Redhots
Member
- Apr 9, 2006
- 507
- 36
- 16
GunnyL said:I appreciate the thought, whether you can give points or not.
However, I'm wondering where the pro-gay agenda posse is to rebutt?:huh:
Easy enough, though I wouldn't say i'm "pro-gay"... I just happen to buy into that "life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness" bullshit.
Anyway.
You include it when its relevent.
Real-life example.
If you were just talking about Billie Jean King the female tennis player there isn't much reason for it to come up.
However if you're talking about the life of Billie Jean King as a whole then there is a reason for it to come up, its part of who she is and I'm sure its influenced her perspective on some of the activist issues she has taken a stand on, just like being a female athlete would on others.
The reason we don't say "George Washington was a heterosexual" is because when we mention that he had a wife and kids its assumed that he was a heterosexual.
Also because being heterosexual is the norm, theres nothing exceptional about it. The same isn't true about homosexuality, so we tend to take note of it.