This is how Obama loses the lead in the Middle East

quorthon

Senior Member
Jan 21, 2015
497
23
46

Looks and sounds awful, doesn’t it? It was a big mistake to declare that the United States commander-in-chief has no strategy of fighting the enemy, I’m sure all of generals would answer just about the same.


And here are Russians who seem to have some strategy and appeal Middle Eastern nations to unite and cooperate against ISIS. The whole Obama’s policy in the Middle East was a fail. And it would be a greater fail if Russia will finally dominate in the region.
 
There are about 5 million soldiers in the Middle East countries. Why do they need us?
Israel has several hundred nukes and we subsidize their military. What are we getting in return?
Obama is the leader of a coalition of more than 60 other countries and US has carried out more strikes on ISIL than any other country. Why should we do more?

In Iran, we have several choices:
Do nothing.
Invade.
Bomb.
The Deal.

By getting the deal, we took more than 98% of Iran's enriched uranium and left them only materials and locations that cannot produce bombs. In addition, we have not given up any of our other choices.

The right wants eternal wars and piles of dead Americans. The president disagrees. Peace is better for us and better for Irans' innocent citizens and the president continues to lead the rest of the world in both word and deed.

Look at this graph and THINK IT THROUGH.

0053_defense-comparison-crop.gif
 

Looks and sounds awful, doesn’t it? It was a big mistake to declare that the United States commander-in-chief has no strategy of fighting the enemy, I’m sure all of generals would answer just about the same.


And here are Russians who seem to have some strategy and appeal Middle Eastern nations to unite and cooperate against ISIS. The whole Obama’s policy in the Middle East was a fail. And it would be a greater fail if Russia will finally dominate in the region.


That's just wrong!

Obama does have a Middle East Strategy, it's called #ObamaSwitchedSides and is arming and supporting ISIS, Al Qaeda and the Jihadists. The reason he clamped down on the Benghazi Attack was because he was arming the jihadists through the Consulate
 

Looks and sounds awful, doesn’t it? It was a big mistake to declare that the United States commander-in-chief has no strategy of fighting the enemy, I’m sure all of generals would answer just about the same.


And here are Russians who seem to have some strategy and appeal Middle Eastern nations to unite and cooperate against ISIS. The whole Obama’s policy in the Middle East was a fail. And it would be a greater fail if Russia will finally dominate in the region.


That's just wrong!

Obama does have a Middle East Strategy, it's called #ObamaSwitchedSides and is arming and supporting ISIS, Al Qaeda and the Jihadists. The reason he clamped down on the Benghazi Attack was because he was arming the jihadists through the Consulate



Yeah, that must be why Obama has killed more terrorists than any other prez.

You're thinking of Bush who hid the bin Ladens and purposely refused to go after Osama. President Obama finished that job for the shrub too.

Or you mean Ronnie Ray-Gun who created the original terrorist group and gave them arms.

11880680_919598424799879_317517945811971270_n.jpg
 

Looks and sounds awful, doesn’t it? It was a big mistake to declare that the United States commander-in-chief has no strategy of fighting the enemy, I’m sure all of generals would answer just about the same.


And here are Russians who seem to have some strategy and appeal Middle Eastern nations to unite and cooperate against ISIS. The whole Obama’s policy in the Middle East was a fail. And it would be a greater fail if Russia will finally dominate in the region.


That's just wrong!

Obama does have a Middle East Strategy, it's called #ObamaSwitchedSides and is arming and supporting ISIS, Al Qaeda and the Jihadists. The reason he clamped down on the Benghazi Attack was because he was arming the jihadists through the Consulate



Yeah, that must be why Obama has killed more terrorists than any other prez.

You're thinking of Bush who hid the bin Ladens and purposely refused to go after Osama. President Obama finished that job for the shrub too.

Or you mean Ronnie Ray-Gun who created the original terrorist group and gave them arms.

11880680_919598424799879_317517945811971270_n.jpg

So thoughtful of you to link to a source the FBI has considered to be a terrorist threat.
FBI considered Occupy movement potential threat, documents say - CNN.com
 
There are about 5 million soldiers in the Middle East countries. Why do they need us?
Israel has several hundred nukes and we subsidize their military. What are we getting in return?
Obama is the leader of a coalition of more than 60 other countries and US has carried out more strikes on ISIL than any other country. Why should we do more?

In Iran, we have several choices:
Do nothing.
Invade.
Bomb.
The Deal.

By getting the deal, we took more than 98% of Iran's enriched uranium and left them only materials and locations that cannot produce bombs. In addition, we have not given up any of our other choices.

The right wants eternal wars and piles of dead Americans. The president disagrees. Peace is better for us and better for Irans' innocent citizens and the president continues to lead the rest of the world in both word and deed.

Look at this graph and THINK IT THROUGH.

0053_defense-comparison-crop.gif

Wow you packed a lot of dishonestly into a single post. Crippling sanctions was doing nothing? Then there is this blatant LIE, "The right wants eternal wars and piles of dead Americans." Your post rates a full 'liar liar pants on fire' rating.
 
There are about 5 million soldiers in the Middle East countries. Why do they need us?
Israel has several hundred nukes and we subsidize their military. What are we getting in return?
Obama is the leader of a coalition of more than 60 other countries and US has carried out more strikes on ISIL than any other country. Why should we do more?

In Iran, we have several choices:
Do nothing.
Invade.
Bomb.
The Deal.

By getting the deal, we took more than 98% of Iran's enriched uranium and left them only materials and locations that cannot produce bombs. In addition, we have not given up any of our other choices.

The right wants eternal wars and piles of dead Americans. The president disagrees. Peace is better for us and better for Irans' innocent citizens and the president continues to lead the rest of the world in both word and deed.

Look at this graph and THINK IT THROUGH.

0053_defense-comparison-crop.gif

Wow you packed a lot of dishonestly into a single post. Crippling sanctions was doing nothing? Then there is this blatant LIE, "The right wants eternal wars and piles of dead Americans." Your post rates a full 'liar liar pants on fire' rating.


Oh please. What I wrote is FACT.

Show me where I wrote that "sanctions was doing nothing".

And, its a fact that the right wants eternal wars and its a fact that wars result in dead Americans.

Repubs have said they want to bomb Iran and we all know why. It puts money in their pockets.
 
There are about 5 million soldiers in the Middle East countries. Why do they need us?
Israel has several hundred nukes and we subsidize their military. What are we getting in return?
Obama is the leader of a coalition of more than 60 other countries and US has carried out more strikes on ISIL than any other country. Why should we do more?

In Iran, we have several choices:
Do nothing.
Invade.
Bomb.
The Deal.

By getting the deal, we took more than 98% of Iran's enriched uranium and left them only materials and locations that cannot produce bombs. In addition, we have not given up any of our other choices.

The right wants eternal wars and piles of dead Americans. The president disagrees. Peace is better for us and better for Irans' innocent citizens and the president continues to lead the rest of the world in both word and deed.

Look at this graph and THINK IT THROUGH.

0053_defense-comparison-crop.gif

Wow you packed a lot of dishonestly into a single post. Crippling sanctions was doing nothing? Then there is this blatant LIE, "The right wants eternal wars and piles of dead Americans." Your post rates a full 'liar liar pants on fire' rating.


Oh please. What I wrote is FACT.

Show me where I wrote that "sanctions was doing nothing".

And, its a fact that the right wants eternal wars and its a fact that wars result in dead Americans.

Repubs have said they want to bomb Iran and we all know why. It puts money in their pockets.

^^^ more lies you really are pathetic.
 
We shouldn't be in the Middle East. It's on the other side of the fucking planet, and none of our damn business...
So what American soldiers fought for? Obama traited all of them. And what's going on in the Middle East is not Russia's business too.
 

Forum List

Back
Top