soft money") to political parties, so that many of the big-dollar donations began flowing to 527 groups instead. McCain-Feingold at Rest
 

Forum List

Back
Top