This mindset is racist to me, is racist to you?

[Buford]

dear fucking IDIOT,

black people have needed help because racist fucks exsist.

pretend all you wnat no one is racists but it is a fucking fact

The fact there are racists doesn't mean the taxpayers have to support Black people. This is all about votes and continuing the Democrat racist rhetoric to paint Blacks as victims of racism like you're doing, not helping people.

 

[Lonestar_logic]

dear fucking IDIOT,

black people have needed help because racist fucks exsist.

pretend all you wnat no one is racists but it is a fucking fact

At what point will the blacks no longer need help? Are they going to play the victim for all eternity?

If I were a black man I would be appalled at the idea that I needed any more help than a white man. Are white men better than blacks? Will there ever be racial equality when you have one race that needs special help than the other?

I know you won't address these questions because you are the biggest coward on USMB.

Now prove me wrong!

 

[martinjlm]

dear fucking IDIOT,

black people have needed help because racist fucks exsist.

pretend all you wnat no one is racists but it is a fucking fact

At what point will the blacks no longer need help? Are they going to play the victim for all eternity?

If I were a black man I would be appalled at the idea that I needed any more help than a white man. Are white men better than blacks? Will there ever be racial equality when you have one race that needs special help than the other?

I know you won't address these questions because you are the biggest coward on USMB.

Now prove me wrong!

Truth master can answer for himself, however, I will point out that an appropriate reply to your questions can be found impost #20. At this point in time, government sponsored "special help" should be and for the most part is driven more by financial situation than skin color.

 

[JWBooth]

are you REALLY going to pretend Blacks were not refused employment?

Are you really going to to pretend that whites were not refused employment?

Olson Johnson: All right... we'll give some land to the ******* and the chinks. But we don't want the Irish!

 

[BBCAmerica]

This is funny

 

[Foxfyre]

dear fucking IDIOT,

black people have needed help because racist fucks exsist.

pretend all you wnat no one is racists but it is a fucking fact

At what point will the blacks no longer need help? Are they going to play the victim for all eternity?

If I were a black man I would be appalled at the idea that I needed any more help than a white man. Are white men better than blacks? Will there ever be racial equality when you have one race that needs special help than the other?

I know you won't address these questions because you are the biggest coward on USMB.

Now prove me wrong!

Truth master can answer for himself, however, I will point out that an appropriate reply to your questions can be found impost #20. At this point in time, government sponsored "special help" should be and for the most part is driven more by financial situation than skin color.

Which of course is absolutely why the Democrats make sure that they promise more and more benefit to specifically help black people. Has nothing to do with skin color. Uh huh. Not speaking of you specifically, but some people can be so naive.

Again, the one fact that nobody seems to wish to address is the fact that black people, as a demographic, were the fastest advancing group financially. . . .UNTIL. . . .the "Great Society" programs began targeting them for special help. I posted earlier the audio clip of Lyndon Johnson saying that they would have those N*'s voting Democrat for the next 100 years.

But once those Great Society programs kicked in, black people were no longer the fastest advancing group financially and, as a demographic began falling behind. And began experiencing many other negatives that had not been the case previously.

In the name of anti-racism.
In the name of responsibility.
In the name of respect and dignity.
In the name of genuine compassion rather than raw ideology and/or partisanship. . . .

When do the grown ups become willing to look at the unintended negative consequences of the policies we impose on black people? (Or anybody else for that matter.)

 

[yidnar]

dear fucking IDIOT,

black people have needed help because racist fucks exsist.

pretend all you wnat no one is racists but it is a fucking fact

you and your sub human kind need a pack leader [government] to take care of the animals in your community !!

 

[Huey]

since theres more whites then Blacks in this country,we know who's getting all the support from welfare,affirmative action,etc.So stop your lying white boy.

 

[Buford]

 

[Rozman]

I thought the whole point of the civil rights era was that all people
should be treated equally???

I guess that should be amended to All people should be treated equally
but if you happen to be black you will be looked after and get special treatment.

 

[Buford]

I thought the whole point of the civil rights era was that all people
should be treated equally???

I guess that should be amended to All people should be treated equally
but if you happen to be black you will be looked after and get special treatment.

Sharpton, Jackson, Obama, et all, would have to get real jobs if we didn't allow race hustling in the USA. If it wasn't for weak minded white people, everyone would be treated the same, but they are too weak and timid and afraid of being called a racist to stand up and tell the gangsters to go fuck themselves.

 

[Foxfyre]

I thought the whole point of the civil rights era was that all people
should be treated equally???

I guess that should be amended to All people should be treated equally
but if you happen to be black you will be looked after and get special treatment.

In the hands of a Martin Luther King, erasing all boundaries created by race, ethnicity, etc. was the goal. He never lobbied for special treatments of any kind for black people. He only wanted black people, based on their ability, to have an equal shot to compete and succeed.

In the hands of Leftism though, the Civil Rights movement has never been about removing artificial barriers. It has attempted to make society the 'keepers' of the black man and others who could be manipulated to meet the real goals of a socialist society. And the only way that can be accomplished is to convince the 'black man' and others that they are victims and have been kept down and their only hope is to keep voting in those who promise them a better world even though decades of such promises have produced only increased breakdown in the black family and institutionns that strengthened them, and has increased poverty, misery, anger, and dissatisfaction.

And yes. That is racism in one of its ugliest forms.

 

[martinjlm]

Black Conservatives Blast Al Sharpton Protesters in DC 8/28 - YouTube

Buford,

Glad you posted this video. It shows a couple very important things....

1. Contrary to popular belief on this board and many others, all blacks do not think alike, socially or politically
2. There are many in the black community who have values that would be considered to be socially conservative
3. Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson (since those are the only two names right wing conservatives can come up with) do not speak for all black people anymore than Rush Limbaugh or Sarah Palin speak for all white people. ,

Now, even though I probably agree philosophically more with the woman in the video, I will still be placing my mark on the ballot for Barack Obama this November, because even though I do not agree with his position on abortion, that is one issue that has zero impact on how this country is / should be run. And on those issues, my balance sheet tilts towards Obama when compared to Romney.

 

[William Joyce]

Are white men better than blacks?

Yes.

The races cannot live together because blacks will never, by their own efforts, sustain a lifestyle equal to ours. They don't have the brains or the discipline. So they'll always need welfare, AA, government jobs, private sector jobs where we look the other way on their lack of ability, and so on.

The alternative is we cut them loose, and they live in dire poverty. Then they attack us.

Bottom line is that life with blacks requires whites to make a sacrifice one way or the other.

It's time to start thinking of new approaches.

 

[Salt Jones]

Are white men better than blacks?

Yes.

The races cannot live together because blacks will never, by their own efforts, sustain a lifestyle equal to ours. They don't have the brains or the discipline. So they'll always need welfare, AA, government jobs, private sector jobs where we look the other way on their lack of ability, and so on.

The alternative is we cut them loose, and they live in dire poverty. Then they attack us.

Bottom line is that life with blacks requires whites to make a sacrifice one way or the other.

It's time to start thinking of new approaches.

And what would those new approaches be?

 

[Buford]

 

[bayoubill]

Blacks need welfare, affirmative action, gov't assistance, hiring quotas.

As a white guy growing up in the inner city, I was taught that pitying blacks because they're black is immoral. I think my parents got it right.

Sounds to me a lot like the mindset some slaveowners had, that blacks need to be owned as slaves because they can't handle freedom or living on their own/independence.

Edit: title should be is IT racist to you?

I've heard it said that the federal government is the "new plantation"...

which, for the last couple of generations, has handed out meager benefits to a downtrodden class of people, who've as a result become locked into a dependency upon these handouts to barely get along in life... and in the process have largely lost the initiative to break out of the endemic cycle of poverty...

in return, these unfortunate folks can be depended upon to turn out in droves at election time to cast their ballots for the candidates who will most likely keep those meager benefits coming... thus perpetuating their serfdom on the new plantation...

can anybody challenge this assessment...?

 

[martinjlm]

Are white men better than blacks?

Yes.

The races cannot live together because blacks will never, by their own efforts, sustain a lifestyle equal to ours. They don't have the brains or the discipline. So they'll always need welfare, AA, government jobs, private sector jobs where we look the other way on their lack of ability, and so on.

The alternative is we cut them loose, and they live in dire poverty. Then they attack us.

Bottom line is that life with blacks requires whites to make a sacrifice one way or the other.

It's time to start thinking of new approaches.

And what would those new approaches be?

Salt, one approach would be to ignore folks like Willaim Joyce. Unfed trolls eventually wither away.

 

[martinjlm]

Blacks need welfare, affirmative action, gov't assistance, hiring quotas.

As a white guy growing up in the inner city, I was taught that pitying blacks because they're black is immoral. I think my parents got it right.

Sounds to me a lot like the mindset some slaveowners had, that blacks need to be owned as slaves because they can't handle freedom or living on their own/independence.

Edit: title should be is IT racist to you?

I've heard it said that the federal government is the "new plantation"...

which, for the last couple of generations, has handed out meager benefits to a downtrodden class of people, who've as a result become locked into a dependency upon these handouts to barely get along in life... and in the process have largely lost the initiative to break out of the endemic cycle of poverty...

in return, these unfortunate folks can be depended upon to turn out in droves at election time to cast their ballots for the candidates who will most likely keep those meager benefits coming... thus perpetuating their serfdom on the new plantation...

can anybody challenge this assessment...?

Yes. Quite easily actually. First look at it from the pov of who receives government handouts for what. Is it exclusive to blacks? No. Is it even exclusive to people? Again, no. So if the mere presence of government handouts creates dependency, then there are people of all races, companies of all sizes, and foreign governments in all regions who by default MUST be dependent. Truth is, some are, some are not. Negates the word MUST, and clarifies that it is not just black people.

Now, let's look at it from the perspective of black people. Are there any black people who have received government aid and achieved beyond that to the point where they no longer need it? Yes. That would include the vast majority of black people I know who have received one sort or another of government aid. (Of course I also know a number of white folks who received government aid and went on to lead lives of high achievement, but they are not the ones being questioned, right ). There are people like Tyler Perry who was once homeless and is now one of the highest paid persons in the entertainment business.

Are there black people who have never received government aid? Well, that would constitute most of the black people I know. However, I am sure that in most of these cases if you go back a couple generations you'll find one or both of two things......someone who did receive government aid, but then improved their lot in life so as to no longer need it, and/or someone who was unfairly discriminated against in a manner that required them to need government assistance to have a leg to stand to be able to compete at all in an unfair environment.

 

[tjvh]

It's amazing how many people allow themselves to be "held back", simply because the Government dangled some free cheese, and free phones, (among other things) in front of them. I've said it before... You can spend the day studying, and getting an education to succeed in your life, or you can spend the day playing Playstation 3 wondering why your life sucks.