Think You Know Who Won WWII?

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 6, 2008
124,898
60,271
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
Did we....really?


Or are we the victims of hugely successful manipulation by the Soviets, tied to politicians, weak of mind and/or character?


Were we fighting the Nazis, with the aid of our Soviet ally?

Or were these two 'bad cop- good cop' playing the rubes of America?
Rather than prove your case by referring to 'historians' or 'textbooks,' let's look at the final result.






1. Background on the two "mortal enemies," Communists and Nazis.

A year after Lenin's death, 1924, the NYTimes published a small article about a newly established party in Germany, the National Socialist Labor Party, which "...persists in believing that Lenin and Hitler can be compared or contrasted...Dr. Goebell's....assertion that Lenin was the greatest man second only to Hitler....and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight...."
NYTimes, November 27, 1925.

a. "Hitler often stated that he learned much from reading Marx, and the whole of National Socialism is doctrinally based on Marxism."
George Watson, Historian, Cambridge.

b. "Socialists in Germany were national socialists, communists were international socialists."
Vladimir Bukovsky.

2. When Hitler began his advances on other countries, Stalin refused to join the nations talking of stopping him. Stalin was, in fact, pleased that Hitler was destroying the old order throughout Europe. "There will be no parliaments, no trade unions, no armies, no governments....then Stalin will come as the liberator...millions of people will be sitting in concentration camps, hoping someone will liberate them, then Stalin and the Red Army will come and liberate them. That was his plan."
Vladimir Bukovsky.

3. But Hitler didn't have the supplies nor resources he needed, so August 23, 1939, Soviet Russia' Foreign Minister Molotov signs the Nazi-Soviet Non-aggression Pact while German Foreign Minister Von Ribbentrop and Soviet leader Josef Stalin look on, while standing under a portrait of Lenin –materials to be provided in later economic agreements.





4. September 1, 1939, Hitler attacked Poland....on September 17, Stalin attacks from the East. The Soviet radio transmitter in Minsk guided the Nazi bombers attacking Polish cities. Newsreel footage showed the Red Army in Nazi helmets, marching side by side with the SS. One photo shows the hammer and sickle along side the swastika.

a. The Soviet press depicted the battle as a fight against Polish fascism, with the peace-loving Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union fighting aggressive Polish fascism.

5. Hitler and Stalin signed secret protocols to divide up Europe. First, Stalin moved against Finland, November 1939....for the aggression, the USSR was expelled from the League of Nations. Hitler attacked to the West.

a. Norway was invaded with the direct help of the Soviet Union, providing the Soviet naval base near Murmansk. "German Admiral Raeder sent a letter of thanks to the Commander of the Soviet Navy, Kuznetsov."






6. Viktor Suvorov " is a Soviet Army Cold War-era Soviet military intelligence officer who defected to the United Kingdom, eventually becoming a famous writer and historian." Viktor Suvorov - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

In his 2008 "The Chief Culprit: Stalin's Grand Design to Start World War II," Suvorov explains that Stalin materially assisted Nazi Germany in its aggression so that the Soviet Union could intervene at the proper time and seize all of continental Europe for itself. Hopefully, Germany and the West would exhaust themselves fighting each other.



So....their doctrines were essentially the same, they attacked the same targets, they used the same methods of governance....and agreed to split Europe between themselves.
Stalin 'used' Hitler....but expected to, ultimately,overpower him.
The aim of communism was, and is, world domination.


7. Move forward:
The war ended with the Soviet military occupation of half of Europe. There is no possible argument that could conclude that Joseph Stalin was any better than Adolph Hitler. None. Yet, "Nazi" produces a visceral response. "Communist," none such.

Yet many answer the title of the OP with "democracy won."





8. Lies, cover-up, censorship by American leaders cloud the true nature of the victory of WWII.
"This [the results of WWII] was, after all, the Kremlin dream, the Communist grail. Now it was real, its headquarters rising in concrete and steel over Turtle Bay in New York City, brought into existence by a bevy of Soviet agents lodged deep in the vitals of the United States and other Western governments.....Think about what [Harry] Hopkins, [Alger] Hiss and [Harry Dexter] White actually accomplished."
West, "American Betrayal," p.255.

9. "Thus the world found itself in 1945 at the conclusion of catastrophe with a whole series of international institutions- ranging from commercial agreements , to exchange rates, to war credits and loans, to the administration of territories without governments, to the ambulating world without citizenship, to the United Nations itself- which had been imposed by the United States. But even more important was the fact that all the "charters" and constitutions of these world institutions had been composed by America's leading Soviet agents."
Gregor Dallas, "1945: The War That Never Ended," p. 413-414





10. In a letter to FDR, dated January 29, 1943, Ambassador (to Moscow) William Bullitt warned Roosevelt about what would happen if he continued pursuing the policies of appeasement toward Stalin that formed the foundation of the American war strategy. He pleaded with FDR not to 'permit our war to prevent Nazi domination of Europe to be turned into a war to establish Soviet domination of Europe.' He predicted the Soviet annexation of half of Europe; George Kennan identified that letter as the earliest warning of what would be the result of FDR's policies.
"For the President Personal & Secret: Correspondence Between Franklin D. Roosevelt and William C. Bullitt," Orville H. Bullitt, p. 575-590

FDR replied: "Bill, I don't dispute your facts, they are accurate, I don't dispute the logic of your reasoning. I have just had a hunch that Stalin is not that kind of a man. Harry [Hopkins] says he's not and that he doesn't want anything in the world but security for his country, and I think that if I give him everything I possibly can and ask nothing from him in return, noblesse oblige, he won't try to annex anything and will work with me for a world of democracy and peace."
William C. Bullitt, "How We Won The War and Lost The Peace," Life Magazine, August 30, 1948, p. 94




So....who won WWII?
 
Please "prove your case by referring to 'historians' or 'textbooks,'"

Your suggestion to not do so is as sensible as review committees by non-scientists of scientific findings.
 
I have this sense of deja vu, like we've already discussed this exhaustively... or at least until it got silly.

Maybe for a change we could talk about our present day struggles, like our war against militant fundamentalism. :eusa_eh:
 
The US came out of it in better shape than any nation on earth

Of course we won. Both economically and militarily
 
The US came out of it in better shape than any nation on earth

Of course we won. Both economically and militarily

and today, over 10 years into it, or military can't even shut down a bunch loosely banded terrorists in a small country like Afghanistan.
 
Patton said that WWII was a huge strategic failure for the US and Brits because is left much of Eastern Europe in the hands of "the descendants of Genghis Khan" and he was correct.

WWII left Eastern Europe enslaved to Soviet Communism and it wasn't until Reagan beat the USSR that they would be free again.

and Liberal apologists for the USSR can kiss my Santa-white ass in Macy's window
 
Last edited:
Please "prove your case by referring to 'historians' or 'textbooks,'"

Your suggestion to not do so is as sensible as review committees by non-scientists of scientific findings.





1. World domination and control under one government....The United Nations formed through the efforts of Soviet agents in the United States Government
The end of national sovereignty.

2. Heavy progressive taxation and taxation of inheritances.
Mandated in chapter two of The Communist Manifesto
Communist Manifesto (Chapter 2)

3. Control of education...resulting in a population that is unaware of the dominance of collectivism at the cost of individualism....e.g., you.
Ibid.



Had it not been for President Reagan, Stalin's plan would have been totally and irrevocably successful.




Now, as for "Your suggestion to not do so is as sensible as review committees by non-scientists of scientific findings."

Herein you highlight perhaps the major difference between the two of us.
I am eminently equipped to research and make judgments about any.....any.....topic, whether it be science, or social science.


Unlike you, lazy and ill-equipped in ability, I take all challenges and accept no answer that I have not investigated.
That is why you are no more than a follower, a lock-step Liberal.

And will remain so.
 
...and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight.

Nazi's hated the communist and had frequent fights until Hitler became Chancellor and outlawed the communist party.
 
Does the rhetoric of the outward belly buttons that hate democrats and communist ever get passed cutting off their noses to spite their faces? A continuous barrage of misinformation trying to explain away US success since Hoover failed at running the American economy or society. The extreme side of Polivinylchics political affiliation never ceases to rewrite history trying to make the US look dirty. Yet no GOP leader has done as much for the forward progress of the US than the democrats and their positive attitude they hold in politics versus the I hate America politics from the GOP or what ever party they affiliate themselves with.
 
...and that the difference between communism and the Hitler faith was very slight.

Nazi's hated the communist and had frequent fights until Hitler became Chancellor and outlawed the communist party.



Posting in light of items #1-2-3-4-and 5 in the OP, you come off like a moron.

No worse than you inability to grasp the obvious and stop posting your brand of garbage which lowers any esteem we may hold for you.
 
The US came out of it in better shape than any nation on earth

Of course we won. Both economically and militarily

and today, over 10 years into it, or military can't even shut down a bunch loosely banded terrorists in a small country like Afghanistan.

Perhaps you should consider learning the difference between "Total War" and "Limited War". You may also wish to investigate "Rules of Engagement".
In regards to Afghanistan, President Bush made the decision to designate the war as a "Limited War". He in fact designated the entire "War on Terrorism" as a very defined limited war. He had a window of oppurtunity immediatly following and for a short time after 911 to declare total war on international terrorism. He (USA and allies) could have demanded unconditional surrender or implemented total annihilation from or to international terrorist and their supporters, including al Qaeda and the Taliban. He didn't. He blew his chance at greatness and at best he left a mess and a loss or stalmeted war to be dealt with by whoever followed him.
 
Last edited:
Does the rhetoric of the outward belly buttons that hate democrats and communist ever get passed cutting off their noses to spite their faces? A continuous barrage of misinformation trying to explain away US success since Hoover failed at running the American economy or society. The extreme side of Polivinylchics political affiliation never ceases to rewrite history trying to make the US look dirty. Yet no GOP leader has done as much for the forward progress of the US than the democrats and their positive attitude they hold in politics versus the I hate America politics from the GOP or what ever party they affiliate themselves with.


Here's a simple challenge.

Defend your "misinformation" charge.

Where is it so?




"Yet no GOP leader has done as much for the forward progress of the US than the democrats and their positive attitude they hold in politics versus the I hate America politics from the GOP or what ever party they affiliate themselves with."

1. If you believe that that is an actual sentence, and/or that it makes sense, you must be sitting in an Ojibwe sweat lodge, on peyote.


2. If, within that cloud of drug induced haze you mean that the Democrats are better for this nation....

a. Reagan added $17 trillion to the economy

b. Republicans began the earned income tax credits.

c. Democrats emasculated the intelligence community, with 9/11 being the result

d. Democrats installed a program which the CBO just claimed would remove 2.3 million jobs


.....and that's for starters.
 

Forum List

Back
Top